In vitro allergen challenge of peripheral blood induces differential gene expression in mononuclear cells of asthmatic patients: inhibition of cytosolic phospholipase A2alpha overcomes the asthma-associated response.

BACKGROUND: Existing treatments for asthma are not effective in all patients and disease exacerbations are common, highlighting the need for increased understanding of disease mechanisms and novel treatment strategies. The leukotriene pathway including the enzyme responsible for arachidonic acid release from cellular phospholipids, cPLA(2)alpha, is a major contributor to asthmatic responses and an attractive target in asthma therapies. OBJECTIVE: The study reported here investigates (a) the differential effects of in vitro exposure of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to allergen between asthma and healthy subjects, and (b) the contribution of cPLA(2)alpha to these differences in gene expression. METHODS: In vitro responses of asthma (N=26) and healthy (N=11) subject PBMC samples to allergen stimulation in the presence and absence of cPLA(2)alpha inhibition or 5-lipoxygenase inhibition were compared at the gene expression level using oligonucleotide arrays and at the protein level using ELISA. RESULTS: Subject samples within both asthma and healthy groups showed allergen-dependent cytokine production and allergen-dependent gene expression changes, although transcriptional profiling identified 153 genes that were modulated significantly differently by allergen between asthma and healthy subjects. Among these were genes previously associated with asthma, but the majority (about 80%) have not previously been associated with asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Transcriptional profiling elucidated novel gene expression differences between the asthmatic and healthy subject samples. Although 5-lipoxygenase inhibition did not significantly affect allergen-modulated gene expression, the inhibition of cPLA(2)alpha activity affected many of the allergen-dependent, asthma-associated gene expression changes.

Comparison of once-daily to twice-daily treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.

BACKGROUND: Once-daily dosing with an effective inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) would likely enhance compliance and, therefore, aid in the management of asthma. OBJECTIVE: Several once-daily dosing regimens of mometasone furoate (MF) administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with a twice-daily dosing regimen in 286 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma who were previously being treated with ICS. METHODS: During a 2-week open-label phase, patients received MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily. They were then randomized to continue MF-DPI, 200 microg twice-daily treatment or to receive MF-DPI, 200 microg once daily in the morning (AM), 200 microg once daily in the evening (PM), 400 microg once daily AM, or placebo as part of the 12-week, double-blind phase. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from the baseline to endpoint (last evaluable observation) for FEV1. RESULTS: Once-daily MF-DPI, 400 microg, AM maintained FEV1, and morning peak expiratory flow rate, FVC, FEF25%-75%, and asthma symptom scores, at levels similar to those for MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily and significantly better than placebo. Once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, PM was effective in maintaining pulmonary function, but was less effective on other efficacy measures. In comparison to the other MF-DPI groups, once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, AM was not as effective overall. The incidence of local adverse events, including oral candidiasis, was low with all dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily MF-DPI, 400 microg, AM was as effective as MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily, whereas once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, was more effective when administered in the evening compared with morning, for patients receiving ICS therapy. Once-daily dosing offers an effective and convenient treatment that could aid compliance in the treatment of asthma.

Inhaled mometasone furoate reduces oral prednisone requirements while improving respiratory function and health-related quality of life in patients with severe persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroid therapy in severe persistent asthma has been shown to reduce or eliminate oral corticosteroid (OCS) use while retaining effective asthma control. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the ability of mometasone furoate (MF) delivered by means of dry powder inhaler to reduce daily oral prednisone requirements in OCS-dependent patients with severe persistent asthma. METHODS: We performed a 12-week, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial (21 centers, 132 patients) comparing 2 doses of MF (400 and 800 microg administered twice daily) with placebo, followed by a 9-month open-label phase in which 128 patients received treatment with MF. RESULTS: At the endpoint of the double-blind trial, MF 400 and 800 mg twice daily reduced daily OCS requirements by 46.0% and 23.9%, respectively, whereas placebo increased OCS requirements by 164.4% (P <.01). Oral steroids were eliminated in 40%, 37%, and 0% of patients in the MF 400 and 800 mg twice daily and placebo groups, respectively. Pulmonary function and quality of life significantly increased for MF-treated patients. Further reductions in OCS requirements were achieved with long-term MF treatment in the open-label phase. CONCLUSION: MF inhaled orally as a dry powder is an effective alternative to systemic corticosteroids in patients with severe persistent asthma.

Interaction of ephedrine and theophylline.

The effectiveness and safety of individualized theophylline doses administered as such and in combination with ephedrine and hydroxyzine was investigated in 23 children with chronic asthma who received these medications and a placebo for 1 week each, double-blind and in randomized sequence. Theophylline, determined by prior clinical titration in each patient, averaged 7.3 mg/kg per dose administered every 6 hr, with peak serum theophylline concentrations averaging about 16 mug/ml. Asthmatic symptoms were controlled with theophylline. Ephedrine, alone or in combination, was relatively ineffectual in these patients. None of the drugs given alone was associated with significant adverse effects but both ephedrine-theophylline combinations (with and without hydroxyzine) were associated with insomnia, nervousness, and gastrointestinal complaints. Since the combinations were not significantly more effective than theophylline alone, the apparent toxicity of these combinations suggests a contraindication for the routine use of ephedrine with theophylline in the management of chronic asthma.