Transferring laparoscopic skills to robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.

Robotic-Assisted Surgery (RAS) is experiencing rapid expansion, prompting the integration of robotic technical skills training into surgical education programs. As access to robotic training platforms remains limited, it is important to investigate the transferability of laparoscopic skills to RAS. This could potentially support the inclusion of early years laparoscopic training to mitigate the learning curve associated with robotic surgery. This study aims to assess the transferability of laparoscopic skills to robotic surgery. A systematic search was conducted using the PRISMA checklist to identify relevant articles. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to collate eligible articles. Included were original articles comparing the performance of comparable tasks on both laparoscopic and robotic platforms written in English. Non-peer reviewed papers, conference abstracts, reviews, and case series were excluded. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 10 studies (59%) demonstrated skill transferability from laparoscopic surgery (LS) to robotic surgery (RS); while one study (5.8%) showed no significant transferability. Four studies highlighted the positive impact of prior laparoscopic training on robotic skill, whereas six papers suggested no significant difference between laparoscopic novices and experienced laparoscopists when utilizing a robotic simulator. Five studies evaluated advanced surgical skills such as intracorporeal knot tying and suturing, revealing superior robotic performance among experienced laparoscopists compared to novice learners. Laparoscopic skills appear to be transferrable to robotic surgery, particularly in complex surgical techniques. Robotic simulators demonstrate a significant reduction in the learning curve for surgical novices, albeit to a lesser extent for experienced laparoscopists.

Safety of maintaining elective and emergency surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic with the introduction of a Protected Elective Surgical Unit (PESU): A cross-specialty evaluation of 30-day outcomes in 9,925 patients undergoing surgery in a University Health Board.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented health care challenges mandating surgical service reconfiguration. Within our hospital, emergency and elective streams were separated and self-contained Protected Elective Surgical Units were developed to mitigate against infection-related morbidity. Aims of this study were to determine the risk of COVID-19 transmission and mortality and whether the development of Protected Elective Surgical Units can result in significant reduction in risk. Methods: A retrospective observational study of consecutive patients from 18 specialties undergoing elective or emergency surgery under general, spinal, or epidural anaesthetic over a 12-month study period was undertaken. Primary outcome measures were 30-day postoperative COVID-19 transmission rate and mortality. Secondary adjusted analyses were performed to ascertain hospital and Protected Elective Surgical Unit transmission rates. Results: Between 15 March 2020 and 14 March 2021, 9,925 patients underwent surgery: 6,464 (65.1%) elective, 5,116 (51.5%) female, and median age 57 (39-70). A total of 69.5% of all procedures were performed in Protected Elective Surgical Units. Overall, 30-day postoperative COVID-19 transmission was 2.8% (3.4% emergency vs 1.2% elective P < .001). Protected Elective Surgical Unit postoperative transmission was significantly lower than non-Protected Elective Surgical Unit (0.42% vs 3.2% P < .001), with an adjusted likely in-hospital Protected Elective Surgical Unit transmission of 0.04%. The 30-day all-cause mortality was 1.7% and was 14.6% in COVID-19-positive patients. COVID-19 infection, age > 70, male sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade > 2, and emergency surgery were all independently associated with mortality. Conclusion: This study has demonstrated that Protected Elective Surgical Units can facilitate high-volume elective surgical services throughout peaks of the COVID-19 pandemic while minimising viral transmission and mortality. However, mortality risk associated with perioperative COVID-19 infection remains high.