High rates of the SDHB p.Arg46Gln pathogenic variant predisposes New Zealand Maori to phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma.

BACKGROUND: Phaeochromocytomas (PCC) and paragangliomas (PGL; together PPGL) are rare tumours of the adrenal medulla or extra-adrenal paraganglia. They may secrete catecholamines with significant cardiovascular effects. Management of PPGL is predominantly surgical, despite the anaesthetic risks related to potential haemodynamic instability. Meticulous pre-treatment and intra-operative management are required to improve cardiovascular outcomes. AIMS: There are limited local data regarding the incidence of PPGL and the clinical characteristics of individuals diagnosed with these tumours in New Zealand. We undertook a retrospective study investigating the local practice and patient characteristics with an additional focus on intra-operative haemodynamic stability and post-operative outcomes. METHODS: Electronic patient records were searched for individuals with a diagnosis of PPGL. Clinical records and electronic databases were interrogated for pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative data points. Particular attention was paid to rates and types of germline mutations, intra-operative haemodynamic stability and post-operative renal and cardiovascular outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 49 individuals with PPGL, of whom 34 were from the local area. This gave a local incidence of PPGL of around five cases per million people per year. Maori were significantly over-represented in our cohort, with this being in part due to high rates of the SDHB R46Q mutation. Over 95% of our cohort met pre-specified pre-operative blood pressure parameters. Intra-operative monitoring revealed a tendency to hypotension, but this did not translate into adverse post-operative outcomes, which were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Maori were over-represented due to high rates of germline SDHB R46Q mutations. There were few post-operative adverse outcomes in this contemporary cohort.

Perioperative leaders' experience of COVID-19 in Aotearoa: a qualitative interview study.

AIMS: Once it became apparent that COVID-19 would reach Aotearoa New Zealand, perioperative services responded urgently to contain viral spread, keep staff safe and maintain patient care. We aimed to understand how perioperative leaders around the country responded to the pandemic, their experiences, reflections and the lessons learnt. Our goal is to inform future pandemic responses. METHODS: We undertook a qualitative study with thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews. We recruited perioperative leads involved in the COVID-19 response using snowball sampling, following initial contact with anaesthetic and surgical department heads. RESULTS: We interviewed 33 perioperative leads from 16 of the country's 20 district health boards, with representation across hospitals of different sizes and the professional groups working in operating theatres. Four main themes were identified from data. These were: "no one source of truth," with prolific, constantly changing information, limited initial support from hospital senior executives, and siloed approaches and tensions between departments and professional groups; resourcing challenges attributed to limited baseline preparedness and increased workload; deficiencies in PPE and physical facilities; staff stress and anxiety, and the impact this had on workforce capacity; ongoing preparedness for future waves; and reflections on "lessons learnt". These lessons focused strongly on communication, caring for staff, collaboration, downtime to enable preparation, and a need for external, potentially national co-ordination and resources to facilitate planning. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative leaders' experiences and reflections of COVID-19 paint a picture of limited prior preparation or planning for a pandemic, requiring an immediate pivot from routine care to emergency response. In an environment of uncertainty, information overload and staff stress hospital leaders worked to obtain resources, maintain staff safety and engagement, develop new systems and in some cases, create new facilities. Sharing the experiences and lessons learned about communication and collaboration, policy development and staff training may go some way to facilitate a smoother implementation of a pandemic response the next time around.

Proposed delay for safe surgery after COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Long-term effects after COVID-19 may affect surgical safety. This study aimed to evaluate the literature and produce evidence-based guidance regarding the period of delay necessary for adequate recovery of patients following COVID-19 infection before undergoing surgery. METHODS: A rapid review was combined with advice from a working group of 10 clinical experts across Australia and New Zealand. MEDLINE, medRxiv and grey literature were searched to 4 October 2020. The level of evidence was stratified according to the National Health and Medical Research Council evidence hierarchy. RESULTS: A total of 1020 records were identified, from which 20 studies (12 peer-reviewed) were included. None were randomized trials. The studies comprised one case-control study (level III-2 evidence), one prospective cohort study (level III-2) and 18 case-series studies (level IV). Follow-up periods containing observable clinical characteristics ranged from 3 to 16 weeks. New or excessive fatigue and breathlessness were the most frequently reported symptoms. SARS-CoV-2 may impact the immune system for multiple months after laboratory confirmation of infection. For patients with past COVID-19 undergoing elective curative surgery for cancer, risks of pulmonary complications and mortality may be lowest at 4 weeks or later after a positive swab. CONCLUSION: After laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, minor surgery should be delayed for at least 4 weeks and major surgery for 8-12 weeks, if patient outcome is not compromised. Comprehensive preoperative and ongoing assessment must be carried out to ensure optimal clinical decision-making.

Critical care admission following elective surgery was not associated with survival benefit: prospective analysis of data from 27 countries.

PURPOSE: As global initiatives increase patient access to surgical treatments, there is a need to define optimal levels of perioperative care. Our aim was to describe the relationship between the provision and use of critical care resources and postoperative mortality. METHODS: Planned analysis of data collected during an international 7-day cohort study of adults undergoing elective in-patient surgery. We used risk-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression models to evaluate the association between admission to critical care immediately after surgery and in-hospital mortality. We evaluated hospital-level associations between mortality and critical care admission immediately after surgery, critical care admission to treat life-threatening complications, and hospital provision of critical care beds. We evaluated the effect of national income using interaction tests. RESULTS: 44,814 patients from 474 hospitals in 27 countries were available for analysis. Death was more frequent amongst patients admitted directly to critical care after surgery (critical care: 103/4317 patients [2%], standard ward: 99/39,566 patients [0.3%]; adjusted OR 3.01 [2.10-5.21]; p < 0.001). This association may differ with national income (high income countries OR 2.50 vs. low and middle income countries OR 4.68; p = 0.07). At hospital level, there was no association between mortality and critical care admission directly after surgery (p = 0.26), critical care admission to treat complications (p = 0.33), or provision of critical care beds (p = 0.70). Findings of the hospital-level analyses were not affected by national income status. A sensitivity analysis including only high-risk patients yielded similar findings. CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify any survival benefit from critical care admission following surgery.

Liver transplantation in Jehovah's Witness patients in Australasia.

Until recently, liver transplantation was contraindicated in Jehovah's Witness patients because of recipient-imposed restrictions on use of blood products. However, recent improvements in surgical and anaesthetic techniques and new procoagulant agents challenge this practice. We describe two Jehovah's Witness patients who had successful liver transplantation without blood transfusion. To our knowledge, these are the first such cases in Australasia. The techniques used to minimise blood loss and transfusion requirements could potentially benefit all patients undergoing major surgery.