Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Crit Care Med ; 14(10): 864-8, 1986 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3530637

RESUMO

Twelve patients with an endotracheal tube and a new infiltrate were assessed for differences in the bacteriologic information that could be obtained by routine tracheal suctioning (RTS), a double-lumen protected-sheath brush passed through a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (B-FFB), and suctioning through a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (S-FEB). Gram stains and cultures were performed on all specimens. There was 100% agreement for the culture results obtained by RTS and S-FEB. It is concluded that RTS obtains comparable information to that obtained by the more expensive and more personnel-intensive B-FFB.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Intubação Intratraqueal , Sistema Respiratório/microbiologia , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Broncoscopia , Cateterismo , Humanos , Sucção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...