Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Orthopedics ; 44(4): e563-e569, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34292816

RESUMO

The effects of radiation therapy and laminectomy on the growing spine have been well documented. Due to compromised bone quality after irradiation, spinal fusion has a high failure rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment of post-laminectomy and post-irradiation kyphosis in children using a vascularized rib graft (VRG) to augment anterior spinal fusion and posterior spinal fusion. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records for all patients treated at a single institution for post-laminectomy and post-irradiation kyphosis who underwent VRG to augment spinal fusions done between December 2003 and August 2015. Five patients were included in the analysis. Imaging studies were analyzed by 2 senior pediatric orthopedic surgeons and a pediatric orthopedic surgery fellow. The outcome for all 5 patients who underwent VRG were considered successful at most recent clinical follow-up. Success was defined as the following: complete fusion evident through computed tomography scan, no implant failure, and no kyphosis progression. Follow-up ranged from 21 to 63 months. One patient experienced 2 complications: esophageal tear and deep infection. Spinal fusion with a VRG is a viable treatment option for children who have developed kyphosis following laminectomy and irradiation. On long-term follow-up, there has been no evidence of progression of kyphosis for patients who were treated with VRG in either the primary fusion procedure or in subsequent revision procedures. A VRG provides a non-irradiated, vascularized bone graft to bridge the irradiated segments, increasing the stability of the spine. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e563-e569.].


Assuntos
Cifose , Laminectomia , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Cifose/diagnóstico por imagem , Cifose/etiologia , Cifose/cirurgia , Laminectomia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 31(10): e334-e338, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28650944

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes and costs between titanium elastic nails (TENs), stainless steel elastic nails (SENs), and Kirschner wires (K-wires) in the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures with intramedullary fixation. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level 1 Pediatric Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 100 patients (65 male and 35 female) younger than 18 years with diaphyseal forearm fractures treated with intramedullary fixation were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Patients received single or both bone intramedullary fixation with either TENs, SENs, or K-wires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time to radiographic union, complication rate, surgical time, and average cost per implant. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in the study. Thirty-one patients were treated with TENs, 30 with SENs, and 39 with K-wires. No significant difference in time to radiographic union, complication rate, or surgical time was found between the 3 types of fixation. Average time to union was 9.4 ± 5.4 weeks, and complication rate was 12.9% for TENs, 10.0% for SENs, and 12.8% for K-wires. There was a significant difference in cost per implant, with an average cost of $639, $172, and $24 for TENs, SENs, and K-wires, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates no difference between TENs, SENs, and K-wires in the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures with regards to outcome, time to union, surgical time, or complication rates. Given the significant cost difference between these implants, we recommend that surgeons consider modifying their implant selection to help mitigate cost. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Pinos Ortopédicos , Fios Ortopédicos , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/instrumentação , Fraturas do Rádio/cirurgia , Fraturas da Ulna/cirurgia , Adolescente , Criança , Estudos de Coortes , Diáfises/lesões , Diáfises/cirurgia , Feminino , Traumatismos do Antebraço/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Antebraço/cirurgia , Fixação Intramedular de Fraturas/métodos , Consolidação da Fratura/fisiologia , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Masculino , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico por imagem , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Aço Inoxidável , Titânio , Fraturas da Ulna/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...