Examining facilitative services for entry into substance use disorder treatment: A cluster analysis of treatment facilities.

OBJECTIVES: We examined services to facilitate access to entering substance use disorder (SUD) treatment among a national sample of SUD treatment facilities. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS) 2020. Facilities were included in the sample based on criteria such as SUD treatment provision and being in the U.S. Cluster analysis was conducted using variables including ownership, levels of care, and whether facilities provide services or accept payment options aimed at reducing treatment barriers. National and state-level data on the percentage of facilities in each cluster were presented. RESULTS: Among N = 15,788 SUD treatment facilities four distinct clusters were identified: Cluster 1 consisted of for-profit and government outpatient facilities with high proportions of services to reduce barriers (22.2%). Cluster 2, comprised of non-profit outpatient facilities, offered the most comprehensive array of services to minimize barriers to treatment among all four clusters (25.2%). Cluster 3 included facilities with diverse ownership and care levels and provided a moderate to high degree of services aimed at reducing entry barriers to treatment (26.0%). Cluster 4 was primarily for-profit outpatient facilities with a low proportion of these services (26.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed facility-level groupings with different services to reduce barriers to SUD treatment across various clusters of SUD treatment facilities. While some facilities offered extensive services, others provided fewer. Differences in cluster distributions point to possible facilitators to treatment access for some persons seeking admission to specific treatment facilities. Efforts should be made to ensure that individuals seeking SUD treatment can access these services, and facilities should be adequately equipped to meet their diverse needs.

Learning curves of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) hernia repair among two surgeons at a high-volume community hospital: a cumulative sum analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Robotic extended totally extraperitoneal hernia (eTEP) repair is a novel technique for minimally invasive ventral hernia repair with retromuscular placement of mesh. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for robotic eTEP hernia repair using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis for two general surgeons-one with dedicated fellowship training in robotic eTEP technique (surgeon 2) and another without robotic eTEP-specific training (surgeon 1). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 98 patients undergoing robotic eTEP hernia repair from July 2020 to February 2022 for two surgeons. RA-CUSUM method was applied to the overall operative time (OT) in minutes, adjusting for transversus abdominis release (TAR). RESULTS: Figures 3 (surgeon 1) and 4 (surgeon 2) illustrate the three phases in the RA-CUSUM graphs of OT. For surgeon 1, the cases for each phase were determined: phase 1 (1 to 12), phase 2 (13 to 24), and phase 3 (25 to 51). For surgeon 2, the three phases were similarly determined as 1 to 8, 9 to 32, and 33 to 47, respectively. A significant (p = 0.017) difference existed for the OTs between phases 1 (262 ± 69) and 3 (192 ± 63.0) for surgeon 1. OT compared to the risk-adjusted value stabilized after case 12 and decreased after case 24 for surgeon 1; it began to decrease after case 8 for surgeon 2. CONCLUSIONS: The initial learning curve for surgeon 1 reached its plateau after 12 cases, shorter than comparable studies. This was likely due to the surgeon's intentional focus on learning this technique through courses, proctoring, and active mentorship. The flat learning curve seen in surgeon 2's series illustrates the value of experience gained during fellowship training. Our data support that, given the right resources and support, a short learning curve for eTEP is attainable for community surgeons without prior training in the technique.

Advancing successful implementation of task-shifted mental health care in low-resource settings (BASIC): protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The mental health treatment gap-the difference between those with mental health need and those who receive treatment-is high in low- and middle-income countries. Task-shifting has been used to address the shortage of mental health professionals, with a growing body of research demonstrating the effectiveness of mental health interventions delivered through task-shifting. However, very little research has focused on how to embed, support, and sustain task-shifting in government-funded systems with potential for scale up. The goal of the Building and Sustaining Interventions for Children (BASIC) study is to examine implementation policies and practices that predict adoption, fidelity, and sustainment of a mental health intervention in the education sector via teacher delivery and the health sector via community health volunteer delivery. METHODS: BASIC is a Hybrid Type II Implementation-Effectiveness trial. The study design is a stepped wedge, cluster randomized trial involving 7 sequences of 40 schools and 40 communities surrounding the schools. Enrollment consists of 120 teachers, 120 community health volunteers, up to 80 site leaders, and up to 1280 youth and one of their primary guardians. The evidence-based mental health intervention is a locally adapted version of Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, called Pamoja Tunaweza. Lay counselors are trained and supervised in Pamoja Tunaweza by local trainers who are experienced in delivering the intervention and who participated in a Train-the-Trainer model of skills transfer. After the first sequence completes implementation, in-depth interviews are conducted with initial implementing sites' counselors and leaders. Findings are used to inform delivery of implementation facilitation for subsequent sequences' sites. We use a mixed methods approach including qualitative comparative analysis to identify necessary and sufficient implementation policies and practices that predict 3 implementation outcomes of interest: adoption, fidelity, and sustainment. We also examine child mental health outcomes and cost of the intervention in both the education and health sectors. DISCUSSION: The BASIC study will provide knowledge about how implementation of task-shifted mental health care can be supported in government systems that already serve children and adolescents. Knowledge about implementation policies and practices from BASIC can advance the science of implementation in low-resource contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03243396. Registered 9th August 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03243396.

Mental health and challenges of transgender women: A qualitative study in Brazil and India.

Background: Transgender women from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are understudied, their coping strategies and struggles underrecognised. Aims: This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of transgender women from two major cities located in Brazil and India, LMICs with high rates of transphobia and gender-based violence. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods, exploratory study, including focus group discussions (FGDs) and brief survey interviews with 23 transgender women from Hyderabad, India and 12 transgender women from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Herein we present the combined (qualitative and quantitative) results related to discrimination, stigma, violence, and suicidality in transgender women's lives. Results: Three major themes emerged from FGDs: stigma and discrimination; violence, and suicidality. Lack of education and working opportunities influence high levels of poverty and engagement in survival sex work by transgender women in both cities. Study participants live in large cities with more than 6 million inhabitants, but transgender women reported chronic social isolation. Participants disclosed frequent suicide ideation and suicide attempts. Brief surveys corroborate FGD findings, identifying high prevalence of discrimination, intimate partner violence, suicidality and low social support. Discussion: Multiple layers of stigma, discrimination, violence and social isolation affect transgender women's quality of life in Hyderabad and Rio de Janeiro. Strategies sensitive to gender and culture should be implemented to tackle entrenched prejudice and social exclusion reported by transgender women. Additional social support strategies, better access to education and employment opportunities are also urgently needed. Improving the availability of evidence-based mental health interventions addressing the high prevalence of suicidality among transgender women from Hyderabad, India and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil should be prioritized.