Validity and reliability of the ERSA questionnaire in Turkish.

This methodological study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Evaluation of the Impact of Hearing Loss in Adults (ERSA) questionnaire for individuals with treated hearing loss. The study involved 200 participants, and both exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to examine structural validity. External validity was assessed by correlating ERSA scores with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. The Turkish ERSA demonstrated strong psychometric properties, with significant correlations between APHAB and ERSA scores and excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The findings suggest that the Turkish ERSA is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating the impact of hearing loss in individuals.

Investigation of Head Shake Sensory Organization Test (HS-SOT) in three planes: Test-retest reliability and age-related differences.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, it has been determined that SOT sensitivity is insufficient in patients who develop vestibular compensation and therefore the Head Shake Sensory Organization Test (HS-SOT) has been developed. RESEARCH QUESTION: How differs the balance performance of healthy adults that is tested with HS-SOT according to age and test planes? What is the test-retest reliability level of the HS-SOT in three planes? METHODS: Our prospective study, which has a methodological research design, included 80 participants divided into three groups by age range (Group 1: 20-39 years (n = 30); Group 2: 40-49 years (n = 30) and Group 3: 50-64 years (n = 20)). SOT and HSSOT ( yaw, pitch, roll) were performed to all participants. To investigate the testretest reliability of the HS-SOT, a total of 27 participants were re-evaluated one week later. The HS-SOT performance of the participants was compared between age groups and test planes. Intra-class correlation coefficient and minimum detectable change values (MDC) was calculated to test-retest reliability of HS-SOT. RESULTS: HS-SOT scores (HS-2 and HS-5) did not differ significantly between age groups. The balance performance of individuals for the pitch plane was lower than other planes. Only the HS-5 score showed a significant difference between the sessions. HS-5 scores were higher in the re-test; for the first group in the pitch plane and for the third group in the yaw plane. The test-retest reliability level of these conditions was "moderate-good" for both groups. The corresponding MDC value was highest (14.01) for the HS-5 (yaw) score of the elderly group. SIGNIFICANCE: The findings from this study demonstrated that the test plane influences the HS-SOT, a learning/practice effect may occur because of repeated HS-SOT evaluation, and this effect is more explicit in the elderly. This study provides a perspective for the evaluation and follow-up processes of patients with balance problems.

Outcomes of Treatment of Multicanal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo by Means of TRV Chair.

INTRODUCTION: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is one of the most common causes of peripheral vertigo and can manifest in different forms. Multicanal BPPV is rare and difficult to treat. TRV Chair is a method that offers diagnosis and treatment at the same time. The aim was to analyze the outcomes of treatment of multicanal BPPV by means of TRV Chair and compare those results with manual maneuvers. METHODS: Forty-nine subjects aged 26-73 and diagnosed with multicanal BPPV were included. Appropriate maneuvers were performed on affected canals either by TRV Chair or manually. The number of maneuvers required by TRV Chair and manual maneuver were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: The mean number of maneuvers performed until the treatment was completed in manual treatment group was 2.57 ± 1.03, and in TRV group, it was 2.25 ± 1.16. No significant difference was observed between the number of maneuvers performed in either group until the end of the treatment (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS: Neither TRV Chair nor manual maneuvers were superior to the other in the treatment of multicanal BPPV cases.

Vestibular activities and participation measure: Turkish validity and reliability.

BACKGROUND: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) has an important role in rehabilitation in terms of assessments. In the field of vestibular rehabilitation, Vestibular Activities of Participation (VAP) measure is the first assessment developed in a perspective of ICF. OBJECTIVE: It was aimed to adapt cross-culturally and analyze psychometric properties of VAP into Turkish Language. METHODS: The VAP was translated into Turkish language by the authors and back translated by a blind native English speaker. The final version was applied to 310 participants. Internal consistency was analyzed with Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability analyzed with Intraclass Correlation coefficient (ICC). Validity of the scale investigated with Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor analysis (EFA and CFA). RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was found 0.94, and the reliability of the subscales ranged from 0.75 to 0.95; ICC was found 0.94. VAP resulted 8-factor structure and explained 88%of the total variance. In CFA (χ2) / df ratio shows good agreement with 2.472 and the goodness of fit indices of TLI (0.814), CFI (0.893) and RMSEA (0.075) showed acceptable fit. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that VAP-Turkish version is valid and reliable in Turkish speaking populations, and might be used to determine impact of vestibular disorders on activities and participation.