Gastric antral webs in adults: A case series characterizing their clinical presentation and management in the modern endoscopic era.

AIM: To investigate the current management of gastric antral webs (GAWs) among adults and identify optimal endoscopic and/or surgical management for these patients. METHODS: We reviewed our endoscopy database seeking to identify patients in whom a GAW was visualized among 24640 esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD) over a seven-year period (2006-2013) at a single tertiary care center. The diagnosis of GAW was suspected during EGD if aperture size of the antrum did not vary with peristalsis or if a "double bulb" sign was present on upper gastrointestinal series. Confirmation of the diagnosis was made by demonstrating a normal pylorus distal to the GAW. RESULTS: We identified 34 patients who met our inclusion criteria (incidence 0.14%). Of these, five patients presented with gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), four of whom underwent repeated sequential balloon dilations and/or needle-knife incisions with steroid injection for alleviation of GOO. The other 29 patients were incidentally found to have a non-obstructing GAW. Age at diagnosis ranged from 30-87 years. Non-obstructing GAWs are mostly incidental findings. The most frequently observed symptom prompting endoscopic work-up was refractory gastroesophageal reflux (n = 24, 70.6%) followed by abdominal pain (n = 11, 33.4%), nausea and vomiting (n = 9, 26.5%), dysphagia (n = 6, 17.6%), unexplained weight loss, (n = 4, 11.8%), early satiety (n = 4, 11.8%), and melena of unclear etiology (n = 3, 8.82%). Four of five GOO patients were treated with balloon dilation (n = 4), four-quadrant needle-knife incision (n = 3), and triamcinolone injection (n = 2). Three of these patients required repeat intervention. One patient had a significant complication of perforation after needle-knife incision. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic intervention for GAW using balloon dilation or needle-knife incision is generally safe and effective in relieving symptoms, however repeat treatment may be needed and a risk of perforation exists with thermal therapies.

Effect of propofol anesthesia on force application during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Sedation is frequently used during colonoscopy to control patient discomfort and pain. Propofol is associated with a deeper level of sedation than is a combination of a narcotic and sedative hypnotic and, therefore, may be associated with an increase in force applied to the colonoscope to advance and withdraw the instrument. OBJECTIVE: To compare force application to the colonoscope insertion tube during propofol anesthesia and moderate sedation. DESIGN: An observational cohort study of 13 expert and 12 trainee endoscopists performing colonoscopy in 114 patients. Forces were measured by using the colonoscopy force monitor, which is a wireless, handheld device that attaches to the insertion tube of the colonoscope. SETTING: Community ambulatory surgery center and academic gastroenterology training programs. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing routine screening or diagnostic colonoscopy with complete segment force recordings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Axial and radial forces and examination time. RESULTS: Axial and radial forces increase and examination time decreases significantly when propofol is used as the method of anesthesia. LIMITATIONS: Small study, observational design, nonrandomized distribution of sedation type and experience level, different instrument type and effect of prototype device on insertion tube manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol sedation is associated with a decrease in examination time and an increase in axial and radial forces used to advance the colonoscope.

Segmental increases in force application during colonoscope insertion: quantitative analysis using force monitoring technology.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is a frequently performed procedure that requires extensive training and a high skill level. OBJECTIVE: Quantification of forces applied to the external portion of the colonoscope insertion tube during the insertion phase of colonoscopy. DESIGN: Observational cohort study of 7 expert and 9 trainee endoscopists for analysis of colonic segment force application in 49 patients. Forces were measured by using the colonoscopy force monitor, which is a wireless, handheld device that attaches to the insertion tube of the colonoscope. SETTING: Academic gastroenterology training programs. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing routine screening or diagnostic colonoscopy with complete segment force recordings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Axial and radial force and examination time. RESULTS: Both axial and radial force increased significantly as the colonoscope was advanced from the rectum to the cecum. Analysis of variance demonstrated highly significant operator-independent differences between segments of the colon (zones) in all axial and radial forces except average torque. Expert and trainee endoscopists differed only in the magnitude of counterclockwise force, average push/pull force rate used, and examination time. LIMITATIONS: Small study, observational design, effect of prototype device on insertion tube manipulation. CONCLUSION: Axial and radial forces used to advance the colonoscope increase through the segments of the colon and are operator independent.

Large colorectal polyps: endoscopic management and rate of malignancy: does size matter?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: High rate of malignancy has been reported in large colorectal polyps. However, studies were limited by including surgically resected polypoid lesions, only polyp ≥3 cm, only sessile polyps or carcinoma in situ. The aim of the study was to define the prevalence of invasive carcinoma among colorectal polyps ≥2 cm in diameter detected by colonoscopy and also to study the success of endoscopic resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All polypectomies of ≥2 cm colorectal polyps were identified from our endoscopy and pathology database and patients' medical records were reviewed for gross features, techniques of resection, complications, histology, and follow-up. Standard statistical tests were applied for calculating the rates, prevalence, and difference in proportions. RESULTS: Colonoscopic resection of 183 large polyps was performed in 174 patients over a period of 6 years (55% men and 45% women), mean age 64 years (median 67 y and range 25-91 y). The majority of polyps were sessile (84%). Fifty-six percent were located in the right colon. Invasive cancer was found in 10% of polyps. Endoscopic resection was successful in 89% of patients. Postpolypectomy bleeding and perforation was noted in 5% and 2% of patients, respectively. No death was observed. Seventy-eight percent of patients completed >1 year of follow-up after initial polypectomy. Recurrence of adenoma was noted in 12%, which was managed successfully by colonoscopic polypectomy techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of invasive cancer is low among endoscopically resected large colorectal polyps and most of these polyps can be resected successfully via colonoscopy with minimal morbidity and no mortality. A close endoscopic follow-up is required to monitor for recurrence.

Minimizing endoscopic complications--gastric and esophageal physiologic testing.

This article focuses on minimizing endoscopic complications associated with esophageal physiologic testing. A historical background is provided. The article then details traditional evaluation of the esophagus and stomach, as well as Bravo pH testing.

Day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH monitoring system.

BACKGROUND & GOALS: The wireless pH monitoring system such as the BRAVO pH system is a significant advancement in the evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux because of its potentially better tolerability and the ability to record data over a 48-hour period. The aim of our study was to evaluate safety, performance, tolerability, and day-to-day variability in acid reflux patterns using the BRAVO pH system. METHODS: A total of 90 consecutive patients (48 men and 42 women) with persistent reflux symptoms underwent BRAVO pH capsule placement from October 2002 to August 2003 at a tertiary care hospital. The BRAVO pH capsule was deployed 6 cm proximal to the squamocolumnar junction under endoscopic guidance. The pH recordings over 48 hours were obtained after uploading data to a computer from the pager-like device that recorded pH signals from the BRAVO pH capsule. RESULTS: Successful pH data over 48 hours was obtained in 90% of patients. Nearly two thirds of patients experienced a variety of symptoms ranging from a foreign body sensation to chest discomfort or pain. Four patients had severe chest pain, 3 of whom required endoscopic removal of the BRAVO pH capsule. In 74.4% of patients, number of reflux events as well as time (%) pH<4 correlated from the first 24-hour period to the second 24-hour period. However, in 28% of patients, no predictable pattern of (%) time pH<4 in the supine position was reproduced from one 24-hour period to the next 24-hour period. CONCLUSIONS: The BRAVO pH system appears a safe and effective method of recording esophageal acid exposure. It is an acceptable alternative for patients who are unwilling or unable to tolerate nasopharyngeal catheter-based pH studies, and it has a potential advantage of the 2-day recording period.

A prospective study of gastric acid analysis and esophageal acid exposure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux refractory to medical therapy.

A number of factors have been proposed to account for the lack of response to medical therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux; however, no controlled studies are available in the literature. The goal of this study was to determine possible causes of medical refractoriness in patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Gastric acid output and esophageal acid exposure were measured in patients who continue to have reflux symptoms despite aggressive antisecretory therapy. In addition, an upper endoscopy was also performed in each patient. Patients with a drug-controlled acid output < 1 mEq/hr and a supine total esophageal pH < 4 for less than 1.7% of the time measured were considered responsive to therapy; on the other hand, those with a drug-controlled gastric acid output > 1 mEq/hr and a supine esophageal pH < 4 for more than 1.7% of the time measured were considered resistant to therapy. Twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria (13 male and 11 female; mean age, 52). Drug-controlled gastric acid output was more than 1 mEq/hr in 25% of patients and less than 1 mEq/hr in the remainder. Of those patients with a gastric acid output of less than 1 mEq/hr (18 patients), 8(44%) had a supine esophageal pH < 4 for more than 1.7% of the time, suggesting that factors other than gastroesophageal reflux likely contributed to their reflux-like symptoms. Acid suppression appears adequate in the majority of patients with gastroesophageal reflux refractory to medical therapy. The exact cause of persistent reflux-like symptoms in patients who fail medical treatment is uncertain but may be related to non-acid-related factors such as esophageal hypersensitivity to physiologic reflux, increased intake of air resulting in aerophagia, or other factors such as bile reflux.

The frequency of peptic ulcer as a cause of upper-GI bleeding is exaggerated.

BACKGROUND: Peptic ulcer disease is considered the cause of upper-GI bleeding in 50% of cases. A recent decline in the proportion of cases of upper-GI bleeding because of a peptic ulcer was noted by us. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the frequency of peptic ulcer in patients with upper-GI bleeding and the proportion of bleeding peptic ulcers with a non-bleeding visible vessel. METHODS: Patients with upper-GI bleeding seen from December 1999 until April 2001 at a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center were studied prospectively. The Clinical Outcome Research Initiative (CORI) database was used to correlate the single institution data with nationwide data. Endoscopic data in the CORI database for patients who had endoscopy for upper-GI bleeding between December 1999 and July 2001 were retrieved and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were included in the prospective study. The endoscopic findings were: peptic ulcer in 31.8%: 95% confidence interval (CI) [23.7%, 40.6%] of patients; a non-bleeding visible vessel was present in 10%: 95% CI[2.8%, 23.7%] of these peptic ulcers. From the nationwide CORI database, data for 7822 patients with upper-GI bleeding were obtained. The endoscopic findings were: peptic ulcer in 20.6%:95% CI[19.7%, 21.5%] of patients with upper-GI bleeding; a non-bleeding visible vessel was present in 7.3%: 95% CI[6.1%, 8.6%] of the ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of peptic ulcer in patients with upper-GI bleeding and the proportion of bleeding ulcers with a non-bleeding visible vessel are less than previously reported.

Endoscopic removal of large colonic lipomas.

BACKGROUND: Colonic lipomas are benign adipose tumors that rarely cause symptoms. Removal of lipomas 2 cm or greater in diameter has been associated with a greater risk of perforation. Experience with the evaluation and removal of large colonic lipomas with the assistance of EUS to reduce the risk of perforation is reported. METHODS: Four patients with large colonic lipomas were evaluated and treated with endoscopic methods. EUS was performed to confirm that the lesion was a lipoma superficial to the muscularis propria. Saline or epinephrine solution was injected at the base of the tumor, which was then resected electrosurgically with a snare. OBSERVATIONS: All 4 lesions were successfully removed and histopathologically confirmed to be lipomas (mean maximal diameter 2.8 cm). There were no complications of any procedure. One patient was hospitalized overnight because of abdominal pain that resolved without complication. CONCLUSIONS: Large colonic lipomas can be removed safely by electrosurgical snare resection after injection of the base with epinephrine or saline solution. EUS should be used to ensure that the lipoma does not extend into the muscularis propria. Clinical judgment is important in assessing the need to remove these lesions.

High-resolution chromoendoscopy for classifying colonic polyps: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Chromoendoscopy may reliably separate adenomatous from nonadenomatous polyps. The aim of this multicenter trial was to determine the accuracy of high-resolution chromoendoscopy for the determination of colonic polyp histology. METHODS: This multicenter trial included 4 academic centers and a primary care practice. In 299 patients referred for routine colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy, 520 polyps 10 mm in size were sprayed with indigo carmine dye. Using a high-resolution endoscope, the endoscopist predicted the histology of each polyp based on its surface characteristics. Hyperplastic polyps had a "pitted" surface pattern of orderly arranged "dots" that resembled surrounding normal mucosa. Adenomatous polyps had at least one surface "groove" or "sulcus." Each polyp was subsequently resected for histopathologic evaluation. RESULTS: The resected polyps were comprised by 193 adenomas (37%), 225 hyperplastic polyps (43%), and 102 "other" types (20%). Forty polyps (7.7%) could not be classified by high resolution chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye. For the remaining polyps, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of indigo carmine dye staining for adenomatous polyps were, respectively, 82%, 82%, and 88%. The results were consistent among the academic centers and the primary care practice. CONCLUSIONS: High-resolution chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye demonstrates morphologic detail of diminutive colorectal polyps that can reliably be used to separate adenomatous from nonadenomatous polyps.