From near-zero to zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation procedures.

AIMS: The use of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) systems can reduce radiation exposure (RX) and it can also completely eliminate the use of RX. Radiation exposure related to conventional radiofrequency ablation procedures can have a stochastic and deterministic effect on health. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of an entirely nonfluoroscopic approach to catheter ablation (CA) using EAM CARTO3. METHODS: In 2011 we started an RX-minimization programme in all procedures using the CARTO system with the deliberate intention to not resort to the aid of RX unless strictly necessary. We divided procedures into two groups (group 1: from 2011 to 2013; group 2: from 2014 to 2017). The only exclusion criteria were the need for transseptal puncture, and nonidiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT). RESULTS: From a total of 525 procedures, we performed CA entirely without RX in 78.5% of cases. From 2011 to 2013, we performed CA without RX in 38.5% of cases; from 2014 to 2017, we performed 96.2% of cases with zero RX. The use of RX was significantly reduced in group 2 (group 2: 1.4 ± 19.6 seconds vs group 1: 556.92 ± 520.76 seconds; P < .001). These differences were irrespective of arrhythmia treatment. There were no differences between the two groups in acute success, complications, or duration of procedures. CONCLUSION: CA of supraventricular tachycardia and VT entirely without RX, guided by the CARTO system, is safe, feasible, and effective. After an adequate learning curve, CA can be performed entirely without RX.

Catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia without the use of fluoroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is the treatment of choice for many patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT). Unfortunately, conventional catheter ablation is guided by fluoroscopy, which is associated with a small but definite radiation risk for patients and laboratory personnel. The aim of our study is to assess feasibility, success rate and safety of idiopathic VT ablation procedure performed without the use of fluoroscopy. METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients undergoing idiopathic VT ablation at our institution have been included. The ablation procedures were performed under the guidance of electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). RESULTS: Nineteen patients (mean age 38.7 years) underwent ablation procedure for idiopathic VT. Twelve (63%) had outflow tract VT, 3 (18%) fascicular tachycardia, 2 (11%) peri-tricuspidal VT, 1 (5%) peri-mitral VT, and 1 (5%) lateral left free-wall VT. The mean procedural time was 170.2 ± 45.7 min. No fluoroscopy was used in any procedural phase. Acute success rate was 100%. No complication was documented in any patients. After a mean follow up of 18 ± 4 months, recurrences occurred in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our preliminary experience idiopathic VT ablation without the use of fluoroscopy was feasible and safe, using a combination of EAM and ICE. Success rate was excellent with no complication.