The joint contribution of tumor phenotype and education to breast cancer survival disparity between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

Some studies suggest that Hispanic women are more likely to have ER- and triple-negative (ER-/PR-/HER2-) tumors and subsequently poorer prognosis than non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. In addition, only a handful of studies have examined period-specific effects of tumor phenotype and ethnicity on breast cancer survival, leaving the time-varying effects of hormonal status and ethnicity on breast cancer survival poorly defined. This study describes short and long-term breast cancer survival by ethnicity at 0-5 years and 5+ years post-diagnosis using data from the New Mexico Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle cohort of Hispanic and NHW women ages 29-88 years newly diagnosed with stages I-IIIA breast cancer. The survival rate for Hispanics at 0-5 years was 82.2 % versus 94.3 % for NHW. Hispanics were more likely to have larger tumors, more advanced stage, and ER- phenotypes compared to NHW women. There was a significantly higher risk of breast cancer mortality in Hispanics over 5 years of follow-up compared to NHW (HR = 2.78, 95 % CI 1.39-5.56), adjusting for age, tumor phenotype, stage, and tumor size. This ethnic difference in survival, however, was attenuated and no longer statistically significant when additional adjustment was made for education, although a >1.5-fold increase in mortality was observed. In contrast, there was no difference between ethnic groups for survival after 5 years (HR = 1.08, 95 % CI 0.36-3.24). Our results indicate that the difference in survival between Hispanic and NHW women with breast cancer occurs in the first few years following diagnosis and is jointly associated with tumor phenotype and socio-demographic factors related to education.

Genetic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors associated with IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women.

Circulating concentrations of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 are associated with risk of pre-menopausal breast cancer. Racial differences in levels of these factors have been reported, and determinants of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels within racial and ethnic groups are unclear. In this study we examine genetic, anthropometric, diet, and lifestyle factors that may predict serum levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. A sample of healthy controls participating in the SHINE (Southwest Hormone, Insulin, Nutrition, and Exercise Study) case-control breast cancer in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, and Utah were included in these analyses. Subjects included 210 Hispanic and 284 non-Hispanic white women. Hispanic women had significantly lower levels of IGFBP-3 (mean=3764.3 mcg/ml) after adjusting for age, body size, physical activity, menopausal status, and dietary factors than non-Hispanic white women (mean = 4058.0 mcg/ml; p<0.01). The CC genotype of the -202 A>C polymorphism of the IGFBP3 gene was associated with lower IGFBP-3 levels in both ethnic groups. The frequency of the IGFBP3 C allele differed between Hispanic (0.65) and non-Hispanic white women (0.53), but serum levels of IGFBP-3 were lower for Hispanic women than non-Hispanic after accounting for IGFBP3 genotype. Body size indicators, vigorous physical activity, and dietary factors appeared to influence serum levels of IGF-1 and the ratio of IGF-1 to IGFBP-3 in pre-menopausal women more than in post-menopausal women. On the other hand, using aspirin/NSAIDs appeared to increase IGFBP-3 levels significantly among pre-menopausal Hispanic women. Results from this study suggest that differences in IGFBP-3 levels exist in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. These differences could be due to the combined effects of genetic and behavioral factors which could account for ethnic differences in the risk of breast cancer and other chronic diseases.

Association of body composition and weight history with breast cancer prognostic markers: divergent pattern for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White women.

Body composition and weight gain are breast cancer risk factors that may influence prognosis. The Health, Eating, Activity, and Lifestyle Study was designed to evaluate the relations of body composition, weight history, hormones, and lifestyle factors to prognosis for women with breast cancer. In the cross-sectional analysis of this cohort study specific to 150 Hispanic and 466 non-Hispanic White women in New Mexico diagnosed between 1996 and 1999, the authors hypothesized that obesity measures are associated with baseline prognostic markers and that these associations are modified by ethnicity. Ethnic-stratified multiple logistic regression analyses showed divergent results for a tumor size of 1.0 cm or more and, to a lesser extent, positive lymph node status. Among Hispanics, the highest quartile for body mass index (29.5 vs. <22.5 kg/m2: odds ratio (OR) = 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03, 0.84) and for waist circumference (> or =95.0 vs. <78.5 cm: OR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.78) was significantly associated with a reduced tumor size. In contrast, for overweight and obese non-Hispanic White women, there was an increased association with obesity-related measures, particularly striking for the highest quartile of waist circumference (OR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.45, 5.26). These findings suggest that Hispanics may have a different breast cancer phenotype than non-Hispanic Whites, which associates differently with body composition and weight history.

Family history and risk of breast cancer in hispanic and non-hispanic women: the New Mexico Women's Health Study.

OBJECTIVES: Many epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that an increased risk of breast cancer is associated with positive family history of this disease. Little information had been available on the relationship of breast cancer risk with family history in Hispanic women. To investigate the association of family history of breast cancer on the risk of breast cancer, we examined the data from the New Mexico Women's Health Study (NMWHS), a statewide case-control study. METHODS: In this study 712 women (332 Hispanics and 380 non-Hispanic whites) with breast cancer and 844 controls (388 Hispanics and 456 non-Hispanic whites) were included. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). adjusted for sociodemographic, medical, and reproductive factors. RESULTS: We found an increased risk in women with a history of breast cancer in one or more first-degree or second-degree relatives (OR= 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9), first-degree relatives (OR= 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.8) and second-degree relatives (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2). Hispanic women had higher risk estimates for a positive family history (OR= 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.5) than non-Hispanic white women (OR= 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-2.0); however, the differences were not statistically significant. In both ethnic groups a higher risk was observed in premenopausal women compared with postmenopausal women and women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 years compared with older women. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that Hispanic women with a family history of breast cancer are at increased risk of breast cancer.

Occupational and environmental risk factors for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a multicenter case-control study. Collaborating Centers.

Occupational exposures were investigated in a multicenter case-control study of clinically and histologically diagnosed idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a chronic diffuse interstitial lung disease of unknown etiology. Results are based on 248 cases, aged 20-75 years, diagnosed at 16 referral centers between January 1989 and July 1993. There were 491 controls ascertained by random digit dialing and matched to cases on sex, age, and geographic region. Data were collected using a standard telephone questionnaire. Occupational factors were based on a detailed history of jobs lasting 6 months or more and job activity, hobby, and specific substance checklists. Several occupational factors, adjusted for age and smoking in conditional multivariate logistic regression analyses, were significantly associated with IPF: farming (odds ratio (OR) = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0, 2.5); livestock (OR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.3, 5.5); hairdressing (OR = 4.4, 95% CI: 1.2, 16.3); metal dust (OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.0, 4.0); raising birds (OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 1.6, 14.1); stone cutting/polishing (OR = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.2, 12.7); and vegetable dust/animal dust (OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 2.1, 10.4). Interaction was detected between smoking and exposure to livestock (p = 0.06) and farming (p = 0.08). Results confirm previous studies showing increased risk associated with dusty environments.

Reproductive risk factors for breast cancer in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women: the New Mexico Women's Health Study.

The authors conducted a population-based case-control study of breast cancer in Hispanic women in New Mexico. Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women with incident breast cancer, aged 30-74 years and diagnosed between 1992 and 1994, were identified by the New Mexico Tumor Registry. Controls were selected using random digit dialing and frequency matched by ethnicity, age, and region. Information on reproductive history, lactation, and other risk factors was collected through in-person interviews; 719 Hispanics and 836 non-Hispanic whites were included in the analysis. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate relative risk of breast cancer for reproductive factors and to assess ethnic differences in effects. Older age at first full-term birth was associated with breast cancer among Hispanics; the odds ratio for women aged 27 years and older at first full-term birth compared with women 18 years or younger was 2.26 (95% confidence interval 1.17-4.38) compared with 1.60 (95% confidence interval 0.86-3.01) for non-Hispanic whites. Higher parity was associated with reduced risk of breast cancer for non-Hispanic whites, but not Hispanics (p < 0.008). Longer lactation was associated with reduced risk in premenopausal Hispanic women and premenopausal and postmenopausal non-Hispanic white women. Reproductive factors explained 17% of the ethnic difference in breast cancer incidence for postmenopausal women and none of the difference for premenopausal women.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: survival in population based and hospital based cohorts.

BACKGROUND: To ascertain whether findings from hospital based clinical series can be extended to patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the general population, the survival of patients with IPF in a population based registry was compared with that of a cohort of patients with IPF treated at major referral hospitals and the factors influencing survival in the population based registry were identified. METHODS: The survival of 209 patients with IPF from the New Mexico Interstitial Lung Disease Registry and a cohort of 248 patients with IPF who were participating in a multicentre case-control study was compared. The determinants of survival for the patients from the Registry were determined using life table and proportional hazard modelling methods. RESULTS: The median survival times of patients with IPF in the Registry and case-control cohorts were similar (4.2 years and 4.1 years, respectively), although the average age at diagnosis of the Registry patients was greater (71.7 years versus 60.6 years, p < 0.01). After adjusting for differences in age, sex, and ethnicity, the death rate within six months of diagnosis was found to be greater in the Registry patients (relative hazard (RH) 6.32, 95% CI 2.19 to 18.22) but more than 18 months after diagnosis the death rate was less (RH 0.35, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.66) than in the patients in the case-control study. Factors associated with poorer prognosis in the Registry included advanced age, severe radiographic abnormalities, severe reduction in forced vital capacity, and a history of corticosteroid treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The adjusted survival of patients with IPF in the general population is different from that of hospital referrals which suggests that selection biases affect the survival experience of referral hospitals.

Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women in New Mexico.

The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of an interviewer-administered, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) among 132 volunteer New Mexico Hispanic (H) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) women, aged 35-74 years, with (n = 47) and without (n = 85) a breast cancer history, and to add to the limited data presently available on the performance of FFQs among different ethnic groups. Validity was measured at one month and six months from baseline against four-day food records, and reproducibility was tested by comparing FFQs. Unadjusted validity correlation coefficients were highest at one month, ranging from 0.38 (polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fat) to 0.57 (calcium); energy-adjusted correlation coefficients were highest at six months, ranging from 0.15 (polyunsaturated fat) to 0.68 (calcium). Energy-adjusted correlation coefficients were statistically significant by ethnicity for vitamins A and C, protein, carotene and calcium, and by case status for saturated fat, folate, fiber, and vitamins A and E. Reproducibility correlation coefficients (unadjusted) ranged from 0.40 (polyunsaturated fat) to 0.71 (carbohydrate, retinol); energy-adjusted correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 (vitamin E) to 0.78 (fiber), and differed significantly by ethnicity for saturated fat and retinol, and by case status for carbohydrate. Overall, our FFQ has comparable characteristics to other FFQs and is suitable for use with New Mexico's H and NHW women.

Cigarette smoking: a risk factor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

We conducted a multicenter case-control study of clinically and histologically diagnosed idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a chronic diffuse interstitial lung disease of unknown cause. The study included 248 cases, and 491 control subjects identified through random-digit dialing, matched to cases in sex, age, and geographic region. Telephone interviews were conducted with both cases and controls to collect information on potential risk factors for IPF, including smoking and household, occupational, and environmental exposures. Pulmonary function tests, X-rays, computed tomographic (CT) scans of the chest, and lung biopsy reports were submitted by referring centers to support the diagnoses. An a priori hypothesis that smoking is associated with IPF was examined with conditional logistic regression analyses. More cases (72%) than control subjects (63%) had a history of ever smoking. The odds ratio (OR) for ever smoking was 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1 to 2.4). Risk was significantly elevated for former smokers (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.3 to 2.9) and for smokers with 21 to 40 pack-yr (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.3 to 3.8). A history of smoking is associated with an increased risk for the development of IPF. Although there was no clear exposure-response pattern with cumulative consumption of cigarettes, there was a trend for time since cessation of smoking, with the highest risk for those who had most recently quit.

Epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs, and the risk of spontaneous abortion.

The possible effect of in utero antiepileptic drug (AED) exposure on the incidence of spontaneous abortion was evaluated among pregnancies of women with epilepsy and the wives of men with epilepsy. The proportion of pregnancy outcomes terminating in spontaneous abortion, the gestational age-specific rates of spontaneous abortion, and the cumulative risks of spontaneous abortion were determined. The gestational age-adjusted rate ratio for spontaneous abortion of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.45-1.40) was not increased for the pregnancies of women with epilepsy compared with those of the wives of men with epilepsy. Among women with epilepsy the rate ratio for in utero exposure to AED exposure was 1.14 (0.52-1.47) and was consistent with no effect of AED on fetal loss. The cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion of 18% for AED exposed pregnancies was also similar to risks reported in nonepilepsy populations. Thus, neither epilepsy nor in utero AED exposure was found to be associated with recognized fetal loss.