Safety and Immunogenicity of a Recombinant Protein RBD Fusion Heterodimer Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: preliminary results of a phase 1-2a dose-escalating, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

BackgroundWe report safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant protein RBD-fusion heterodimeric vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (PHH-1V). MethodsA dose-escalation, phase 1-2a, randomized clinical trial was performed in Catalonia, Spain. Each cohort had one safety sentinel that received PHH-1V vaccine of the corresponding dose, and remaining participants were randomly assigned to receive PHH-1V formulations [10{micro}g (n=5), 20{micro}g (n=10), 40{micro}g (n=10)] or control BNT162b2 (n=5). Two intramuscular doses (0-21 days) were administered. Primary endpoint was solicited events 7 days after each vaccination and secondary-exploratory endpoints were humoral and cellular immunogenicity. Findings30 young healthy adults were enrolled, thirteen were female. Vaccines were safe, well tolerated. The most common solicited events for all groups were tenderness and pain at the site of injection. The proportion of subjects with at least one reported local and/or systemic solicited adverse events (AE) after first or second vaccine dose were lowest in PHH-1V (n=21, 84%) than control group (n=5, 100%). AE were mild to moderate, and no severe AE nor AE of special interest were reported. All participants had a >4-fold change at day 35 in total binding antibodies from baseline. Variants of concern (VOC) alpha, beta, delta and gamma were evaluated using a SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus-based neutralization assay. All groups had a significant geometric mean fold rise (p<.0001) at day 35 against all studied VOC. Similar results were obtained when a full replicative virus neutralization assay was carried out. InterpretationPHH-1V was safe, well tolerated, and induced robust humoral responses. These data support further exploration of PHH-1V in larger studies. FundingHIPRA ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT05007509 Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed up until August 1, 2021, with the terms "SARS-CoV-2", "COVID-19" and "vaccine". We initially identified 12,952 results but when added the terms "clinical trial" and "variants" this number decreased to 50. Of these references twelve were clinical trials, and although several vaccines were under development, and the ones that were already approved for administration in the general population described the neutralization effect to the different circulating variants of concern, we could not find any reference to a vaccine developed using variants of concern instead of ancestral Wuhan strain. Added value of this studyTo the best of our knowledge, our study is the first clinical trial to assess the effect as a primary series of a recombinant protein receptor-binding domain fusion heterodimer PHH-1V vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 not including the ancestral strain in its composition. This vaccine contains RBD from B{middle dot}1{middle dot}351 (beta) and B{middle dot}1{middle dot}1{middle dot}7 (alpha) variants and is co-formulated with an oil-in-water adjuvant emulsion. In this first-in-human randomized clinical trial, two doses of the SARS-CoV-2 PHH-1V vaccine in a range of 10 to 40 {micro}g/dose were safe and well-tolerated and induced robust humoral immune responses to different circulating variants of concern, including alpha (B1{middle dot}1{middle dot}7), beta (B{middle dot}1{middle dot}351), delta (B{middle dot}1{middle dot}617{middle dot}2) and gamma (P{middle dot}1). Additionally, the PHH-1V 40{micro}g dose vaccine elicited moderated cellular immune responses, particularly to variants of concern alpha and delta. Implications of all the available evidenceThese findings indicate that the recombinant protein receptor-binding domain fusion heterodimer vaccine PHH-1V is safe and immunogenic. Phase 2b and Phase 3 clinical trials are ongoing to further investigate its safety and protective efficacy as heterologous booster.

Safety and immunogenicity of the protein-based PHH-IV compared to BNT162b2 as a heterologous SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccine in adults vaccinated against COVID-19: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority phase IIb trial.

Background: A SARS-CoV-2 protein-based heterodimer vaccine, PHH-1V, has been shown to be safe and well-tolerated in healthy young adults in a first-in-human, Phase I/IIa study dose-escalation trial. Here, we report the interim results of the Phase IIb HH-2, where the immunogenicity and safety of a heterologous booster with PHH-1V is assessed versus a homologous booster with BNT162b2 at 14, 28 and 98 days after vaccine administration. Methods: The HH-2 study is an ongoing multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority Phase IIb trial, where participants 18 years or older who had received two doses of BNT162b2 were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive a booster dose of vaccine -either heterologous (PHH-1V group) or homologous (BNT162b2 group)- in 10 centres in Spain. Eligible subjects were allocated to treatment stratified by age group (18-64 versus [≥]65 years) with approximately 10% of the sample enrolled in the older age group. The primary endpoints were humoral immunogenicity measured by changes in levels of neutralizing antibodies (PBNA) against the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 strain after the PHH-1V or the BNT162b2 boost, and the safety and tolerability of PHH-1V as a boost. The secondary endpoints were to compare changes in levels of neutralizing antibodies against different variants of SARS-CoV-2 and the T-cell responses towards the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein peptides. The exploratory endpoint was to assess the number of subjects with SARS-CoV-2 infections [≥]14 days after PHH-1V booster. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05142553. Findings: From 15 November 2021, 782 adults were randomly assigned to PHH-1V (n=522) or BNT162b2 (n=260) boost vaccine groups. The geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of neutralizing antibodies on days 14, 28 and 98, shown as BNT162b2 active control versus PHH-1V, was, respectively, 1.68 (p<0.0001), 1.31 (p=0.0007) and 0.86 (p=0.40) for the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 strain; 0.62 (p<0.0001), 0.65 (p<0.0001) and 0.56 (p=0.003) for the Beta variant; 1.01 (p=0.92), 0.88 (p=0.11) and 0.52 (p=0.0003) for the Delta variant; and 0.59 (p=<0.0001), 0.66 (p<0.0001) and 0.57 (p=0.0028) for the Omicron BA.1 variant. Additionally, PHH-1V as a booster dose induced a significant increase of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells expressing IFN-{gamma} on day 14. There were 458 participants who experienced at least one adverse event (89.3%) in the PHH-1V and 238 (94.4%) in the BNT162b2 group. The most frequent adverse events were injection site pain (79.7% and 89.3%), fatigue (27.5% and 42.1%) and headache (31.2 and 40.1%) for the PHH-1V and the BNT162b2 groups, respectively. A total of 52 COVID-19 cases occurred from day 14 post-vaccination (10.14%) for the PHH-1V group and 30 (11.90%) for the BNT162b2 group (p=0.45), and none of the subjects developed severe COVID-19. Interpretation: Our interim results from the Phase IIb HH-2 trial show that PHH-1V as a heterologous booster vaccine, when compared to BNT162b2, although it does not reach a non-inferior neutralizing antibody response against the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain at days 14 and 28 after vaccination, it does so at day 98. PHH-1V as a heterologous booster elicits a superior neutralizing antibody response against the previous circulating Beta and Delta SARS-CoV-2 variants, as well as the currently circulating Omicron BA.1. Moreover, the PHH-1V boost also induces a strong and balanced T-cell response. Concerning the safety profile, subjects in the PHH-1V group report significantly fewer adverse events than those in the BNT162b2 group, most of mild intensity, and both vaccine groups present comparable COVID-19 breakthrough cases, none of them severe. Funding: HIPRA SCIENTIFIC, S.L.U.

Cross-sectional study to assess the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with monoclonal gammopathies

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is the most effective strategy to protect patients with haematologic malignancies against severe COVID-19, but primary vaccine responses are less effective in this population. Here, we characterized the humoral responses following 3 months after mRNA-based vaccines in patients at different stages of the same plasma cell diseases, including monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) and multiple myeloma on first line therapy (MM), compared to a healthy control population matched by sex and age. We observed that plasmas from uninfected MM patients after 3 months post-vaccine have lower SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG and IgA antibodies and decreased neutralization capacity compared with MGUS and SMM individuals, and a group of healthy controls. Importantly, we detected significantly higher plasma neutralization capacity in MM individuals who recovered from COVID-19 compared to their uninfected counterparts, highlighting that hybrid immunity elicit stronger immune responses even in this immunocompromised population. In contrast to MM group, no differences in the vaccine-induced humoral response were observed between uninfected MGUS, SMM and healthy individuals. In conclusion, a booster vaccine dose is recommended in uninfected MM patients to develop an adequate and effective humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

Preclinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of PHH-1V, a second-generation COVID-19 vaccine candidate based on a novel recombinant RBD fusion heterodimer of SARS-CoV-2.

The current COVID-19 vaccines have been associated with a decline in infection rates, prevention of severe disease and decrease in mortality rates. However, new variants of concern (VoCs) are continuously evolving, making the development of new accessible COVID-19 vaccines essential in order to mitigate the pandemic. Here we present data on preclinical studies in mice of a receptor-binding domain (RBD)-based recombinant protein vaccine candidate (PHH-1V) consisting of an RBD fusion heterodimer containing the B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 VoCs and formulated with the SQBA adjuvant, an oil-in-water emulsion produced by HIPRA. BALB/c and K18-hACE2 mice were immunized with different recombinant RBD fusion heterodimer doses, following a two-dose prime-and-boost schedule. Vaccination induced a CD4+ and CD8+ T cell response and RBD-binding antibodies with neutralising activity against various VoCs with a good tolerability profile. Significantly, a 10-{micro}g or 20-{micro}g RBD fusion heterodimer/dose vaccination conferred 100% efficacy, preventing mortality in SARS-CoV-2 infected K18-hACE2 mice. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of this recombinant vaccine strategy.

Limited immune responses after three months of BNT162b2 vaccine in SARS-CoV-2 uninfected elders living in long-term care facilities

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 vaccination is the most effective strategy to protect elders living in long-term care facilities (LTCF) against severe COVID-19, but primary vaccine responses are less effective in older adults. Here, we characterized the humoral responses following 3 months after mRNA/BNT162b2 vaccine in institutionalized elders. MethodsPlasma levels of specific SARS-CoV-2 total IgG, IgM and IgA antibodies were measured before and 3 months after vaccination in elders living in LTCF. Neutralization capacity was assessed in a pseudovirus neutralization assay against WH1 (original) and B.1.617.2/Delta variants. A group of younger adults was used as reference group. ResultsThree months after vaccination, uninfected-elders presented reduced specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels and significantly lower neutralization capacity against the WH1 and Delta virus compared to vaccinated uninfected younger individuals. In contrast, COVID-19 recovered elders showed significantly higher specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels after vaccination than younger counterparts, while showing similar neutralization activity against WH1 virus and increased neutralization capacity against Delta variant. Despite previously infected elders elicit potent cross-reactive immune responses similarly to younger individuals, higher quantities of specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies are required to reach the same neutralization levels. ConclusionsWhile hybrid immunity seems to be active in previously infected elders after three months from mRNA/BNT162b2 vaccination, humoral immune responses are diminished in COVID-19 uninfected vaccinated residents living in LTCF. These results suggests that a vaccine booster dose should be prioritized for this particularly vulnerable population. Word summaryWhile previously infected and vaccinated elders living in LTCF had comparable neutralizing antibody levels to younger individuals, vaccinated uninfected-residents showed limited neutralization capacity against both original and delta variants. Hybrid immunity seems to be active in elders and can be relevant to design vaccine boosting campaigns.

SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 (beta) variant shows enhanced infectivity in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice and expanded tropism to wildtype mice compared to B.1 variant

SARS-CoV-2 variants display enhanced transmissibility and/or immune evasion and can be generated in humans or animals, like minks, thus generating new reservoirs. The continuous surveillance of animal susceptibility to new variants is necessary to predict pandemic evolution. In this study we demonstrate that, compared to the B.1 SARS-CoV-2 variant, K18-hACE2 transgenic mice challenged with the B.1.351 variant displayed a faster progression of infection. Furthermore, we also report that B.1.351 can establish infection in wildtype mice, while B.1 cannot. B.1.351-challenged wildtype mice showed a milder infection than transgenic mice, confirmed by detectable viral loads in oropharyngeal swabs and tissues, lung pathology, immunohistochemistry and serology. In silico models supported these findings by demonstrating that the Spike mutations in B.1.351 resulted in increased affinity for both human and murine ACE2 receptors. Overall, this study highlights the plasticity of SARS-CoV-2 animal susceptibility landscape, which may contribute to viral persistence and expansion.

Clinical course impacts early kinetics and long-term magnitude and amplitude of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies beyond one year after infection

BackgroundUnderstanding the determinants of long-term immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and the concurrent impact of vaccination and emerging variants of concern will guide optimal strategies to achieve global protection against the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsA prospective cohort of 332 COVID-19 patients was followed beyond one year. Plasma neutralizing activity was evaluated using HIV-based reporter pseudoviruses expressing different SARS-CoV-2 spikes and was longitudinally analyzed using mixed-effects models. FindingsLong-term neutralizing activity was stable beyond one year after infection in mild/asymptomatic and hospitalized participants. However, longitudinal models suggest that hospitalized individuals generate both short- and long-lived memory B cells, while outpatient responses were dominated by long-lived B cells. In both groups, vaccination boosted responses to natural infection, although viral variants, mainly B.1.351, reduced the efficacy of neutralization. Importantly, despite showing higher neutralization titers, hospitalized patients showed lower cross-neutralization of B.1.351 variant compared to outpatients. Multivariate analysis identified severity of primary infection as the factor that independently determines both the magnitude and the inferior cross-neutralization activity of long-term neutralizing responses. ConclusionsNeutralizing response induced by SARS-CoV-2 is heterogeneous in magnitude but stable beyond one year after infection. Vaccination boosts these long-lasting natural neutralizing responses, counteracting the significant resistance to neutralization of new viral variants. Severity of primary infection determines higher magnitude but poorer quality of long-term neutralizing responses.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 hyperimmune immunoglobulin provides potent and robust neutralization capacity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis induction through N and S proteins

BackgroundAlthough progressive COVID-19 vaccinations provide a significant reduction of infection rate in the short-to mid-term, effective COVID-19 treatments will continue to be an urgent need. MethodsWe have functionally characterized the anti-SARS-CoV-2 hyperimmune immunoglobulin (hIG) prepared from human COVID-19 convalescent plasma. SARS-CoV-2 virus neutralization was evaluated by four different methodologies (plaque reduction, virus induced cytotoxicity, TCID50 reduction and immunofluorimetry-based methodology) performed at four different laboratories and using four geographically different SARS-CoV-2 isolates (one each from USA and Italy; two from Spain). Two of the isolates contained the D614G mutation. Neutralization capacity against the original Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 straom and variants (D614G mutant, B.1.1.7, P.1 and B.1.351 variants) was evaluated using a pseudovirus platform expressing the corresponding spike (S) protein. The capacity to induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) was also evaluated. ResultsAll the SARS-CoV-2 isolates tested were effectively neutralized by hIG solutions. This was confirmed by all four methodologies showing potent neutralization capacity. Wild-type SARS-CoV-2 and variants were effectively neutralized as demonstrated using the pseudovirus platform. The hIG solutions had the capacity to induce ADCC and ADCP against SARS-CoV-2 N and S proteins but not the E protein. Under our experimental conditions, very low concentrations (25-100 {micro}g IgG/mL) were required to induce both effects. Besides the S protein, we observed a clear and potent effect triggered by antibodies in the hIG solutions against the SARS-CoV-2 N protein. ConclusionsThese results show that, beyond neutralization, other IgG Fc-dependent pathways may play a role in the protection from and/or resolution of SARS-CoV-2 infection when using hIG COVID-19 products. This could be especially relevant for the treatment of more neutralization resistant SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Siglec-1 on dendritic cells mediates SARS-CoV-2 trans-infection of target cells while on macrophages triggers proinflammatory responses

COVID-19 pandemic is not yet under control by vaccination, and effective antivirals are critical for preparedness. Here we report that macrophages and dendritic cells, key antigen presenting myeloid cells (APCs), are largely resistant to SARS-CoV-2 infection. APCs effectively captured viruses within cellular compartments that lead to antigen degradation. Macrophages sense SARS-CoV-2 and released higher levels of cytokines, including those related to cytokine storm in severe COVID-19. The sialic acid-binding Ig-like lectin 1 (Siglec-1/CD169) present on APCs, which interacts with sialylated gangliosides on membranes of retroviruses or filoviruses, also binds SARS-CoV-2 via GM1. Blockage of Siglec-1 receptors by monoclonal antibodies reduces SARS-CoV-2 uptake and transfer to susceptible target cells. APCs expressing Siglec-1 and carrying SARS-CoV-2 are found in pulmonary tissues of non-human primates. Single cell analysis reveals the in vivo induction of cytokines in those macrophages. Targeting Siglec-1 could offer cross-protection against SARS-CoV-2 and other enveloped viruses that exploit APCs for viral dissemination, including those yet to come in future outbreaks.

Novel Human Lung Tissue Model for the Study of SARS-CoV-2 Entry, Inflammation and New Therapeutics

The development of physiological models that reproduce SARS-CoV-2 infection in primary human cells will be instrumental to identify host-pathogen interactions and potential therapeutics. Here, using cell suspensions directly from primary human lung tissues (HLT), we have developed a rapid platform for the identification of viral targets and the expression of viral entry factors, as well as for the screening of viral entry inhibitors and anti-inflammatory compounds. The direct use of HLT cells, without long-term cell culture and in vitro differentiation approaches, preserves main immune and structural cell populations, including the most susceptible cell targets for SARS-CoV-2; alveolar type II (AT-II) cells, while maintaining the expression of proteins involved in viral infection, such as ACE2, TMPRSS2, CD147 and AXL. Further, antiviral testing of 39 drug candidates reveals a highly reproducible method, suitable for different SARS-CoV-2 variants, and provides the identification of new compounds missed by conventional systems, such as VeroE6. Using this method, we also show that interferons do not modulate ACE2 expression, and that stimulation of local inflammatory responses can be modulated by different compounds with antiviral activity. Overall, we present a relevant and rapid method for the study of SARS-CoV-2. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=193 SRC="FIGDIR/small/440731v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (48K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@96abf6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f3cfe3org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d55fdborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1884cd6_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsEx vivo physiological systems for the study of SARS-CoV-2-host interactions are scarce. Here, we establish a method using primary human lung tissue (HLT) cells for the rapid analysis of cell tropism and identification of therapeutics. O_LIHLT cells preserve main cell subpopulations, including alveolar type-2 cells, and expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry factors ACE2, CD147, TMPRSS2 and AXL. C_LIO_LIHLT cells are readily susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection without the need of cell isolation or further cell differentiation. C_LIO_LIAntiviral testing in HLT cells allows the rapid identification of new drug candidates against SARS-CoV-2 variants, missed by conventional systems. C_LIO_LILocal inflammation is supported in HLT cells and offers the identification of relevant anti-inflammatory compounds for SARS-CoV-2 infection. C_LI

Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection increases B.1.1.7 cross-neutralization by vaccinated individuals.

To assess the potential impact of predominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants on neutralizing activity of infected and/or vaccinated individuals, we analyzed neutralization of pseudoviruses expressing the spike of the original Wuhan strain, the D614G and B.1.1.7 variants. Our data show that parameters of natural infection (time from infection and infecting variant) determined cross-neutralization. Importantly, upon vaccination, previously infected individuals developed equivalent B.1.1.7 and Wuhan neutralizing responses. In contrast, uninfected vaccinees showed reduced neutralization against B.1.1.7. FundingThis study was funded by Grifols, the Departament de Salut of the Generalitat de Catalunya, the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III, CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya, and the crowdfunding initiatives #joemcorono, BonPreu/Esclat and Correos.

Seven-month kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and protective role of pre-existing antibodies to seasonal human coronaviruses on COVID-19

Unraveling the long-term kinetics of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and its determinants, including the impact of pre-existing antibodies to human coronaviruses causing common cold (HCoVs), is essential to understand protective immunity to COVID-19 and devise effective surveillance strategies. IgM, IgA and IgG levels against six SARS-CoV-2 and four HCoV antigens were quantified by Luminex, and antibody neutralization capacity was assessed by flow cytometry, in a cohort of health care workers followed-up for 6 months. Seroprevalence increased over time from 13.5% (month 0) and 15.6% (month 1) to 16.4% (month 6). Levels of antibodies, including those with neutralizing capacity, were stable over time, except IgG to nucleocapsid antigen and IgM levels that waned. After the peak response, anti-spike antibody levels increased from [~]150 days post-symptom onset in all individuals (73% for IgG), in the absence of any evidence of re-exposure. Pre-existing antibodies to alpha-HCoV were lower in individuals who subsequently seroconverted for SARS-CoV-2. IgG and IgA to HCoV were significantly higher in asymptomatic than symptomatic seropositive individuals. Thus, pre-existing cross-reactive HCoVs antibodies could have a protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease.

Cetylpyridinium chloride-containing mouthwashes reduce in vitro SARS-CoV-2 infectivity

Oral mouthwashes decrease the infectivity of several respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV-2. However, the precise agents with antiviral activity present in these oral rinses and their exact mechanism of action remain unknown. Here we show that Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), a quaternary ammonium compound present in many oral mouthwashes, reduces SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by inhibiting the viral fusion step with target cells after disrupting the integrity of the viral envelope. We also found that CPC-containing mouth rinses decreased more than a thousand times the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, while the corresponding vehicles had no effect. This activity was effective for different SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the B.1.1.7 variant, predominant in UK, also in the presence of sterilized saliva. CPC-containing mouth rinses could therefore represent a cost-effective measure to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in saliva, aiding to reduce viral transmission from infected individuals regardless of the variants they are infected with.

Stable neutralizing antibody levels six months after mild and severe COVID-19 episode

Understanding mid-term kinetics of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is the cornerstone for public health control of the pandemic and vaccine development. However, current evidence is rather based on limited measurements, thus losing sight of the temporal pattern of these changes1-6. In this longitudinal analysis, conducted on a prospective cohort of COVID-19 patients followed up to 242 days, we found that individuals with mild or asymptomatic infection experienced an insignificant decay in neutralizing activity that persisted six months after symptom onset or diagnosis. Hospitalized individuals showed higher neutralizing titers, which decreased following a two-phase pattern, with an initial rapid decline that significantly slowed after day 80. Despite this initial decay, neutralizing activity at six months remained higher among hospitalized individuals. The slow decline in neutralizing activity at mid-term contrasted with the steep slope of antibody titers change, reinforcing the hypothesis that the quality of immune response evolves over the post-convalescent stage4,5.