Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst ; 50: 216-9, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16358970

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Staphylococcus aureus septicemia (SAS) is usually described in immunocompromised patients and during serious weakening diseases, associated with a neutropenic condition. Over the last recent years, clinic relevance of SAS has become more prominent owing to the progressive rise of methicillin-resistent strains in hospital-acquired infections and to its development in non-neutropenic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical features and outcome of non-neutropenic patients with positive blood culture for Staphylococcus aureus (SA) hospitalized in Internal Medicine Wards of our hospital during 1 year of observation. 24 patients with those characteristics were retrospectively recruited; five of them were then excluded from the analysis because of concomitant oncohematologic disease. The median age of the study group of patients (19 cases) was 56 years (range 18-87); 10 (52.6%) patients were male. RESULTS: Infection was hospital-acquired in 10 patients (52.6%). Predisposing factors were: central venous catheter (CVC) (47.4%), recent surgical intervention (21.0%), drug-addiction (15.8%). Main comorbidities were diabetes mellitus in 10 patients (52.6%), heart disease in 4 (21.0%), chronic renal failure in 3 (15.8%), cerebral vascular disease in 3 (15.8%). Fever >38 degrees C was found in all patients at the moment of SA isolation in blood culture. SA isolated-strains were methicillin-resistant in 7 patients (36.8%). Complications of bacteremia were: pneumonia in 4, endocarditis in 3, vertebral osteomyelytis in 2, septic splenic embolization in 1 and endophtalmitis in 1 patient. The septicemia-attributable mortality was 36.8% (7 patients). CONCLUSIONS: SAS in non-neutropenic patients observed in Internal Medicine Units are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, closer to that reported for neutropenic illnesses.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Medicina Interna , Masculino , Resistência a Meticilina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 40(8): 2953-8, 2002 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12149358

RESUMO

Fluconazole susceptibility among 800 clinical Candida isolates (60% C. albicans) and two control strains (C. krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019) was tested with the NCCLS M27-A method (gold standard) and six commercial products (Candifast, disk, Etest, Fungitest, Integral System Yeasts, and Sensititre YeastOne). Results were classified as susceptible, susceptible-dose dependent, or resistant using M27-A breakpoints or, for Fungitest, Integral System Yeasts, and Candifast, as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant, according to the manufacturers' instructions. Concordance with NCCLS M27-A results was analyzed with the chi(2) test. Intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility was also evaluated. NCCLS M27-A (90.1%), Etest (93.1%), Sensititre YeastOne (93.1%), disk (96.7%), Fungitest (92.6%), Integral System Yeasts (40.6%), and Candifast (6.0%) classified the indicated percentages of C. albicans isolates as susceptible. Among non-C. albicans strains, the percentages of susceptible isolates were as follows: NCCLS M27-A, 74.0%; Etest, 83.8%; Sensititre YeastOne, 64.1%; disk, 60.6%; Fungitest, 76.6%; Integral System Yeasts, 28.3%; and Candifast, 27.4%. All methods except Candifast and Integral System Yeasts showed good agreement with NCCLS M27-A results for both C albicans and non-C. albicans isolates. Intralaboratory reproducibility was excellent for NCCLS M27-A, Etest, Sensititre YeastOne, disk, and Fungitest (88 to 91%). Similar results emerged from the interlaboratory reproducibility evaluation. Our findings indicate that some commercial methods can be useful for fluconazole susceptibility testing of clinical Candida isolates. Those characterized by a lack of medium standardization and/or objective interpretative criteria should be avoided. Particular caution is necessary when testing is being done for clinical and epidemiological purposes.


Assuntos
Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Candida/efeitos dos fármacos , Fluconazol/farmacologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/normas , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Candidíase/microbiologia , Humanos , Laboratórios , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...