Final results and pharmacoeconomic analysis of a trial comparing two neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) regimens followed by surgery in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II randomised study by the European Lung Cancer Working Party.

Induction cisplatin-based CT improves survival in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to determine the respective activity of third-generation (gemcitabine-vinorelbine-cisplatin [GVP]) in comparison with second-generation drugs CT (mitomycine-ifosfamide-cisplatin [MIP]) and their cost-effectiveness as neoadjuvant CT before surgery in NSCLC. Patients with histologically proven initially untreated resectable stages I-III NSCLC were randomised between three courses of MIP or GVP followed by surgery. A two-stage Simon design was used for each arm with resectability rate as primary endpoint. A cost minimisation analysis, considering the direct medical costs, was performed in the Belgian and French social security systems. From 2001 to 2007, 140 patients (pts) were randomised (MIP 69, GVP 71). Main characteristics were: stage I/II/III in 52, 37 and 51 pts, squamous histology in 82 pts, male 114 pts, median PS 90. Objective response rates to induction CT were 60% (MIP) and 65% (GVP) (p=0.55). Complete resection rates were 77% (MIP) and 80% (GVP) (p=0.62). Median survival times were 47.2 months (MIP) and 36.6 months (GVP) (p=0.41). Cost-analyses showed significant incremental costs with GVP. In conclusion, while both neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens shared similar efficacy in patients with resectable NSCLC, costs were significantly higher for third-generation regimens.

A phase III randomised study of concomitant induction radiochemotherapy testing two modalities of radiosensitisation by cisplatin (standard versus daily) for limited small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine in limited small-cell lung cancer if locoregional irradiation concurrently with induction chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide prolongs survival when cisplatin is given daily as a radiosensitiser. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two-hundred and four eligible patients were randomised between standard radiosensitised induction chemoradiotherapy (arm A) with cisplatin (90 mg/m(2) day 1) plus etoposide and daily radiosensitised induction chemoradiotherapy (arm B) with cisplatin (6 mg/m(2)/day) plus etoposide. Chemotherapy and chest irradiation (39.90 Gy in 15 fractions >3 weeks) both started on day 1. RESULTS: There was no difference in survival between both arms with respective median, 2 and 5 years of 15.5 months, 35% and 18% in arm A and 17.0 months, 38% and 21% in arm B (P = 0.50). Performance status and T status were identified as independent prognostic factors for survival. In terms of local control rate, there was a statistical trend in favour of arm A with 2% only local relapse versus 10% in arm B. Daily cisplatin radiosensitisation was associated with more oesophagitis and thrombopenia but less nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Induction chemoradiotherapy resulted in both arms in good long-term survival, comparable to the best reported results and without improvement by daily cisplatin administration.

Chemotherapy improves low performance status lung cancer patients.

The aim of the present study was to determine the potential benefit of conventional cisplatin-based chemotherapy on patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and poor performance status (PS), defined as 60-70 on the Karnofsky scale. Retrospective analysis was carried out of a randomised trial performed in advanced NSCLC where 485 patients received three courses of gemcitabine+ifosfamide+cisplatin induction chemotherapy. Of the patients, 80% had good PS (Karnofsky 80-100) and 20% poor PS. Response rates were 38 and 28%, respectively. Clinical improvement, defined as achieving a good PS during chemotherapy, was observed overall in 25% of the poor PS patients, with rates of 38, 20 and 14%, respectively, in case of response, no change and progression. PS improved more quickly in the responders. Survival of patients with poor PS was significantly worse, but survival of responders was similar, irrespective of the initial poor or good PS. Although nonfatal toxicity was almost similar, there were more toxic deaths (including vascular and cardiac fatalities) in the poor PS patients (9.2 versus 2.1%). In conclusion, combination chemotherapy is associated with clinical improvement in a substantial number of patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer of poor performance status.

Second-line paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer initially treated with cisplatin: a study by the European Lung Cancer Working Party.

In the context of a phase III trial comparing in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sequential to conventional administration of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and paclitaxel, we evaluated the activity of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy and investigated any relation of its efficacy with the type of failure after cisplatin. Patients received three courses of induction GIP (gemcitabine, ifosfamide, cisplatin). Non-progressing patients were randomised between three further courses of GIP or three courses of paclitaxel. Second-line paclitaxel was given to patients with primary failure (PF) to GIP and to those progressing after randomisation to further GIP (secondary failure or SF). One hundred sixty patients received second-line paclitaxel. Response rates were 7.7% for PF and 11.6% for SF (P=0.42). Median survival times (calculated from paclitaxel start) were 4.1 and 7.1 months for PF and SF (P=0.002). In multivariate analysis, three variables were independently associated with better survival: SF (hazard ratio (HR)=1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-2.22; P=0.02), normal haemoglobin level (HR=1.56, 95% CI 1.08-2.26; P=0.02) and minimal weight loss (HR=1.79, 95% CI 1.26-2.55; P=0.001). Paclitaxel in NSCLC patients, whether given for primary or for SF after cisplatin-based chemotherapy, demonstrates activity similar to other drugs considered active as second-line therapy.

A phase III randomised trial comparing sequential chemotherapy using cisplatin-based regimen and paclitaxel to cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine whether in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the sequential administration of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and paclitaxel (Taxol) is superior to a cisplatin-based chemotherapy, followed by paclitaxel as salvage treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 485 chemotherapy naive patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with three courses of GIP (gemcitibine + ifosfamide + cisplatin), consisting of cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1, ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) on days 1 and 8. Patients with nonprogressive disease were then randomised to further similar courses of GIP or courses of paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2) over 3 h every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Objective response or nonprogression after induction GIP occurred in 174 and 115 patients, respectively. After randomisation, there were 140 patients in the GIP arm and 141 in the paclitaxel arm. In terms of postrandomisation survival, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.17) between the two arms. Median times were 9.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-11.6] and 11.9 (95% CI 9.4-14.3) months for paclitaxel and GIP, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that sex and haemoglobin were independent prognostic factors. After adjustment for these factors, the observed hazard ratio was 0.81 (95% CI 0.63-1.04) in favour of GIP (P = 0.10). Toxicity was tolerable; there was a significantly higher rate of grades III/IV thrombocytopenia with GIP and more alopecia with paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: Sequential chemotherapy using cisplatin-based regimen followed by paclitaxel does not result in better outcome than cisplatin-based chemotherapy using taxane as salvage treatment.

A phase II study evaluating the cisplatin and epirubicin combination in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Few chemotherapeutic agents have demonstrated their efficacy in malignant mesothelioma. The cisplatin plus doxorubicin combination has one of the highest response rates. Epirubicin is an anthracyclin, analogous to doxorubicin, with a different toxicologic pattern. As there are no data on the activity of the combination cisplatin plus epirubicin in malignant mesothelioma, the European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) designed a phase II study with response rate as primary objective. Sixty-nine eligible patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma were centrally registered. The majority of the patients were male (n=59), had a Karnofsky performance status of 80 or more (n=62) and presented with an epithelial histologic subtype (n=43). Median age was 62 years. In nine patients, metastases were documented at the initial work-up, mainly in bone, lung and skin. Three hundred and twenty-four cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The main toxicities were nausea and vomiting, neutropenia and alopecia. Among 63 assessable patients, response rate was 19.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-29%). Median survival was 13.3 months. In multivariate analysis, poor prognostic factors for survival were neutrophil count and CALGB groups 4-6. In conclusion, cisplatin plus epirubicin appears as an effective regimen in malignant mesothelioma, with a favourable toxicity profile. However, it does not demonstrate superior activity to other active regimens in this disease.

A three-arm phase III randomised trial assessing, in patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer, accelerated chemotherapy with support of haematological growth factor or oral antibiotics.

The European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) designed a 3-arm phase III randomised trial to determine the role of accelerated chemotherapy in extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Eligible patients were randomised between the 3 following arms: (A) Standard chemotherapy with 6 courses of EVI (epirubicin 60 mg m(-2), vindesine 3 mg m(-2), ifosfamide 5 g m(-2); all drugs given on day 1 repeated every three weeks. (B) Accelerated chemotherapy with EVI administered every 2 weeks and GM-CSF support. (C) Accelerated chemotherapy with EVI and oral antibiotics (cotrimoxazole). Primary endpoint was survival. 233 eligible patients were randomised. Chemotherapy could be significantly accelerated in arm B with increased absolute dose-intensity. Best response rates, in the population of evaluable patients, were, respectively for arm A, B and C, 59%, 76% and 70%. The response rate was significantly higher in arm B in comparison to arm A (P = 0.04). There was, however, no survival difference with respective median duration and 2-year rate of 286 days and 5% for arm A, 264 days and 6% for arm B and 264 days and 6% for arm C. Severe thrombopenia occurred more frequently in arm B but without an increased rate of bleeding. Non-severe infections were more frequent in arm B and severe infections were less frequent in arm C. Our trial failed to demonstrate, in ED-SCLC, a survival benefit of chemotherapy acceleration by using GM-CSF support.

A randomised phase III trial comparing consolidation treatment with further chemotherapy to chest irradiation in patients with initially unresectable locoregional non-small-cell lung cancer responding to induction chemotherapy. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

PURPOSE: A phase III randomised trial was conducted in patients with non-metastatic unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer in order to compare, in responders to induction chemotherapy, consolidation treatment by further chemotherapy to chest irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 462 untreated NSCLC patients were eligible for three courses of induction chemotherapy (MIP) consisting of cisplatin (50 mg/m2), ifosfamide (3 g/m2) and mitomycin C (6 mg/m2). It was proposed that objective responders be randomised to either three further courses of MIP or to chest irradiation (60 Gy; 2 Gy per fraction given over six weeks). RESULTS: An objective response rate of 35% was achieved; 115 patients (including 52% with initial stage IIIA and 44% with initial stage IIIB) were randomised to consolidation treatment, 60 of them to further chemotherapy and 55 to chest radiotherapy. There was no significant difference in survival between the two arms, with a respective median and two-year survival of 42 weeks (95% confidence intervals (95% CI: 35-51) and 18% (95% CI: 8-28) for chemotherapy and 54 weeks (95% CI: 43-73) and 22% (95% CI: 11-33) for irradiation. There was also no statistical difference for response duration between the two arms but chest irradiation was associated with a significantly greater duration of local control than chemotherapy (median duration times: 158 vs. 31 weeks, P = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: For non-metastatic unresectable NSCLC treated by an induction chemotherapy regimen containing cisplatin and ifosfamide, if an objective response is obtained, consolidation treatments by further chemotherapy or by chest irradiation result in non-statistically different survival distributions, although a better local control duration is observed with radiotherapy.

A comparison of methods of calculation for estimating carboplatin AUC with a retrospective pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

We retrospectively analysed the data obtained in a large randomised trial performed in 505 eligible patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Its purpose had been to compare a combination of carboplatin (200 mg/m2) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) with or without the addition of ifosfamide. The present retrospective analysis assessed two ways of dosing carboplatin: according to body surface area (mg/m2) or to the estimated targeted area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC). Two different methods were used in the latter calculation: the Calvert formula using the Cockroft approximation to evaluate the glomerular filtration rate and the Chatelut equation. There was an excellent linear correlation between them. With the Chatelut method, the calculated administered AUC were lower. Whichever method was used, carboplatin AUC was not significantly associated with antitumour response rate nor patient survival. A statistically significant increase in haematological toxicity, mainly thrombopenia, was observed with an increase in the AUC. This effect was observed whatever AUC variable was considered, i.e. total dosage at course one, total dosage during the first three chemotherapy courses or dose intensity during the first three courses. The effect remained highly significant after adjustment for treatment arm. We conclude that for a moderate carboplatin dose in non-small cell lung cancer, the therapeutic index could be improved if dosage is calculated according to the AUC.

Phase III randomized trial comparing cisplatin and carboplatin with or without ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

PURPOSE: A phase III randomized trial in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was performed to determine if the addition of ifosfamide to moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin improved response rate (primary end point) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 529 patients were randomized to receive a combination of moderate-dose carboplatin (200 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] on day 1) and cisplatin (30 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 and 3) with (CCI arm) or without (CC arm) ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 3). There were 248 eligible patients on the CC arm and 257 on the CCI arm, with 220 and 238 patients assessable for response, respectively. All but 23 had stage IV disease with pleural effusion. RESULTS: There was a 16% objective response (OR) rate to CC and a 31% OR rate to CCI. That observed difference was highly statistically significant (P < 0.001). Duration of response and survival were not statistically different between arms. The CCI regimen was associated with significantly more acute toxicities: emesis, alopecia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. The frequency of chronic renal, auditive, and peripheral neurologic toxicity was low in both arms (4.6% and 6.6%, respectively, after six courses of chemotherapy). The relative dose-intensity (RDI) of the CCI arm was significantly lower than that of the CC arm. CONCLUSION: The addition of ifosfamide to moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin significantly improves the antitumoral response rate, but has no apparent effect an survival in advanced NSCLC.

Evaluation of the TN sub-staging in patients with initially unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated by induction chemotherapy. The European Lung Cancer Working Party.

PURPOSE: This study attempted to investigate, in a cohort of patients with clinical stage III initially unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated by the same induction chemotherapy regimen, the prognostic value of clinical T and N sub-groupings in order to validate the current International Staging System (ISS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All the eligible patients with stage III NSCLC (428 patients) registered in a clinical trial were included in the study investigating, after three courses of induction chemotherapy, the role, in responders, of chest irradiation in comparison to further chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of mitomycin C, ifosfamide and cisplatin. RESULTS: Patients with ISS 1986 stage IIIA had a significantly better survival than those with stage IIIB (median survival 47 vs 36 weeks; P = 0.01). A RECPAM analysis showed that patients with T1-T2 N3 and T4 N0-1-2 stage had a more similar prognosis to those with stage IIIA. That result leads to define two new sub-groups: stage IIIlalpha (T3-T4 N0-N1; any T N2; T1-T2 N3) and IIIbeta (T3-T4 N3), with a highly significant difference in survival between them (median survival: 45 vs 29 weeks; P < 0.0001). The superiority of that new classification on the ISS documented in our series of stage III patients for discriminating survival and tumour response has to be confirmed on another series in a multivariate context. CONCLUSION: For unresectable NSCLC treated by induction chemotherapy, stage III sub-classification by moving T4 N0-1 and T1-2 N3 tumours from stage IIIB to stage IIIA appeared to better correlate with prognosis. The usefulness of this new sub-division has to be tested in validation studies.

[Prognostic factors in advanced stage non-small cell bronchial cancer: experiences of the European Lung Cancer Working Party]. / Facteurs pronostiques des cancers bronchiques non à petites cellules au stade avancé: expérience de l'European Lung Cancer Working Party.

The European Lung Cancer Working Party has investigated prognostic factors for response, overall survival, long term survival in a population with advanced non small cell lung cancer registered in a clinical trial evaluating platinum derivatives-containing chemotherapy regimens. Various factors have been identified in multivariate analyses and were classified using RECPAM methodology. In addition to the clinical factors such as disease extent and performance status were shown, as significant predictors, rarely studied biological factors like pretherapeutic leucocyte and polynuclear levels. The obtention of an objective response to chemotherapy appeared to be a major prognostic factor for further survival.

Prognostic factors for response to chemotherapy containing platinum derivatives in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. (NSCLC).

PURPOSE: To identify pretreatment variables predicting response to platinum derivatives containing chemotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients included in one of the 7 consecutive clinical trials conducted by the European Lung Cancer Working Party between December 1980 and August 1991. All patients received a cisplatin or carboplatin containing chemotherapy. We analyzed 22 potential prognostic factors including sex, age, histology, performance status, weight loss, type of lesions, extent of disease, main metastatic sites and several biological parameters, namely white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count, platelet count, hemoglobinemia, creatininemia, serum alkaline phosphatases and LDH. RESULTS: On 1052 eligible patients. 107 were not assessable for response. The objective response rate was 26% (95% C.I.: 23, 29%). Univariate analysis identified as statistically significantly associated with a higher objective antitumoral response rate the following characteristics: a normal platelet count, the absence of skin metastasis, the absence of adrenal metastasis, a higher creatininemia, a normal hemoglobinemia, an older age and a normal WBC count. On a restricted set of variables including data from 777 patients, a multivariate logistic regression model disclosed age and platelet count as significantly and independently related to response rate. CONCLUSION: Clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with unresectable NSCLC, as well as routine laboratory parameters, could not accurately predict response to chemotherapy in a population of patients selected for a clinical trial. Future studies on this subject should include more sophisticated variables as new biomolecular makers.

Randomized trial comparing induction chemotherapy versus induction chemotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: The European Lung Cancer Working Party (ELCWP) performed a randomized trial with the primary end point to determine if maintenance chemotherapy with 12 courses of etoposide (120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 3) and vindesine (3 mg/m2 on day 3) could improve progression-free survival in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients who responded to six courses of induction chemotherapy with ifosfamide, etoposide, and an anthracycline (doxorubicin or epirubicin). RESULTS: Among 235 eligible patients initially registered, 91 were randomized to receive maintenance therapy, including seven patients who were no longer responding. Among 84 randomized responders, progression-free survival was significantly improved (P = .003) by maintenance therapy, with median durations (maintenance v follow-up) of 25 versus 12 weeks after the second randomization, but survival was not significantly increased (P = .10), with median durations of 48 and 38 weeks. However, in a multi-variate analysis that took into account disease extent, maintenance therapy, Karnofsky performance status (PS), and absolute dose-intensity (ADI) of anthracycline given during induction, limited disease (LD) and maintenance were found to be independent positive predictors of survival. CONCLUSION: We conclude that maintenance chemotherapy in responding patients is beneficial in SCLC.

Induction chemotherapy with ifosfamide, etoposide, and anthracycline for small cell lung cancer: experience of the European Lung Cancer Working Party.

Prospective trials comparing drug analogues in the treatment of small cell lung cancer are rare. The European Lung Cancer Working Party has conducted a randomized trial with a primary end point of determining the effect on survival of maintenance chemotherapy and a secondary end point of comparing doxorubicin (45 mg/m2) with a bioequivalent epirubicin dose (60 mg/m2) in one set of patients, and a standard with a high epirubicin dose (60 v 90 mg/m2) in a second set of patients. Anthracycline was given on day 1 of induction chemotherapy in combination with ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2 intravenously days 1 through 3) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 intravenously days 1 through 3). Six courses were given at 3-week intervals. In all, 235 eligible previously untreated patients with pathologically proven small cell lung cancer were randomized: 106 to the comparison of doxorubicin and epirubicin and 129 to the comparison of standard-dose versus high-dose epirubicin. There was no difference between the regimens in terms of objective response rate or survival, and the regimen containing the lower (60 mg/m2) epirubicin dose was better tolerated, with fewer toxic deaths and less need for dose and schedule adjustments.

A four-drug combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, mitomycin, vindesine and 5 fluorouracile: a regimen associated with major toxicity in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The purpose of this study was to determine the activity of a 4-drug combination chemotherapy: cisplatin, mitomycin C, vindesine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Chemotherapy consisted of the administration of cisplatin (30 mg/m2 d 1-4), mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 d 1), vindesine (3 mg/m2 d 1) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 d 1-4 by continuous intravenous infusion). In patients older than 70 years, and in those who received prior irradiation or chemotherapy, cisplatin and 5-FU were omitted on day 4. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks and evaluation of response was performed after the first 2 courses. In case of response, treatment was continued until best response or untolerable toxicity. Among 182 eligible patients, 75% had received no prior therapy; 41% had locoregional disease and 59% metastatic disease; 41% lost more than 5% of their pretherapy body weight. A 34% objective response rate was observed in the 164 evaluable patients (31% in all the eligible patients) including 4 complete and 52 partial responses. Patients with locoregional disease had a significantly better response rate than those with metastases (44% vs 27%). The overall median survival was 26 weeks. Significant hematological toxicity was documented but the most serious adverse event was the occurrence of 18 (10%) cardiac or sudden deaths. These toxic deaths were significantly associated with a 5% loss of body weight prior to therapy. The addition of 5-FU to combination of cisplatin, mitomycin C and vindesine does not improve antitumoral effect but results in very significant cardiac toxicity.

A four-drug combination chemotherapy with cisplatin, mitomycin, vindesine and 5-fluorouracil. A regimen associated with major toxicity in patients with advanced non-small lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

PURPOSE: To determine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer the activity of a 4-drug combination chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy consisted of the administration of cisplatin (30 mg/m2 d 1-3 or 4), mitomycin C (10 mg/m2 d 1), vindesine (3 mg/m2 d 1) and 5-FU (1 g/m2 d 1-3 or 4 by continuous intravenous infusion. RESULTS: 182 were eligible patients. A 34% objective response rate was observed in the 164 evaluable patients. The overall median survival was 26 weeks. The most serious adverse event was the occurrence of 18 (10%) cardiac or sudden deaths. These toxic deaths were significantly associated with a > or = 5% loss of body weight prior to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen studied resulted in a very significant cardiac toxicity.

Phase II randomized trial comparing high-dose cisplatin with moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

PURPOSE: A phase II randomized trial was conducted in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine if the combination of moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin was active (primary end point) and could avoid the long-term limiting (renal, auditive, neurologic) toxicity of high-dose cisplatin, which prevents prolonged administration (secondary end point). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-one patients, registered between April 1990 and September 1991, were randomized to receive high-dose cisplatin (120 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] on day 1) or a combination of moderate-dose carboplatin (200 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and moderate-dose cisplatin (30 mg/m2 IV on days 2 and 3). One hundred nine patients were eligible: 56 in the cisplatin arm and 53 in the combined arm; 52 and 47, respectively, were assessable for response. All had stage IV disease (or stage IIIB with pleural effusion) and none had received prior chemotherapy. RESULTS: There was a 23% objective response rate to cisplatin (23% of the eligible patients) and a 22% response rate to cisplatin plus carboplatin (21% of the eligible patients). The overall survival rate was not significantly different between the two study arms, but responders in the combined arm survived significantly longer than those in the high-dose cisplatin arm (respective median survival durations, 66 and 30 weeks). Although there was no difference between the arms for alopecia, emesis, and leukopenia, the combined arm was significantly associated with more thrombocytopenia (although rarely severe) and, more importantly, with less renal (19% v 36%), auditive (4% v 16%), and neurologic (0% v 16%) toxicity of any grade. CONCLUSION: The regimen combining moderate-dose cisplatin and carboplatin was active against advanced NSCLC and significantly less toxic than high-dose cisplatin.

[Small cell bronchial cancer. Comparison of results of weekly polychemotherapy using multiple drugs with standard chemotherapy. European Lung Cancer Working Party]. / Cancer bronchique à petites cellules. Comparaison des résultats d'une polychimiothérapie hebdomadaire avec de multiples médicaments avec une chimiothérapie standard. European Lung Cancer Working Party.

The administration of multiple cytostatic drugs on a weekly basis has been proposed as a new intensive chemotherapy modality for small-cell lung cancer. The European Lung Cancer Working Party has conducted a randomized trial comparing to a standard regimen (cyclophosphamide + adriamycin + etoposide given at the cycle beginning) a weekly chemotherapy with 7 active drugs (cyclophosphamide + adriamycin + etoposide on day 1; cisplatin + vindesine on day 8; methotrexate + vincristine on day 15). A total of 215 eligible patients have been registered. There has been no significant difference between the 2 arms for response and for survival. The total relative dose-intensity has been lower in the weekly chemotherapy arm. This approach has failed to improve current results.

Multiple-drug weekly chemotherapy versus standard combination regimen in small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized study conducted by the European Lung Cancer Working Party.

PURPOSE: A randomized trial was conducted in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) to determine if survival can be improved by a weekly chemotherapy regimen combining various drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three patients were randomized to receive either six courses of a multiple-drug combination (MDC) regimen (Adriamycin [ADR; doxorubicin; Farmitalia Carlo Erba, Milan, Italy] 25 mg/m2 intravenously [i.v.] on day 1; etoposide [VP16] 120 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; cyclophosphamide [CPA] 500 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; cisplatin 60 mg/m2 i.v. on day 8; vindesine [VDS] 3 mg/m2 i.v. on day 8; vincristine [VCR] 2 mg i.v. on day 15; methotrexate [MTX] 100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 15), or a standard chemotherapy (SC) regimen (ADR 50 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; CPA 1 g/m2 i.v. on day 1; VP16 80 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 3). RESULTS: In 98 MDC-treated and 101 SC-treated assessable patients, we observed 69% and 62% objective responses rates, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival, with median durations and 2-year overall survival rates of 49 and 43 weeks and 8.5% and 7.9%, respectively. There was a significant increase in response rate in favor of MDC patients with limited disease (84% v 62%). Toxicity was tolerable, although SC was more hematotoxic, with 76% (v 59%) experiencing leukopenia and 17% (v 7%) experiencing thrombocytopenia (grades III and IV). If the cumulative doses received were nearly equal to the scheduled cumulative doses in both arms, the total relative dose-intensity (RDI) was significantly higher in the SC arm. The difference was due to increased treatment delays in the MDC arm. CONCLUSION: Weekly MDC failed to improve survival rates in patients with SCLC.