BRCA1/2 Molecular Assay for Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Survey through Italian Departments of Oncology and Molecular and Genomic Diagnostic Laboratories.

In Italy, 5200 new ovarian cancers were diagnosed in 2018, highlighting an increasing need to test women for BRCA1/2. The number of labs offering this test is continuously increasing. The aim of this study was to show the results coming from the intersociety survey coordinated by four different Clinical and Laboratory Italian Scientific Societies (AIOM, SIAPEC-IAP, SIBIOC, and SIGU). A multidisciplinary team belonging to the four scientific societies drew up two different questionnaires: One was targeted toward all Italian Departments of Medical Oncology, and the second toward laboratories of clinical molecular biology. This survey was implemented from September 2017 to March 2018. Seventy-seven out of 305 (25%) Departments of Medical Oncology filled our survey form. Indeed, 59 molecular laboratories were invited. A total of 41 laboratories (70%) filled in the questionnaire. From 2014 to 2017, 16 new molecular laboratories were activated. A total of 12,559 tests were performed in the year 2016, with a mean of 339 tests and a median of 254 tests per laboratory, showing a glimpse of an extreme low number of tests performed per year by some laboratories. In terms of the type and number of professionals involved in the pre- and post-test counseling, results among the onco-genetic team were heterogeneous. Our data show that the number of laboratories providing BRCA1/2 germline assays is significantly increased with further implementation of the somatic test coming soon. The harmonization of the complete laboratory diagnostic path should be encouraged, particularly in order to reduce the gap between laboratories with high and low throughput.

Recommendations for the implementation of BRCA testing in ovarian cancer patients and their relatives.

The current availability of new Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer patients independently of the presence of a BRCA pathogenic variant, together with the validation of somatic test for the analysis of BRCA1/2 genes, involves the need to optimise the guidelines for BRCA testing. The AIOM-SIGU-SIBIOC-SIAPEC-IAP Italian Scientific Societies, in this position paper, recommend the implementation of BRCA testing with 2 main objectives: the first is the identification of ovarian cancer patients with higher probability of benefit from specific anticancer treatments (test for response to therapy); the second goal, through BRCA testing in the family members of ovarian cancer patients, is the identification of carriers of pathogenic variant, who have inheredited predisposition to cancer development (test for cancer risk). These individuals with increased risk of cancer, should be encouraged to participate in dedicated high-risk surveillance clinics and specific risk-reducing measures (primary and/or secondary prevention programs).

Long-lasting clinical benefit of sunitinib malate in the treatment of a case of heavily pre-treated metastatic liposarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms including several distinct entities with different cell differentiation and clinical prognosis, but which are often treated as a single disease. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a male patient, heavily treated for a metastatic well-differentiated liposarcoma occurring in the left lateral neck. He received radiotherapy and different lines of standard chemotherapy with local progression and lung metastasis. In November 2009, on the basis of a phase II study demonstrating the efficacy of sunitinib in patients with liposarcoma, the patient was treated with sunitinib at 37.5 mg daily in 4-week cycles on a compassionate use basis. Until November 2012 he received a total of 23 cycles of sunitinib treatment achieving a stable disease in all sites. Therapy with sunitinib is still ongoing without side effects. CONCLUSION: Our findings confirm that sunitinib may be a useful therapeutic tool in the treatment of some cases of pre-treated liposarcoma.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status and interval breast cancer in a population-based cancer registry study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive status is associated with risk of breast cancer diagnosis in the interval between mammographic screening, we estimated the distribution of features of aggressive tumor behavior in a general population with newly diagnosed breast cancer and known screening status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated all invasive breast cancers (N = 641) that were systematically collected by the Parma Province Cancer Registry and diagnosed in women age 50 to 69 years from 2004 to 2007. From this population, 292 screen-detected cancers and 48 interval cases with negative screening mammograms on expert rereading (true interval cancers) were selected for study purposes. Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for age and tumor size was used to determine whether interval cancers were associated with selected clinicobiologic characteristics. RESULTS: Tumors with a high histologic grade (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.8), high proliferative rate (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.5), negative estrogen receptor status (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.1), or HER2-positive status (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7 to 7.1) were more likely to be diagnosed in the interval between screening. Women age less than 60 years with HER2-positive breast cancer were four times more likely to be diagnosed in the interval between screening compared with only a two-fold increased risk for older women. CONCLUSION: This population-based cancer registry study demonstrated that HER2-positive tumors account for a substantial proportion of mammographic screening failure. The distribution of biologic characteristics in screen-detected cancers differs from that observed in interval cancers and may account in part for the more aggressive behavior of interval-detected cases.