PACAP-38 but not VIP induces release of CGRP from trigeminal nucleus caudalis via a receptor distinct from the PAC1 receptor.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if PACAP and VIP have an effect on CGRP release or NOS activity in the trigeminal ganglion and trigeminal nucleus caudalis and if there can be a difference in effect between PACAP and VIP on these two systems. Furthermore, we investigate if PACAP co-localize with CGRP and/or nNOS in the two tissues. BACKGROUND: The structurally related neuropeptides vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide-38 (PACAP-38) partially share receptors and are both potent vasodilators. However, PACAP-38 but not VIP is an efficient inducer of migraine attacks in migraineurs. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and nitric oxide (NO) are two signaling molecules known to be involved in migraine. METHODS: Rat tissue was used for all experiments. Release of CGRP induced by VIP and PACAP in dura mater, trigeminal ganglion (TG) and trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) was quantified by EIA. Regulation of NOS-enzymes caused by VIP and PACAP was investigated in dura mater, TG and TNC by measuring the conversion of L-[3H]arginine to L-[3H]citrulline. Co-expression of PACAP, neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and CGRP was explored by immunohistochemistry in TG and TNC. mRNA expression studies of VPAC1, VPAC2 and PAC1-receptors were performed by qRT-PCR. RESULTS: PACAP-38 administered in increasing concentrations caused a concentration-dependent CGRP-release in the TNC, but not in TG. VIP was without effect in both tissues examined. The PAC1 receptor agonist maxadilan had no effect on CGRP release and the PAC1 antagonist M65 did not inhibit PACAP-38 induced CGRP release. PACAP-38 or VIP did not affect NOS activity in homogenates of TG and TNC. Quantitative PCR demonstrated the presence of VPAC1, VPAC2 and PAC1 receptors in TG and TNC. Immunohistochemistry of PACAP and CGRP showed co-expression in TG and TNC. PACAP and nNOS were co-localized in TG, but not in TNC. PACAP was found to co-localize with glutamine synthetase in TG satellite glial cells. CONCLUSION: PACAP-38 cause release of CGRP from TNC but not from TG. We suggest that the release is not caused via activation of PAC1, VPAC1 or VPAC2 receptors. PACAP has no effect on NOS activity in TG or TNC. In TG PACAP was found in neuronal cells and in satellite glial cells. It co-localized with CGRP and nNOS in the neuronal cells. In TNC PACAP was co-localized with CGRP but not with nNOS.

Dural mast cell degranulation is a putative mechanism for headache induced by PACAP-38.

BACKGROUND: Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide-38 (PACAP-38) has been shown to induce migraine in migraineurs, whereas the related peptide vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) does not. In the present study we examine the hypothesis that PACAP-38 and its truncated version PACAP-27 but not VIP cause degranulation of mast cells in peritoneum and in dura mater. METHODS: The degranulatory effects of PACAP-38, PACAP-27 and VIP were investigated by measuring the amount of N-acetyl-ß-hexosaminidase released from isolated peritoneal mast cells and from dura mater attached to the skull of the rat in vitro. In peritoneal mast cells N-truncated fragments of PACAP-38 (PACAP(6-38), PACAP(16-38) and PACAP(28-38)) were also studied. To investigate transduction pathways involved in mast cell degranulation induced by PACAP-38, PACAP-27 and VIP, the phospholipase C inhibitor U-73122 and the adenylate cyclase inhibitor SQ 22536 were used. RESULTS: The peptides induced degranulation of isolated peritoneal mast cells of the rat with the following order of potency: PACAP-38 = PACAP(6-38) = PACAP(16-38) ¼ PACAP-27 = VIP = PACAP(28-38). In the dura mater we found that 10(-5) M PACAP-38 was significantly more potent in inducing mast cell degranulation than the same concentration of PACAP-27 or VIP. Inhibition of intracellular mechanisms demonstrated that PACAP-38-induced degranulation is mediated by the phospholipase C pathway. Selective blockade of the PAC(1) receptor did not attenuate degranulation. CONCLUSION: These findings correlate with clinical studies and support the hypothesis that mast cell degranulation is involved in PACAP-induced migraine. PACAP-38 has a much stronger degranulatory effect on rat peritoneal and dural mast cells than VIP and PACAP-27. The difference in potency between PACAP-38- and PACAP-27/VIP-induced peritoneal mast cell degranulation is probably not related to the PAC(1) receptor but is caused by a difference in efficacy on phospholipase C.

Pharmacological characterization and expression of VIP and PACAP receptors in isolated cranial arteries of the rat.

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP) are potent vasodilators in animals and humans. PACAP infusion but not VIP infusion precipitates migraine attacks in migraine patients. The vascular effects of VIP and the two varieties of PACAP (PACAP-27 and PACAP-38) were investigated versus selective antagonists in segments of rat middle cerebral arteries (MCA), basilar arteries (BA) and middle meningeal arteries (MMA) using myographs. The luminal and abluminal effects of VIP were studied using perfusion myograph. mRNA expression of the relevant receptors (VPAC(1), VPAC(2) and PAC(1)) was examined by in situ hybridization. There was no significant difference in relaxant potency of the peptides in the MCA. In BA the relaxant potency was VIP>PACAP-27=PACAP-38. Relaxant responses were either absent or very weak in MMA. VIP was found to be somewhat more potent in BA than in the MCA. Maxadilan, a selective PAC(1)-receptor agonist, showed no relaxant effect in either vessel. The VPAC(2)-antagonist PG 99-465 alone proved ineffective in the MCA, while it had a weak effect on BA. The VPAC(1)-antagonist PG 97-269 inhibited relaxation induced by both VIP and the PACAPs in cerebral vessels. In combination, the two antagonists demonstrated better effect than either alone. VIP applied luminally via perfusion myograph caused no dilatation, indicating lack of endothelial involvement. In situ hybridization demonstrated the presence of mRNA for all three receptors in the smooth muscle cells of the vessels. In conclusion, migraine-like headache induced by PACAP-38 infusion is unlikely to be caused by direct vasodilator action on intracranial vessels.

Pharmacological characterization of VIP and PACAP receptors in the human meningeal and coronary artery.

OBJECTIVE: We pharmacologically characterized pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptides (PACAPs), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and the VPAC(1), VPAC(2) and PAC(1) receptors in human meningeal (for their role in migraine) and coronary (for potential side effects) arteries. METHODS: Concentration response curves to PACAP38, PACAP27, VIP and the VPAC(1) receptor agonist ([Lys15,Arg16,Leu27]-VIP[1-7]-GRF[8-27]) were constructed in the absence or presence of the PAC(1) receptor antagonist PACAP6-38 or the VPAC(1) receptor antagonist, PG97269. mRNA expression was measured using qPCR. RESULTS: PACAP38 was less potent than VIP in both arteries. Both peptides had lower potency and efficacy in meningeal than in coronary arteries, while mRNA expression of VPAC(1) receptor was more pronounced in meningeal arteries. PACAP6-38 reduced the E(max) of PACAP27, while PG97269 right-shifted the VIP-induced relaxation curve only in the coronary arteries. CONCLUSION: The direct vasodilatory effect of VIP and PACAP might be less relevant than the central effect of this compound in migraine pathogenesis.

Functional and molecular characterization of prostaglandin E2 dilatory receptors in the rat craniovascular system in relevance to migraine.

INTRODUCTION: Migraine pain is thought to involve an increase in trigeminal nerve terminal activity around large cerebral and meningeal arteries, leading to vasodilatation. Because prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) is elevated in cephalic venous blood during migraine attacks, and is also capable of inducing headache in healthy volunteers, we hypothesize that PGE(2) dilatory receptors, EP(2) and EP(4), mediate the response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: By the use of specific agonists and antagonists, the dilatory effect of PGE(2) was characterized in rat cranial arteries by use of in vivo and in vitro methods. Furthermore, EP(2) and EP(4) quantitative messenger RNA (mRNA) receptor expression was studied in the rat craniovascular system. RESULTS: Our results suggest that EP(4), and to a lesser degree EP(2), receptors mediate the dilatory effect of PGE(2) in the craniovascular system in rats. Thus, antagonism of these receptors might be of therapeutic relevance in migraine.

Presence and vascular pharmacology of KATP channel subtypes in rat central and peripheral tissues.

K(ATP) channel openers are vasodilators and induce headache in normal subjects. We previously identified the Kir6.1/SUR2B K(ATP) channel subtype in major cerebral and dural arteries of rat, pig and man. We hypothesized that craniovascular Kir6.1/SUR2B K(ATP) channels mediate the headache-inducing effects of K(ATP) channel openers and that a Kir6.1/SUR2B specific blocker might be effective in the treatment of primary headaches such as migraine. Since K(ATP) channels are ubiquitous, we characterized the K(ATP) channel subtypes in major rat cranial and peripheral arteries and organs in order to understand the possible adverse effects of a Kir6.1/SUR2B blocker. We studied the mRNA expression of K(ATP) channel subunits in rat femoral, mesenteric, renal, coronary, basilar, middle cerebral and middle meningeal arteries and in tissue from rat heart, brain, liver, colon, lung, kidney and pancreas. We also studied the effects and potencies of a panel of synthetic K(ATP) channel openers and their potential inhibition by the Kir6.1 subunit-specific K(ATP) channel blocker PNU-37883A in segments of the arteries mounted in a wire myograph. Our studies suggest that Kir6.1/SUR2B forms the major functional K(ATP) channel complex in rat cranial and peripheral arteries. The mRNA transcripts of SUR1 and Kir6.2 subunits were predominantly found in brain, pancreas and heart, while SUR2A mRNA was merely detected within the heart. K(ATP) channel blockers highly specific for the SUR2B subunit may have no adverse CNS and cardiac effects and will not affect insulin release in the pancreas. However, a SUR2B blocker may not discriminate between cranial and peripheral arteries.