Post-capsulotomy dysphotopsia in monofocal versus multifocal lenses.

PURPOSE: To compare the photic symptoms experienced by patients with the monofocal SI30 intraocular lens (IOL) with the refractive multifocal SA40 Array IOL after capsulotomy. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 49 eyes of 49 patients (20 multifocal, 29 monofocal IOLs) were assessed following uncomplicated cataract extraction and Nd:YAG capsulotomy equal to the scotopic pupillary diameter. Subjects with post-operative refraction of +/-1.00 or more DS, +/-1.00 or more DC, concurrent ocular pathology, LogMAR acuity of worse than 0.3 for distance or 1.0 for near were excluded. Glare and halo were assessed objectively with computer-generated psychophysical tests (Glare and Halo) and subjective dysphotopic symptoms were evaluated with Tester, Javitt, Winther-Neilsen and Sedgewick questionnaires. RESULTS: No significant difference was found for mean halo size (square degrees) between monofocals (121.33) and multifocals (97.32, p = 0.207) or for mean glare (percentage contrast), monofocals (7.881) and multifocals (7.353, p = 0.812). No significant differences in the subjective appreciation of dysphotopsia were found: Tester (p = 0.358), Javitt (p = 0.29), Winther-Neilson (p = 0.54) and Sedgewick questionnaires (p = 0.134). CONCLUSION: The posterior capsule is an important optical medium, which has not been fully considered in other comparative studies and its complete removal eliminates any confounding contribution. The results suggest that after capsulotomy, there is no significant difference in objective or subjective photic phenomena between monofocal and multifocal silicone lenses. Dysphotopic symptoms in patients with refractive multifocal IOLs were comparable to monofocal IOL patients after capsulotomy.

Glare and halo with refractive correction.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this investigation was to compare glare and halo with various methods of refractive correction. METHODS: Ninety-eight eyes of healthy pre-presbyopes were analysed for the presence of glare and halo using computer-generated stimuli. Subjects were divided into three groups: emmetropes without correction, single vision plastic lens spectacle wearers (with clean and dirty lenses) or single-vision soft contact lens wearers. RESULTS: No significant difference in glare was found among groups. Significant differences were noted in halos between emmetropes and both contact lens (p<0.001) and uncleaned spectacle groups (p<0.05) but not with cleaned spectacles. The reduction in halo size after cleaning the lenses was significant (p<0.0187). CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens and unclean spectacle wearers both have significantly larger halos than emmetropes and those wearing cleaned spectacle lenses. Unclean spectacles may affect the accuracy of results in psychophysical and clinical testing.