Opportunistic screening for bone disease using abdominal CT scans obtained for other reasons in newly diagnosed IBD patients.

Bone disease is prevalent among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), though bone density screening remains underutilized. We used CT scans performed for other indications in IBD patients to identify and monitor osteopenia using CT attenuation values at the lumbar spine. Significant rates of bone disease were detected which would have otherwise gone undiagnosed. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis affects about 14-42% of patients with IBD. Though screening is recommended in IBD patients with risk factors, it remains underutilized. In patients with newly diagnosed IBD, we used CT scans performed for other indications to identify and monitor progression of osteopenia. METHODS: Using the Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry, we identified adult patients with one or more abdominal CT scans. Each patient had two age- and gender-matched controls. Radiologists measured attenuation through trabecular bone in the L1 vertebral body recorded in Hounsfield units (HU). Generalized estimating equations were used to measure how HU varied as a function of gender, type of IBD, and age. RESULTS: One hundred five IBD patients were included, and 72.4% were classified as "normal" bone mineral density (BMD) and 27.6% as potentially osteopenic: 8.6% with ulcerative colitis and 19.0% with Crohn's disease. We found a decrease in bone density over time (p < 0.001) and that BMD decreases more in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis (p < 0.004). Sixty patients had two CT scans, and mean loss of 9.3 HU was noted. There was a non-significant decrease in BMD over time in patients exposed to > 31 days of steroids and BMD was stable with < 30 days of steroid exposure (p < 0.09). CONCLUSION: Using CT scans obtained for other indications, we found low rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis that may otherwise have gone undiagnosed. Refinement of opportunistic screening may have advantages in terms of cost-savings and earlier detection of bone loss.

Kidney transplant donor glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance during computerized tomographic angiography of the kidneys.

BACKGROUND: Pre-transplantation living-donor kidney function determines remaining donor kidney function and significantly affects post-transplantation allograft function in the recipient. Few transplantation centers perform donor kidney function measurement owing to patient burden. A simplified method of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement after angiographic procedures may facilitate more precise measurement of donor kidney function. METHODS: We evaluated the agreement between a simplified method of GFR measurement after renal computerized tomographic (CT) angiography (index GFR, 100 mL iohexol [350 mg/mL iodine]) and the reference GFR measurement with the use of iodinated radiocontrast media (5 mL bolus of iohexol [300 mg/mL iodine]) among 19 potential living kidney transplant donors. The 24-hour creatinine clearance and GFR estimation equations were additionally examined. Kidney lengths and total and segmented cortical kidney volumes were also measured. RESULTS: The index CT angiography GFR performed best with respect to the reference GFR with minimal bias (mean difference, -4 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), good precision (SD of the difference, 9.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), coefficient of determination (R(2)) of 0.74, narrow mean coefficient of variation (5% [range 1%-15%]), and high accuracy, with 100% of the values for the index test within 30% of the reference test. The 24-hour urine creatinine clearance values performed poorly. Kidney volumes and length did not significantly correlate with measured GFR. CONCLUSIONS: The CT angiographic GFR measurement could be a useful and more convenient method of donor kidney function evaluation and maintains minimal bias, high precision, and accuracy compared with the reference GFR measurement.