Systematic review with meta-analysis: the association between hepatitis E seroprevalence and haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection appears to be more common than previously thought. HEV seroprevalence in patients on maintenance haemodialysis (HD) is unclear with a range from 0% to 44%. In addition, risk factors of transmission of HEV in patients on haemodialysis are unknown. AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of HEV seroprevalence in HD patients compared with controls. METHODS: A systematic search of several databases identified all observational studies with comparative arms. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed the methodological quality. A random-effects model was used for pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of positive anti-HEV IgG in both groups. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed with appropriate tests. RESULTS: We identified 31 studies from 17 countries between 1994 and 2016. Sixteen studies were judged to have adequate quality and 15 to have moderate limitations. HEV infection was more prevalent in patients on haemodialysis compared with controls (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.79-3.40, I2 = 75.2%, P < .01). We conducted several subgroup analyses without difference in results. Egger regression test did not suggest publication bias (P = .83). Specific risk factors of HEV transmission in patients on haemodialysis were not clearly identified. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatitis E virus infection is more prevalent in patients on haemodialysis compared with non-haemodialysis control groups. Further studies are needed to determine risk factors of acquisition, impact on health, and risk for chronic HEV especially among those patients going to receive organ transplantation.

Secretory diarrhea and hypokalemia associated with colonic pseudo-obstruction: A case study and systematic analysis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Colonic pseudo-obstruction (CPO) is characterized by colonic distention in the absence of mechanical obstruction or toxic megacolon. Concomitant secretory diarrhea (SD) with hypokalemia (SD-CPO) due to gastrointestinal (GI) loss requires further characterization. AIM: To perform a systematic review of SD-CPO, report a case study, and compare SD-CPO with classical CPO (C-CPO). METHODS: We performed a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus for reports based on a priori criteria for CPO, SD and GI loss of potassium. An additional case at Mayo Clinic was included. RESULTS: Nine publications met inclusion criteria, with a total of 14 cases. Six studies had high, three moderate, and our case high methodological quality. Median age was 74 years (66-97), with 2:1 male/female ratio. Kidney disease was present in 6/14 patients. Diarrhea was described as profuse, watery, or viscous in 10 patients. Median serum, stool, and urine potassium concentrations (mmol/L) were 2.4 (range: 1.9-3.1), 137 (100-180), and 17 (8-40), respectively. Maximal diameter of colon and cecum (median) were 10.2 cm and 10.5 cm, respectively. Conservative therapy alone was effective in five out of 14 patients. Median potassium supplementation was 124 mEq/d (40-300). Colonic decompression was effective in three out of six patients; one had a total colectomy; three out of 14 had died. The main differences between SD-CPO and C-CPO were lower responses to treatments: conservative measures (35.7% vs 73.6%, P=.01), neostigmine (17% vs 89.2%, P<.001), and colonic decompression (50% vs 82.4%, P=.02). CONCLUSION: SD-CPO is a rare phenotype associated with increased fecal potassium and is more difficult to treat than C-CPO.

A comparative study of the use of selective digestive decontamination prophylaxis in living-donor liver transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Bacterial infections are major causes of early morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. Selective digestive decontamination (SDD) can be used pre-operatively for living-donor liver transplant (LD-LT), but its role in this setting remains controversial. METHODS: To evaluate this strategy, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of consecutive LD-LTs performed in our center from March 2007 to February 2011 and compared the incidence and nature of early infectious complications, length of intensive care unit stay and hospitalization, antibiotic use, and emergence of resistant bacteria in patients with or without SDD prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of 148 LD-LTs in the study period, 111 received SDD prophylaxis while 37 did not. In a multivariate model, the independent factors associated with an increased risk of early post-transplant infections were length of postoperative mechanical ventilation (for every additional day odds ratio [OR] = 2.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-4.0; P = 0.002), and choledochojejunostomy (OR = 4.5, 95% CI 1.95-10.5; P < 0.001). Use of SDD did not affect the rate or distribution of infectious complications, duration of hospitalization, antibiotic use, or acquisition of resistant bacteria (OR = 3.52, 95% CI 0.43-15.17; P = 0.376). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the use of SDD prophylaxis in LD-LT was not beneficial and should be avoided, as it offers no advantage and could potentiate the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms.

Normothermic acellular ex vivo liver perfusion reduces liver and bile duct injury of pig livers retrieved after cardiac death.

We compared cold static with acellular normothermic ex vivo liver perfusion (NEVLP) as a novel preservation technique in a pig model of DCD liver injury. DCD livers (60 min warm ischemia) were cold stored for 4 h, or treated with 4 h cold storage plus 8 h NEVLP. First, the livers were reperfused with diluted blood as a model of transplantation. Liver injury was determined by ALT, oxygen extraction, histology, bile content analysis and hepatic artery (HA) angiography. Second, AST levels and bile production were assessed after DCD liver transplantation. Cold stored versus NEVLP grafts had higher ALT levels (350 ± 125 vs. 55 ± 35 U/L; p < 0.0001), decreased oxygen extraction (250 ± 65 mmHg vs. 410 ± 58 mmHg, p < 0.01) and increased hepatocyte necrosis (45% vs. 10%, p = 0.01). Levels of bilirubin, phospholipids and bile salts were fivefold decreased, while LDH was sixfold higher in cold stored versus NEVLP grafts. HA perfusion was decreased (twofold), and bile duct necrosis was increased (100% vs. 5%, p < 0.0001) in cold stored versus NEVLP livers. Following transplantation, mean serum AST level was higher in the cold stored versus NEVLP group (1809 ± 205 U/L vs. 524 ± 187 U/L, p < 0.05), with similar bile production (2.5 ± 1.2 cc/h vs. 2.8 ± 1.4 cc/h; p = 0.2). NEVLP improved HA perfusion and decreased markers of liver duct injury in DCD grafts.

Portal venous versus systemic venous drainage of pancreas grafts: impact on long-term results.

Portal venous (PV) and systemic venous (SV) drainage methods are used in pancreas transplantation. The impact of the reconstruction technique on long-term outcome remains unclear. We compared the efficacy and side effects of both methods in 192 recipients who received synchronous pancreas kidney transplants between November 1995 and November 2007. SV and PV drainage were used in 147 and 45 cases, respectively. Pancreas function was determined by hemoglobin A1c levels and annual oral glucose tolerance test. Serum creatinine assessed kidney function. Serum lipid (low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein and cholesterol) levels and body mass index were measured annually. Patient and graft survival were calculated by log-rank analysis. Pancreas survival for SV versus PV patients was similar after 5 years (81.8% vs. 75.5%) and 10 years (65.1% vs. 60%; p = NS). Similarly, no difference was detected between the groups regarding kidney survival after 5 years (92.9% vs. 84.4%) and 10 years (81.6% vs. 75.5%; p = NS). Patient survival did not differ at 5 years (94.3% vs. 88.8%) and 10 years (85.1% vs. 84.4%; p = NS). Pancreas and kidney function and the lipid profiles were similar in both groups. SV and PV drainage of pancreas grafts offer similar long-term graft survival and function and choice of method should remain the preference of the surgeon.