A systematic review on the birth prevalence of metachromatic leukodystrophy.

BACKGROUND: Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease caused by deficiency in arylsulfatase A (ASA) activity arising primarily from ASA gene (ARSA) variants. Late-infantile, juvenile and adult clinical subtypes are defined by symptom onset at ≤ 2.5, > 2.5 to < 16 and ≥ 16 years, respectively. Epidemiological data were sought to address knowledge gaps and to inform decisions regarding the clinical development of an investigational drug. METHODS: To synthesize all available estimates of MLD incidence and birth prevalence worldwide and in selected countries, Ovid MEDLINE and Embase were searched systematically (March 11, 2022) using a population, intervention, comparator, outcome, time and setting framework, complemented by pragmatic searching to reduce publication bias. Where possible, results were stratified by clinical subtype. Data were extracted from non-interventional studies (clinical trials, non-clinical studies and case reports were excluded; reviews were used for snowballing only). RESULTS: Of the 31 studies included, 14 reported birth prevalence (13 countries in Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America), one reported prevalence and none reported incidence. Birth prevalence per 100,000 live births ranged from 0.16 (Japan) to 1.85 (Portugal). In the three European studies with estimates stratified by clinical subtypes, birth prevalence was highest for late-infantile cases (0.31-1.12 per 100,000 live births). The distribution of clinical subtypes reported in cases diagnosed over various time periods in 17 studies varied substantially, but late-infantile and juvenile MLD accounted for at least two-thirds of cases in most studies. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a foundation for further analysis of the regional epidemiology of MLD. Data gaps indicate the need for better global coverage, increased use of epidemiological measures (e.g. prevalence estimates) and more stratification of outcomes by clinical and genetic disease subtype.

Von Willebrand Disease Epidemiology, Burden of Illness and Management: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Although hereditary von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common bleeding disorder, its epidemiology is not well understood. A systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020197674/CRD42021244374) on the epidemiology/burden of illness of VWD was conducted to better understand patients' unmet needs. Methods: Observational studies (published January 1, 2010 to April 14, 2021) were identified in MEDLINE and Embase databases, using free-text keywords and thesaurus terms for VWD and outcomes of interest. Pragmatic web-based searches of the gray literature, including conference abstracts, were performed, and reference lists of retained publications were manually searched for additional sources. Case reports and clinical trials (phase 1-3) were excluded. Outcomes of interest were incidence, prevalence, mortality, patient characteristics, burden of illness, and therapeutic management/treatments currently used for VWD. Results: Of the 3095 identified sources, 168 were included in this systematic review. Reported VWD prevalence (22 sources) ranged from 108.9 to 2200 per 100,000 in population-based studies and from 0.3 to 16.5 per 100,000 in referral-based studies. Reported times between first symptom onset and diagnosis (two sources; mean 669 days; median 3 years) highlighted gaps in timely VWD diagnosis. Bleeding events reported in 72-94% of the patients with VWD (all types; 27 sources) were mostly mucocutaneous including epistaxis, menorrhagia, and oral/gum bleeding. Poorer health-related quality of life (three sources) and greater health care resource utilization (three sources) were reported for patients with VWD than in general populations. Conclusion: Available data suggest that patients with VWD experience high disease burden in terms of bleeding, poor quality of life, and health care resource utilization.

Effectiveness and Safety of Palivizumab for the Prevention of Serious Lower Respiratory Tract Infection Caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Palivizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody approved for the prevention of serious lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants and young children at high risk of RSV disease. This systematic review summarized evidence on the effectiveness and safety of palivizumab when used in approved populations. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of Phase III trials and observational studies was conducted according to the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, timing, setting (PICOTS) approach (PROSPERO, CRD42021281380). Target populations consisted of infants with a history of premature birth (≤35-week gestational age) and children aged <2 years with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) or with hemodynamically significant congenital heart disease (hs-CHD). Outcomes of interest included RSV-related hospitalization, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), requirement for mechanical ventilation, treatment-related adverse events (AEs), and RSV-related deaths. Information sources were literature search (Ovid MEDLINE and Embase), pragmatic searches, and snowballing (covering the period up to 07 September 2021). RESULTS: A total of 60 sources were included (5 Phase III trials and 55 observational studies). RSV-related hospitalization rates following palivizumab prophylaxis in Phase III trials were 1.8% in premature infants and 7.9% in children with BPD, which were significantly lower than rates in placebo arms. In the real-world setting, similar hospitalization rates were found (0.7-4.0% in premature infants [16 studies] and 0-5.5% in patients with BPD [10 studies]) with ICU admission reported in 0 to 33.3% of patients hospitalized for RSV. In Phase III trials, RSV-related mortality rates were 0.2 and 0.3%, while AEs occurred in 11% of premature and/or BPD patients and 7.2% of hs-CHD patients, consisting mainly of injection site reaction, fever, and diarrhea. Similar results were found in observational studies. CONCLUSION: This systematic review supports the effectiveness and safety of palivizumab in the indicated populations. KEY POINTS: · Systematic review supports the positive benefit-risk profile of palivizumab in the indicated populations.. · Real-world safety and effectiveness of palivizumab are consistent with Phase III trials results.. · Palivizumab reduces RSV-related hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and need for mechanical ventilation..

Epidemiology of Asymptomatic Pre-heart Failure: a Systematic Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To quantify the prevalence of asymptomatic pre-heart failure (pre-HF), progression to more severe stages, and associated mortality. RECENT FINDINGS: A systematic review was conducted between 01 January 2010 and 12 March 2020 (PROSPERO: CRD42020176141). Data of interest included prevalence, disease progression, and mortality rates. In total, 1030 sources were identified, of which, 12 reported on pre-HF (using the ACC/AHA definition for stage B HF) and were eligible. Prevalence estimates of pre-HF ranged from 11 to 42.7% (10 sources) with higher estimates found in the elderly, in patients with hypertension, and in men. Three studies reported on disease progression with follow-up ranging from 13 months to 7 years. The incidence of symptomatic HF (HF/advanced HF) ranged from 0.63 to 9.8%, and all-cause mortality from 1.6 to 5.4%. Further research is required to investigate whether early detection and intervention can slow or stop the progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic HF.

Human Papillomavirus Vaccination and Premature Ovarian Failure: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

INTRODUCTION: There have been public health concerns about a potential association between human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines and premature ovarian failure (POF) in young women. OBJECTIVE: To identify a potential safety signal of POF after HPV vaccination using the United States (US) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database. METHODS: We manually selected relevant MedDRA preferred terms related to POF and identified in VAERS all POF reports in women less than 40 years of age between 2 July 1990 and 14 May 2018, followed by a review of narratives to confirm the cases. We conducted descriptive analyses on age, POF type, HPV vaccine type (HPV2, HPV4, HPV9), time to onset of POF, and dose rank. We described trends in reporting over time and assessed a potential safety signal using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). RESULTS: Of the 228,341 eligible POF reports, 281 (0.1%) were suspected to be associated with HPV vaccines. Median patient age was 15 years (range 11-39 years). POF events consisted mainly of amenorrhea (80.4%) and premature menopause (15.3%). Mean number of reported POF events significantly increased after the first HPV vaccine launch in 2006 with 22.2 POF cases/year up from 1.4 POF cases/year before the launch. PRR was 46.1 (95% confidence interval: 31.7-67.2) and sensitivity analyses yielded similar estimates. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests the presence of a potential safety signal of POF associated with HPV vaccination, which may only be partly attributed to notoriety bias. Due to the well-known limitations of spontaneous reporting data, further investigations are warranted.

Effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin monotherapy in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of brentuximab vedotin (BV) in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) in the clinical practice setting using most recent results. A total of 32 observational studies reporting on treatment patterns, overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were found. After four cycles, a random-effect model yielded pooled ORR and CR rates of 62.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 56.0-68.9; I2 = 9.7%) and 32.9% (95% CI, 20.8-46.3, I2 = 64.8%), respectively. Regarding survival, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year PFS ranged from 52.1% to 63.2%, 45.2% to 56.2%, and 31.9% to 33.0%, respectively. OS rates were 68.2-82.7%, 58.0-81.9%, and 58.0-62.0%, respectively. Most common adverse events were hematological toxicities (neutropenia: 13.3-23%, anemia: 8.8-39.0%, and thrombocytopenia: 4-4.6%), and grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy (3.3-7.3%). This study supports the effectiveness and safety of BV in R/R cHL patients in the real-world setting.

Epidemiology of status epilepticus in the United States: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) is a life-threatening neurologic emergency, which is defined by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) as bilateral tonic-clonic seizure activity lasting longer than 5 min, while absence status epilepticus (SE) and focal SE are specified as exceeding 10 min. Epidemiological evidence on SE is currently lacking, and the incidence is not well-known, especially in light of changes in the ILAE criteria for SE. The objectives of this systematic literature review were to describe the epidemiology of SE in the US population and the associated burden of illness. METHODS: A systematic review, including literature and pragmatic searches, was conducted. Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, and Web of Science electronic databases from inception to February 2019. Pragmatic searches of the gray literature were carried out using Google, Google Scholar, conference proceedings, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify additional sources. Only US-based studies or multinational studies reporting US data of interest were included. RESULTS: In total, 69 sources were identified. The incidence of all SE in patients of all ages in the USA ranged from 18.3 to 41 per 100,000 people per year. Incidence of all-age CSE rose from 3.5 (1979) to 12.5 (2010) per 100,000 people per year. Status epilepticus incidence followed a bimodal (U-shaped) distribution, with the highest estimates in the first years of life (0-4 years) and after 60 years. Mortality associated with SE varied from 21% over 30 days to 31.2% over 10 years. For CSE, two studies reported similar in-hospital mortalities (9.2% and 10.7%). Median healthcare costs related to SE admission were approximately US$14,500 per adult (17-45 years) and US$8000 per child (0-16 years). CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of recent data on the epidemiology and healthcare burden associated with SE. Reports of SE incidence in the USA are highly variable and predate the 2015 ILAE definition of SE. However, the available data suggest a high burden of illness.

Effectiveness of Risk Minimization Measures for Fentanyl Buccal Tablet (FENTORA) in Canada: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Using Surveys, Medical Chart Records and Web Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT), a potent opioid, was approved in Canada in 2013 for breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant adult cancer patients. Additional risk minimization measures (aRMMs), consisting of communications to patients and healthcare providers (HCPs), were implemented from November 2014 through September 2015. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of FBT aRMMs as measured by prescriber knowledge, understanding, and behavior regarding key safety concerns (off-label use, use in non-opioid-tolerant patients, misuse/abuse/diversion, and drug-drug interaction) and to evaluate illicit FBT use. METHODS: The study included three components: (1) a knowledge and understanding (KAU) survey of FBT prescribers conducted in two waves: November 2016-February 2017 and April-September 2018; (2) a retrospective prescription study of medical records of patients treated with FBT by a subgroup of prescribers from the KAU survey; and (3) Web surveillance of illicit FBT use in Canada using the search term FENTORA (May 2014-September 2018). The aRMMs were considered effective if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval indicated that at least 65% of respondents met or partly met the knowledge objective for each key safety concern. RESULTS: KAU survey: Of 46 eligible HCPs, 97.8% met or partly met the knowledge objective on use in breakthrough pain cancer patients, 97.8% on use in opioid-tolerant patients, 89.1% on dose and titration, 100% on abuse/addiction, and 58.7% on drug-drug interaction. Retrospective prescription study: Of 22 FBT-treated patients identified from 14 HCPs, 45.5% had cancer, 50.0% recorded a breakthrough pain indication, and 36.4% reported opioid tolerance; however, only 13.6% of patients were prescribed FBT according to the approved indication. Web surveillance: Of 932 FBT posts in Canada, only 40 (4.3%) mentioned illicit use. CONCLUSIONS: The aRMMs as measured by the prescriber KAU were effective for most key safety messages; however, not all key messages of the aRMMs were stringently followed in routine practice.

Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the leading causes of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). To further understand this patient population, we present the first systematic review on the epidemiology of SSc and SSc-associated ILD (SSc-ILD). Methods: Bibliographic databases and web sources were searched for studies including patients with SSc and SSc-ILD in Europe and North America (United States and Canada). The systematic review was limited to publications in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese, published between January 1, 2000 and February 29, 2016. For all publications included in the review, the methodologic quality was assessed. For each dimension and region, data availability in terms of quantity and consistency of reported findings was evaluated. Results: Fifty publications reporting epidemiologic data (prevalence, incidence, demographic profile, and survival and mortality) were included; 39 included patients with SSc and 16 included patients with SSc-ILD. The reported prevalence of SSc was 7.2-33.9 and 13.5-44.3 per 100,000 individuals in Europe and North America, respectively. Annual incidence estimates were 0.6-2.3 and 1.4-5.6 per 100,000 individuals in Europe and North America, respectively. Associated ILD was present in ~35% of the patients in Europe and ~52% of the patients in North America. In Europe, a study estimated the prevalence and annual incidence of SSc-ILD at 1.7-4.2 and 0.1-0.4 per 100,000 individuals, respectively. In both Europe and North America, SSc-ILD was diagnosed at a slightly older age than SSc, with both presentations of the disease affecting 2-3 times more women than men. Ten-year survival in patients with SSc was reported at 65-73% in Europe and 54-82% in North America, with cardiorespiratory manifestations (including ILD) associated with poor prognosis. Conclusion: This systematic review confirms that SSc and SSc-ILD are rare, with geographic variation in prevalence and incidence.

Drug Utilization Studies in Latin America: A Scoping Review and Survey of Ethical Requirements.

BACKGROUND: Drug utilization studies (DUSs) are increasingly being conducted in Latin America, especially in countries with a universal healthcare coverage, to inform policies and decision making. The need for an ethical framework specific to DUSs in Latin America has been recognized. OBJECTIVES: To describe the ethical and/or legal requirements applicable to DUSs in Latin American countries with universal healthcare coverage. METHODS: We conducted a nonsystematic scoping review on DUSs in this region, covering the period from January 1, 2012, to July 1, 2017, and reviewed legislations and data protection requirements in each country. We also surveyed 45 ethics committees and 22 key informants to determine specific ethical requirements for various types of DUSs differing in data collection methods, study populations, and settings. RESULTS: Local legislations on DUSs are highly heterogeneous across Latin America. In Chile and Guatemala, authorization from the national health authority must be obtained for accessing clinical records, whereas in Argentina, no authorization is required for the secondary use of existing data. In Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Peru, a national ethics committee approval is required in addition to a site-specific approval. Requirements for patient informed consent also vary across countries and depend on the type of DUS and study population. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of consensus in the legislative and ethical frameworks applicable to DUSs across Latin America leads to operational challenges for the implementation of multinational studies. In many countries, absence of a framework leads to precautionary stringent requirements, which restricts the feasibility of DUSs.