Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 23(4): 514-8, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24406124

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Coracoid bone graft osteolysis and fibrous union are the principal causes of failure in patients treated with the Latarjet procedure. This study aims to investigate the hypothesis that coracoid bone graft osteolysis is more pronounced in cases without glenoid bone loss, which may be due to a diminished mechanotransduction effect at the bone healing site. METHODS: We prospectively followed up 34 patients, treated with a mini-plate Latarjet procedure, divided into 2 groups (group A patients had glenoid bone loss >15% and group B patients had no glenoid bone loss). A computed tomography scan evaluation with 3-dimensional reconstruction was then performed on all patients to evaluate coracoid bone graft osteolysis according to our coracoid bone graft osteolysis classification. RESULTS: The computed tomography scan analysis showed a different distribution of osteolysis between group A and group B. The statistical analysis showed a significant difference (P < .01, Bonferroni test) between groups A and B for the following sections: proximal/lateral/superficial, proximal/medial/deep, distal/lateral/superficial, and distal/lateral/deep. On average, the coracoid grafts in group A patients showed less osteolysis than the coracoid grafts in group B patients (39.6% vs 65.1%). DISCUSSION: The coracoid bone graft underwent much less osteolysis in patients with significant glenoid bone loss (>15%) than in those without it. Because factors of blood supply, compression, and surgical technique were the same for both groups, we believe that the mechanotransduction effect from the humeral head on the graft influences its remodeling. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the bone graft part of the Latarjet procedure plays a role in patients with significant coracoid bone loss but much less so when there is no bone loss.


Assuntos
Reabsorção Óssea/fisiopatologia , Osteólise/diagnóstico por imagem , Escápula/diagnóstico por imagem , Luxação do Ombro/cirurgia , Articulação do Ombro/diagnóstico por imagem , Reabsorção Óssea/etiologia , Transplante Ósseo , Feminino , Consolidação da Fratura , Humanos , Cabeça do Úmero/fisiopatologia , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Masculino , Mecanotransdução Celular , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Escápula/cirurgia , Articulação do Ombro/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
2.
Int J Shoulder Surg ; 7(1): 1-6, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23858288

RESUMO

AIMS: One of the reason for Latarjet procedure failure may be coracoid graft osteolysis. In this study, we aimed to understand if a better compression between the coracoid process and the glenoid, using a mini-plate fixation during the Latarjet procedure, could reduce the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A computed tomography scan analysis of 26 prospectively followed-up patients was conducted after modified Latarjet procedure using mini-plate fixation technique to determine both the location and the amount of coracoid graft osteolysis in them. We then compared our current results with results from that of our previous study without using mini-plate fixation to determine if there is any statistical significant difference in terms of corcacoid bone graft osteolysis between the two surgical techniques. RESULTS: The most relevant osteolysis was represented by the superficial part of the proximal coracoid, whereas the deep part of the proximal coracoid graft is least involved in osteolysis and has best bone healing. The current study showed a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid with our previous study (P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, there are no studies in literature that show the causes of coracoid bone graft osteolysis after Latarjet procedure. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that there is a significant difference only for the deep part of the distal coracoid in terms of osteolysis. At clinical examination, this difference did not correspond with any clinical findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prospective case series, Treatment study.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA