Arthroscopic approach in initial training: Study of a novice cohort using inverse direct and indirect approaches and its implication in the development of training programs.

INTRODUCTION: Arthroscopic training includes successive stages of observation, reproduction and then repetition. Learning through simulation in 2D virtual reality makes it possible to repeat these different stages to enhance the learner's experience in complete safety and a shorter timeframe. Some procedures require inversion of the optical and instrumental approaches in the axial plane, disrupting the existing psychomotor and technical skills. The objective of this study was to compare the degree of difficulty and the distribution of results for the same exercise carried out alternately in classical holding and inverted holding of the instruments in a cohort of novice learners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two medical students, novices in arthroscopic surgery, participated in the study. Each performed an exercise consisting of grasping ten targets with arthroscopic forceps and placing them in a basket on the VirtaMed ArthroS™ simulator. The exercise was performed with the scope and grasping instrument pointed away from the operator, "catch the stars front" (CTSF), then directed towards the operator, "catch the stars back" (CTSB). The simulator recorded several parameters making up an overall composite score ("overall performance score", OPS) out of 120 points. Voluntary abandonment of the exercise was also collected. RESULTS: All students completed the CTSF exercise but 6 dropped out of the CTSB exercise (27%, p=0.01). In the CTSF exercise, the average OPS was higher with 45.9 points versus 22.8 points in the CTSB exercise (p<0.001). By detailing the components of the OPS score, the parameters of interest on the Fundamentals of Arthroscopic Training (FAST) module of the simulator included: the distance traveled by the scope and the grasping forceps was significantly greater in the CTSB group (p<0.001), the duration of the exercise was significantly greater in the CTSB group (p<0.001), the time spent with the instruments in the videoscopic field was significantly lower in the CTSB group (p=0.001) and finally the absence of a significant difference in the camera alignment compared to the horizontal plane between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The exercise with the instruments directed towards the operator is more difficult with a greater distribution for all the secondary criteria except for the camera alignment, which suggests that it could be more discriminating. The dropout rate is also higher. It would therefore be interesting to introduce CTSB type training in initial training programs in arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, comparative prospective study.

3D planning and patient-specific surgical guides in forearm osteotomy in children: Radiographic accuracy and clinical morbidity.

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional (3D) planning and patient-specific surgical guides are increasingly used in the treatment of skeletal deformities. The present study hypothesis was that they are reliable in forearm osteotomy in children, with low morbidity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-there children with one or several osteotomies to correct forearm deformities were retrospectively included: 9 (20 osteotomies) with surgical guide (G+), and 14 (28 osteotomies) without (G-). Etiologies comprised 8 cases of Madelung disease (3G+, 5G-) and 15 of post-traumatic malunion (6G+, 9G-). Mean age at surgery was 14.8±1.9 years. The patient-specific 3D-printed polyamide guides were produced from 3D virtual models based on 3D CT reconstruction. Mean follow-up was 22.1±13.6 months. RESULTS: Mean correction error was 5.3°±4.1 and 4.2°±4.1 in the frontal and sagittal planes respectively in G+ (p=0.6). Surgery time was significantly shorter in G+, by a mean 42min (p=0.02). Mean total radiation dose (preoperative CT+intraoperative fluoroscopy) was significantly higher in G+ (p<0.0001). Complications rates were similar between groups. Improvement in PRWE score was significantly greater in G+. CONCLUSION: The present preliminary results were encouraging. 3D planning and patient-specific surgical guides can be used in the treatment of forearm deformity in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective cohort study.