Declaration of Helsinki: ethical norm in pursuit of common global goals.

The World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki is in the process of being revised. The following amendments are recommended to be incorporated in pursuit of the common goal of promoting health for all. 1. Data-driven research that facilitates broad informed consent and dynamic consent, assuring participant's rights, and the sharing of individual participant data (IPD) and research results to promote open science and generate social value. 2. Risk minimisation in a placebo-controlled study and post-trial access to the best-proven interventions for all who need them. 3. A future-oriented research framework for co-creation with all the relevant stakeholders.

The ethical responsibility to continue investigational treatments of research participants in situation of armed conflicts, economic sanctions or natural catastrophes.

This paper discusses the effects of armed conflict, economic sanctions, and natural catastrophes on ongoing clinical trials. We suggest that • stopping the accrual of new patients in clinical trials under such extreme conditions is acceptable. • research participants already receiving trial medication in such disruptive situations are to be considered highly vulnerable due to their medical dependency for ongoing treatment according to the approved clinical study protocol. • based on the present experience in Ukraine and Russia, we conclude that finishing ongoing trial treatments according to approved or amended protocols should be considered to be an ethical obligation of trial sponsors irrespective whether trial disruption is due to war, economic sanctions, or natural catastrophes. • it is important to devote more attention to the ethical challenges raised by such fundamentally disruptive situations to clinical trials generally in any region of the world.

Linking the Declarations of Helsinki and of Taipei: Critical Challenges of Future-Oriented Research Ethics.

Expansion of data-driven research in the 21st century has posed challenges in the evolution of the international agreed framework of research ethics. The World Medical Association (WMA)'s Declaration of Helsinki (DoH) has provided ethical principles for medical research involving humans since 1964, with the last update in 2013. To complement the DoH, WMA issued the Declaration of Taipei (DoT) in 2016 to provide additional principles for health databases and biobanks. However, the ethical principles for secondary use of data or material obtained in research remain unclear. With such a perspective, the Working Group on Ethics (WGE) of the International Federation of Associations of Pharmaceutical Physicians and Pharmaceutical Medicine (IFAPP) suggests a closer scientific linkage in the DoH to the (Declaration of Taipei) DoT focusing specifically on areas that will facilitate data-driven research, and to further strengthen the protection of research participants.

Development and Use of Gene Therapy Orphan Drugs-Ethical Needs for a Broader Cooperation Between the Pharmaceutical Industry and Society.

Gene therapy orphan medicinal products constitute a unique group of new drugs which in case of hereditary diseases are usually administered only once at an early age, in the hope to provide sufficient gene product to last for the entire life of the patients. The combination of an exceptionally large single payment and the life-long clinical follow-up needed for understanding the long-term benefits and safety of gene therapy, represent new types of scientific, financial, social and ethical challenges for the pharmaceutical industry, regulators and society. With special consideration of the uniqueness and importance of gene therapy, the authors propose a three points plan for a close cooperation between the pharmaceutical industry and society to develop orphan gene therapy. (1) In fully transparent health technology negotiations a close and long-lasting, contractually fixed cooperation should be established between the manufacturers and local health-care stakeholders for sharing the medical and scientific benefits, the financial risks as well as the burdens of the post-authorization clinical and regulatory development. (2) The parties should agree on a fair, locally affordable drug price without the usually very high premium price calculated to compensate for the low number of patients. In case of high manufacturing costs, the companies should offer prolonged, 15-20 years long payment by installment with risk-sharing, especially considering that the late outcome of the treatment is unknown. Society should assist scientifically and financially organizing a specific patient registry, treatment in specialized hospitals and adequate long-term follow-up of patients, the coordinated management of financial transactions related to the risk sharing program. (3) The post-authorization treatment and prolonged observation of additional new cases coordinated by society should provide real world data needed for the modern complex regulatory evaluation of gene therapy products by the competent authorities. We assume that fair sharing of the benefits and risks as well as a well-organized cooperation of society with the industry in collecting real world evidence might result in better drug evaluation and improved accessibility due to lower prices. The outlined concept might support gene therapy more efficiently than the presently requested outstandingly high prices.

Corrigendum: Linking the Declarations of Helsinki and of Taipei: Critical Challenges of Future-Oriented Research Ethics.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.579714.].

The Shared Ethical Responsibility of Medically and Non-medically Qualified Experts in Human Drug Development Teams.

The complexity of developing and applying increasingly sophisticated new medicinal products has led to the participation of many non-medically qualified scientists in multi-disciplinary non-clinical and clinical drug development teams world-wide. In this introductory paper to the "IFAPP International Ethics Framework for Pharmaceutical Physicians and Medicines Development Scientists" it is argued that all members of such multidisciplinary teams must share the scientific and ethical responsibilities since they all influence directly or indirectly both the outcome of the various phases of the medicines development projects and the safety of the research subjects involved. The participating medical practitioner retains the overriding responsibility and the final decision to stop a trial if the well-being of the research subjects is seriously endangered. All the team members should follow the main ethical principles governing human research, the respect for autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence. Nevertheless, the weighing of these principles might be different under various conditions according to the specialty of the members.

Health Interoperability into Practice: Results of the Development of a Consent Form in a Pilot Project in a Health District in São Paulo, Brazil.

Interoperability of health information systems is a centerpiece of the "E-Health" Brazilian Ministry of Health strategy. It aims to solve at least partially the health information technology puzzle that we face today. This paper describes a health information exchange pilot project in a health district of the city of São Paulo. It discusses the results of the development of an informed consent form for health information exchange. This consent form showed excellent results, with median application time of 3 minutes and with 97.8% of patients feeling fully clarified. The patients' perception when faced with options of consent to share their data is also described.

Lymphocyte count and mortality risk in older persons. The Leiden 85-Plus Study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a low peripheral blood lymphocyte count is associated with increased mortality risk in older persons and to determine whether this association could be ascribed to ill health. DESIGN: A cohort study with a total follow-up period of 1,602 person years. SETTING: Leiden, the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred thirty-six community-dwelling residents aged 85 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Health status and leukocyte total and differential counts were assessed at baseline. Lymphocyte subsets were measured with a fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Age- and sex-adjusted mortality risks were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: There was no association between lymphocyte count and mortality in persons with ill health (mortality risk lowest vs highest quartile=1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.85-1.58, P=.35), but mortality was dependent on lymphocyte count if disease was excluded (mortality risk lowest vs highest quartile=2.14; 95% CI=1.08-4.23, P=.03). A similar increase in mortality risk was found when the cluster designation (CD)4+, CD8+, and CD16+ lymphocyte subsets were analyzed. Within individuals, low values of the lymphocyte subsets were related and there was no compensatory increase in CD16+ lymphocyte counts. A low lymphocyte count was not associated with specific causes of death. CONCLUSION: A low lymphocyte count was associated with an increased mortality risk in older persons without apparent disease. This association was not only found for the total lymphocyte count but also for the CD4+, CD8+, and CD16+ lymphocyte subset counts.