[Clinical practice guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology on unstable angina/infarction without ST elevation]. / Guías de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en la angina inestable/infarto sin elevación ST.

This paper up-dates the Clinical Guidelines for Unstable Angina/Non Q wave Myocardial Infarction of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Due to the increased efficacy of adequate management in the early phases, it has been considered necessary to include recommendations for the pre Hospital and Emergency department phase. Prehospital management. Patients with thoracic pain compatible with myocardial ischemia should be transferred to Hospital as quickly as possible and an ECG tracing performed. Initial management includes rest, sublingual nitroglycerin and aspirin. In the Emergency department. Immediate clinical attention and accessibility to a defibrillator should be available. If ECG tracing discloses ST elevation reperfusion strategy is to be implemented immediately. If no ST elevation is present, the probability of myocardial ischemia and risk factor evaluation is essential for adequate management. A simplified risk stratification classification is presented, that also determines the most adequate site for admission: Coronary Care Unit if high risk factors are present, Cardiology ward for the intermediate risk patient and ambulatory treatment if low risk. Management in Coronary Care Unit. Includes routine ECG monitoring and analgesia. Antithrombotic and anti ischemic treatment include new indication for GP IIb-IIIa and Low molecular weight heparins. Coronary arteriography and revascularisation are recommended, if refractory or recurrent angina, left ventricles dysfunction or other complications are present. Management in the ward is based on adequate chronic medical treatment, risk stratification, and secondary prevention strategy. Coronary arteriography before discharge must be considered in the light of the result of non-invasive tests.

[A change in the prescription of thrombolytic treatment in elderly patients. The experience of the Hospital de León]. / Cambio en la prescipción de tratamiento trombolítico en pacientes ancianos. Experiencia del Hospital de León.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Most deaths caused from AMI occur in elderly patients, and it is know that these patients way also benefit from the type treatment normally offered to younger patients. We proposed to analyse how our therapeutic strategy has evolved for patients of advanced age related to the admission in the CCU and the prescription of thrombolytic treatment. METHODS: In order to carry our investigation, we compared the clinical profile, the treatment and the results of patients over the age of 70 who were hospitalized in our Service with suspected AMI during last 3 years. A total number of 366 which were divided into two consecutive periods of 18 months; 176 patients from January'91 to June'92 (Period I--former--) and 190 patients from July'92 to December'93 (Period II--latter--). RESULTS: In both periods, nearly all patients with suspected AMI and < 48 hours of since symptoms began were hospitalized in the CCU irrespective of their age. In both periods, over 40% of the total number of patients admitted to CCU were > 70 years (I: 45.2% vs II: 42.6%). We observed that in the latter group a major part of patients had complicated AMI at the moment of admittance (I: 15.3% vs II: 24.2%; p < 0.05). This is probably related to a less favorable clinical profile. Despite this, a parallel increase in hospital death rate was not observed (I: 21% vs II: 17%; p: NS). Over time, the ratio of patients prescribed with thrombolysis > 70 was nearly doubled (I: 13.7% vs II: 24.7%; p < 0.01), without a detected increase in complications of hemorrhages. CONCLUSIONS: For a variety of factors, the number of elderly patients admitted with complicated AMI has increased. In our experience the simple modification in the way thrombolysis is prescribed is capable of restraining the hospital death rate ratio.