Tadalafil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a double-blind 52-week uncontrolled extension study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and durability of efficacy of tadalafil for pulmonary arterial hypertension. BACKGROUND: Tadalafil is an oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor approved for PAH treatment. In the multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, 16-week PHIRST (Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Response to Tadalafil) study, tadalafil 40 mg improved exercise capacity and delayed clinical worsening. METHODS: Eligible patients from PHIRST received once-daily tadalafil 20 mg (T20 mg) or 40 mg (T40 mg) (n = 357) in the double-blind, 52-week, uncontrolled extension study (PHIRST-2); 293 patients completed PHIRST-2. Durability of efficacy was explored using the 6-min walk distance (6MWD) test. Clinical worsening and changes in World Health Organization functional class were evaluated. RESULTS: The safety profile of tadalafil in PHIRST-2 was similar to that in PHIRST, with typical phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor adverse events. The 6MWDs achieved in PHIRST for the subset of patients receiving T20 mg and T40 mg in both PHIRST and PHIRST-2 (406 ± 67 m [n = 52] and 413 ± 81 m [n = 59] at PHIRST-2 enrollment, respectively) were maintained at PHIRST-2 completion (415 ± 80 m [n = 51] and 410 ± 78 m [n = 59], respectively). Numerically fewer patients who were on T40 mg in PHIRST and PHIRST-2 experienced World Health Organization functional class deterioration (6% [n = 5]) compared with those randomized to T20 mg (9% [n = 7]) across both studies. Post hoc analyses showed that background bosentan use and higher 6MWD at PHIRST baseline were associated with fewer clinical worsening events. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with tadalafil was well tolerated in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. In patients receiving either T20 mg or T40 mg, the improvements in 6MWD demonstrated in the 16-week PHIRST study appeared sustained for up to 52 additional weeks of treatment in PHIRST-2. (Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Response to Tadalafil Study; NCT00549302).

Factors associated with ejaculatory and orgasmic dysfunction in men with erectile dysfunction: analysis of clinical trials involving the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor tadalafil.

OBJECTIVE: To determine frequencies of, and risk factors for, ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD) and orgasmic dysfunction (OD) in men with different degrees of erectile dysfunction (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Baseline data from 28 ED trials were integrated and analysed. The International Index of Erectile Function Question 9 (IIEF-Q9; 'When you had sexual stimulation or intercourse, how often did you ejaculate?') and IIEF-Q10 ('How often did you have the feeling of orgasm with or without ejaculation?') were used to evaluate ejaculatory and orgasmic functions. Responses of 'almost never or never' or 'a few times (much less than half the time)' were taken as evidence of EjD or OD, respectively, whereas responses of 'almost always or always' or 'most times (much more than half the time)' were taken as evidence of normal function. Estimates of the relative risks (RRs) of EjD or OD were determined for multiple patient characteristics. RESULTS: Among 12,130 study participants with available data, only 5117 (42.2%) reported normal ejaculatory function, and 4321 (35.6%) normal orgasm, regardless of ED severity. Among subjects with poor ejaculatory function, 16.7% had mild ED, and among subjects with poor sensation of orgasm, 21.9% had mild ED. Frequencies of EjD and OD increased with increasing ED severity. Of the 5117 individuals with normal ejaculatory function, 796 (15.6%) had poor sensation of orgasm. Of the 4321 subjects with normal orgasm, 226 (5.2%) had poor ejaculatory function. Men with (vs without) EjD or OD tended to be younger: 53.7 vs 56.9 years and 54.2 vs 56.2 years, respectively. Factors associated with increased RRs of EjD and OD included cardiomyopathy (RR for EjD 1.74; RR for OD 1.59); cardiac failure (RR 1.40; 1.22); and baseline use (or history of use) of antipsychotics (RR 1.45; 1.30), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (RR 1.31; 1.27), and tricyclic antidepressants (RR 1.34; 1.28). CONCLUSIONS: EjD and OD occurred at baseline in more than one in three men enrolled in tadalafil trials. Even men with mild ED reported EjD or OD. Further studies are warranted to better understand the impacts of EjD and OD on male sexuality and quality of life.

Tadalafil monotherapy and as add-on to background bosentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Tadalafil 40 mg orally once daily, was shown to be well-tolerated and efficacious for pulmonary arterial hypertension in a 16-week, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial. Inclusion criteria included the option for background bosentan. Analyses of tadalafil in treatment-naive patients and as add-on to bosentan were pre-specified. Objectives were to provide safety and efficacy data for both groups. METHODS: Groups analyzed included: treatment-naive + PBO; treatment-naive + tadalafil; background bosentan + PBO; and background bosentan + tadalafil. Patients randomized to tadalafil or PBO (N = 405) were analyzed by bosentan use (yes = 216, no = 189). Treatment differences in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD, PBO-adjusted), functional class (FC), clinical worsening (CW) and adverse events were assessed. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented for FC and CW. RESULTS: At Week 16, PBO-adjusted 6MWD increases were 44 m (CI: 20 to 69 m; n = 37) for tadalafil 40 mg in treatment-naive patients and 23 m (CI: -2 to 48 m; n = 42) for tadalafil 40 mg add-on to bosentan. The 6MWD for treatment-naive and background bosentan PBO patients decreased by 3 m and increased by 19 m, respectively, at Week 16 compared with baseline. Two (5%) treatment-naive patients had CW with tadalafil 40 mg vs 8 (22%) with PBO (HR = 3.3, CI: 1.1 to 10.0). Two (5%) background bosentan patients had CW with tadalafil 40 mg add-on vs 5 (11%) for PBO add-on (HR = 1.9, CI: 0.4 to 10.2). Adverse events for tadalafil monotherapy and as add-on were similar. CONCLUSION: Tadalafil 40 mg was well-tolerated and provided clinical benefit in patients as monotherapy. It was also well-tolerated when added to background bosentan, but data are insufficient to conclude additional benefit.

Treatment patterns and resource utilization and costs among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To explore treatment patterns and resource utilization and cost for subjects with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective claims database analysis of 706 patients with PAH enrolled in a large, geographically diverse US managed-care organization. RESULTS: In the final sample of PAH patients treated with bosentan (n=251) or sildenafil (n=455), average age was 57 years, 86% of patients were commercially insured, and 52% of patients were male. Gender distribution varied significantly across subgroups, with a lower proportion of males in the bosentan (30%) subgroup compared with the sildenafil group (64%) (p<0.001). Average baseline Charlson comorbidity score was 2.4. Average numbers of fills per month were 0.8 and 0.4 for bosentan and sildenafil patients, respectively (p<0.001). Over 80% of patients received only one PAH treatment in the first 90 days following the index date, with 28% of bosentan and 13% of sildenafil patients receiving combination therapy (p<0.001). Over one-third of bosentan patients and one-quarter of sildenafil patients experienced a dose increase in the follow-up period (p=0.009). Sixteen percent of sildenafil patients experienced a dose decrease in the follow-up period, while a smaller proportion of patients receiving bosentan (4%) experienced a dose decrease (p<0.001). On average, number of PAH-related per subject per month (PSPM) inpatient stays and emergency department visits and PSPM length of inpatient stays were statistically similar between the subgroups. PAH-related PSPM healthcare costs were high for both subgroups, with average monthly costs of $5,332 and $3,632 among bosentan and sildenafil patients, respectively (p=0.003). Differences in total costs were driven mainly by differences in pharmacy expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: Of the oral agents approved for treating PAH at the time of this study, sildenafil was most commonly prescribed as index therapy and was also associated with the lowest costs, largely due to significantly lower pharmacy costs. This study is characterized by limitations inherent to claims database analyses, such as the potential for coding errors and lack of information on whether a drug was taken as prescribed. Furthermore, PAH severity (WHO functional class) was not assessed.

Short- and long-term efficacy and safety of duloxetine in women with predominant stress urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short- and long-term safety and efficacy of duloxetine in women with predominant stress urinary incontinence (SUI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was a 6-week, double-blind, randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled study followed by an uncontrolled open-label extension (OLE) run in 342 study centres in 16 European countries. Women with predominant SUI were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 1380) or duloxetine 40 mg twice daily (n = 1378) for 6 weeks. Completers of the acute phase were enrolled in the OLE, which had a minimum duration of 6 weeks and ended, based on the approval status of duloxetine in the participating country. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the change in incontinence episode frequency (IEF) over 6 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were the long-term maintenance of effect on IEF and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), the short- and long-term impact on quality of life using the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and the long-term safety of duloxetine. RESULTS: After 6 weeks, the decrease in weekly IEF was significantly greater with duloxetine treatment compared to placebo (-50.0 vs. -29.9%; p < 0.001). The percentage of responders (defined as > or =50% decrease in IEF) was significantly higher with duloxetine treatment than with placebo (50.6 vs. 31.2%; p < 0.001). Duloxetine treatment was associated with improvements in weekly pad use (-31.4%), PGI-I ratings (63.6%), and KHQ score (-6.25) compared to placebo (-12.5%, 48.5% and -3.13, respectively, all p < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse events were significantly more common during duloxetine treatment (48.3%) than placebo (33.3%), (p < 0.001). Of the 2290 patients continuing into the OLE, 1165 (42.2%) completed the available duration, and 592 (21.5%) discontinued because of an adverse event (percentages relative to total randomised patients). Long-term efficacy in the OLE was assessed over a 72-week period and was maintained over that time. However, the results should be interpreted within the context that better responding patients are more likely to remain on duloxetine, while patients responding poorly are more likely to discontinue over time. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine seems to be an efficacious treatment with an acceptable safety profile for women with SUI. Achieved improvement is maintained over the longer term in those women who remain on therapy.

Tadalafil, a long-acting inhibitor of PDE5, improves pulmonary hemodynamics and survival rate of monocrotaline-induced pulmonary artery hypertension in rats.

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of tadalafil (0.5, 2.5, and 10 mg/kg per day) on the progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in early treatment and on the survival rate in late treatment on the monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PAH rat model. Tadalafil was administered once daily to rats for 3 weeks from the day of MCT-injection or 21 days after the injection. With early treatment, tadalafil at 10 mg/kg per day prevented the development of PAH by maintaining mean pulmonary artery pressure within the normal range and attenuated right ventricular hypertrophy. With late treatment, tadalafil tended to increase the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood and dose-dependently improved the survival rate by 55%, 60%, and 70% at 0.5, 2.5, and 10 mg/kg per day, respectively, versus 40% in the MCT-control group. Both early and late treatments with tadalafil were associated with elevated lung cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). These results suggest that tadalafil relaxes pulmonary arteries by elevating cGMP in lungs and extend survival time by improving pulmonary hemodynamics even when treatment occurs in the late phase of PAH. Thus, it is expected that tadalafil may be an effective, once-daily treatment option in humans with PAH.

Tadalafil therapy and health-related quality of life in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare, progressive lung disorder that impairs performance of daily activities and quality of life (QoL), leading to right heart failure and death. Treatment options include prostanoids, endothelin antagonists, and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (e.g., tadalafil). Currently there is no cure for PAH, but tadalafil has improved exercise capacity in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To explore the effect of tadalafil on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Response to Tadalafil (PHIRST) clinical trial examined the efficacy and tolerability of tadalafil for the treatment of PAH. The impact of tadalafil on HRQoL and exercise capacity, as measured by 6-minute walk test (6MW test), was also examined. Change from baseline to last non-missing post-baseline was examined for the SF-36, EQ-5D, and 6MW test, along with the relationship between HRQoL and 6MW test performance. RESULTS: Tadalafil 40 mg showed significant improvement over placebo for six of eight SF-36 domains, and EQ-5D index scores. Also, the tadalafil 40-mg group showed significant improvement over placebo on the 6MW test (p < 0.001), but no clear relationship was found between 6MW test performance and HRQoL. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that tadalafil 40 mg may significantly improve HRQoL and exercise capacity for PAH patients. Limitations of this study include its relatively short nature limited to 16 weeks and the relative heterogeneity of the study population.

Tadalafil therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for pulmonary arterial hypertension target the prostacyclin, endothelin, or nitric oxide pathways. Tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, increases cGMP, the final mediator in the nitric oxide pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 405 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (idiopathic or associated), either treatment-naive or on background therapy with the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan, were randomized to placebo or tadalafil 2.5, 10, 20, or 40 mg orally once daily. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 16 in the distance walked in 6 minutes. Changes in World Health Organization functional class, clinical worsening, and health-related quality of life were also assessed. Patients completing the 16-week study could enter a long-term extension study. Tadalafil increased the distance walked in 6 minutes in a dose-dependent manner; only the 40-mg dose met the prespecified level of statistical significance (P<0.01). Overall, the mean placebo-corrected treatment effect was 33 m (95% confidence interval, 15 to 50 m). In the bosentan-naive group, the treatment effect was 44 m (95% confidence interval, 20 to 69 m) compared with 23 m (95% confidence interval, -2 to 48 m) in patients on background bosentan therapy. Tadalafil 40 mg improved the time to clinical worsening (P=0.041), incidence of clinical worsening (68% relative risk reduction; P=0.038), and health-related quality of life. The changes in World Health Organization functional class were not statistically significant. The most common treatment-related adverse events reported with tadalafil were headache, myalgia, and flushing. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, tadalafil 40 mg was well tolerated and improved exercise capacity and quality of life measures and reduced clinical worsening.

Long-term efficacy of duloxetine in women with stress urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the maintenance of efficacy of duloxetine beyond 3 months, using data from several long-term, open-label studies, as the efficacy of duloxetine 40-mg twice daily for treating women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) for up to 3 months has been established in several randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 1424 patients (Cohort A) enrolled in three 12-week, placebo-controlled clinical trials and their uncontrolled, open-label extensions, and in one uncontrolled, open-label study, were used to assess long-term continuation rates and continued efficacy based on responses to the validated Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale for up to 30 months. Data from another 2758 patients (Cohort B) enrolled in an additional placebo-controlled study and its open-label extension were used to assess PGI-I ratings, reductions in incontinence episode frequency (IEF) recorded on urinary diaries, and the relationship between PGI-I ratings and reductions in IEF for up to 72 weeks. RESULTS: In Cohort A, the duloxetine continuation rate at 1 year was 42.5%. At 12, 24 and 30 months, most (83%, 83% and 88%, respectively) patients in Cohort A who continued treatment rated their incontinence in one of the three 'better since starting treatment' PGI-I categories. Both the median IEF reductions (50-77%) and the PGI-I 'better' ratings (70-88% of patients) remained fairly consistent over 72 weeks in Cohort B. Finally, IEF reductions increased with increasing PGI-I ratings (approximately 46% for 'a little better', 75% for 'much better' and 95% for 'very much better') over the first year of treatment. CONCLUSION: The benefits of duloxetine were maintained in patients who continued treatment for up to 30 months. However, these favourable results need to be interpreted cautiously, as many patients discontinued treatment and those with better responses are more likely to continue taking medication.

Factors associated with preference for sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy: post hoc analysis of data from a multicentre, randomized, open-label, crossover study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if baseline characteristics, treatment efficacy, psychosocial outcomes or tolerability were associated with patient preference for sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) or tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction (ED) in men naive to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an open-label, crossover study of sildenafil (25, 50 or 100 mg) and tadalafil (10 or 20 mg), dosed as needed, after a 4-week baseline assessment, 367 men with ED were randomly assigned to sildenafil followed by tadalafil or vice versa (8-week dose optimization and 4-week assessment phase for each treatment period). Patients completing both periods chose which treatment they preferred for an 8-week extension phase. Bivariate logistic regression and stepwise logistic regression were used to determine if any baseline characteristics or post-baseline measurements were associated with the patients' treatment preference. Baseline variables examined were age, race, ED aetiology/duration, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, vital signs, comorbid medical conditions, and baseline scores for the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) domains, Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS) domains, and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary questions. Post-baseline variables examined were therapy sequence, dosage, and differences in IIEF and PAIRS domains, SEP scores, in number/timing of sexual attempts and in the severity of side-effects (overall patient perception). RESULTS: Of 291 patients completing both treatments and indicating a preference, 85 (29%) preferred sildenafil and 206 (71%) preferred tadalafil. Variables were individually analysed using bivariate analysis; one baseline characteristic (presence/absence of hyperlipidaemia) and 13 post-baseline measurements were significantly associated with the patients' treatment preference. Variables were analysed as a group using stepwise logistic regression; a set of six post-baseline factors was identified as significantly associated with patient preference. Dosage choice, reductions in the PAIRS time concerns domain, IIEF intercourse satisfaction domain improvements, smaller side-effect severity scores, more sexual attempts, and increased SEP4 scores (satisfaction with erection hardness) during the tadalafil or sildenafil treatment periods were all significantly associated with preference for tadalafil or sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: We identified no baseline characteristics that prospectively distinguish patients who will prefer tadalafil or sildenafil. Patient differences in time concerns, dosage choice, intercourse satisfaction, treatment tolerability, number of sexual attempts and satisfaction with erection hardness were the set of factors most significantly associated with treatment preference, and the preference observed for tadalafil (71%) or sildenafil (29%) might be substantially accounted for by differences in these factors during the tadalafil and sildenafil treatment periods.

Therapeutic effectiveness and patient satisfaction after 6 months of treatment with tadalafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil: results from the erectile dysfunction observational study (EDOS).

OBJECTIVE: This observational study was conducted across Europe to assess health outcomes in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who took tadalafil, sildenafil citrate (sildenafil), or vardenafil HCl (vardenafil) for 6 mo. METHODS: Therapy effectiveness and patient satisfaction were evaluated using established and new questions on erectile function. Behavioural, psychological, and relationship outcomes were assessed using the short form of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (SF-PAIRS). RESULTS: In nine European countries at 904 sites, 8047 patients were enrolled and 94% (7560) selected either tadalafil (5315), sildenafil (1252), or vardenafil (993) for treatment at baseline. Of the 7560, 3998 (52.9%) took the same drug for 6 mo. Baseline characteristics across the three treatment groups were comparable: mean age approximately 56 yr, moderate or severe ED, and mean International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score about 13. Tadalafil, sildenafil, and vardenafil were therapeutically effective and improved patient satisfaction in the 40-58% of men who completed 6 mo of a single therapy. Patients taking tadalafil consistently had numerically higher levels of therapeutic effectiveness and satisfaction compared with patients who took sildenafil or vardenafil. The three cohorts had statistically significant changes from baseline in response to SF-PAIRS and there were significant differences, in favour of tadalafil, among cohorts in the Time Concerns domain. CONCLUSION: In a large observational study that mimics a routine clinical setting, most patients selected an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 5 to treat ED, which resulted in a high level of therapeutic effectiveness and patient satisfaction.

Sexual intercourse frequency in men presenting for treatment of erectile dysfunction: results from the pan-European erectile dysfunction observational study.

Factors that influence the number of sexual intercourse attempts among men with erectile dysfunction (ED) before initiation of ED treatment were investigated in a population of 4998 men enrolled in the (Erectile Dysfunctions) Observation Study (EDOS). Our results showed that increasing age, increasing severity and duration of ED, and decreasing satisfaction with one's sex life and partner were all associated with a reduced number of sexual intercourse attempts in the 4 weeks prior to enrollment in EDOS.

Psychosocial outcomes and drug attributes affecting treatment choice in men receiving sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, crossover study.

INTRODUCTION: Although sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil are efficacious and well-tolerated treatments for erectile dysfunction (ED), preference studies have shown that patients may favor one medication over the other. AIM: To determine whether psychosocial outcomes differed when men with ED received tadalafil compared with sildenafil. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures included a treatment preference question, Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales (PAIRS), and Drug Attribute Questionnaire. METHODS: Randomized, open-label, crossover study. After a 4-week baseline, men with ED (N = 367; mean age = 54 years; naïve to type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor therapy) were randomized: tadalafil for 12 weeks then sildenafil for 12 weeks or vice versa (8-week dose optimization/4-week assessment phases). During dose optimization, patients started with 10 mg tadalafil, or 25 or 50 mg sildenafil and could titrate to their optimal dose (10 or 20 mg tadalafil; 25, 50, or 100 mg sildenafil). Medications were taken as needed. Patients completing both 12-week periods chose which medication to continue during an 8-week extension. RESULTS: Of 291 men completing both treatment periods, 71% (N = 206) chose tadalafil and 29% (N = 85) chose sildenafil (P < 0.001) for the 8-week extension. When taking tadalafil compared with sildenafil men had higher mean endpoint scores on PAIRS Sexual Self-Confidence (tadalafil = 2.91 vs. sildenafil = 2.75; P < 0.001) and Spontaneity (tadalafil = 3.32 vs. sildenafil = 3.17; P < 0.001) Domains and a lower mean endpoint score on Time Concerns Domain (tadalafil = 2.2 vs. sildenafil = 2.59; P < 0.001). The two most frequently chosen drug attributes to explain treatment preference were ability to get an erection long after taking the medication and firmness of erections. Tadalafil and sildenafil were well tolerated with 12 (3.3%) patients discontinuing for an adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: As measured with PAIRS, men with ED had higher sexual self-confidence and spontaneity and less time concerns related to sexual encounters when treated with tadalafil compared with sildenafil. These psychosocial outcomes may help explain why more men (71%) preferred tadalafil for the treatment of ED in this clinical trial.

Treatment-seeking behavior of erectile dysfunction patients in Europe: Results of the Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: The Erectile Dysfunction Observational Study (EDOS) is a 6-month, pan-European prospective, observational study of health outcomes designed to assess patients' profiles and characteristics and the effectiveness of erectile dysfunction (ED) treatment in routine clinical practice. AIM: To present baseline characteristics and treatment-seeking behavior of a large sample of ED patients recruited in real-life clinical settings. METHODS: Men aged 18 years and older who visited a physician to initiate or change any ED treatment were enrolled in EDOS. They were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months as part of their normal course of care in nine European countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sexual health outcomes using the short form of the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales. Treatment effectiveness and satisfaction were assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire, Global Assessment Questions, and further single-item questions. RESULTS: Of the 8,186 patients enrolled by 904 investigators (69% general practitioners [GPs]) across nine European countries, 8,055 patients were eligible for analysis at baseline; 63.9% were ED treatment-naive. Of the total patient population, mean age was 56.5 years, mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.2 kg/m2, 18.3% were obese (BMI > 30 kg/m2), 42.5% had severe ED, and there was a high frequency of comorbidities and concomitant medication use. A similar proportion of the treatment-naive patients were seen by GPs (62.9%) and specialists (65.8%). In the treatment-naive group, there was a higher frequency of severe ED among ex-smokers, obese patients, and in those who drank no alcohol or excessive amounts of alcohol. CONCLUSIONS: Unmet need of treatment in ED is high; 66% of patients had experienced ED symptoms for 1 year or longer when they were looking for treatment. Severity seems to be related to treatment seeking.

An open-label, multicentre, randomized, crossover study comparing sildenafil citrate and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare treatment preference, efficacy, and tolerability of sildenafil citrate (sildenafil) and tadalafil for treating erectile dysfunction (ED) in men naïve to phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, crossover study of sildenafil and tadalafil (taken as needed). After a 4-week baseline assessment, 367 men with ED (mean age 54 years) were randomized to receive sildenafil for 12 weeks followed by tadalafil for 12 weeks or vice versa (8-week dose optimization and 4-week assessment phases). During dose optimization, patients started taking 25- or 50-mg sildenafil or 10-mg tadalafil and could titrate to find their optimum dose (25-, 50- or 100-mg sildenafil; 10- or 20-mg tadalafil). After completing both 12-week periods, patients chose which treatment to continue during an 8-week extension. Efficacy was measured with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary. RESULTS: Of the 291 men who completed both treatments, 85 (29%) chose sildenafil and 206 (71%) chose tadalafil (P < 0.001) for the 8-week extension. The IIEF erectile function domain scores were 14.2 at baseline, 23.9 at endpoint on sildenafil, and 24.3 at endpoint on tadalafil (P = 0.08, sildenafil vs tadalafil). The mean per patient percentage success scores for SEP2 (penetration) were: baseline (46%), sildenafil (post-baseline 82%) and tadalafil (post-baseline 85%; P = 0.06, sildenafil vs tadalafil), and for SEP3 (successful intercourse) were: baseline (19%), sildenafil (post-baseline 72%), and tadalafil (post-baseline 77%; P = 0.003, sildenafil vs tadalafil). The only treatment-emergent adverse events that were reported by >5% of men were headache and flushing. CONCLUSIONS: In men with ED who were naïve to PDE5 inhibitor therapy, sildenafil and tadalafil were both effective and well tolerated. After treatment with sildenafil and tadalafil, 29% of men chose sildenafil and 71% chose tadalafil for ED therapy during an 8-week extension.

Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in a Western European population of men with erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial, the safety and efficacy of on-demand tadalafil (an oral phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor approved in many countries for treating erectile dysfunction, ED) in a Western European population of men with mild-to-severe ED. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized according to baseline severity of ED in a ratio of 3 : 1 to receive either tadalafil 20 mg or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints were mean changes from baseline to endpoint (12 weeks) in the erectile function (EF) domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and percentages of 'Yes' responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary Question 2 ('Were you able to insert your penis into your partner's vagina?') and Question 3 ('Did your erection last long enough for you to have successful intercourse?'). Secondary endpoints included mean changes from baseline to endpoint in IIEF Intercourse Satisfaction and Overall Satisfaction domains, selected questions of the IIEF, and the percentage of 'Yes' responses to Global Assessment Questions (GAQ) at the last visit. Other analyses included the percentage of patients in each treatment group at endpoint with IIEF EF domain scores in the normal range (>26), the frequency of intercourse attempts and mean per-patient intercourse success rate at various times after dosing. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 53 years and 80% had a history of ED of > or = 1 year. The mean baseline EF domain score was 13.5, with 40.5% of patients in the severe category. Tadalafil improved mean EF domain scores by 11.1, vs 0.4 for placebo (P < 0.001). In addition, 73.9% of sexual intercourse attempts were successful (SEP-Q3) in tadalafil-treated patients, compared with 29.9% in placebo-treated patients during the period after baseline (P < 0.001). Tadalafil significantly improved the mean IIEF intercourse satisfaction (5.1, tadalafil; 1.1, placebo) and overall satisfaction domain scores (3.9, tadalafil; 0.5, placebo), P < 0.001. GAQs used to assess the overall effect of the treatment indicated that tadalafil was superior to placebo (P < 0.001) in improving erections (82.1%, tadalafil; 23.1%, placebo) and sexual activity (78.6% and 17.3%). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events more frequent (>2%) with tadalafil than placebo were headache, dyspepsia, flushing, back pain, pain in limb and myalgia. These adverse events were mostly mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil improved erectile function and was well tolerated when taken by men from Western Europe with mild-to-severe ED.