[New possibilities of using moxonidin for blood pressure control in female patients with osteopenia].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of moxonidine on bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal patients with arterial hypertension (AH) and osteopenia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, open, clinical trial included 114 postmenopausal patients with AH. All participants were evaluated bone metabolism), BMD, telomerase activity (TA). Randomization was carried out into 2 groups (moxonidine and bisoprolol therapy) using simple envelopes. After 12 months of therapy, a dynamic examination was performed. RESULTS: Both groups showed a positive effect of both moxonidine and bisoprolol on hypertension during treatment both as monotherapy and in the group of patients receiving combined antihypertensive therapy: a decrease in SBP and DBP in the 1st group was 13.6% and 12.8% respectively, and in the 2nd group - 13.7% and 15% respectively, while achieving normal values. In most patients of group 1, normalization of body weight was noted in comparison with group 2 (23.4% and 17.4%, respectively, p = 0.043), delta of body weight in the moxonidine group was -1.89%. The increase in the processes of bone formation in the form of increased markers of OC and Osteoprotegerin and a statistically signifcant increase in TA in patients receiving moxonidine were revealed, while in women who took bisoprolol there were no dynamic changes in bone metabolism rates, there was a tendency for a decrease in BMD and a signifcant decrease in AT. CONCLUSIONS: Te detected pleiotropic effect of moxonidine on bone metabolism and replicative cell aging processes will reduce the risk of development or progression of osteopenia and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with AH.

[Diagnostic Value of Biochemical Markers in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced, Borderline and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The study of the diagnostic value of biochemical markers of myocardial stress and inflammation in chronic heart failure (CHF) with different values of the ejection fraction (EF) of the left ventricle (LV). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cross-sectional study included 105 patients aged 24 to 84 years (mean 58+/-14 years) with stable chronic heart failure I-II NYHA functional class classification. The causes of CHF were ischemic heart disease (IHD) in 33% of patients and arterial hypertension (AH) - 67%. All patients received medical treatment: angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) - 76%, -blockers - 72%, diuretics - 100%, statins - 80%. The control group consisted of 35 healthy volunteers. All subjects identified blood natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, ANP), adiponectin, galectin-3, pentraxins-3 and growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). All surveyed performed transthoracic echocardiography (Echo). RESULTS: The blood NT-proBNP, ANP, galectin-3, pentraxins and GDF-3-15 in patients with chronic heart failure was significantly higher than in the control group (p<0.001 in all cases). In contrast, the level of adiponectin was significantly higher than in healthy individuals - 11.90 (11.39; 12.65) vs 7.73 (3.58; 8.86) ng/ml in patients with chronic heart failure (p<0.001). LVEF ranged from 30 to 55%, in 33% of patients it was >50%. Correlation analysis Spearman found strong correlations (p<0.001 for all markers) between LVEF and the content of all the biomarkers, while between the PV and the level of adiponectin is a positive correlation was found (r=0.862), and between the PV and the other biomarkers - reverse (r from -0.858 to -0.901). Multivariate linear regression analysis found the strongest correlation with the value of LVEF at pentraxin 3 and adiponectin. Subsequent ROC-analysis confirmed the diagnostic value of adiponectin in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Thus, the level of adiponectin more than 8.3 ng/ml served as a prognostic factor for the presence of heart failure in patients with LVEF >50% with a sensitivity of 94.3% and a specificity of 92.9% (area under the curve 0.977; 95% confidence interval from 0.954 to 0.999; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among the 6 studied biomarkers of myocardial stress and inflammation only adiponectin has diagnostic significance in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.

[Effectiveness and safety of losartan and its combination with amlodipine in therapy of arterial hypertension].

AIM: To estimate effectiveness and safety of losartan and its combination with amlodipine in therapy of arterial hypertension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study based at 6 clinical centres was conducted in two stages. All 160 patients with grade I-II AH (103 women and 57 men aged 54 ± 12 yr) participated in stage 1 of the study and patients of centre No 1 (n = 100) in stage 2. Losartan was used at a dose of 50-100 mg/24 h for 8 weeks (stage 1) and thereafter from week 9 to 26 (stage 2) in combination with amlodipine (5-10 mg/24 hr) if the desired AP level (< 140/90 mmHg) was not achieved. The following parameters were measured: systolic and diastolic AP (SAP and DAP) (office measurement and 24-hr monitoring), pulse wave propagation rate (PWPR), left ventricle mass index (LVMI), thickness of intima-media complex (IMT), blood biochemistry, tolerability of therapy and its side effects. RESULTS: Losartan alone decreased SAP and DAP from 150 ± 11/91 ± 7 to 132 ± 12/81 ± 8 mm Hg (office measurement) and from 144 ± 10/86 ± 9 to 128 ± 12/76 ± 10 mm Hg (24-hr monitoring); heart rate decreased fom 74 ± 8 to 70 ± 8/min (p < 0.05). SAP and DAP in 66 patients who completed stage 2 was 122 ± 6/73 ± 6 mm Hg or significantly lower than before therapy (147 ± 9/87 ± 9) (p < 0.001). Mean daily decrease of SAP and DAP according to 24-hr monitoring decreased from 144 ± 10 to 128 ± 12 and from 86 ± 9 to 76 ± 10 mm Hg respectively (p < 0.001). The target AP value was reached in 73% of the cases (99 out of 136 patients) after stage 1 and in 95% cases (63 out of 66) after stage 2. The values of LVMI (105 ± 23 and 98 ± 26 g/m2), PWPR from 16 ± 2.1 to 13 ± 3.5 m/s (p < 0.05), IMT (0.76 ± 0.16 and 0.80 ± 42 mm), and microalbuminuria (11.0 ± 1.7 and 8.6 ± 0.7 mg/24 hr) before and after completion of stage 2 were not significantly different in 66 patients (p > 0.05). Biochemical parameters of blood did not appreciably change. The safety profiles of both drugs were on the whole positive. Deaths and adverse reactions were absent barring clinically insignificant side effects in 28 of the 160 patients (17.5%). CONCLUSION: Losartan and amlodipine are effective and safe agents for AH therapy.