Diagnostic methodology in labelled leukocyte scan for prosthetic / non-prosthetic osteoarticular infection: Visual or semi-quantitative analysis? One- or two-day protocol?

OBJECTIVE: as scarce literature on the topic is available, we aimed to compare diagnostic utility of semi-quantitative versus visual analysis in labelled white blood cell scintigraphy (WBCS) for osteoarticular infection. One-day and two-day protocols were assessed, particularly in orthopaedic devices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: prospective study of 79 consecutive patients with suspected osteoarticular infection. In all patients, WBCS were performed at 30min, 4h, 8h and 24h. Images were analysed by grouping in two protocols: one-day-protocol (experts evaluated 30min, 4h and 8h planar images) and two-day-protocol (experts evaluated 30min, 4h and 24h planar images). Planar images were interpreted qualitative and semiquantitatively and also were compared grouping patients with and without orthopaedic devices. To find which cut-off value of the percentage variation could predict of osteoarticular infection, multiple cut-off values were calculated in both protocols from the Youden index. Three blinded readers analysed the images. RESULTS: Comparing final diagnosis visual analysis of the one-day-protocol provided better results with sensitivity of 95.5%, specificity of 93% and diagnostic accuracy of 93.7% (p<001) than the two-day-protocol with values of 86.4%, 94.7% and 92.4%, respectively (p<001). For semi-quantitative analysis, the one-day-protocol also obtained better results with sensitivity of 72.7%, specificity of 78.9% and accuracy of 77.2% (p<001) than two-day-protocol (no significant results; p=0.14), especially in the group of patients with orthopaedic devices (sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 79.5% and accuracy of 82.7%; p<001). CONCLUSIONS: most accurate approach in the diagnosis of osteoarticular infection corresponded to visual analysis in one-day-protocol that showed greater sensitivity and specificity than semi-quantitative analysis. Semi-quantitative analysis only could be useful when visual analysis is doubtful. In patients with joint prostheses, an increase in percentage variation above 9% obtained maximum sensitivity and negative predictive value.

Utility of 8 h and time decay-corrected acquisition scintigraphy with in-vitro labeled white blood cells for the diagnosis of osteoarticular infection.

INTRODUCTION: Except in the spine, labeled white-blood cell scintigraphy (WBCS) with image acquisition up to 24 h is the nuclear medicine test of choice for diagnosing osteoarticular infection. However, distinguishing between inflammation and infection is a challenge. OBJECTIVES: The first aim of this study was to verify earlier research studies that used 4 and 24 h time decay-corrected acquisition (TDCA) to differentiate infection from inflammation. The second aim was to analyze whether 8 h acquisition (1-day protocol) yielded similar results as 20-24 h acquisition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an observational study of 94 patients (22-86 years, 52 women) with suspected osteoarticular infection referred to nuclear medicine to confirm infection. WBCS and TDCA images were obtained at 30 min, 4 h, and 8 h after injection of the labeled leukocytes, with collection times of 5, 8, and 12 min, respectively. Scintigrams were classified into three protocols: protocol 1: experts read only 30 min and 4 h images; protocol 2: experts read the whole set of images (30 min, 4 h, and 8 h) with different pixel intensities (each image normalized to its own maximum activity); protocol 3: experts read the whole set of images with the same pixel intensity. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated. In patients with orthopedic implants, the interobserver reproducibility for visual analysis was calculated using the κ index. RESULTS: Infection was confirmed in 26 cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and κ results were as follows: protocol 1: 92.3, 50.0, 41.4, 94.4, 61.7%, 0.79; protocol 2: 92.3, 94.1, 85.7, 97.0, 93.6%, 0.80; protocol 3: 96.2, 97.1, 92.6, 98.5, 96.8%, 0.77. CONCLUSION: TDCA acquisition of WBCS at 8 h (1-day protocol) enables a faster diagnosis than 24 h acquisition. The use of TDCA with the same pixel intensity in all images enables an accurate diagnostic of osteoarticular infection, with a considerable interobserver agreement for all protocols.

Lymphoscintigraphy in oral squamous cell carcinoma sentinel node biopsy and its role in the surgical planning.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of different lymphatic pathways on surgical planning and the reliability of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy to predict regional recurrence in patients with clinically N0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). METHODS: Twenty-five patients with cT1/T2 N0 OSCC underwent a lymphoscintigraphy and an SLN biopsy. Elective neck dissection was performed at the validation stage and in patients with metastatic SLN. Scintigraphic and surgical SLN detection, pathologic status of SLN and of elective neck dissection, and regional recurrence in patients with negative SLN (pN0(sn)) were all analyzed. RESULTS: Scintigraphic and surgical detection were 96% and 100%, respectively, with 68% of negative SLN. Lymphoscintigraphy modified surgery in 32% of patients. In pN0(sn) patients, the free-of-disease survival rate was 88%. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the reliability of sentinel node biopsy in OSCC. Presurgical lymphoscintigraphy is essential, because it can modify the surgical procedure.

Factors associated with the non detection of the sentinel node in breast cancer

The aim of the work was to analyse the potential influence of different factors on the surgical detection of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. The procedure has been performed in 704 patients. In 43 out of the 704 cases, the SN was not detected, 24 were palpable and 19 had no palpable tumors. Lymphoscitigraphy was done in 2 h p.i. of 37-55 MBq of 99mTc-nanocolloid. The day before surgery in palpable tumours and 4 h previous to surgery in non-palpable tumours, surgical detection was performed using a gammaprobe. The following factors were analysed: patient age, tumour size, breast quadrant tumour localization, scintigraphic visualizatio,n and the palpation of the tumour. Results: Patient age was significantly (p<0.001) higher in the patients in whom SN was not detected. Scintigraphic visualization was significantly (p<0.05) lower in the patients in whom SN was not detected. There were no significant differences concerning the other parameters analysed. Conclusion: patient age and scintigraphic visualization are parameters that directly influence the detection of sentinel node in breast cancer.

O objetivo deste trabalho foi analisar a possível influencia de diferentes fatores na detecção cirúrgica de linfonodos sentinela no câncer de mama. O procedimento foi realizado em 704 pacientes. Em 43 dos 704, o linfonodo sentinela não foi detectado, 24 eram palpáveis e 19 eram tumores não palpáveis. Foi realizada a linfocintilografia 2 horas após a injeção de 37-55MBq de 99mTc-nanocolóide. No dia anterior à cirurgia nos tumores palpáveis e nas 4 horas prévias à cirurgia de tumores não palpáveis foi realizada detecção cirúrgica com a gammaprobe. Foram analisados os seguintes fatores: idade do paciente, tamanho do tumor, quadrante de localização do tumor de seio, visualização cintilográfica e palpação do tumor. Resultados: a idade do paciente foi significativamente maior (p<0,001) nos pacientes nos quais o nódulo sentinela não foi detectado. Não foram observadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas com relação ao outros parâmetros estudados. A idade do paciente e a visualização cintilográfica são parâmetros que influenciam diretamente na detecção de nódulo sentinela em câncer de mama.