Thrombectomy or intravenous thrombolysis in patients with NIHSS of 5 or less?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of minor stroke patients with intracranial vessel occlusions (IVO) underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus those treated with intravenous thrombolysis alone (IVT). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed two large prospective stroke databases from two European centers searching for patients admitted with minor stroke (i.e. NIHSS Score░≤░5), baseline mRS░=░0 and occlusion of the M1-M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Groups receiving (A) IVT alone and (B) MT+/-IVT were compared. Primary outcome measures were MT safety, successful recanalization rate (mTICI 2b-3) and NIHSS shift (discharge NIHSS minus admission NIHSS); secondary outcomes included discharge rates and excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) at 3 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in Group B (19░MT alone; 13 MT░+░IVT) and 24 in Group A. Successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3) was obtained in 100% of cases in Group B vs 38% in Group A. Symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation rate did not differ between the two groups. Multivariate analysis reported MT as the only predictor of early (<░12░h) favorable NIHSS shift and lower NIHSS at discharge. Moreover, discharge at home and excellent outcome at 3-month follow-up were statistically associated with MT. CONCLUSIONS: MT in patients with minor strokes and intracranial vessel occlusion (IVO) is safe and can determine a rapid improvement of NIHSS Score. MT seems also associated with a higher rate of patients discharged at home after hospitalization and better clinical outcome at 3-month follow-up. Larger randomized trials are warranted to confirm these results.

The occurrence of neointimal hyperplasia after flow-diverter implantation is associated with cardiovascular risks factors and the stent design.

BACKGROUND: Neo-intimal hyperplasia (NIH) is frequently observed after flow-diverter stent (FDS) implantation. Although mostly asymptomatic, this vascular response can sometimes lead to delayed ischemic strokes. This study intended to evaluate the factors potentially influencing the rates of NIH following FDS treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All aneurysm treatments performed with a Pipeline embolization device (PED) or a SILK stent from May 2011 to May 2015 were collected in a prospectively maintained database. Patient demographics, clinical, and angiographic outcomes including both digital subtraction angiography and C-arm cone-beam CT were registered. Two blind reviewers rated the presence of NIH on a binary scale (present/absent). RESULTS: From 148 patients, 63 datasets were available for analysis. Inter-reader agreement was excellent (Kappa=0.88). NIH was positively correlated with smoking, dyslipidemia, and high blood pressure, but not with aneurysm characteristics. At early follow-up (<12 months), NIH was more frequently associated with the use of the SILK stent (68%) rather than the PED (38%): P<0.02. At long-term follow-up, the NIH rate in the total population dropped from 55% to 26% with no more significant difference between the two stents. The complete occlusion rate as seen in early follow-up was higher in the SILK group with 76% vs 65% but without statistical significance (P=0.4). CONCLUSION: NIH is a dual-vessel reaction after FDS implant. When planning a treatment in locations at risk of ischemic complications if severe NIH would occur, then the stent design should be considered. However, minimal NIH might also be needed as it is involved in aneurysm healing. Before treatment patients should be recommended best medical management of their cardiovascular risks factors to prevent an excessive NIH reaction.