Core bacteria and fungi in response to residue retention and their contribution to soil multifunctionality in maize agroecosystem.

Core microbiome has been proven to play crucial roles in soil function. However, we still lack knowledge on how core microbiome responds to crop residue retention, and whether they contribute to this process. Consequently, we examined the effect of residue retention on soil core and non-core microbial communities in maize seedling, mature stage and freezing period based on a multi-site field experiment in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Totally, 247 bacterial amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and 109 fungal ASVs were identified as core microbiota. Both core and non-core bacterial/fungal community composition were significantly influenced by residue retention across all study sites. Especially, the core fungal community shifted towards a saprotroph-dominated community. Normalized stochastic ratio pattern revealed that that deterministic process dominated both core and non-core microbial community assembly processes. Residue retention enhanced the deterministic process of core microbial community assembly, while exhibited opposite effect on non-core microbial community. This study also revealed that soil fungi were more sensitive to residue retention than bacteria, with a larger proportion of core fungi were enriched or depleted by residue retention. In addition, residue retention complicated core bacterial co-occurrence network, while simplified fungal network. Our results pointed out both no reduction in microbial diversity or collapse in microbial network structure after repeated freezing-thawing cycles. The potential function of core microbiome was evaluated through random forest analysis and structural equation model, the results indicated core microbiome contributed more to multifunctionality than non-core microbiome. Overall, this study strengthened our understanding of soil core microbiome in response to residue retention, and highlighted their importance in maintaining soil multifunctionality.

Spontaneous grassland recovery on abandoned croplands in northern China: Different vegetation patterns in desert and typical steppe.

Passive restoration (without any intervention) has been proposed as an effective strategy for grassland restoration in abandoned croplands. However, whether the vegetation in abandoned croplands can change towards the desired state and the time needed to reach a relative stable state are context-dependent. We investigated three abandoned croplands with different recovery times (5, 15 and 20 years) and one natural grassland in each of two different types of steppe (desert steppe and typical steppe) in the agro-pastoral ecotone of northern China to assess the restoration potential of grassland on abandoned croplands. Above- and below-ground biomass as well as species biodiversity increased gradually with increasing recovery time. After 20 years of restoration there was no significant difference between abandoned cropland and natural steppe in the typical steppe site, but above- and below-ground biomass and species biodiversity were still lower in abandoned cropland in the desert steppe site. At the beginning of restoration, the communities were dominated mainly by annual species, especially in the desert steppe. As recovery time increased, the biomass and richness of perennial graminoids and forbs increased significantly and replaced annual species as the dominant species. In both desert steppe and typical steppes, species similarity between restored and natural steppe increased over time, suggesting that previously cultivated grassland recovered towards the desired state. Our results indicate that 20 years was sufficient time for the restoration of croplands in the typical steppe, but more time may be needed in the desert steppe.

Biocultural approaches to well-being and sustainability indicators across scales.

Monitoring and evaluation are central to ensuring that innovative, multi-scale, and interdisciplinary approaches to sustainability are effective. The development of relevant indicators for local sustainable management outcomes, and the ability to link these to broader national and international policy targets, are key challenges for resource managers, policymakers, and scientists. Sets of indicators that capture both ecological and social-cultural factors, and the feedbacks between them, can underpin cross-scale linkages that help bridge local and global scale initiatives to increase resilience of both humans and ecosystems. Here we argue that biocultural approaches, in combination with methods for synthesizing across evidence from multiple sources, are critical to developing metrics that facilitate linkages across scales and dimensions. Biocultural approaches explicitly start with and build on local cultural perspectives - encompassing values, knowledges, and needs - and recognize feedbacks between ecosystems and human well-being. Adoption of these approaches can encourage exchange between local and global actors, and facilitate identification of crucial problems and solutions that are missing from many regional and international framings of sustainability. Resource managers, scientists, and policymakers need to be thoughtful about not only what kinds of indicators are measured, but also how indicators are designed, implemented, measured, and ultimately combined to evaluate resource use and well-being. We conclude by providing suggestions for translating between local and global indicator efforts.