Pregabalin increases slow-wave sleep and may improve attention in patients with partial epilepsy and insomnia.

UNLABELLED: Insomnia is a common phenomenon particularly in patients with epilepsy. This study was performed to look at the effects of pregabalin, an anticonvulsant known to increase sleep depth and decrease arousals, in patients with insomnia and well-controlled epilepsy. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of subjects with insomnia and epilepsy. Each subject was treated with pregabalin 150 mg BID or placebo for two weeks, followed by a two-week washout period, then the other treatment for two weeks. Polysomnography and neuropsychological testing were performed at baseline and at the end of each treatment arm. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in percentage of slow-wave sleep and a decrease in stage 1 sleep when subjects were taking pregabalin. Sleep efficiency increased during pregabalin treatment, although this was not statistically significant (84.5+/-4.6% for placebo versus 90.4+/-2.6% for pregabalin). There were a significant improvement in attention in the pregabalin group based on trial one of the Rey-Auditory Verbal Learning Test and a trend toward improvement in the psychomotor vigilance task; other neuropsychological measures were not significantly changed. CONCLUSION: Concurrent treatment with pregabalin improves sleep depth in patients with insomnia and epilepsy and improves daytime attention.

Long-term association between seizure outcome and depression after resective epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the association between long-term epilepsy surgery outcome and changes in depressive symptoms. METHODS: Adults were enrolled between 1996 and 2001 in a multicenter prospective study to evaluate outcomes of resective epilepsy surgery. The extent of depressive symptoms and depression case status (none, mild, or moderate/severe) were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) preoperatively and 3, 12, 24, 48, and 60 months postoperatively. A mixed-model repeated-measures analysis was performed, adjusting for covariates of seizure location, gender, age, race, education, and seizure control. RESULTS: Of the total 373 subjects, 256 were evaluated at baseline and 5 years after surgery. At baseline, 164 (64.1%) were not depressed, 34 (13.3%) were mildly depressed, and 58 (22.7%) had moderate to severe depression. After 5 years, 198 (77.3%) were not depressed, 20 (7.8%) were mildly depressed, and 38 (14.8%) were moderately to severely depressed. Five years after surgery, the reduction in mean change from baseline in BDI score was greater in subjects with excellent seizure control than in the fair and poor seizure control groups (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.02 respectively). Those with good seizure control had a greater reduction in BDI score than the poor seizure control group (p = 0.02) and borderline significant reduction compared with the fair seizure control group (p = 0.055). CONCLUSION: Although study participants had initial improvement in depressive symptoms, on average, after resective surgery, only patients with good or excellent seizure control had sustained long-term improvement in mood.

Cross-sensitivity of skin rashes with antiepileptic drug use.

OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of cross-sensitivity of rash among commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: The incidence of AED-related rash was determined in 1875 outpatients (> or =12 years), taking carbamazepine (CBZ), clobazam (CLB), felbamate (FBM), gabapentin (GBP), levetiracetam (LEV), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), primidone (PRM), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), valproic acid (VPA), or zonisamide (ZNS). We compared rates of rash for each AED in patients with vs those without a rash to 1) another specific AED; 2) any other AED; 3) any two other AEDs; and 4) any non-epilepsy medication. RESULTS: A total of 14.3% (269/1,875) of patients had a rash attributed to at least one AED; 2.8% had a rash to two or more AEDs. Of patients who had a rash to CBZ and were also prescribed PHT (n = 59), 57.6% had a rash to PHT (abbreviated as CBZ --> PHT: 57.6%); of patients who had a rash to PHT and were also prescribed CBZ (n = 81), rate of rash was 42% (i.e., PHT --> CBZ: 42%). Other results: CBZ --> LTG: 20% (n = 50); LTG --> CBZ: 26.3% (n = 38); CBZ --> OXC: 33% (n = 15); OXC --> CBZ: 71.4% (n = 7); CBZ --> PB: 26.7% (n = 30); PB --> CBZ: 66.7% (n = 12); LTG --> PHT: 38.9% (n = 36); PHT --> LTG: 18.9% (n = 74); PB --> PHT: 53.3% (n = 15); PHT --> PB: 19.5% (n = 41); OXC --> LTG: 37.5% (n = 8); LTG --> OXC: 20% (n = 15). There was evidence of specific cross-sensitivity between CBZ and PHT, and between CBZ and PB. CONCLUSION: Cross-sensitivity rates between certain antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are high, especially when involving carbamazepine and phenytoin. Specific cross-sensitivity rates provided here may be useful for AED selection and counseling in individual patients.

Comparison and predictors of rash associated with 15 antiepileptic drugs.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors and relative incidence of antiepileptic drug (AED)-related rash in patients taking all common AEDs. METHODS: We reviewed 1,890 outpatients. Eighty-one variables were tested as potential predictors of rash. We compared the rate of rash attributed to each AED (AED rash) with the average rate of rash attributed to the other AEDs in all adults (aged > or =16 years; n = 1,649) when taking carbamazepine (CBZ), clobazam (CLB), felbamate (FBM), gabapentin (GBP), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), primidone (PRM), tiagabine (TGB), topiramate (TPM), vigabatrin (VGB), valproate (VPA), or zonisamide (ZNS). We repeated this analysis for patients with and without the identified nondrug predictors of AED rash. RESULTS: The average rate of AED rash was 2.8%. The only nondrug predictor significant in multivariate analysis was occurrence of another AED rash (odds ratio 3.1, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.1; p < 0.0001); the rate of rash in this subgroup was 8.8%, vs 1.7% in those without another AED rash. Higher AED rash rates were seen with PHT (5.9% overall, p = 0.0008; 25.0% in those with another AED rash, p = 0.001), LTG (4.8%, p = 0.00095; 14.4%, p = 0.025), and CBZ (3.7%, not significant; 16.5%, p = 0.01). Lower rates were seen with LEV (0.6% overall; p = 0.00042), GBP (0.3%, p = 0.00035), and VPA (0.7%, p = 0.01). Rash rates were also low (<1% overall) with FBM, PRM, TPM, and VGB (not significant). These AED differences remained similar in patients with and without other AED rashes. There were four cases of Stevens-Johnson syndrome involving four AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of an antiepileptic drug (AED) rash is approximately five times greater in patients with another AED rash (8.8%) vs those without (1.7%). Rash rates were highest with phenytoin, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine and low (<1%) with several AEDs.

Health care costs decline after successful epilepsy surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is an effective, high-cost procedure used increasingly to treat refractory epilepsy. For surgery to be cost-effective, long-term cost savings from reduced health care use should provide some offset to the initial costs of evaluation and surgery. There is little information about how health care costs are affected by evaluation and surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether health care costs change when seizures become controlled after surgery. METHODS: Health care costs for the 2 years prior to surgical evaluation and for 2 years afterward were calculated from medical records of 68 subjects with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) participating in a multicenter observational study. Costs were compared among patients who did not have surgery, patients who had persisting seizures after surgery, and patients who were seizure free after surgery. RESULTS: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) accounted for more than half of the costs of care in the pre-evaluation period. Total costs for seizure-free patients had declined 32% by 2 years following surgery due to less use of AEDs and inpatient care. Costs did not change in patients with persisting seizures, whether they had surgery or not. In the 18 to 24 months following evaluation, epilepsy-related costs were $2,068 to $2,094 in patients with persisting seizures vs $582 in seizure-free patients. CONCLUSIONS: Costs remain stable over 2 years post-evaluation in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy whose seizures persist, but patients who become seizure free after surgery use substantially less health care than before surgery. Further cost reductions in seizure-free patients can be expected as antiepileptic drugs are successfully eliminated.

Patient-perceived impact of resective epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the patient-perceived impact of resective epilepsy surgery, a key outcome to consider in evaluating such a highly invasive, elective procedure. METHODS: Impact measures obtained from 396 patients in a multicenter cohort study of resective epilepsy surgery included (1) willingness to undergo surgery if that decision could be made again and (2) the overall impact of surgery on the patient's life. Predictors of impact were analyzed using multivariate ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Of study participants, 73.8%, 77.4%, and 75.5% would definitely undergo surgery again and 78.2%, 80.2%, and 79.1% reported a very strong or strong positive overall impact of surgery at 3, 12, and 24 months. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression showed that seizure freedom predicted more positive perceptions at 3, 12, and 24 months (all p < 0.04). Becoming employed was uniquely associated with willingness to undergo surgery again and with overall impact at 24 months (all p < 0.05), but only a net 7% of the cohort improved their employment status. Right-sided resection (at 12 and 24 months, p < 0.005) and female gender (at 3 and 12 months, p = 0.006) were each positively associated with perceived overall impact. CONCLUSIONS: Most epilepsy surgery patients report a positive overall impact of the procedure on their lives and a high willingness to undergo surgery again if that choice could be made. Seizure-free individuals express consistently more positive perceptions of the procedure. Findings suggest that it is important to make early efforts to reintegrate epilepsy surgery patients into employment.

Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy.

Generic, preference-based instruments are recommended for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cost-utility analyses (CUA). We aimed to determine which instrument is the most appropriate for CUA of epilepsy care, using established psychometric criteria. We compared validity and responsiveness of EQ5D (using both UK and US preferences), visual analog scale (VAS), Health Utilities Index Mark II (HUI-2) and Mark III (HUI-3) and SF6D in 165 adults evaluated for epilepsy surgery. SF6D had the strongest or next-strongest associations with seizure severity and seizure control. It was not associated with education or IQ. Only SF6D and HUI-3 discriminated between patients with and without seizures 2 years after baseline evaluation. SF6D was most or next-most responsive to being seizure-free for 2 years, in most responsiveness analyses. VAS was also responsive, but showed less evidence of validity. The QOLIE-89, an epilepsy-targeted profile instrument, had stronger evidence for validity and responsiveness than the preference instruments. SF6D has several key psychometric advantages over four other preference instruments in CUAs of epilepsy care. This may reflect better coverage of HRQOL dimensions affected by epilepsy, greater sensitivity at the upper end of the HRQOL continuum, or both. These findings may not generalize to other chronic conditions.

Changes in depression and anxiety after resective surgery for epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine changes in depression and anxiety after resective surgery. METHODS: Data from subjects enrolled in a prospective multicenter study of resective epilepsy surgery were reviewed with the Beck Psychiatric Symptoms Scales (Beck Depression Inventory [BDI] and Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI]) and Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) up to a 24-month period. chi2 analyses were used to correlate proportions. RESULTS: A total of 358 presurgical BDI and 360 BAI results were reviewed. Moderate and severe levels of depression were reported in 22.1% of patients, and similar levels of anxiety were reported by 24.7%. Postoperative rates of depression and anxiety declined at the 3-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up periods. At the 24-month follow-up, moderate to severe levels of depression symptoms were reported in 17.6 and 14.7% of the patients who continued to have postoperative seizures. Moderate to severe depression and anxiety were found in 8.2% of those who were seizure-free. There was no relationship, prior to surgery, between the presence or absence of depression and anxiety and the laterality or location of the seizure onset. There were no significant relationships between depression or anxiety at 24-month follow-up and the laterality or location of the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Depression and anxiety in patients with refractory epilepsy significantly improve after epilepsy surgery, especially in those who are seizure-free. Neither the lateralization nor the localization of the seizure focus or surgery was associated with the risk of affective symptoms at baseline or after surgery.

Predicting long-term seizure outcome after resective epilepsy surgery: the multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: In a seven-center prospective observational study of resective epilepsy surgery, the authors examined probability and predictors of entering 2-year remission and the risk of subsequent relapse. METHODS: Patients aged 12 years and over were enrolled at time of referral for epilepsy surgery, and underwent standardized evaluation, treatment, and follow-up procedures. The authors defined seizure remission as 2 years completely seizure-free after hospital discharge with or without auras, and relapse as any seizures after 2-year remission. The authors examined type of surgery, seizure, clinical and demographic variables, and localization study results with respect to prediction of seizure remission or relapse, using chi2 and proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: Of 396 operated patients, 339 were followed over 2 years, and 223 (66%) experienced 2-year remission, not significantly different between medial temporal (68%) and neocortical (50%) resections. In multivariable models, only absence of generalized tonic-clonic seizures and presence of hippocampal atrophy were significantly and independently associated with remission, and only in the medial temporal resection group. Fifty-five patients relapsed after 2-year remission, again not significantly different between medial temporal (25%) and neocortical (19%) resections. Only delay to remission predicted relapse, and only in medial temporal patients. CONCLUSION: Hippocampal atrophy and a history of absence of generalized tonic clonic seizures were the sole predictors of 2-year remission, and only for medial temporal resections.

Correlating lamotrigine serum concentrations with tolerability in patients with epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate lamotrigine (LTG) serum concentrations (levels) with tolerability in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: The charts of 811 outpatients with epilepsy who had received LTG and were seen at the Columbia Comprehensive Epilepsy Center after January 1, 2000, were reviewed. Data gathered included levels, dosage, duration of use, concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), clinical toxicity, specific side effects, and efficacy. Rates of toxicity, specific side effects, and efficacy were calculated and correlated with serum levels. RESULTS: In total, 3,731 LTG levels were recorded. A regimen was categorized as toxic if the patient experienced side effects that led to a dosage change or discontinuation of LTG. Of 3,919 AED regimens, 9.4% were toxic and 30.7% of patients had at least one toxic regimen. Toxicity increased with increasing LTG levels (p < 0.0001): With levels <5.0 microg/mL, 7% of patients were toxic; with levels of 5 to 10 microg/mL, 14%; with 10 to 15 microg/mL, 24%; with 15 to 20 microg/mL, 34%; and with >20 microg/mL, 59%. The correlation between levels and tolerability was independent of concurrent medication. Increasing efficacy, as measured by seizure freedom for a 6-month period, occurred up to levels of >20 microg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: There is a correlation between LTG serum level and tolerability, independent of the use of other AEDs. Adverse effects requiring a dose change are uncommon with the most frequently encountered LTG concentrations (<10 microg/mL) and occur in only 7.4% of patients at levels obtained during the majority of clinical trials (<5 microg/mL). An initial target range of 1.5 to 10 microg/mL is suggested, though higher levels, up to >20 microg/mL, are often tolerated and can lead to additional efficacy in refractory patients.

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs I: treatment of new onset epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide-reviewed in the order in which these agents received approval by the US Food and Drug Administration) in the treatment of children and adults with newly diagnosed partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee, including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy, evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until September 2002, with selected manual searches up until 2003. RESULTS: There is evidence either from comparative or dose-controlled trials that gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, and oxcarbazepine have efficacy as monotherapy in newly diagnosed adolescents and adults with either partial or mixed seizure disorders. There is also evidence that lamotrigine is effective for newly diagnosed absence seizures in children. Evidence for effectiveness of the new AEDs in newly diagnosed patients with other generalized epilepsy syndromes is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Efficacy and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drugs II: treatment of refractory epilepsy: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee and Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evidence demonstrating efficacy, tolerability, and safety of seven new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (gabapentin, lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, and zonisamide) in the treatment of children and adults with refractory partial and generalized epilepsies. METHODS: A 23-member committee including general neurologists, pediatric neurologists, epileptologists, and doctors in pharmacy evaluated the available evidence based on a structured literature review including MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane library for relevant articles from 1987 until March 2003. RESULTS: All of the new AEDs were found to be appropriate for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial seizures in adults. Gabapentin can be effective for the treatment of mixed seizure disorders, and gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate for the treatment of refractory partial seizures in children. Limited evidence suggests that lamotrigine and topiramate are also effective for adjunctive treatment of idiopathic generalized epilepsy in adults and children, as well as treatment of the Lennox Gastaut syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of AED depends upon seizure and/or syndrome type, patient age, concomitant medications, AED tolerability, safety, and efficacy. The results of this evidence-based assessment provide guidelines for the prescription of AEDs for patients with refractory epilepsy and identify those seizure types and syndromes where more evidence is necessary.

Initial outcomes in the Multicenter Study of Epilepsy Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain prospective data regarding seizures, anxiety, depression, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after resective epilepsy surgery. METHODS: The authors characterized resective epilepsy surgery patients prospectively at yearly intervals for seizure outcome, QOL, anxiety, and depression, using standardized instruments and patient interviews. RESULTS: Of 396 patients who underwent resective surgical procedures, 355 were followed for at least 1 year. Of these, 75% achieved a 1-year remission at some time during follow-up; patients with medial temporal (77%) were more likely than neocortical resections (56%) to achieve remission (p = 0.01). Relapse occurred in 59 (22%) patients who remitted, more often in medial temporal (24%) than neocortical (4%) resected patients (p = 0.02). QOL, anxiety, and depression all improved dramatically within 3 months after surgery (p < 0.0001), with no significant difference based on seizure outcome. After 3 months, QOL in seizure-free patients further improved gradually, and patients with seizures showed gradual declines. By 12 and 24 months, overall QOL and its epilepsy-targeted and physical health domains were significantly different in the two outcome groups. (Anxiety and depression scores also gradually diverged, with improvements in seizure-free and declines in continued seizure groups, but differences were not significant.) CONCLUSION: Resective surgery for treatment of epilepsy significantly reduces seizures, most strikingly after medial temporal resection (77% 1 year remission) compared to neocortical resection (56% 1 year remission). Resective epilepsy surgery has a gradual but lasting effect on QOL, but minimal effects on anxiety and depression. Longer follow-up will be essential to determine ultimate seizure, QOL, and psychiatric outcomes of epilepsy surgery.

Occurrence of seizure clusters and status epilepticus during inpatient video-EEG monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the occurrence of status epilepticus and seizure clusters, and the duration until first seizure at epilepsy monitoring units in the United States. METHODS: The authors examined the inpatient video-EEG monitoring reports of 514 consecutive patients admitted to five comprehensive epilepsy centers during the year 2000. Time to first seizure, seizure clustering, and seizure duration were ascertained from reports and entered into a database. RESULTS: In 169 admissions with complex partial seizures (CPSs) or secondarily generalized tonic-clonic (2GTC) seizures, there were 5 (3.0%) patients with status epilepticus, 30 (17.8%) with 4-hour seizure clusters, and 82 (48.5%) with 24-hour seizure clusters. There were no statistically significant differences between centers, except that seizure clusters were observed to be less common at the one center with a formal drug withdrawal protocol. The average time to CPS or 2GTC seizure was 2.1 days; the average number of days to nonepileptic event was 1.2 days (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although status epilepticus is uncommon at epilepsy monitoring units, clusters of seizures are common. Intensive monitoring with drug withdrawal must be performed in a highly supervised, hospitalized setting. Inpatient video-EEG monitoring is efficient, with recording of the first epileptic or nonepileptic events in 2 days or less.

How long does it take for partial epilepsy to become intractable?

BACKGROUND: Much remains unknown about the natural history of intractable localization-related epilepsy, including how long it typically takes before intractability becomes evident. This information could guide the design of future studies, resolve certain discrepancies in the literature, and provide more accurate information about long-term prognosis. METHODS: Individuals evaluated for resective surgery for refractory localization-related epilepsy were prospectively identified at the time of initial surgical evaluation at seven surgical centers (between 1996 and 2001). The latency time between onset of epilepsy and failure of second medication and history of remission (>/=1 year seizure-free) before surgical evaluation were examined with respect to age at onset, hippocampal atrophy, febrile seizures, and surgical site. RESULTS: In the 333 patients included in the analysis, latency time was 9.1 years (range 0 to 48) and 26% reported a prior remission before surgery. A prior remission of >/=5 years was reported by 8.5% of study participants. Younger age at onset was strongly associated with longer latency time (p < 0.0001) and higher probability of past remission (p < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, age at onset remained as the most important explanatory variable of both latency time and prior remission. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of localization-related epilepsy may not become clearly intractable for many years after onset. This is especially true of epilepsy of childhood and early adolescent onset. If prospective studies confirm these findings and the underlying mechanisms behind these associations become understood, this raises the possibility of considering interventions that might interrupt such a process and some day prevent some forms of epilepsy from becoming intractable.

ECT in the treatment of status epilepticus.

INTRODUCTION: Owing to its potent anticonvulsant actions, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been proposed as an intervention for treatment-resistant seizure disorders. METHOD: We review the literature on the use of ECT in treatment-resistant epilepsy and status epilepticus (SE) and present a case of a patient who was in nonconvulsive SE for 26 days and then treated with ECT after all standard pharmacological strategies were exhausted. Because of skull defects, a novel electrode placement was used. RESULTS: Owing to massively elevated seizure threshold attributable to concomitant anticonvulsant medications, extraordinarily high electrical dosage was needed for ECT to elicit generalized seizures. Status was terminated after three successful ECT-induced seizures. However, the long-term functional outcome of the patient was poor. DISCUSSION: The role of ECT in the treatment algorithm for SE is discussed.

Distribution of partial seizures during the sleep--wake cycle: differences by seizure onset site.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of sleep on partial seizures arising from various brain regions. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 133 patients with localization-related epilepsy undergoing video-EEG monitoring over a 2-year period. Seizure type, site of onset, sleep/wake state at onset, duration, and epilepsy syndrome diagnosis were recorded. Periorbital, chin EMG, and scalp/sphenoidal electrodes were used. A subset of 34 patients underwent all-night polysomnography with scoring of sleep stages. RESULTS: The authors analyzed 613 seizures in 133 patients. Forty-three percent (264 of 613) of all partial seizures began during sleep. Sleep seizures began during stages 1 (23%) and 2 (68%) but were rare in slow-wave sleep; no seizures occurred during REM sleep. Temporal lobe complex partial seizures were more likely to secondarily generalize during sleep (31%) than during wakefulness (15%), but frontal lobe seizures were less likely to secondarily generalize during sleep (10% versus 26%; p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Partial-onset seizures occur frequently during NREM sleep, especially stage 2 sleep. Frontal lobe seizures are most likely to occur during sleep. Patients with temporal lobe seizures have intermediate sleep seizure rates, and patients with seizures arising from the occipital or parietal lobes have rare sleep-onset seizures. Sleep, particularly stage 2 sleep, promotes secondary generalization of temporal and occipitoparietal, but not frontal, seizures. These findings suggest that the hypersynchrony of sleep facilitates both initiation and propagation of partial seizures, and that effects of sleep depend in part on the location of the epileptic focus.

Antiepileptic drugs in the 21st century.

During the past 10 years, there has been a welcome influx of novel agents for the treatment of epilepsy. Many show advantages compared to older agents, including better adverse effect profiles and lack of drug-drug interactions. The sheer number of agents now available makes distinction among them confusing at times. Agents differ in spectrum of action, pharmacokinetic profile (affecting dosing schedule and drug interactions), and titration time. This review highlights the differences between the various new agents and the more traditional antiseizure drugs. Evidence for the widespread use of these compounds outside their indication, particularly for diseases other than epilepsy, is reviewed as well.