Contrast-enhanced cine MR sequences in the assessment of myocardial hyperemia in acute myocarditis: can they help? A feasibility study.

The study was designed to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced balanced steady-state free precession (cine-SSFP) CMR imaging sequences to exhibit myocardial hyperemia in acute myocarditis, which has for a long time been investigated in some centers using early gadolinium enhancement (EGE) sequence. Contrast-enhanced cine-SSFP (CESSFP) sequences were compared to precontrast cine-SSFP sequences to calculate the early cine-contrast enhancement in 36 consecutive patients with acute myocarditis and 36 controls matched for age and gender. Four-chamber views images were obtained in each subject before and after gadolinium injection. Absolute and relative left ventricular myocardial enhancement of the overall myocardium, then separately of the lateral wall and interventricular septum was analyzed in telediastole. Myocarditis patients displayed higher cine-SSFP absolute enhancement than controls (overall left ventricular myocardium 2.38 ± 0.33 vs 1.84 ± 0.31; lateral wall 2.45 ± 0.35 vs 1.83 ± 0.32; and septum 2.26 ± 0.29 vs 1.82 ± 0.29, p < 0.0001 for all). Less significant differences were observed for the relative enhancement (p < 0.05 for all). Using ROC curves, the optimal threshold value of absolute enhancement to diagnose acute myocarditis was 2.05 (sensitivity: 86%; specificity: 81%). Given the simplicity of use, contrast-enhanced cine-SSFP sequences should be used as an additional diagnostic tool to detect hyperemia in acute myocarditis patients.

Cardiac diffusion-weighted MR imaging in recent, subacute, and chronic myocardial infarction: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to detect recent myocardial infarction (MI) and to differentiate it from subacute and chronic MI, with late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequence as reference. Furthermore, to measure variation of the myocardial apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) according to the age of MI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-four MI patients were separated in 3 groups. Group A included 34 recent (< 8 days) MI patients; group B, 22 subacute (9-90 days) MI patients; group C, 18 chronic (> 90 days) MI patients; a fourth group (group D) included 24 controls. DWI and LGE images were acquired on a 1.5T system. DWI and LGE matched images were assessed visually by two blinded observers for hyperintense areas in corresponding segments. RESULTS: Qualitative assessment of DWI compared with LGE images yielded a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 61%/14% to differentiate recent from chronic/subacute MI, respectively. The absolute ADCs (recent 0.00632 ± 0.00037 mm(2) /s, subacute 0.00639 ± 0.00035 mm(2) /s, chronic 0.00743 ± 0.00056 mm(2) /s, remote or normal 0.00895 ± 0.00019 mm(2) /s) and relative ADCs were significantly different between groups (P < 0.001) except between recent and subacute MIs. CONCLUSION: DWI is a sensitive technique to diagnose recent MI. DWI MR sequences could help differentiate recent from chronic MI. From these preliminary results, one should expect DWI to be used in the triage of emergency patients with atypical chest pain, to clarify if an MI is present or not in just a few minutes.