Identification of a High-risk Subgroup With Malignant Mitral Valve Prolapse Who Are Predisposed to Sudden Cardiac Death: A Review.

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) affects approximately 170 million people worldwide; however, phenotypically, there is a wide variety of heterogeneity. In particular subsets, the incidence of sudden cardiac death is calculated to be 998 per 100,000 person-years, which is significantly increased when compared with the general population of MVP patients. Individuals with high-risk features have been identified as young females with bileaflet MVP and electrocardiogram findings of frequent complex ectopy, ST-T wave changes, and inferior T wave inversions. Supplemental imaging modalities in this subgroup demonstrate redundant leaflets and chordae on 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography along with varying severity of mitral annular disjunction. Detailed morphologic assessment by 3-dimensional echocardiography provides a quantitative assessment of annular disjunction along with left ventricular longitudinal and basal circumferential strain patterns. Late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging identifies diffuse and isolated left ventricle fibrosis involving the fascicles and papillary muscles, which has been visualized in isolation during autopsy. Findings of this review propose that sudden cardiac death as a result of malignant arrhythmias arises from automaticity, complex ectopy, and reentry at the level of the fascicles and papillary muscles. The repetitive mechanical stress provides a nidus for the development of both micro- and macrofibrosis easily identified by late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Escalation to electrophysiology studies and early intervention could provide new targeted lifesaving therapies.

Institutional Red Blood Cell Transfusion Rates Are Correlated Following Endovascular and Surgical Cardiovascular Procedures: Evidence That Local Culture Influences Transfusion Decisions.

Background The relationship between local hospital culture and transfusion rates following endovascular and surgical cardiovascular procedures has not been well studied. Methods and Results Patients undergoing coronary revascularization, aortic valve replacement, lower extremity peripheral vascular intervention, or carotid artery revascularization from up to 852 US hospitals in the Nationwide Readmissions Database were identified. Crude and risk-standardized red blood cell transfusion rates were determined for each procedure. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between respective procedural transfusion rates. Median odds ratios were estimated to reflect between-hospital variability in red blood cell transfusion rates following the same procedure for a given patient. There was wide variation in red blood cell transfusion rates across different procedures, from 2% following carotid endarterectomy to 29% following surgical aortic valve replacement. For surgical and endovascular modalities, transfusion rates at the same hospital were highly correlated for aortic valve replacement (r=0.67; P<0.001), moderately correlated for coronary revascularization (r=0.56; P<0.001) and peripheral vascular intervention (r=0.51; P<0.001), and weakly correlated for carotid artery revascularization (r=0.19, P<0.001). Median odds ratios were all >2, highest for coronary artery bypass graft surgery and surgical aortic valve replacement, indicating substantial site variation in transfusion rates. Conclusions After adjustment for patient-related factors, wide variation in red blood cell transfusion rates remained across surgical and endovascular procedures employed for the same cardiovascular condition. Transfusion rates following these procedures are highly correlated at individual hospitals and vary widely across hospitals. In aggregate, these findings suggest that local institutional culture significantly influences the decision to transfuse following invasive cardiovascular procedures and highlight the need for randomized data to inform such decisions.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement of a Bicuspid Aortic Valve in a Heart Transplant Recipient.

Patients with heart transplants who present with severe aortic stenosis may be deemed high-risk surgical candidates due to immunosuppression and multiple comorbid conditions. Appropriately selected patients may be successfully treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Trends and outcomes of red blood cell transfusion in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To examine temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States. METHODS: We used the National Inpatient Sample databases to identify TAVR procedures performed between January 2012 and September 2015 in the United States. Patients were propensity matched (within the strata of overt and no bleeding) on the likelihood of receiving RBC transfusion, and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the 2 groups in the matched cohort. RESULTS: Among 46,710 TAVR procedures performed during the study period, rates of RBC transfusion were 17.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.1%-18.5%). RBC transfusion rates decreased significantly from 29.5% during the first quarter of 2012 to 10.8% during the third quarter of 2015 (P < .001). Older age, female sex, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, anemia, coagulopathy, and fluid/electrolyte disorders were associated with increased odds, whereas elective admission, obesity, and endovascular access were associated with decreased odds of RBC transfusion. In the propensity-matched cohort (7995 pairs with and without RBC transfusion), RBC transfusion was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality, infection, and transient ischemic attack/stroke in patients without bleeding (odds ratio [OR]Mortality, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.31-4.02; ORInfection, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.03-4.39; ORTransient ischemic attack/Stroke, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.52-7.45), but not in those with overt bleeding (ORMortality, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.68-1.48; ORInfection, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.45-1.45; ORTransient ischemic attack/Stroke, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.74-1.85); Pinteraction < .05 for all. CONCLUSIONS: RBC transfusion is associated with worse clinical outcomes in TAVR patients without bleeding, but not in those with overt bleeding. The utility and optimal threshold for RBC transfusion in TAVR patients, especially among those with overt bleeding, warrants further prospective investigation.

Association Between Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the association between postprocedural packed red blood cell transfusion and morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 429 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Propensity-score adjusted multivariable logistic and Cox regression models were used to determine the association of packed red blood cell transfusion with the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 30 days and in hospital, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Patients receiving transfusions had a higher 30-day and in-hospital incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke when compared with patients who did not receive transfusions (hazard ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 4.07, p = 0.045; and hazard ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 5.41, p = 0.025, respectively). Postprocedural transfusion was independently associated with 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval: 1.21 to 5.80, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Packed red blood cell transfusion for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with an increased incidence of adverse outcomes during hospitalization and at 30-day and 1-year follow-up.

Comparison of phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation outcomes between patients after transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement.

Background Referral rates and outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation have not been evaluated in patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement or compared with surgical aortic valve replacement. Method A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 488 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement ( n = 199) and surgical aortic valve replacement ( n = 289) from a university-based statewide transcatheter aortic valve replacement/surgical aortic valve replacement program during 2015-2017. Cardiac rehabilitation consisted of supervised exercise, diet education, and stress and depression management. We compared changes from baseline in exercise duration and intensity during cardiac rehabilitation sessions, quality-of-life (36-Item Short-Form Health Survey), and psychosocial measures (anxiety, depression, mood, social support, and diet) between transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement patients using t-test and chi-square analyses. Results Of 488 patients, cardiac rehabilitation referral rates were similar at 41% (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 81/199 versus surgical aortic valve replacement 117/289), but enrollment rates were lower in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (27/199, 14%) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (102/289, 35%, p < 0.01). Among eligible patients, cardiac rehabilitation completion rates were lower in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (12%) than surgical aortic valve replacement (32%). Exercise intensity during cardiac rehabilitation improved in both groups in a similar fashion (transcatheter aortic valve replacement 1.03 ± 1.09 versus surgical aortic valve replacement 1.34 ± 1.15 metabolic equivalents), but increase in exercise duration was higher in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients versus surgical aortic valve replacement patients (14.52 ± 6.42 versus 10.67 ± 8.38 min, p = 0.02). Improvement in physical composite score was higher in surgical aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (8.72 ± 7.87 versus 2.36 ± 7.6, p = 0.02) while improvement in mental composite score was higher in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (8.19 ± 8.50) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (1.18 ± 7.23, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the two groups in improvement in psychosocial measures. Conclusion Cardiac rehabilitation enrollment was low in transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients versus surgical aortic valve replacement patients despite similar referral rates. Improvement in functional and quality-of-life performance was achieved in both transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement. Future studies should address obstacles for enrollment of transcatheter aortic valve replacement patients.

Drug Eluting Stents for Very Long Lesions: Go Long, But Know the Risks.

Long coronary artery lesions are increasingly treated with new technologies including current generation drug eluting stents (DES) despite a lack of robust data on outcomes. In the current study, patients receiving Xience V DES for very long lesions (>35 mm) compared to lesions 25-35 mm had similar outcomes. Future research should address late outcomes, stent thrombosis rates, as well as investigation of lesions greater than 60 mm.