Specialist Perspectives on the Imaging Selection of Large Vessel Occlusion in the Late Window.

BACKGROUND: The proper imaging modality for use in the selection of patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) presenting in the late window remains controversial, despite current guidelines advocating the use of advanced imaging in this population. We sought to understand if clinicians with different specialty training differ in their approach to patient selection for EVT in the late time window. METHODS: We conducted an international survey of stroke and neurointerventional clinicians between January and May 2022 with questions focusing on imaging and treatment decisions of large vessel occlusion (LVO) patients presenting in the late window. Interventional neurologists, interventional neuroradiologists, and endovascular neurosurgeons were defined as interventionists whereas all other specialties were defined as non-interventionists. The non-interventionist group was defined by all other specialties of the respondents: stroke neurologist, neuroradiologist, emergency medicine physician, trainee (fellows and residents) and others. RESULTS: Of 3000 invited to participate, 1506 (1027 non-interventionists, 478 interventionists, 1 declined to specify) physicians completed the study. Interventionist respondents were more likely to proceed directly to EVT (39.5% vs. 19.5%; p < 0.0001) compared to non-interventionist respondents in patients with favorable ASPECTS (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score). Despite no difference in access to advanced imaging, interventionists were more likely to prefer CT/CTA alone (34.8% vs. 21.0%) and less likely to prefer CT/CTA/CTP (39.1% vs. 52.4%) for patient selection (p < 0.0001). When faced with uncertainty, non-interventionists were more likely to follow clinical guidelines (45.1% vs. 30.2%) while interventionists were more likely to follow their assessment of evidence (38.7% vs. 27.0%) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Interventionists were less likely to use advanced imaging techniques in selecting LVO patients presenting in the late window and more likely to base their decisions on their assessment of evidence rather than published guidelines. These results reflect gaps between interventionists and non-interventionists reliance on clinical guidelines, the limits of available evidence, and clinician belief in the utility of advanced imaging.

Basilar artery occlusion management: Specialist perspectives from an international survey.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two early basilar artery occlusion (BAO) randomized controlled trials did not establish the superiority of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) over medical management. While many providers continue to recommend EVT for acute BAO, perceptions of equipoise in randomizing patients with BAO to EVT versus medical management may differ between clinician specialties. METHODS: We conducted an international survey (January 18, 2022 to March 31, 2022) regarding management strategies in acute BAO prior to the announcement of two trials indicating the superiority of EVT, and compared responses between interventionalists (INTs) and non-interventionalists (nINTs). Selection practices for routine EVT and perceptions of equipoise regarding randomizing to medical management based on neuroimaging and clinical features were compared between the two groups using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Among the 1245 respondents (nINTs = 702), INTs more commonly believed that EVT was superior to medical management in acute BAO (98.5% vs. 95.1%, p < .01). A similar proportion of INTs and nINTs responded that they would not randomize a patient with BAO to EVT (29.4% vs. 26.7%), or that they would only under specific clinical circumstances (p = .45). Among respondents who would recommend EVT for BAO, there was no difference in the maximum prestroke disability, minimum stroke severity, or infarct burden on computed tomography between the two groups (p > .05), although nINTs more commonly preferred perfusion imaging (24.2% vs. 19.7%, p = .04). Among respondents who indicated they would randomize to medical management, INTs were more likely to randomize when the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was ≥10 (15.9% vs. 6.9%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Following the publication of two neutral clinical trials in BAO EVT, most stroke providers believed EVT to be superior to medical management in carefully selected patients, with most indicating they would not randomize a BAO patient to medical treatment. There were small differences in preference for advanced neuroimaging for patient selection, although these preferences were unsupported by clinical trial data at the time of the survey.

AAMP is a binding partner of costimulatory human B7-H3.

Background: Targeted immunotherapies are of growing interest in the treatment of various cancers. B7 homolog 3 protein (B7-H3), a member of the co-stimulatory/-inhibitory B7-family, exerts immunosuppressive and pro-tumorigenic functions in various cancer types and is under evaluation in ongoing clinical trials. Unfortunately, interaction partner(s) remain unknown which restricts the druggability. Methods: Aiming to identify potential binding partner(s) of B7-H3, a yeast two-hybrid and a mass spectrometry screen were performed. Potential candidates were evaluated by bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assay, co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP), and functionally in a 3H-thymidine proliferation assay of Jurkat cells, a T-cell lineage cell line. Prognostic value of angio-associated migratory cell protein (AAMP) and B7-H3 expression was evaluated in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 wildtype (IDH1wt) glioblastoma (GBM) patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-GBM cohort. Results: Of the screening candidates, CD164, AAMP, PTPRA, and SLAMF7 could be substantiated via BiFC. AAMP binding could be further confirmed via co-IP and on a functional level. AAMP was ubiquitously expressed in glioma cells, immune cells, and glioma tissue, but did not correlate with glioma grade. Finally, an interaction between AAMP and B7-H3 could be observed on expression level, hinting toward a combined synergistic effect. Conclusions: AAMP was identified as a novel interaction partner of B7-H3, opening new possibilities to create a targeted therapy against the pro-tumorigenic costimulatory protein B7-H3.

Leaving the day behind: endovascular therapy beyond 24 h in acute stroke of the anterior and posterior circulation.

Background: There is little evidence of endovascular therapy (EVT) being performed in acute ischemic stroke beyond 24 h, and that evidence is limited to anterior circulation stroke. Objective: To extend evidence of efficacy and safety of EVT after more than 24 h in both anterior and posterior circulation stroke. Methods: Local, prospectively collected registries were screened for patients with acute ischemic stroke and large-vessel occlusion who had received either EVT > 24 h after last-seen-well but <24 h after symptom recognition (EVT>24LSW) or EVT > 24 h since first (definitive) symptom recognition (EVT>24DEF). Patients treated <24 h served as a group for comparison. Favorable outcome was defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-2 or return to prestroke mRS at 3 months. Results: Between January 2014 and August 2021, N = 2347 were treated with EVT at our comprehensive stroke center, of whom n = 43 met the inclusion criteria (EVT>24LSW, n = 16, EVT>24DEF, n = 27). EVT>24LSW patients were treated at a median of 28.7 h [interquartile range (IQR) = 27.3-32.8] after last-seen-well and 7.3 h (IQR = 2.8-14.3) after symptom recognition; EVT>24DEF patients were treated 52.5 h (IQR = 26.5-94.2) after first symptoms. Favorable outcome was achieved by 23.3% (10/43) in the EVT > 24 compared with 39.4% (886/2250) in the EVT < 24 group (p = 0.04). Bleeding rates were similar across groups. Mortality was also similar [EVT > 24, 27.9% (12/43) versus EVT < 24, 25.7% (584/2264), p = 0.727; posterior circulation, EVT > 24, 41.7% (5/12) versus EVT < 24, 36.5% (92/252) p = 0.764]. Conclusion: In selected patients, EVT seems effective and safe beyond 24 h for both anterior and posterior circulation stroke.

Endovascular therapy versus no endovascular therapy in patients receiving best medical management for acute isolated occlusion of the posterior cerebral artery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular therapy (EVT) is increasingly reported for treatment of isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusions although its clinical benefit remains uncertain. This study-level meta-analysis investigated the functional outcomes and safety of EVT and best medical management (BMM) compared to BMM alone for treatment of PCA occlusion stroke. METHODS: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science and Embase for studies in patients with isolated PCA occlusion stroke treated with EVT + BMM or BMM including intravenous thrombolysis. There were no randomized trials and all studies were retrospective. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 3 months, while safety outcomes included mortality rate and incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: Twelve studies with a total of 679 patients were included in the meta-analysis: 338 patients with EVT + BMM and 341 patients receiving BMM alone. Good functional outcome at 3 months was achieved in 58.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 43.83-70.95) of patients receiving EVT + BMM and 48.1% (95% CI 40.35-55.92) of patients who received BMM alone, with respective mortality rates of 12.6% (95% CI 7.30-20.93) and 12.3% (95% CI 8.64-17.33). sICH occurred in 4.2% (95% CI 2.47-7.03) of patients treated with EVT + BMM and 3.2% (95% CI 1.75-5.92) of patients treated with BMM alone. Comparative analyses were performed on studies that included both treatments and these demonstrated no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that EVT represents a safe treatment for patients with isolated PCA occlusion stroke. There were no differences in clinical or safety outcomes between treatments, supporting randomization of future patients into distal vessel occlusion trials.

Diagnostic accuracy of automated occlusion detection in CT angiography using e-CTA.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of e-CTA (product name) (Brainomix) in the automatic detection of large vessel occlusions in anterior circulation stroke. METHODS: Of 487 CT angiographies from patients with large vessel occlusions stroke, 327 were used to train the algorithm while the remaining cases together with 140 negative CT angiographies were used to validate its performance against ground truth. Of these 301 cases, 144 were randomly selected and used for an additional comparative analysis against 4 raters. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), accuracy and level of agreement with ground truth (Cohen's Kappa) were determined and compared to the performance of a neuroradiologist, a radiology resident, and two neurology residents. RESULTS: e-CTA had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.84 (0.77-0.89) and 0.96 (0.91-0.98) respectively for the detection of any large vessel occlusions on the correct side in the whole validation cohort. This performance was identical in the comparative analysis subgroup and was within the range of physicians at different levels of expertise: 0.86-0.97 and 0.91-1.00, respectively. For the detection of proximal occlusions, it was 0.92 (0.84-0.96) and 0.98 (0.94-1.00) for the whole cohort and 0.93 (0.80-0.98) and 1.00 (0.95-1.00) for the comparative analysis, respectively for e-CTA. The range was 0.8-0.97 for sensitivity and 0.97-1.00 for specificity for the four physicians. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of e-CTA in detecting any large vessel occlusions is comparable to less experienced physicians but is similar to experienced physicians for detecting proximal large vessel occlusions.

Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Levels Are Similar in Asymptomatic vs. Symptomatic Cerebrovascular Atherosclerosis.

Introduction: Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) is correlated with atherosclerosis and vascular diseases such as coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke. The aim of the study was to investigate whether TMAO levels are different in symptomatic vs. asymptomatic cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. Methods: This was a prospective, case-control study, conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. Patients were included if they had large-artery atherosclerosis (TOAST criteria). Symptomatic patients with ischemic stroke were compared with asymptomatic patients. As primary endpoint, TMAO levels on admission were compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Univariable analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U test and multivariable analysis using binary logistic regression. TMAO values were adjusted for glomerular filtration rate (GFR), age, and smoking. Results: Between 2018 and 2020, 82 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were recruited. Median age was 70 years; 65% were male. Comparing symptomatic (n = 42) and asymptomatic (n = 40) patients, no significant differences were found in univariable analysis in TMAO [3.96 (IQR 2.30-6.73) vs. 5.36 (3.59-8.68) µmol/L; p = 0.055], GFR [87 (72-97) vs. 82 (71-90) ml/min*1.73 m2; p = 0.189] and age [71 (60-79) vs. 69 (67-75) years; p = 0.756]. In multivariable analysis, TMAO was not a predictor of symptomatic cerebrovascular disease after adjusting for age and GFR [OR 1.003 (95% CI: 0.941-1.070); p = 0.920]. In a sensitivity analysis, we only analyzed patients with symptomatic stenosis and excluded patients with occlusion of brain-supplying arteries. Again, TMAO was not a significant predictor of symptomatic stenosis [OR 1.039 (0.965-1.120), p = 0.311]. Conclusion: TMAO levels could not be used to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic cerebrovascular disease in our study.

Prophylactic anticoagulation in patients with glioblastoma or brain metastases and atrial fibrillation: an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage?

PURPOSE: Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) or brain metastases (MET) and atrial fibrillation (AF) might be at an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) due to anticoagulation (AC). Our aim was to assess this risk. METHODS: Our institution's database (from 2005 to 2017) was screened for patients with GBM or MET and AF with an indication for AC according to their CHA2DS2VASc stroke risk score (≥ 2). Required follow-up was at least 3 months. AC was either performed with heparins, phenprocoumon or non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Applying the propensity score approach, patient cohorts (matched according to primary tumor, age, sex) were generated (GBM [or MET] with AF ± AC, GBM [or MET] without AF/AC, no GBM [or MET] but AF on AC). ICH was defined as clinical deterioration caused by new blood on imaging. A log rank test was performed to compare the risk for ICH between the three groups. RESULTS: In total, 104 patients were identified of which 49 with GBM (37% on AC) and 37 with MET (46% on AC) were successfully matched. Median follow up was 8.6 and 7.2 months, respectively. ICH occurred in 10.2% of GBM + AF and 12.2% GBM-AF, whereas 8% of patients with AF on AC suffered ICH (p = 0.076). 13.5% of patients with MET + AF had ICHs, in the controls it was 16% for MET-AF and 8% for AF on AC (p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: AC did not seem to influence the incidence of ICH in patients with glioblastoma or brain metastases within follow up of just under 9 months.

Patient profiles contribute to differences in quality metrics of stroke centers.

OBJECTIVE: To examine this association by comparing patient profiles in 2 closely affiliated hospitals and by examining their association with quality metrics. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study comparing a university level comprehensive stroke centers (CSC) with its teaching hospital and local stroke unit (LSU) using routinely collected quality assurance data over a 2 year period. Both hospitals were closely affiliated, shared important resources and medical staff rotated amongst both hospitals. We compared patient profiles as well as internationally recognized quality metrics and examined the association of profiles with quality metrics. RESULTS: A total of 2,462 patients were treated in the CSC and 726 in the LSU. The LSU had a longer door-to-image and door-to-needle times. Rate of systemic thrombolysis was lower in the LSU. Patient profiles differed significantly and were associated with door-to-image and door-to-needle times as well as intravenous thrombolysis rates, even when adjusted for stroke service level. The diagnostic procedures for stroke work-up were similar. Discharge management differed strongly. CONCLUSION: Although LSUs and CSCs are the primary care providers in their respective regions, differences in patient profiles may contribute to differences in performance parameters. Adjusting for patient profiles may improve the comparability of the quality of stroke care provided by hospitals belonging to different stroke service levels.

Methylome analyses of three glioblastoma cohorts reveal chemotherapy sensitivity markers within DDR genes.

BACKGROUND: Gliomas evade current therapies through primary and acquired resistance and the effect of temozolomide is mainly restricted to methylguanin-O6-methyltransferase promoter (MGMT) promoter hypermethylated tumors. Further resistance markers are largely unknown and would help for better stratification. METHODS: Clinical data and methylation profiles from the NOA-08 (104, elderly glioblastoma) and the EORTC 26101 (297, glioblastoma) studies and 398 patients with glioblastoma from the Heidelberg Neuro-Oncology center have been analyzed focused on the predictive effect of DNA damage response (DDR) gene methylation. Candidate genes were validated in vitro. RESULTS: Twenty-eight glioblastoma 5'-cytosine-phosphat-guanine-3' (CpGs) from 17 DDR genes negatively correlated with expression and were used together with telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations in further analysis. CpG methylation of DDR genes shows highest association with the mesenchymal (MES) and receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) II glioblastoma subgroup. MES tumors have lower tumor purity compared to RTK I and II subgroup tumors. CpG hypomethylation of DDR genes TP73 and PRPF19 correlated with worse patient survival in particular in MGMT promoter unmethylated tumors. TERT promoter mutation is most frequent in RTK I and II subtypes and associated with worse survival. Primary glioma cells show methylation patterns that resemble RTK I and II glioblastoma and long term established glioma cell lines do not match with glioblastoma subtypes. Silencing of selected resistance genes PRPF19 and TERT increase sensitivity to temozolomide in vitro. CONCLUSION: Hypomethylation of DDR genes and TERT promoter mutations is associated with worse tumor prognosis, dependent on the methylation cluster and MGMT promoter methylation status in IDH wild-type glioblastoma.

Molecular profiling-based decision for targeted therapies in IDH wild-type glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Molecular profiling allows tumor classification as well as assessment of diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment-related molecular changes. Translation into clinical practice and relevance for patients has not been demonstrated yet. METHODS: We analyzed clinical and molecular data of isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioblastoma patients with sufficient clinical follow-up from the Heidelberg Neuro-Oncology Center and with molecular analysis of tumor tissue that consisted of DNA methylation array data, genome-scale copy number variations, gene panel sequencing, and partly mTOR immunohistochemistry between October 2014 and April 2018. RESULTS: Of 536 patients screened, molecular assessment was performed in 253 patients (47%) in a prospective routine clinical setting with further clinical appointments. Therapy decision was directly based on the molecular assessment in 97 (38%) patients. Of these, genetic information from MGMT (n = 68), EGFR (n = 7), CDKN2A/B (n = 8), alterations of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway (n = 5), and BRAF (n = 3) have been the most frequently used for decision making with a positive overall survival signal for patients with glioblastoma harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter treated according to the molecular assignment. Based on detected molecular alterations and possible targeted therapies, we generated an automated web-based prioritization algorithm. CONCLUSION: Molecular decision making in clinical practice was mainly driven by MGMT promoter status in elderly patients and study inclusion criteria. A reasonable number of patients have been treated based on other molecular aberrations. This study prepares for complex molecular decisions in a routine clinical decision making.

LAPTM5-CD40 Crosstalk in Glioblastoma Invasion and Temozolomide Resistance.

Background: Glioma therapy is challenged by the diffuse and invasive growth of glioma. Lysosomal protein transmembrane 5 (LAPTM5) was identified as an invasion inhibitor by an in vivo screen for invasion-associated genes. The aim of this study was to decipher the function of LAPTM5 in glioblastoma and its interaction with the CD40 receptor which is intensively evaluated as a target in the therapy of diverse cancers including glioma. Methods: Knockdown of LAPTM5 was performed in different glioma cell lines to analyze the impact on clonogenicity, invasiveness, sensitivity to temozolomide chemotherapy, and tumorigenicity in vitro and in vivo. An expression array was used to elucidate the underlying pathways. CD40 knockdown and overexpression were induced to investigate a potential crosstalk of LAPTM5 and CD40. LAPTM5 and CD40 were correlated with the clinical outcome of glioma patients. Results: Knockdown of LAPTM5 unleashed CD40-mediated NFκB activation, resulting in enhanced invasiveness, clonogenicity, and temozolomide resistance that was overcome by NFκB inhibition. LAPTM5 expression correlated with better overall survival in glioblastoma patients depending on CD40 expression status. Conclusion: We conclude that LAPTM5 conveyed tumor suppression and temozolomide sensitation in CD40-positive glioblastoma through the inhibition of CD40-mediated NFκB activation. Hence, LAPTM5 may provide a potential biomarker for sensitivity to temozolomide in CD40-positive glioblastoma.

cMyc and ERK activity are associated with resistance to ALK inhibitory treatment in glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is expressed in ~ 60% of glioblastomas and conveys tumorigenic functions. Therefore, ALK inhibitory strategies with alectinib are conceivable for patients with glioblastoma. The aims of this preclinical study were to investigate efficacy as well as to understand and potentially overcome primary and acquired resistance mechanisms of alectinib in glioblastoma. METHODS: Efficacy of alectinib was analyzed dependent on ALK expression in different glioblastoma initiating cells and after lentiviral knockdown of ALK. Alectinib resistant cells were generated by continuous treatment with increasing alectinib doses over 3 months. M-RNA, phospho-protein and protein regulation were analyzed to decipher relevant pathways associated to treatment or resistance and specifically inhibited to evaluate rational salvage therapies. RESULTS: Alectinib reduced clonogenicity and proliferation and induced apoptosis in ALK expressing glioblastoma initiating cells, whereas cells without ALK expression or after ALK depletion via knockdown showed primary resistance against alectinib. High expression of cMyc and activation of the ERK1/2 pathway conferred resistance against alectinib in ALK expressing glioblastoma cells. Pharmacological inhibition of these pathways by cMyc inhibitor or MEK inhibitor, trametinib, overcame alectinib resistance and re-sensitized resistant cells to continued alectinib treatment. The combination of alectinib with radiotherapy demonstrated synergistic effects in inhibition of clonogenicity in non-resistant and alectinib resistant glioblastoma cells. CONCLUSION: The data offer rationales for alectinib treatment in ALK expressing glioblastoma and for the use of ALK expression status as potential biomarker for alectinib treatment. In addition, the results propose MEK inhibition or radiotherapy as reasonable salvage treatments after acquired alectinib resistance.

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Improves Functional Outcome in Patients With Progressive Lacunar Strokes.

Background and Purpose- In 20% to 30% of patients with lacunar strokes, early neurological deterioration (END) occurs within the first days after stroke onset. However, effective treatment strategies are still missing for these patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze efficacy of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients presenting with END. Methods- Four hundred fifty-eight patients with lacunar strokes and corresponding neuroimaging evidence of lacunar ischemia were retrospectively screened for END, which was defined by deterioration of ≥3 total National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale points, ≥2 National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale points for limb paresis, or documented clinical deterioration within 5 days after admission. Patients with END were treated with DAPT according to in-house standards. Primary efficacy end point was fulfilled if National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at discharge improved at least to the score at admission. Secondary end points were Rankin Scale score, further clinical fluctuation, and symptomatic bleeding complications. Results- END occurred in 130 (28%) of 458 patients with lacunar strokes. Ninety-seven (75%) of these patients were treated with DAPT after END, mostly for 5 days. DAPT was associated with improved functional outcome. The primary end point was met in 68% (66) of patients with DAPT compared with 36% (12) of patients with standard treatment ( P=0.0019). Further clinical fluctuations were absent in 79% (77) of patients with DAPT versus 33% (11) of patients without DAPT ( P<0.001). Symptomatic bleeding complications were not observed in any patient. Conclusions- The results demonstrated potential positive effects of DAPT in patients with progressive lacunar strokes.

Targeting Resistance against the MDM2 Inhibitor RG7388 in Glioblastoma Cells by the MEK Inhibitor Trametinib.

PURPOSE: Resistance is an obstacle of glioma therapy. Despite targeted interventions, tumors harbor primary resistance or become resistant over short course of treatment. This study examined the mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibitor RG7388 together with radiotherapy and analyzed strategies to overcome acquired MDM2 inhibitor resistance in glioblastoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Effects of RG7388 and radiotherapy were analyzed in p53 wild-type glioblastoma cell lines and glioma-initiating cells. RG7388 resistant cells were generated by increasing RG7388 doses over 3 months. Regulated pathways were investigated by microarray, qRT-PCR, and immunoblot analysis and specifically inhibited to evaluate rational salvage therapies at RG7388 resistance. Effects of RG7388 and trametinib treatment were challenged in an orthotopical mouse model with RG7388 resistant U87MG glioblastoma cells. RESULTS: MDM2 inhibition required functional p53 and showed synergistic activity with radiotherapy in first-line treatment. Long-term exposure to RG7388 induced resistance by activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2)-insulin growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP1) signaling cascade, which was specifically overcome by ERK1/2 pathway inhibition with trametinib and knockdown of IGFBP1. Combining trametinib with continued RG7388 treatment enhanced antitumor effects at RG7388 resistance in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide a rationale for combining RG7388 and radiotherapy as first-line therapy with a specific relevance for tumors insensitive to alkylating standard chemotherapy and for the addition of trametinib to continued RG7388 treatment as salvage therapy after acquired resistance against RG7388 for clinical practice.