Addressing Glucocorticoid-Related Problems with the Clinical Pharmacist Collaboration in Rheumatology Practice: A Prospective Follow-Up Study.

INTRODUCTION: Glucocorticoids (GCs) play a crucial role in the treatment of many rheumatic diseases regarding their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. Inappropriate use of GCs can exacerbate GC-related problems besides complex treatment regimens and miscellaneous well-established adverse events. Although several guidelines exist for managing these problems, there is lack of real-life studies evaluating the problems at the patient level. This study aims to identify GC-related problems among patients with rheumatic diseases and address how they have been solved. METHODS: This prospective follow-up study was conducted between January 2021 and June 2022 at a university rheumatology outpatient clinic and included patients using GCs. A clinical pharmacist assessed patients for possible GC-related problems at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Identified problems, their causes, interventions to address these problems, and their outcomes were categorized using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE v9.1) classification system. The resolution of the problems was evaluated at the patient's next follow-up visit. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were included, and 236 GC-related problems were identified in 66% of the patients. Adverse drug events (possible) accounted for the highest proportion of GC-related problems (94.1%), and the most common causes were lack of laboratory monitoring of GC-related adverse events (41.5%) and lack of drug treatment despite existing indications (39.8%). The median cumulative prednisolone dose was higher in patients with GC-related problems (3115 vs. 5455 mg, p = 0.007). The clinical pharmacist suggested 381 interventions: 47.7% (n = 182) at the 'prescriber level', 31.8% (n = 121) at the 'patient level', and 20.5% (n = 78) at the 'drug level'. Of those interventions, 98% were accepted, and 80.1% of the problems were solved. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the prevalence of GC-related problems is high in patients with rheumatic diseases. Integrating clinical pharmacists into the multidisciplinary rheumatology team provides an advantage in effectively identifying and managing GC-related problems at an early stage.

Risk assessments of drug-related problems for cardiac surgery patients.

OBJECTIVES: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are considered at high risk for developing drug-related problems (DRPs) due to comorbidities and complexity of drug treatment. This study aimed to identify DRPs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to develop and implement a framework to reduce potential risks associated with drug treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Prospectively designed quasi-experimental study. METHODS: This study consisted of observational (risk assessment and framework development) and interventional (framework implementation) periods and was conducted at a department of cardiovascular surgery in a university hospital. An expert panel evaluated the causes of DRPs. Then a framework was developed in consensus to identify safeguards to be implemented during the interventional period. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients (100 patients per study period) were included. During the observational period, a total of 275 DRPs and 487 causes were identified; 74.5% of DRPs were not solved. For the risk analysis, 487 causes were evaluated and only 32.6% were considered acceptable risk. By implementing the framework in the interventional period, 215 DRPs and 304 causes were identified and 386 interventions were recommended by a clinical pharmacist. A total of 342 (88.6%) interventions were accepted by a health care team, and 128 (59.5%) DRPs were completely solved. For the risk analysis, 304 causes were evaluated and 84.9% were considered acceptable risk ( P < .001 compared with the observational period). CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to reduce risk levels or prevent occurrence of DRPs by implementing a framework for risk management developed by a multidisciplinary care team in areas such as cardiac surgery where time is limited.

Prospective Assessment of Glucocorticoid Toxicity in Rheumatology Practice: A Focus on the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index.

OBJECTIVE: The glucocorticoid toxicity index (GTI) is developed to measure glucocorticoid (GC)-related morbidity over time. This study aimed to assess GC-toxicity in patients at a rheumatology outpatient clinic by using the GTI and to identify the factors that interfere with the GTI. METHODS: This prospective study included patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA), connective tissue disease, and vasculitis who were newly prescribed GC-treatment (GC-naive) or have been still on GC-treatment for ≤2 years (GC-experienced). Patient demographics and disease characteristics, aggregate improvement score (GTI-AIS), cumulative worsening score (GTI-CWS), and cumulative GC-doses were recorded at baseline, 3rd month, and 6th month. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to evaluate the GTI scores and associated factors including cumulative GC-doses. RESULTS: The study included 156 (48.7% GC-naive) patients with a mean age of 49.1 ± 17.1 years. More than half of the patients in both groups had a diagnosis of vasculitis. A higher cumulative GC-dose was found to be associated with higher GTI-scores in both groups (p< 0.001). In the GC-naive group, patients with vasculitis showed higher GTI-scores than IA patients (p< 0.001); there was also a significant increase in the GTI-CWS at the 6th month compared with the 3rd month. In the GC-experienced group, GTI-AIS and GTI-CWS were significantly different at 3rd and 6th month (p< 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was shown that GTI scores were associated with cumulative GC-doses and vasculitis patients in the GC-naive patients had higher GTI scores than inflammatory arthritis. The GTI allows individualized assessment and management of adverse effects experienced by patients as a result of GC treatment.

Assessment of Knowledge and Attitudes of Physicians and Pharmacists on Probiotics: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Objectives: Probiotics have been gaining increased attention from the public recently, which originates concerns about their rationale use among healthcare professionals. Although there is evidence on the efficacy and safety of probiotics in certain gastrointestinal disorders, it is important to identify healthcare professionals' opinions on probiotics. This study aimed to identify the opinions of pharmacists and physicians on the use of probiotics. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between November, 2017 and August, 2018 among pharmacists and physicians practicing in Ankara, Türkiye. An electronic survey was designed and sent to the participants via e-mail. Results: A total of 361 pharmacists (74.5% female) and 356 physicians (42.4% female) participated in the study. Approximately two-thirds of pharmacists and physicians were familiar with the mechanism of action and indications of probiotics. Most pharmacists and physicians recommended probiotics to be used in gastrointestinal system disorders (99.7% and 97.7%). Other areas that probiotics are commonly recommended was genitourinary system (29.3%) by pharmacists and dermatological symptoms (15.1%) by phycisians, respectively. Considering patient advice regarding the probiotics, pharmacists (63.3%) seemed to receive more requests compared to physicians (30.9%); and with regard to the probiotic recommendation, 70.7% and 38.2% of pharmacists and physicians, respectively, indicated that they have no concerns, but 61% of physicians have concerns on reimbursement policy when prescribing. Conclusion: Pharmacists and physicians are healthcare providers commonly asked about probiotics by patients. Therefore, it is important to address healthcare professionals' concerns and increase their knowledge of the use of probiotics for different health conditions. Given that probiotic products can be purchased without a prescription, healthcare professionals in primary care settings should be more vigilant about the rational use of probiotics.

Evaluation of drug interaction between cyclosporine and lercanidipine: a descriptive study.

OBJECTIVES: Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive drug with a high potential for drug interactions that is frequently used in renal transplant patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the change in cyclosporine concentration in patients taking cyclosporine and lercanidipine concurrently. METHODS: The potential drug interactions in renal transplant patients who received lercanidipine and cyclosporine concurrently in a university hospital between January 2008 and January 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients had renal transplantation from deceased donors or living related donors. The Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS) criteria were used to assess the causality of cyclosporine and lercanidipine drug interaction. RESULTS: The study included six renal transplant patients. The median cyclosporine concentration before lercanidipine use was 325 ng/mL (min-max 101-356) and 592.5 ng/mL (min-max 198-799) thereafter (p=0.028). Serum creatinine and proteinuria levels did not change significantly during lercanidipine treatment (p=0.686 and p=0.116, respectively). According to the DIPS evaluation, cyclosporine and lercanidipine interaction was classified as "possible (score 3)". CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant use of cyclosporine and lercanidipine increases the concentration of cyclosporine, which may result in side effects during effective treatment in renal transplant patients. Therefore, cyclosporine concentrations should definitely be monitored while patients are taking lercanidipine.

Impact of pharmacist-led educational intervention on pneumococcal vaccination rates in cancer patients: a randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate clinical pharmacist's contribution to the pneumococcal vaccination rate by providing education to cancer patients in hospital settings. METHODS: This study was conducted in 2 tertiary-care hospitals' medical oncology outpatient clinics. Patients over 18 years of age and diagnosed with cancer for less than 2 years, in remission stage, and have not previously received the pneumococcal vaccine were included. Patients were randomized to intervention and control groups. The intervention group was provided vaccination education and recommended to receive the PCV13 vaccine. The control group received routine care. Patients' knowledge about pneumonia/pneumococcal vaccine, Vaccine Attitude Examination Scale (VAX) score, and vaccination rates were evaluated at baseline and 3 months after the education. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients (intervention: 117, control: 118) were included. The mean age ± SD was 57.86 ± 11.88 years in the control and 60.68 ± 11.18 years in the intervention groups. The numbers of correct answers about pneumonia/pneumococcal vaccine (p = 0.482) and VAX scores (p = 0.244) of the groups were similar at baseline. After the intervention, the median (IQR) number of correct answers in intervention group [10(3)] was higher than control group [8(4)] (p < 0.001). After the education, the total VAX score (mean ± SD) was less in intervention group (33.09 ± 7.018) than the control group (36.07 ± 6.548) (p = 0.007). Three months after the education, 20.2% of the patients in the intervention and 6.1% in the control groups were vaccinated with pneumococcal vaccine (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The pneumococcal vaccination rate in cancer patients has increased significantly by the education provided by a clinical pharmacist in hospital settings.

Drug-related problems at the heart of cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Optimal perioperative success in cardiac surgery requires precise management of drug treatment. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, types and associated factors of drug-related problems (DRPs) during the entire hospital stay. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at the department of cardiovascular surgery in a university hospital between November 2019 and March 2020. Patients with planned elective cardiac surgery, aged ≥18 years, were included. A clinical pharmacist collaboratively reviewed medications on a daily basis and identified DRPs. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (60 male) were included; median (range) age was 62 (19-86) years, and median (IQR) length of stay in hospital was 15 (9) days. A total of 275 DRPs were identified (median (IQR) 3 (2-4)). The number of patients who had at least one DRP was 47 preoperatively, 55 in the postoperative intensive care unit, 100 in the postoperative ward, and 16 at discharge. In order to reduce bias because of the small sample size, Firth's logistic regression analysis was conducted. Statistically significant variables according to univariate analysis were included into a logistic regression model. Therefore the length of hospital stay (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.26, p=0.008), living arrangements (living alone) (OR 4.24, 95% CI 1.41 to 12.73, p=0.009), number of medications at admission (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.59, p=0.002), and having coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.07 to 7.70, p=0.03) were associated with an increased risk for DRPs in the final model. CONCLUSION: Hospital stay carries an increased risk for DRPs, especially at the postoperative stage. Modifiable risk factors for DRPs can be managed by required interventions performed by a multidisciplinary healthcare team.

Interchangeability and adverse events in originator-rituximab and its biosimilar (CT-P10) among rheumatic patients: a real-life experience.

Biosimilars offer cost-effective and safe treatment options both for patients and healthcare systems. CT-P10 is the first biosimilar of rituximab approved in Europe for use in all indications of originator rituximab (oRTX). This study aimed to provide real-life data on treatment changes and adverse events in patients who received oRTX or CT-P10. We retrospectively reviewed treatment-related adverse events [infusion-related reactions (IRRs), infections, hypogammaglobulinemia] in patients treated with at least one dose of oRTX (MabThera®) or CT-P10 (Truxima®) between 2020 and 2021 and had at least 6 months follow-up after rituximab infusion in a rheumatology clinic. The switches between oRTX and CT-P10 were performed according to drug availability at the hospital pharmacy at the time of infusion according to the local hospital procedure. Physicians were not involved in the decision of biosimilar selection. A total of 128 patients (CT-P10, n = 64; oRTX, n = 64) were included. CT-P10 was switched in 52 (40.6%) patients who had previously used oRTX, and 48 (37.5%) patients remained on oRTX. We demonstrated no difference between patients treated with oRTX or CT-P10 in the rates of IRRs, in which all reactions were grade 1 and 2. Comparable rates of infections (p > 0.05) and the rate of hypogammaglobulinemia (p > 0.05) were found in both groups with no significant difference. CT-P10 provides a safe treatment alternative in patients who require rituximab therapy. The rational use of biosimilars can be supported by evolving evidence on interchangeability and switching in real-life settings, which will help clinicians in decision-making.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vaccination among community pharmacists.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals' vaccine recommendation is the most effective method to increase vaccination rates of the community. The vaccine counseling and recommendation behavior of pharmacists, who are among the easily accessible healthcare professionals, are influenced by their knowledge and attitudes about vaccines. AIM: It was aimed to investigate community pharmacists' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding commonly used vaccines. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted as an online survey with a sample of 1100 community pharmacists in Turkey. Pharmacists were invited to participate in the study by phone calls. A structured survey, which consists of 40 questions to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vaccines, was sent to the e-mail addresses of pharmacists who volunteered to participate in the study. FINDINGS: A total of 430 pharmacists completed the survey. Thirty percent of pharmacists had lack of knowledge about vaccination during pregnancy, whereas 52.2% and 31.4% of pharmacists believed that tetanus and influenza vaccines should be provided during pregnancy, respectively. Nearly 89% of pharmacists recommended vaccines to patients, mainly for influenza vaccine (83.9%). Only 31.5% of pharmacists had been vaccinated against influenza in the last season, whereas 50.5% had never been vaccinated. Pharmacists who had been vaccinated with influenza vaccine had a high rate of recommending influenza vaccines to the patients. CONCLUSION: The present study found that vaccination among pharmacists in Turkey and their knowledge on vaccination during pregnancy were low. Further education of pharmacists to improve their knowledge and attitudes toward vaccines is needed.

Assessment of the Appropriateness of Prescriptions in a Geriatric Outpatient Clinic

Objectives: Appropriateness of the geriatric outpatients' medications needs special attention due to risks of falls, fractures, depression, hospital admissions and mortality. This study aimed to identify current practice on medication usage by using the 2nd version of "Screening Tool of Older People's Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions" and "Screening Tool to Alert Doctors to Right Treatment" criteria and affecting factors for the Turkish population. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between September 2015 and May 2016 at a university research and training hospital's geriatric outpatient clinic. Patients aged ≥65 years and had ≥5 different prescribed medications (considered as polypharmacy) were recruited. The main outcome measure was the frequency of inappropriate medications identified by clinical pharmacist in the outpatient clinic according to the 2nd version of the criterion sets. Results: A total of 700 patients (440 female) were included in this study. According to the results, 316 patients (45.1%) with at least one potentially inappropriate medication and 668 patients (98.3%) with at least one potential prescription omission were detected. Potentially inappropriate medications were associated with the number of medications used per patient [odds ratio (OR): 1.20 p<0.001], living alone (OR: 4.12 p=0.02), and having congestive heart failure (OR: 2.41 p<0.001). Twenty-two (27.5%) out of 80 criteria and 4 (11.8%) out of 34 criteria did not apply to the study population. Conclusion: Detecting inappropriate medications to maintain treatment effectiveness is necessary to provide the optimum therapy. Despite the awareness of polypharmacy in outpatient clinics it is still one of the important causes of inappropriate prescription followed by vaccination rate. Therefore, with the contribution of clinical pharmacist using these available criteria is important, moreover modification of these criteria according to the local needs to be considered to achieve better outcomes.

Oncologists' attitudes towards prophylaxis of cancer associated venous thromboembolism: A prospective, descriptive study.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism creates a big burden on both patients and healthcare systems. Clinical guidelines have a consensus on the initiation of prophylactic treatment for hospitalised patients, however a debate still exists for ambulatory cancer patients. Therefore, this study aimed to identify attitudes and practices of medical oncologists on cancer-associated venous thromboembolism management. METHODS: An online survey consisting of 22 questions was developed by researchers in the view of previous studies and delivered to 100 medical oncologists registered to the national society of medical oncology by e-mail between September and October 2018. Descriptive and statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23.0 (ICM Corp. Released 2015. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). RESULTS: A total of 62 medical oncologists (75.8% male) responded to the survey (response rate of 62%). The most critical three risk factors considered for initiating prophylaxis were prior venous thromboembolism history, immobilisation and tumour/cancer type for inpatients and outpatients (χ2 test, p < 0.001). The first choice of drug for prophylaxis was mostly low molecular weight heparins (n = 60, 96.8%). In the absence of contraindications, physicians initiate prophylaxis 'usually' for inpatients (n = 25, 40.3%) and outpatients (n = 5, 8.1%). However routine use of the Khorana score is not incorporated into the risk assessment process of cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Attitudes of oncologists towards thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients are consistent with previous studies in the literature. The respondents are aware of the venous thromboembolism risk of cancer patients, however raising awareness on both cancer-associated venous thromboembolism and current guideline recommendations is needed.

Does information by pharmacists convince the public to get vaccinated for pneumococcal disease and herpes zoster?

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal diseases (PN) and herpes zoster (HZ) are preventable infections in the adult population. AIMS: This study aimed to identify the vaccination rates at 1 year after pharmacist-led provision of information in the community. The objectives were to reveal the reasons for not being vaccinated and to determine opinions and awareness of PN and HZ vaccination among public. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in five social and solidarity centres in Turkey. Participants were educated by a pharmacist about PN and HZ diseases, vaccinations and reimbursement status, respectively. All participants were followed by telephone 1 year after to determine their vaccination status. RESULTS: A total of 155 participants (72.9% male; mean age was 68.72 ± 9.04 years) were included. With respect to PN and HZ vaccines, it was found that 40% and 12.7% of participants knew about the respective vaccines. Following the pharmacist's educational session, 52.9% and 51.6% were willing to have the respective vaccine, but only 5.7% and 0.8% respectively got vaccinated 1 year after the educational session. Perceived disease severity, provision of information by a pharmacist, and reimbursement status of the vaccines were not associated with the vaccination rates. CONCLUSIONS: The public obtain information on vaccines from friends and family members, which may result in misinformation and inappropriate behaviour in vaccination. Although educational sessions provided by pharmacists did not increase the actual vaccination rates for PN and HZ, public willingness to vaccination has increased.

Treatment of patients with neuropathic pain and provision of drug information by clinical pharmacists

Abstract Patient's satisfaction with healthcare services has an influence on pain management, which can be improved by patient education. Therefore, this study was aimed at identifying primary care health service opportunities in the treatment of neuropathic pain and assessing patients' satisfaction with the provision of drug information by clinical pharmacists. This was a cross- sectional, prospective study conducted at a pain unit during March-May 2017. Patients aged >18 years; diagnosed with neuropathic pain; and who used amitriptyline, gabapentin, pregabalin, or duloxetine were included. They were verbally informed about drug treatment by a clinical pharmacist, and their satisfaction was evaluated after 1 month. In all, 90 patients were included. The median duration for which the patients experienced pain until hospital admission was 3.6 years; furthermore, this duration was longer among women (p < 0.05). However, the median time to seeking advice from doctors was 3 months. The patients (15.6%) were less likely to admit pain unit initially and 46.7% had visited different units before being admitted to a pain unit. More than 95% of the patients indicated that they had received information from a pharmacist at a clinic and were satisfied with the provision of information (median duration, 8.5 min). Thus, the involvement of pharmacists in multidisciplinary pain management may help improve health- related outcomes at hospitals and/or in community care settings

Factors associated with fingolimod rebound: A single center real-life experience.

Background It is still controversial whether the relapse experienced after discontinuation of fingolimod treatment is a rebound. Increasing cases of rebound have been reported in the literature. The rate of fingolimod rebound in patients after fingolimod cessation is reported between 5% and 52%. The present study aims to determine the rate of rebound after discontinuation of fingolimod treatment and the factors affecting the rebound. Methods This retrospective cohort study consists of adult MS patients who have been admitted to the Hacettepe University Hospital Neurology MS Center outpatient clinic between 2012 and 2020. Results During the study period, 642 patients received fingolimod and 23.1% discontinued the fingolimod treatment. Thirteen of 126 patients had a rebound (10.3%) after fingolimod discontinuation. The patients in the rebound group were significantly younger and washout period were significantly longer than those in the non-rebound group. After discontinuation of fingolimod treatment, the EDSS score of the rebound group was significantly higher than the non-rebound group, while Annualized Relapse Rates were similar. Conclusion Younger age, longer washout time, and previous treatment preferences may increase the occurrence probability of rebound. It is recommended that patients should be closely monitored after fingolimod discontinuation and appropriate disease-modifying therapy should be initiated as soon as possible.

Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Antifungal Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Antifungal stewardship (AFS) is recommended to reduce the inappropriate use of antifungal drugs. In this study, the role of AFS in providing appropriate antifungal therapy was evaluated. This study included three periods, consisting of observation, feedback/education, and daily AFS activities. In the observation period, the use of systemic antifungals was evaluated for a baseline measurement of appropriateness. In the second period, monthly meetings were organized to provide feedback and education to physicians regarding antifungal therapy and the rate of adherence to the clinical guidelines. In the final period, a clinical pharmacist participated in daily ward rounds to evaluate the appropriateness of the antifungal therapy. A scoring system for appropriateness was used for comparison between the three periods. Four hundred eighteen episodes of antifungal therapy were evaluated. Baseline demographics of patients were similar in all three periods for age, gender, and the number of comorbidities. The indications for antifungal use were for prophylaxis in 22.7%, Candida infections in 58.6%, and invasive mold infections in 18.7%. During the third period, 157 (78.9%) recommendations were made and 151 (96.2%) were accepted. The overall appropriateness of antifungal use increased significantly for prophylaxis (30.8%, 17.9%, and 46.3%; P = 0.046) and treatment of fungal diseases (27.8%, 32.4%, and 71.9%; P < 0.001) between the first, second, and third periods, respectively. The 30-day mortality was not significantly changed between the three periods (19%, 15.6%, and 27.5%; P = 0.050). Appropriateness in antifungal therapy can be augmented by the integration of an AFS program. A team-based evaluation of fungal infections and assessment of patients by a clinical pharmacist with a therapeutic perspective may help to increase the quality of antifungal therapy.

International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) position statement: Role of the oncology pharmacy team in cancer care.

The Oncology Pharmacy Team (OPT), consisting of specialty-trained pharmacists and/or pharmacy technicians, is an integral component of the multidisciplinary healthcare team (MHT) involved with all aspects of cancer patient care. The OPT fosters quality patient care, safety, and local regulatory compliance. The International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP) developed this position statement to provide guidance on five key areas: 1) oncology pharmacy practice as a pharmacy specialty; 2) contributions to patient care; 3) oncology pharmacy practice management; 4) education and training; and 5) contributions to oncology research and quality initiatives to involve the OPT. This position statement advocates that: 1) the OPT be fully incorporated into the MHT to optimize patient care; 2) educational and healthcare institutions develop programs to continually educate OPT members; and 3) regulatory authorities develop certification programs to recognize the unique contributions of the OPT in cancer patient care.