Traumatic brain injury and occupational risk of low-level blast exposure on adverse career outcomes: an examination of administrative and medical separations from Service (2005-2015).

Introduction: Although traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been linked with adverse long-term health, less research has examined whether TBI is linked with non-clinical outcomes including involuntary job loss. Symptoms associated with TBI may influence one's ability to maintain gainful employment including employment in the U.S. military. That influence may impact military service members with exposure to repetitive low-level blast (LLB). Understanding the association between TBI and involuntary job loss outcomes among military populations is particularly important as it may be associated with differences in eligibility for post-service benefits. The purpose of the present research was to determine whether (1) TBI and related conditions are associated with involuntary job loss (i.e., medical and administrative separations from service) among military personnel, and (2) occupational risk of LLB is associated with involuntary job loss in both the presence and absence of clinical diagnoses of TBI and related conditions. Method: This research leveraged population-level data from the Career History Archival Medical and Personnel System for enlisted personnel who served on active duty between 2005-2015. Risk of LLB exposure was categorized using military occupational specialty as a proxy. Medical diagnoses were identified using ICD-9 codes. Separations for medical and administrative reasons were identified. Results: Risk for administrative separation differed across medical diagnoses of interest, but those who worked in high-risk occupations were more likely to be administratively separated than those working in low-risk occupations. Risk for medical separation was associated with occupational risk of LLB and each of the diagnoses of interest, though significant interactions suggested that the effects of certain diagnoses of interest (e.g., concussion, cognitive problems, postconcussive syndrome, migraines) on medical separations was greater among those working in high-risk occupations. Discussion: Taken together, the present research suggests that TBI and associated medical conditions, as well as occupational risk of LLB, are associated with long-term involuntary job loss for medical reasons. This study is the first to demonstrate involuntary military job loss outcomes associated with TBI, mental health conditions, and conditions associated with blast exposure using both inpatient and outpatient population-level data and may have important implications for civilian employment and post-service benefits.

The Effect of Concussion Mechanism of Injury on Sleep Problems in Active Duty Service Members Following Deployment.

INTRODUCTION: Sleep disruption is pervasive in the military and is generally exacerbated during deployment, partially due to increases in operational tempo and exposure to stressors and/or trauma. In particular, sleep disruption is a commonly reported symptom following deployment-related traumatic brain injury (TBI), though less is known about the prevalence of sleep disturbance as a function of whether the TBI was induced by high-level blast (HLB) or direct impact to the head. TBI assessment, treatment, and prognosis are further complicated by comorbidity with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and alcohol misuse. Here, we examine whether concussion mechanism of injury is associated with differences in the prevalence of self-reported sleep disturbance following deployment in a large sample of U.S. Marines while accounting for probable PTSD, depression, and alcohol misuse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of active duty enlisted Marines with a probable concussion (N = 5757) who completed the Post-Deployment Health Assessment between 2008 and 2012. Probable concussion was defined as endorsement of a potentially concussive event with corresponding loss or alteration of consciousness. The presence of concussion-related sleep problems was assessed with a dichotomous item. Probable PTSD, depression, and alcohol misuse were assessed using the Primary Care PTSD Screen, the Patient Health Questionnaire-2, and the Alcohol Use Identification Test-Concise, respectively. Logistic regression models investigated the effects of mechanism of injury (HLB vs. impact), PTSD, depression, and alcohol misuse on the presence of sleep problems, adjusting for sex and pay grade. The study was approved by the Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: Approximately 41% of individuals with a probable deployment-related concussion reported sleep problems following the event; 79% of concussed individuals reporting both HLB and probable PTSD reported sleep problems. All main effects were significantly associated with sleep disturbance in adjusted models. PTSD showed the strongest association with sleep disturbance (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.84), followed by depression (AOR = 2.43), HLB exposure (AOR = 2.00), female sex (AOR = 1.63), alcohol misuse (AOR = 1.14), and pay grade (AOR = 1.10). A significant HLB × PTSD interaction emerged (AOR = 1.58), which suggests that sleep disturbance was elevated among those with both HLB-induced (vs. impact-induced) concussions and presence (vs. absence) of PTSD. No other significant interactions emerged. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the prevalence of concussion-related sleep complaints following deployment as a function of the mechanism of injury in individuals with and without probable PTSD and depression. Individuals with HLB-induced concussion were twice as likely to report sleep problems as those with an impact-induced concussion. Future work should examine these effects longitudinally with validated measures that assess greater precision of exposure and outcome assessment (e.g., blast intensity and type of sleep disturbance).

Survey response over 15 years of follow-up in the Millennium Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of survey response and the characteristics associated with response over time in longitudinal studies are important to discern for the development of tailored retention efforts aimed at minimizing response bias. The Millennium Cohort Study, the largest and longest running cohort study of military personnel and veterans, is designed to examine the long-term health effects of military service and experiences and thus relies on continued participant survey responses over time. Here, we describe the response rates for follow-up survey data collected over 15 years and identify characteristics associated with follow-up survey response and mode of response (paper vs. web). METHOD: Patterns of follow-up survey response and response mode (web, paper, none) were examined among eligible participants (n=198,833), who were initially recruited in four panels from 2001 to 2013 in the Millennium Cohort Study, for a follow-up period of 3-15 years (2004-2016). Military and sociodemographic factors (i.e., enrollment panel, sex, birth year, race and ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, service component, service branch, pay grade, military occupation, length of service, and time deployed), life experiences and health-related factors (i.e., military deployment/combat experience, life stressors, mental health, physical health, and unhealthy behaviors) were used to examine follow-up response and survey mode over time in multivariable generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: Overall, an average response rate of 60% was observed across all follow-up waves. Factors associated with follow-up survey response over time included increased educational attainment, married status, female sex, older age, military deployment (regardless of combat experience), and higher number of life stressors, mental health issues, and physical health diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Despite the challenges associated with collecting multiple waves of follow-up survey data from members of the U.S. military during and after service, the Millennium Cohort Study has maintained a relatively robust response rate over time. The incorporation of tailored messages and outreach to those groups least likely to respond over time may improve retention and thereby increase the representativeness and generalizability of collected survey data.

Single and repeated high-level blast, low-level blast, and new-onset self-reported health conditions in the U.S. Millennium Cohort Study: An exploratory investigation.

Introduction: Although previous research suggests that overpressure exposure from either high-level blast (HLB) or low-level blast (LLB) are harmful to health, to date no large-scale studies with representative samples of military personnel have utilized prospective designs and self-reported measures to examine the relationships between blast exposure and health conditions. To address these limitations, this analysis of data from the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS), the largest and longest running study of U.S. service members and veterans, examined (1) whether single or repeated HLB exposure is associated with self-reported diagnoses of illness and injury, (2) whether repeated HLB is associated with greater risk than single HLB, (3) potential adverse consequences of LLB exposure using military occupation as a proxy, and (4) the combined effects of single or repeated HLB and LLB exposure. Method: MCS participants who completed the 2011-2013 survey (N = 138,949) were classified as having been exposed to "no," "single," or "repeated" HLB exposure, and into low or high risk of exposure to LLB based on occupation. Participants self-reported diagnosis of 45 medical conditions; newly reported diagnoses were regressed on single and repeated (vs. no) HLB, occupational risk of LLB, and relevant interactions using logistic regression. Results: Single and repeated HLB were associated with new onset of 25 and 29 diagnoses, respectively; repeated HLB exposure was associated with greater risk than single HLB exposure for five diagnoses (e.g., PTSD, depression). Occupational risk of LLB was associated with 11 diagnoses (e.g., PTSD, significant hearing loss). Additionally, 14 significant interactions were detected across 11 diagnoses. Discussion: Findings suggest that overpressure exposure (including single HLB, repeated HLB, and occupational risk of LLB) may increase the risks of self-reporting clinical diagnoses of PTSD, hearing loss, chronic fatigue syndrome, neuropathy-caused reduced sensation in the hands and feet, depression, vision loss, sinusitis, reflux, and anemia. Furthermore, the combination of HLB and LLB exposure may be associated with greater risk of migraines, PTSD, and impaired fecundity. These findings provide further evidence of the potential adverse consequences associated with overpressure exposure and underscore the necessity of public health surveillance initiatives for blast exposure and/or safety recommendations for training and operational environments.

Validation of Military Occupational Specialty as a Proxy for Blast Exposure Using the Salisbury Blast Interview.

Abstract Evaluating large data sets precludes the ability to directly measure individual experiences, instead relying on proxies to infer certain constructs. Blast exposure is a construct of study currently in its infancy, resulting in diverse definitions and measurements across studies. The purpose of the present study was to validate military occupational specialty (MOS) as a proxy for blast exposure in combat veterans. A total of 256 veterans (86.33% male) completed the Salisbury Blast Interview (SBI) and Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC) Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury (MMA-TBI). MOS was collected through record review and categorized into low and high risk for blast exposure. Chi-square analyses and t tests compared SBI metrics between MOS categories. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of MOS category in determining blast exposure severity. Veterans in high-risk MOS were more likely to have experienced blast and deployment TBI (ps < 0.001) than were those in low-risk MOS. ROC analyses indicated good specificity (81.29-88.00) for blast and deployment TBI outcomes, suggesting that low-risk MOS is generally associated with an absence of blast and deployment TBI outcomes. Sensitivity was low (36.46-51.14), indicating that MOS risk level was not a good predictor of the presence of these outcomes. Results demonstrate that high-risk MOSs will identify individuals with blast exposure and deployment TBI history whereas low-risk MOSs will capture a highly variable group. Accuracy of MOS categorization was not acceptable for diagnostic-level tests; however, results support its use as a screening measure for a history of exposure to blast, use in epidemiological studies, and considerations for military policy.

Evaluation of Two Educational Modalities for the Clinical Practice Guideline for Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain for US Military Physicians.

INTRODUCTION: The Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the Management of Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain was updated in 2017 with targeted guidance to provide safe opioid use while mitigating the increasing levels of prescription opioid misuse among military personnel. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two educational training modalities for the CPG (an online training [OLT] module and a mobile app) on provider's knowledge, practices, and comfort with the CPG. The OLT was a self-paced interactive slide-based module that emphasized practical application, and the app provided information on the revised CPG and provider and patient resources. METHODS: Active duty providers (N = 56) were randomly assigned to one of four groups (OLT only, app only, OLT and app combined, or neither OLT nor the app), and they completed a pre-test and an 8-week post-test. RESULTS: Compared with those who received neither intervention, providers who received OLT only or the app only showed significant increases in knowledge over time. The combination of both OLT and app did not seem to significantly increase knowledge above either the OLT or the app alone. Neither the OLT, the app, nor their combination significantly increased either practices or comfort over time. DISCUSSION: These results show that use of these educational tools, individually, was associated with an increase in provider knowledge, suggesting that these tools constitute a valuable addition to the available resources to optimize CPG implementation.

Self-Reported Symptoms in U.S. Marines Following Blast- and Impact-Related Concussion.

INTRODUCTION: Recent research on traumatic brain injury (TBI) has suggested that the mechanism of injury (i.e., whether the TBI was caused by high-level blast [HLB] vs. direct physical impact to the head) may be an important factor in injury severity, symptomology, and recovery because of differences in physiological effects of each type of injury on the brain. However, differences in self-reported symptomology resulting from HLB- vs. impact-related TBIs have not been thoroughly examined. This study tested the hypothesis that HLB- and impact-related concussions result in different self-reported symptoms in an enlisted Marine Corps population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All records of 2008 and 2012 Post-Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA) forms completed by enlisted active duty Marines between January 2008 and January 2017 were examined for self-reported concussion, mechanism of injury, and self-reported symptoms experienced during deployment. Concussion events were categorized as either blast- or impact-related; individual symptoms were categorized as neurological, musculoskeletal, or immunological. A series of logistic regressions were performed to examine associations between self-reported symptoms experienced by healthy controls and Marines who endorsed (1) any concussion (mTBI), (2) a probable blast-related concussion (mbTBI), and (3) a probable impact-related concussion (miTBI); analyses were also stratified by PTSD. To determine if there were significant differences between odds ratios (ORs) for mbTBIs vs. miTBIs, 95% CIs were examined for overlap. RESULTS: Marines with a probable concussion, regardless of the mechanism of injury, were significantly more likely to report all symptoms (OR range: 1.7-19.3). Overall, mbTBIs, compared with miTBIs, resulted in higher odds of symptom reporting for eight symptoms on the 2008 PDHA (tinnitus, trouble hearing, headache, memory problems, dizziness, dim vision, trouble concentrating, and vomiting) and six symptoms on the 2012 PDHA (tinnitus, trouble hearing, headaches, memory problems, balance problems, and increased irritability), all of which were in the neurological symptom category. Conversely, odds of symptom reporting were higher for Marines experiencing miTBIs (vs. mbTBIs) for seven symptoms on the 2008 PDHA (skin diseases or rashes, chest pain, trouble breathing, persistent cough, red eyes, fever, and other) and one symptom on the 2012 PDHA (skin rash and/or lesion), all of which were in the immunological symptoms category. mbTBI (vs. miTBI) was consistently associated with greater odds of reporting tinnitus, trouble hearing, and memory problems, regardless of PTSD status. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support recent research suggesting that the mechanism of injury may play an important role in symptom reporting and/or physiological changes to the brain after concussion. The results of this epidemiological investigation should be used to guide further research on the physiological effects of concussion, diagnostic criteria for neurological injuries, and treatment modalities for various concussion-related symptoms.

The Millennium Cohort Study: The first 20 years of research dedicated to understanding the long-term health of US Service Members and Veterans.

PURPOSE: The Millennium Cohort Study, the US Department of Defense's largest and longest running study, was conceived in 1999 to investigate the effects of military service on service member health and well-being by prospectively following active duty, Reserve, and National Guard personnel from all branches during and following military service. In commemoration of the Study's 20th anniversary, this paper provides a summary of its methods, key findings, and future directions. METHODS: Recruitment and enrollment of the first 5 panels occurred between 2001 and 2021. After completing a baseline survey, participants are requested to complete follow-up surveys every 3-5 years. RESULTS: Study research projects are categorized into 3 core portfolio areas (psychological health, physical health, and health-related behaviors) and several cross-cutting areas and have culminated in more than 120 publications to date. For example, some key Study findings include that specific military service-related factors (e.g., experiencing combat, serving in certain occupational subgroups) were associated with adverse health-related outcomes and that unhealthy behaviors and mental health issues may increase following the transition from military service to veteran status. CONCLUSIONS: The Study will continue to foster stakeholder relationships such that research findings inform and guide policy initiatives and health promotion efforts.

Occupational Risk of Low-Level Blast Exposure and TBI-Related Medical Diagnoses: A Population-Based Epidemiological Investigation (2005-2015).

Because traumatic brain injury (TBI)-most often caused by exposure to high-level blast (HLB)-is a leading cause of medical evacuations of deployed U.S. service members in recent conflicts, researchers seek to identify risk factors for TBI. Previous research using self-reported data has identified low-level blast (LLB) as one such risk factor and suggests an association with susceptibility to and symptoms associated with TBI. This article presents a population-based study of all branches of military service that examines the association between occupational risk for LLB and both clinically diagnosed TBIs-from concussions to severe and penetrating TBIs-and conditions commonly comorbid with concussion. Using archival medical and career records from >2 million service members between 2005-2015, this work demonstrates that occupational risk of LLB is associated with any TBI, mild TBI, moderate TBI, cognitive problems, communication problems, hearing problems, headaches, any behavioral health condition, anxiety, drug abuse/dependence, alcohol abuse/dependence, delirium/dementia, posttraumatic stress disorder, post-concussive syndrome, tinnitus, fatigue, and migraines. Understanding the full scope of the effects of LLB on service members will help ensure the health and readiness of service members and may influence both military policy and clinical practice guidelines for blast-induced injuries.

Getting on the Same Page: Consolidating Terminology to Facilitate Cross-Disciplinary Health-Related Blast Research.

The consequences of blast exposure (including both high-level and low-level blast) have been a focal point of military interest and research for years. Recent mandates from Congress (e.g., National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018, section 734) have further accelerated these efforts, facilitating collaborations between research teams from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds. Based on findings from a recent scoping review, we argue that the scientific field of blast research is plagued by inconsistencies in both conceptualization of relevant constructs and terminology used to describe them. These issues hamper our ability to interpret study methods and findings, hinder efforts to integrate findings across studies to reach scientific consensus, and increase the likelihood of redundant efforts. We argue that multidisciplinary experts in this field require a universal language and clear, standardized terminology to further advance the important work of examining the effects of blast exposure on human health, performance, and well-being. To this end, we present a summary of descriptive conventions regarding the language scientists currently use when discussing blast-related exposures and outcomes based on findings from a recent scoping review. We then provide prescriptive conventions about how these terms should be used by clearly conceptualizing and explicitly defining relevant constructs. Specifically, we summarize essential concepts relevant to the study of blast, precisely distinguish between high-level blast and low-level blast, and discuss how the terms acute, chronic, exposure, and outcome should be used when referring to the health-related consequences of blast exposure.

The Persistence of Blast- Versus Impact-Induced Concussion Symptomology Following Deployment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the persistence of concussion-related symptoms following injury as a function of mechanism of injury (high-level blast [HLB] vs impact) and low-level blast (LLB) exposure among Marines. SETTING: Upon return from deployment and approximately 6 months later, respectively, Marines completed the Post-Deployment Health Assessment and Post-Deployment Health Re-Assessment in an operational or clinic setting. PARTICIPANTS: Data from active duty enlisted Marines who completed both assessments (n = 102 075) and who reported a potentially mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI)-inducing event and completed an mTBI screen (n = 8106) were analyzed. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of Marines deployed between 2008 and 2012. Marines were categorized into groups with relatively high versus low risk for occupational risk of LLB exposure. A mixed model analysis of variance was used to examine the number of symptoms Marines reported experiencing during deployment as a function of probable concussion, HLB exposure, occupational risk, type of symptom, and time of measurement. MAIN MEASURES: Self-reported deployment exposures including HLB, probable mTBIs, and occupational risk of LLB exposure were identified. Outcomes included the proportion of neurological, musculoskeletal, and immunological symptoms for which Marines reported seeking care during and following deployment were analyzed. RESULTS: Probable HLB-induced mTBIs (vs impact-induced) were associated with significantly more neurological symptoms at return from deployment and approximately 6 months later. Although symptom reporting decreased at statistically equivalent rates regardless of mechanism of injury, those with a probable HLB-induced concussion continued to report elevated symptomology post-deployment. Additionally, Marines with probable concussion working in occupations with LLB exposure reported elevated levels of persistent neurological symptoms. Both HLB and LLB exposure were associated with neurological symptoms that persisted following deployment. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that blast-induced brain injuries may be fundamentally different from impact-induced injuries, and that additional screening and symptomatic treatment for blast-exposed patients may be warranted.

Potential Health and Performance Effects of High-Level and Low-Level Blast: A Scoping Review of Two Decades of Research.

Although blast exposure has been recognized as a significant source of morbidity and mortality in military populations, our understanding of the effects of blast exposure, particularly low-level blast (LLB) exposure, on health outcomes remains limited. This scoping review provides a comprehensive, accessible review of the peer-reviewed literature that has been published on blast exposure over the past two decades, with specific emphasis on LLB. We conducted a comprehensive scoping review of the scientific literature published between January 2000 and 2019 pertaining to the effects of blast injury and/or exposure on human and animal health. A three-level review process with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria was used. A full-text review of all articles pertaining to LLB exposure was conducted and relevant study characteristics were extracted. The research team identified 3,215 blast-relevant articles, approximately half of which (55.4%) studied live humans, 16% studied animals, and the remainder were non-subjects research (e.g., literature reviews). Nearly all (99.49%) of the included studies were conducted by experts in medicine or epidemiology; approximately half of these articles were categorized into more than one medical specialty. Among the 51 articles identified as pertaining to LLB specifically, 45.1% were conducted on animals and 39.2% focused on human subjects. Animal studies of LLB predominately used shock tubes to induce various blast exposures in rats, assessed a variety of outcomes, and clearly demonstrated that LLB exposure is associated with brain injury. In contrast, the majority of LLB studies on humans were conducted among military and law enforcement personnel in training environments and had remarkable variability in the exposures and outcomes assessed. While findings suggest that there is the potential for LLB to harm human populations, findings are mixed and more research is needed. Although it is clear that more research is needed on this rapidly growing topic, this review highlights the detrimental effects of LLB on the health of both animals and humans. Future research would benefit from multidisciplinary collaboration, larger sample sizes, and standardization of terminology, exposures, and outcomes.

Self-Reported Concussion Symptomology during Deployment: Differences as a Function of Injury Mechanism and Low-Level Blast Exposure.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), which can result from either direct impact to the head or blast exposure, has been the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in recent military conflicts. However, little research has compared mTBIs by mechanism of injury. The present research addressed two research questions: (1) Are blast-related mTBIs (mbTBIs) associated with significantly more symptoms than impact-related mTBIs (miTBIs), and (2) are mTBIs associated with more self-reported symptoms among service members with higher (vs. lower) risk of low-level blast (LLB) exposure. We obtained data from 181,423 active duty enlisted United States Marines deployed between 2003 and 2012, who completed the Post-Deployment Health Assessment. We examined the self-reported symptoms of Marines who completed an mTBI screen and could be classified as at high or low risk for LLB exposure, using their military occupation as a proxy (n = 12,013). Symptoms were compared as a function of blast exposure (blast vs. impact), probable mTBI (yes vs. no), occupational risk of LLB (high vs. low), and symptom type (neurological vs. musculoskeletal vs. immunological). Overall, musculoskeletal symptoms were reported more frequently than neurological and immunological symptoms. However, Marines with probable mTBIs (regardless of mechanism of injury) and those with probable mbTBIs specifically reported more neurological symptoms, which rose to the level of musculoskeletal symptom reporting. Among Marines with probable mTBI, those with high risk of LLB exposure also reported significantly more neurological symptoms. Our results indicate that mbTBIs and miTBIs may be fundamentally different, and that LLB may increase susceptibility to injury.

Blast Exposure and Risk of Recurrent Occupational Overpressure Exposure Predict Deployment TBIs.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has been the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in recent military conflicts and deployment-related TBIs are most commonly caused by blast. However, knowledge of risk factors that increase susceptibility to TBI following an acute, high-level blast is limited. We hypothesized that recurrent occupational overpressure exposure (ROPE) may be one factor that increases susceptibility to mild TBI (mTBI) following blast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using military occupational specialty as a proxy, we examined the effects of high versus low ROPE on mTBI following blast exposure. Initial analyses included 111,641 active-duty-enlisted U.S. Marines who completed the 2003 or 2008 version of the Post-Deployment Health Assessment. Final analyses examined probable mTBI screens among Marines with at least one qualifying exposure as a function of whether the exposure was a blast and level of ROPE (N = 12,929). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the Naval Health Research Center. RESULTS: Blast and ROPE were both independently and jointly associated with a probable mTBI. Marines who experienced a blast (vs other qualifying exposure) and those in high (vs low) risk occupations were 1.07 and 1.23 times more likely to sustain a probable mTBI, respectively. Furthermore, among those who experienced a blast during deployment, those in high-risk occupations were 1.45 times more likely than those in low-risk occupations to sustain a probable mTBI. CONCLUSIONS: Blast exposure and ROPE were independently associated with mTBIs, and Marines with both blast exposure during deployment and ROPE were especially likely to sustain an mTBI. This suggests that ROPE heightens the risk of mTBI following blast. Ongoing research is examining the severity, symptomology, and sequelae of TBIs as a function of ROPE.

Use of an Educational Video to Reduce Barriers to Military Mental Health Care.

OBJECTIVE: Although there is significant need for mental health care among service members, stigma surrounding these services, along with myths associated with behavioral health treatment, discourages care seeking. This study evaluated the effect of a video designed to demystify mental health treatment on barriers to seeking care among military personnel. METHODS: Participants were 294 active duty U.S. Marine Corps personnel who were randomly assigned to the intervention video only, the intervention video with discussion, or an attentional control video. Participants completed questionnaires that assessed social stigma regarding mental health treatment and willingness to seek help at pretest, posttest, and 6-week follow-up; personal desire for mental health care was assessed at pretest and 6-week follow-up. RESULTS: Participants who viewed the intervention video in either condition showed significant and similar decreases in social stigma and increases in willingness to seek help at posttest (p<.001), whereas participants in the control group showed no change at posttest in either variable. Although social stigma did not differ by intervention group at the 6-week follow-up, participants in either intervention were 2.56 times more likely than participants in the control group to report a personal desire for mental health care at the 6-week follow-up (p=.05). There were no significant differences between the two interventions on the main outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A video in which mental health care providers explain the treatment process may be effective as an initial stand-alone social stigma reduction intervention. Additional efforts are likely needed to sustain effects and to realize increases in help-seeking behavior.

Using high-level construal and perceptions of changeability to promote self-change over self-protection motives in response to negative feedback.

Diagnostic negative information presents people with a motivational dilemma. Although negative feedback can provide useful information with which to guide future self-improvement efforts, it also presents short-term affective costs. We propose that construal level, jointly with the perceived changeability of the feedback domain, determines whether people choose to accept or dismiss such information. Whereas low-level construal promotes short-term self-protection motivation (promoting dismissal), high-level construal promotes long-term self-change motivation (promoting acceptance)--to the extent that change is perceived as possible. Four studies support this hypothesis and examine underlying cognitive and motivational mechanisms. The present work may provide an integrative theoretical framework for understanding when people will be open to and accept negative diagnostic information, and has important practical implications for promoting self-change efforts.

Social buffering by God: prayer and measures of stress.

Social buffering is characterized by attenuation of stress in the presence of others, with supportive individuals providing superior buffering. We were interested in learning if the implied presence of a supportive entity, God, would reduce acute stress. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: prayer, encouraging self-talk, and control. They were subsequently placed in a stressful situation. Self ratings of stress were lower among the prayer and self-talk conditions relative to controls. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures only among those who prayed were lower than controls; however, prayer and self-talk did not differ. Prayer alone did not significantly reduce stress, perhaps because the majority of students in the prayer condition did not consider reading a prayer to constitute praying.