A Near-Miss in Clinical Outcomes Research Data Collection.

ABSTRACT: We present the case of a near-miss in clinical research to illustrate a situation in which errors in data collection would have led to different results in the data analysis, with the potential for drawing incorrect conclusions. Conclusions based on data errors may adversely influence future medical decision-making in patient care. In the interest of presenting this as an educational, nonpunitive, quality-improvement report, the study and the involved researchers remain anonymous, and the specific details and exact number of patients are not reported.

Patient-Perceived Outcomes of Recovery After Trigger Digit Release.

PURPOSE: Trigger finger release (TFR) is one of the most commonly performed hand surgeries; nevertheless, the time until patients subjectively feel recovered has not been well documented. The limited literature on patient perceptions of recovery after any type of surgery has described that patients and surgeons may have differing views on the time until full recovery. Our primary study question was to determine how long it takes for patients to subjectively feel fully recovered after TFR. METHODS: In this prospective study, patients who underwent isolated TFR completed questionnaires before surgery and at multiple time points following surgery until they reported full recovery. Patients completed visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and QuickDASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) and were asked if they felt fully recovered at 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. RESULTS: The average time to self-reported full recovery was 6.2 months (SD 2.6), and the median time to self-reported full recovery was 6 months (IQR 4 months). At 12 months, four out of 50 patients (8%) did not feel fully recovered. QuickDASH and VAS pain scores improved significantly from preoperative assessment to final follow-up. All patients reported improvement in both VAS pain scores and QuickDASH scores greater than the minimal clinically important difference between 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. Higher preoperative VAS and QuickDASH scores were associated with failure to fully recover by 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The length of time after surgery until patients felt fully recovered after isolated TFR is longer than the senior authors' expectations. This suggests that patients and surgeons may consider distinctly different parameters when discussing recovery. Surgeons should be aware of this discrepancy when discussing recovery after surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

Perioperative Complications Associated With Limited Surgical Fasciectomy After Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum for Dupuytren Contracture.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the perioperative complication rate of surgical fasciectomy following previous treatment with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) treatment in patients with Dupuytren disease. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients at a large health system undergoing CCH treatment and subsequent limited surgical fasciectomy for recurrence on the same digit between 2010 and 2020 was performed. Fifty-two patients with 62 affected digits met inclusion criteria, and cases were reviewed for preoperative demographics, treatment characteristics, clinical outcomes, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: Fifty-five digits in 48 patients were treated with CCH and underwent subsequent limited surgical fasciectomy. Of all digits in the present study, 3 (6.3%) had a documented surgical complication following open surgical fasciectomy. There were zero postoperative infections, vascular injuries, or tendon injuries. The rate of nerve injury was 2.1%. The rate of postoperative skin necrosis was 4.2%. These rates were comparable or lower than those of historical published data. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of perioperative complications in patients undergoing limited surgical fasciectomy after previous CCH treatment is low. The findings of this study will aid the counseling of Dupuytren patients in deciding whether to pursue treatment with CCH versus open surgical fasciectomy.

Factors Influencing Patient Preference for Anesthesia in Ambulatory Hand Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify factors that influence preoperative patient preferences toward anesthesia in patients in a hand and upper extremity clinic. METHODS: A survey was administered to consecutive patients in a hand and upper extremity orthopedic clinic at an urban tertiary academic institution. The survey addressed presenting clinical complaint, anesthesia preference for minor soft tissue hand and wrist procedures, factors influencing anesthesia preference, and patient history of anesthesia and surgical treatment. The primary outcome measure was anesthesia preference: local-only or local with sedation. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 219 patients over a 1-month period with a mean patient age of 55 years. Most patients presented with a hand/wrist complaint (56%). One hundred fifty-two patients (71%) preferred local anesthesia with sedation and 61 patients (29%) preferred local-only anesthesia. Patients who preferred local-only anesthesia reported being more likely to be influenced by surgeon preference and cost, and also were more likely to have had prior experience with local-only anesthesia. In contrast, patients who preferred local anesthesia with sedation were more likely to be concerned about pain or were nervous about surgery. Prior surgical experience did not influence preference for anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Patient preferences for local-only anesthesia versus local anesthesia with sedation for ambulatory hand surgery are mixed, with most patients preferring sedation. Understanding patient preferences for anesthesia can better inform preoperative discussions and shared decision-making in anesthesia choice.

Implicit and Explicit Factors That Influence Surgeons' Decision-Making for Distal Radius Fractures in Older Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors that influence surgeons' decision-making in the treatment of distal radius fractures in older patients. METHODS: Fourteen clinical vignettes of a 72-year-old patient with a distal radius fracture were sent to 185 orthopedic hand and/or trauma surgeons. The surgeons were surveyed regarding the demographic/practice details, treatment decision (surgical or nonsurgical), and factors that influenced management, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, functional status, radiographic appearance, and handedness. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the effect of both surgeon-described (explicit) and given clinical (implicit) factors on the treatment decision and to evaluate for discrepancies. RESULTS: Sixty-six surgeons completed the survey, and 7 surgeons completed 10-13 vignettes. Surgeons made the explicit determination to pursue nonsurgical treatment based on the presence of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 0.02 for surgery; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.05), but the observation of the underlying clinical data suggested that the recommendation for surgical treatment was instead based on a higher functional status (OR, 3.54/increase in functional status; 95% CI, 2.52-4.98). Those employed by hospitals/health systems were significantly less likely to recommend surgery than those in private practice (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.79) CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the presence of comorbidities, functional status, and practice setting has a significant impact on a surgeon's decision to treat distal radius fractures in older patients. The discrepancy between the surgeon-described factors and underlying clinical data demonstrates cognitive bias. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should be aware of cognitive biases in clinical reasoning and should work through consequential patient decisions using an analytical framework that attempts to reconcile all available clinical data.

Patient Preferences for Limited Fasciectomy Versus Collagenase Treatment for Dupuytren Contracture.

Background: The primary objective of this study was to assess patient preferences for collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) treatment versus limited surgical fasciectomy in a cohort that has undergone both treatments for Dupuytren contracture. Methods: We retrospectively identified 68 patients who have undergone both limited surgical fasciectomy and CCH treatment for digital flexion contractures from Dupuytren disease. Patients were contacted by telephone and asked whether they preferred surgery or CCH treatment for their Dupuytren contracture. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with preference for surgery versus CCH treatment. Results: Of the 68 patients who were treated with both CCH and surgery, 37 patients (54.4%) preferred CCH treatment over surgery, 26 (38.2%) preferred surgery over CCH treatment, and 5 (7.4%) were unable to decide. Patients expressed common themes of the perceived ease of recovery following CCH treatment versus the perceived durability of contracture correction with surgery. Preference for surgical fasciectomy over CCH treatment was associated with lower American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) [odds ratio (OR): 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14-0.75]. The order of treatment was also associated with the treatment preference; treatment with surgery after CCH compared to treatment with CCH after surgery was associated with a preference for surgery (OR: 6.51, 95% CI: 2.15-19.7). Conclusions: In a cohort of patients who have undergone both treatments, patients were divided in their preferences, with a slight majority preferring CCH treatment over surgery. Treatment recommendations should be individualised to each patient's long-term goals and expectations. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Pronator Quadratus Repair Does Not Affect Reoperation Rates Following Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pronator quadratus (PQ) repair on reoperation rates after distal radius open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) using a volar locking plate. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing distal radius ORIF with a volar locking plate between January 2012 and December 2016 at 2 urban, academic level I trauma centers was performed. Patient demographics, fracture and procedure characteristics, surgeon subspecialty, PQ repair, and reoperations were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to determine whether patient-related or injury-related characteristics were associated with PQ repair. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the effect of PQ repair on subsequent reoperations. RESULTS: In total, 509 patients were included, including 31 patients with bilateral injuries. The average follow-up time was 3.7 ± 2.8 years. Patients undergoing PQ repair were younger (57 ± 17 years vs 61 ± 17 years) and were more likely to have a lower Soong grade (53% vs 44% with Soong grade 0) than patients without PQ repair. Pronator quadratus repair was not found to have a significant impact on hardware removal, reoperations for flexor tendon pathology, or overall reoperations. CONCLUSIONS: Pronator quadratus repair was more commonly performed in younger patients and in patients with a lower Soong grade. Hand-subspecialized surgeons are more likely to pursue PQ repair than trauma-subspecialized surgeons. This study did not detect statistically significant differences in hardware removal, flexor tendon pathology, or overall reoperations between groups.

Patient Perception and Preferences for Virtual Telemedicine Visits for Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.

Introduction: Telemedicine in upper extremity surgery is an evolving modality that provides a viable alternative to the traditional in-person visit for achieving convenient, safe, and cost-effective health care. Our study aimed to identify patient preferences for virtual visits for hand and upper extremity surgery. Methods: An institutional review board approved survey was prospectively administered to all patients >18 years of age, presenting for any complaint to an orthopedic hand and upper extremity clinic at a Level I academic trauma center from September to December 2019. This survey included questions about access and literacy of technology as well as patient preferences regarding virtual visits. The medical record was reviewed to collect demographics, insurance type, and reasons for their visit. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed according to survey responses. Results: Two hundred consecutive patients (n) completed surveys. Surveys revealed that >88% of patients own a computer or smartphone, have WiFi access at home, and own a device capable of video chat. In total, 75% of patients reported that they would be moderately or highly comfortable in their ability to use a device for a virtual visit. In bivariate and multivariate analyses, technological literacy and access to a private space to conduct a visit were associated with high interest in virtual visits. Discussion: Telemedicine is a viable alternative to in-person patient visits. Our study demonstrates that most patients are willing and able to participate in a virtual visit for a hand or upper extremity issue.

The Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Restrictions on an Academic Hand Surgery Practice.

PURPOSE: The impact of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (coronavirus disease 2019) has been felt worldwide. We examined the quantitative impact during the first 4 weeks of hospital system and state-mandated restrictions on an academic, urban hand surgery practice. We hypothesized that the volume of clinic encounters, office procedures, and surgical cases would decrease and that the volume of nonelective care would remain unchanged. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all encounters at a hand surgery practice from March 16, 2020, through April 12, 2020 and compared those to two 4-week control time periods. Weekly encounter volumes and work relative value units (RVUs) were obtained for clinic encounters, office procedures, and surgical cases. The type of ambulatory visit was also identified. Surgical cases were categorized into 4 types (fracture or dislocation, acute soft tissue or nerve injury, infection, or elective/nonurgent) for the most recent time periods. We performed t tests to compare weekly volumes and RVUs between time periods. RESULTS: After the implementation of mandated restrictions on elective health care, ambulatory hand surgery clinic encounters decreased 72% to 73%, clinic procedures decreased by 87% to 90%, and surgical cases decreased by 87% to 88%. The percentage of ambulatory visits performed via telemedicine increased from 0.06% to 74%. Similar impacts on RVUs were seen. Surgeries for fractures and dislocations declined by 58% and those for acute soft tissue or nerve injury declined by 40%; the number of surgical procedures for infection remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: The coronavirus restrictions on elective healthcare led to an immediate, substantial impact on hand surgery practice. There were significant decreases in the volumes of ambulatory encounters, office procedures, and surgical cases. The long-term financial impact of this change in practice is still to be determined but, based on the quantitative impacts seen, is likely to be significant. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/Decision Analysis IV.

The Impact of the Soong Index on Hardware Removal and Overall Reoperation Rates After Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures.

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the impact of volar plate prominence on reoperation rates after open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fractures with volar locking plates and to identify other factors associated with removal of hardware (ROH) or a reoperation. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent distal radius open reduction and internal fixation between 2012 and 2016 at 2 level I trauma centers was conducted. Plate prominence was evaluated using the Soong index at the first postoperative visit. The details of patient demographics, fracture and plate characteristics, complications, and reoperations were recorded. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with increased rates of ROH and overall reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 732 (70.2%) of 1,042 patients completed follow-up at an average of 38.2 months, including 34 patients with bilateral operations, yielding 766 distal radius fractures. One hundred sixteen (15.1%) patients underwent reoperation at an average of 12.1 ± 13.6 months after the index surgery. Removal of hardware was the most commonly performed reoperation (77 patients, 10%). The multivariable regression analysis revealed significantly higher rates of ROH in Soong grade 1 or 2 patients (odds ratio 16, 95% CI 5.8-47; odds ratio 44, 95% CI 14-140, respectively) than in Soong grade 0 patients. Plate type, younger age, bilateral injuries, and concomitant procedures at the time of the index operation were all associated with increased risk of ROH. There were significant differences between individual surgeons the in rates of ROH (range 2.1%-22%) and overall reoperation (range 5.2%-36%). Compared with other hand surgeons, fellowship-trained hand surgeons had lower rates of ROH (8% vs 14%, respectively) and overall reoperation (12% vs 22%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of ROH and overall reoperation increase with increasing Soong grade. Plate type is independently predictive of future ROH. Older patients and those undergoing open reduction and internal fixation experience lower rates of subsequent reoperation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Acute Radial Head Resection for Fracture: are We Likely to Miss an Essex-Lopresti Injury?

BACKGROUND: Given the current available evidence, surgical treatment of radial head fracture with acute resection is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine whether acute resection of the radial head for a radial head fracture leads to longitudinal forearm instability due to a missed Essex-Lopresti injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of radial head resections performed for acute radial head fractures at two Level I trauma centers from 2000 to 2018. A total of 11 patients met inclusion criteria. Our primary outcome was a missed Essex-Lopresti injury at time of final clinical follow-up. Long-term telephone follow-up was attempted for QuickDASH, pain scores, and satisfaction scores. RESULTS: Of the 11 radial head fractures in this study, intraoperative radial pull tests were performed and normal in 6 patients. No patient was found to have a missed Essex-Lopresti injury at a mean of 36.2 months' clinical follow-up after radial head resection. At a mean telephone follow-up of 12.6 years in available patients, mean QuickDASH was 3.4, mean satisfaction was 9.75 out of 10, and no further complication or reoperation was reported. CONCLUSION: Our findings challenge the dogma that the radial head cannot be safely excised in the setting of acute fracture, even with elbow instability and/or wrist pain, particularly when intraoperative longitudinal stability is assessed by a stress maneuver.

Long-Term Outcomes and Mortality Following Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients Older Than 80 Years of Age.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were 1) to assess the long-term patient-reported outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients 80 years of age or older, and 2) to determine the long-term mortality rate of this population after CTR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 96 patients who underwent CTR at 80 years of age or older from July 2008 to June 2013. Mortality was assessed by medical records, the Social Security Death Index, and telephone contact. Living patients were contacted for long-term follow-up, and functional outcomes and patient satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age of the 96 patients at time of CTR was 84.1 years, including 89 octogenarian patients and 7 nonagenarian patients, and 67% were female. At an average of 9 years from surgery, the mortality rate of our cohort was 53% (51 of 96 patients). Five patients died within 1 year after CTR; no factor associated with early mortality after CTR was identified in the bivariate analysis. Telephone follow-up at an average of 9 years after CTR was available for 15 patients. Mean Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire symptom severity score was 1.6 points, mean Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire functional status score was 1.8 points, mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 27.9, and mean satisfaction was 7.1. Eighty percent of patients reported that they would rechoose CTR. CONCLUSIONS: There are long-term benefits from CTR in patients 80 years of age or older. The mortality rate of this cohort mirrors that of the general population, and CTR is justified in this elderly age group both for the magnitude and duration of treatment effect.

Long-term Effects of Skin Tearing on Outcomes After Collagenase Treatment of Dupuytren Contractures.

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the rates of recurrence, additional treatment, patient satisfaction, and willingness to undergo Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) treatment again for Dupuytren disease in patients with and without skin tearing at minimum 5-year follow-up. Methods: We identified 199 digits in 142 patients who underwent CCH treatments for Dupuytren disease from April 2010 to December 2013 with minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients were contacted by telephone to collect our response variables: perceived recurrence of contracture, additional treatment, satisfaction, and willingness to undergo CCH treatment again. Medical records were reviewed for skin tearing at manipulation and patient-related and disease-specific variables. Results: At the time of manipulation, 16 out of 142 patients (11%) and 22 out of 199 digits (11%) had skin tearing. Older age was associated with skin tearing. At an average 7.2-year follow-up, the mean satisfaction was 7.1 ± 2.6 on a 1 to 10 Likert scale for patients with skin tearing and 6.5 ± 3.4 for patients without skin tearing. Eighty-one percent of patients with skin tearing expressed willingness to undergo CCH treatment again, compared with 68% of patients without skin tearing. Perceived recurrence of contracture occurred in 82% of digits with skin tearing and 80% of digits without skin tearing. Additional treatment was performed in 45% of digits with skin tearing and 54% of digits without skin tearing. No difference was statistically significant. Conclusions: Although skin tearing at CCH manipulation complicates the short-term course following CCH treatment, it does not affect long-term perceived contracture recurrence or patient satisfaction.

Correlation of Hounsfield Unit Measurements on Computed Tomography of the Shoulder With Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scans and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Scores: A Potential for Opportunistic Screening.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of bone mineral density (BMD) abnormalities involves dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), but few patients complete this after a fragility fracture. The assessment of BMD using Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements from computed tomography (CT) scans has been correlated with DXA results in previous studies. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between shoulder CT HU and DXA scores. METHODS: Billing databases of 3 academic institutions were queried for patients who underwent both DXA and CT scan of the upper extremity within 1 year of each other. DXA T-scores for spine, hip, and femoral neck were recorded. BMD status was defined based on composite T-scores, using the lowest T-score in the spine, hip, or proximal femur. CT scans were measured for HU over 4 slices, recorded to create a bone column, then averaged. The patients' risks of major osteoporosis-related fracture and hip fracture were calculated using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool. RESULTS: In total, 300 patients were included. A positive correlation was found between composite T-scores and HU for glenoid and proximal humerus (0.36; 0.17). The proximal humerus HU was significantly associated with the BMD T-score for the hip (P = 0.01); the glenoid HU was significantly associated with BMD T-scores for the hip, spine, and femoral neck (P = 0.002; P = 0.001; P = 0.002). A 10-year risk of hip fracture >3% was associated with lower proximal humerus HU. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to discover significant correlations between HU at the glenoid and proximal humerus and risk factors as established by the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool scoring system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Collagenase Treatment of Dupuytren's Disease with Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up: Recurrence, Reintervention, and Satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the rates of patient satisfaction, perceived recurrence of flexion deformity, and additional treatment after collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatment for Dupuytren's contracture at a minimum of 5-year follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 199 digits in 142 patients who underwent collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatments from April of 2010 to December of 2013 with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Patients were contacted by telephone regarding perceived recurrence, additional treatment, satisfaction, and willingness to undergo this treatment again. RESULTS: At an average 7.2-year follow-up, 160 of 199 digits (80 percent) had perceived recurrence, and 105 of 199 digits (53 percent) underwent additional treatment. Average satisfaction was 6.5 on a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, and 67 percent would undergo collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatment again. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 0.77; 95 percent CI, 0.63 to 0.93) and isolated metacarpophalangeal joint involvement (OR, 0.53; 95 percent CI, 0.29 to 0.97) were associated with decreased odds of additional treatment, and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (OR, 2.49; 95 percent CI, 1.35 to 4.48) and nonsmoker status (OR, 0.23; 95 percent CI, 0.09 to 0.59) were associated with willingness to undergo the treatment again. CONCLUSIONS: Patients may be counseled that the long-term perceived recurrence rate of Dupuytren's contractures after collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatment is high, and more than half of patients seek additional treatment. Satisfaction and willingness to undergo collagenase clostridium histolyticum treatment decrease with perceived recurrence. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Predictors of Insurance Claim Rejection in Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Insurance claim rejections represent a challenge for healthcare providers because of the potential for lost revenue and administrative costs of reworking claims. METHODS: The billing records of five hand and upper extremity surgeons at a tertiary academic center were queried for all patient billing activity over a 1-year period yielding a total of 14,421 unique patient encounters. RESULTS: A total of 11,839 unique patient encounters were included, and the overall claim rejection rate was 19.3%. Claim rejection rate varied significantly by payer (P < 0.0001) and was lowest in private insurance (14.0%) and highest in Medicare (31.2%). The use of multiple Current Procedure Terminology codes for an encounter was independently associated with an increased risk of claim rejection for both office (25.6%, relative risk [RR] 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 1.49, P = 0.0032) and surgical (25.6%, RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.18, P = 0.0002) settings. After multivariate regression adjustment, modifier 25 was associated with a decreased risk of claim rejection (23.3%, RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.85, P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Insurance claim rejection occurs frequently (19.3%) in hand/upper extremity surgery and varies by insurance type, with the highest rejection rate occurring in Medicare (31.2%). For a given encounter, the use of multiple Current Procedure Terminology codes and specific modifiers are predictive of rejection risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic.

Sex-Based Differences in Optimal Tunnel Placement for Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Tunnel placement is important for outcomes after acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction, yet little has been written on sex-based differences in optimal tunnel positioning. HYPOTHESIS: No sex-based or anatomic differences will be found in ideal tunnel position based on radiographic measurements. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The records of 2382 patients were retrospectively examined for clavicle radiographs over a 20-year period. A random set of radiographs were reviewed until 200 radiographs from each sex met inclusion criteria per a priori power analysis. Anteroposterior clavicle radiographs were used to collect (1) length from lateral clavicle to lateral coracoid (LCLC), (2) length from lateral clavicle to medial coracoid (LCMC), (3) clavicle length (CL), and (4) clavicular depth at the midcoracoid (MCCD). The Student t test was used to compare differences between male and female patients. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure linear correlations. Variables with a P < .1 were included in a multiple regression model. RESULTS: The cohort included 200 men and 200 women. LCLC and LCMC were significantly greater for men than for women (P < .0001). Clavicle length was significantly correlated with LCLC (r = 0.63; P < .0001) and LCMC (r = 0.74; P < .0001). MCCD was significantly correlated with LCLC (r = 0.32; P < .0001) and LCMC (r = 0.43; P < .0001). The approximate placement for the trapezoid tunnel was found to be 22.1 mm in women and 26.6 mm in men. The approximate placement for the conoid tunnel was found to be 40 mm in women and 46.6 mm in men. The ratios (LCLC:CL and LCMC:CL) were also significantly different between female and male patients. The LCLC:CL was 0.144 in women and 0.154 in men (P < .0001). The LCMC:CL was 0.261 in women and 0.271 in men (P < .0006). CONCLUSION: Significant sex-based differences are found in the position of the coracoid relative to the lateral edge of the clavicle. Coracoid position relative to the lateral edge of the clavicle is correlated with anatomic parameters, most strongly with clavicle length.

The Early Effect of COVID-19 Restrictions on an Academic Orthopedic Surgery Department.

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a global influence on health care. The authors examined the early effect of hospital- and state-mandated restrictions on an orthopedic surgery department and hypothesized that the volume of ambulatory clinic encounters, office and surgical procedures, and cases would dramatically decrease. A retrospective review was performed of all encounters in an orthopedic surgery department at a level I academic trauma center during a 4-week period, from March 16, 2020, to April 12, 2020. The results were compared with two control 4-week periods, February 17, 2020, to March 15, 2020, and March 16, 2019, to April 12, 2019. Weekly volume and work relative value units (RVUs) of clinic encounters, office and surgical procedures, and cases were assessed. The type of ambulatory visit also was recorded. Comparisons of mean weekly volume and RVUs between the study and control periods were performed with Student's t test. Surgical cases were categorized into fracture or dislocation, acute soft tissue or nerve injury, infection, oncology, and elective or nonurgent. After implementation of hospital- and state-mandated restrictions on elective health care, the volume of ambulatory orthopedic surgery clinic encounters decreased by 74% to 77%, the volume of clinic procedures decreased by 95%, and the volume of surgical cases decreased by 88%. The percentage of clinic visits performed via telemedicine increased from 0.3% to 81.2%. Elective surgical cases ceased, and the volume of nonelective surgical cases decreased by 51%. During the first 4 weeks after COVID-19-related restrictions were imposed, an immediate and dramatic effect was observed. Compared with the control periods, significant reductions were seen in the volume of ambulatory encounters, office-based procedures, and surgical cases. In addition, the volume of nonelective surgical cases decreased by 51%. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(4):228-232.].

Risk Factors for Hardware-Related Complications After Olecranon Fracture Fixation.

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for symptomatic hardware and removal of hardware (ROH) after olecranon open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and to assess differences between olecranon locking plate and screws (P&S) or tension band (TB) wire cohorts. The medical records of 331 patients with olecranon fractures treated at two academic level I trauma centers with ORIF from 2012 to 2016 were reviewed. A total of 189 patients were included in the study. Complications, ROH, and subsequent surgery were assessed and compared between cohorts. There were 124 cases in the P&S cohort and 65 in the TB cohort. The overall reoperation rate was 31.2% (59 of 189). The overall incidence of ROH for all cases was 29.1% (55 of 189). Patients who required ROH or developed symptomatic hardware were significantly younger than those who did not (P&S, P<.003; TB, P<.004). Age and body mass index (BMI) were associated with ROH plus symptomatic hardware after P&S. Age (but not BMI) was associated with ROH/symptomatic hardware after TB. Measured hardware prominence was not associated with ROH or ROH plus symptomatic hardware for either the P&S or the TB cohort. Risk factors including patient age and BMI were found to be significantly associated with hardware-related complications. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(3):141-146.].

Functional Outcomes After Sauve-Kapandji Arthrodesis.

PURPOSE: The Sauve-Kapandji procedure (SK) combines a distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthrodesis with the creation of an ulnar pseudarthrosis for the salvage of DRUJ instability or arthritis. Despite several published case series, there are limited data on postoperative functional outcomes. This study evaluates patient-reported outcomes of SK using a validated functional outcomes scale. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent SK in 2 health care systems over 10 years (2008-2018). Preoperative and postoperative range of motion, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, and wrist plain film radiographic measurements were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative outcomes analyses and subgroup comparisons were performed. RESULTS: We included 57 patients in the study. Surgical indications included posttraumatic DRUJ arthritis (n = 35), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 10), degenerative DRUJ arthritis (n = 7), Madelung deformity (n = 3), psoriatic arthritis (n = 1), and giant cell tumor of bone (n = 1). During the first postoperative year, QuickDASH scores decreased from a mean of 52 before surgery to 28 at 12 months. The QuickDASH scores at final follow-up demonstrated significant improvement in patients with osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis. Supination significantly improved after surgery, from 48° to 74°, whereas wrist flexion, wrist extension, and pronation remained unchanged. Radiographically, significant postoperative decreases were seen in ulnar variance and McMurtry's translation index. The postoperative complication rate was 21%, including revision osteotomy in 4 patients (7.0%) and hardware removal in 4 patients (7.0%). No DRUJ nonunions were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The Sauve-Kapandji procedure for DRUJ salvage significantly improved patient-reported outcomes after 1 year and significantly improved supination. Similar functional improvements after SK were seen in both osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.