A Comparative Study of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Nalbuphine as an Adjuvant to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anaesthesia is the most commonly used technique for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries as it is economical and easy to administer. Opioids as adjuvants to local anaesthetics during spinal anaesthesia have played a vital role in reducing post-operative pain qualitatively and effectively. METHODS: This prospective randomised study was conducted on 100 patients divided into two groups scheduled for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Group bupivacaine fentanyl (BF) received 25 mcg of fentanyl with 15 mg of bupivacaine and Group bupivacaine nalbuphine (BN) received 1 mg of nalbuphine and 15 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine. The aim of the study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl and nalbuphine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia. Duration of effective analgesia, haemodynamic parameters, onset and duration of sensory and motor block, adverse effects, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were assessed. RESULTS: Duration of effective analgesia was 388±24.88 minutes in the BN group and was higher (p-value <0.001) in comparison to the BF group, which was 304.70±15.76 minutes. CONCLUSION: Nalbuphine was more effective than fentanyl in providing post-operative analgesia when used as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Peripheral Nerve Stimulator Versus Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Nerve Block for Knee Arthroscopy Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background Femoral nerve block (FNB) provides effective analgesia and is a widely used technique for postoperative pain relief for orthopedic procedures on lower limbs. This study aims to compare the efficacy of ultrasonography (USG) versus peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS)-guided FNB in knee arthroscopic procedures. Methodology This randomized comparative study included two study groups with 30 participants in each group who were given FNB with either PNS or USG for knee arthroscopic procedures following spinal anesthesia. The study evaluated the number of needle repositioning, the time taken for performing the block, the efficacy of postoperative analgesia based on the duration of the block, and patient satisfaction. Results The number of needle repositioning and time taken to finish the procedure using USG was lower compared to the group using PNS (p < 0.001). The duration of the block was comparable in both groups (p = 0.584). Patients were satisfied with both techniques and responded as either very good or outstanding and chose neither as inferior (p = 0.310). Conclusions Both techniques have equal efficacy concerning the duration of the effect of the block and patient satisfaction. However, the procedural time and number of needle repositioning were significantly less in the group where USG was used for the block.