Three Differing Methods of Treating Intraoperative Nondisplaced Calcar Fractures Demonstrate Similar Radiographic Stem Subsidence.

BACKGROUND: Several management strategies have been described to treat intraoperative calcar fractures during total hip arthroplasty (THA), including retaining the primary implant and utilizing cerclage cables (CCs) or switching the implant to one that bypasses the fracture and achieves diaphyseal fixation. However, the radiographic and clinical outcomes of these differing strategies have never been described and compared. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 50 patients who sustained an intraoperative calcar fracture out of 9,129 primary total hip arthroplasties (0.55%) performed by one of three surgeons between 2008 and 2022. Each of the three surgeons consistently employed a distinct strategy for the management of these fractures: retention of the primary metaphyseal-engaging implant and placement of CCs; exchange to a modular, tapered-fluted stem (MTF); or exchange to a fully-coated, diaphyseal-engaging stem (FC). Stem subsidence was then evaluated on standing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs at three months and one year postoperatively. Postoperative medical and surgical complication rates were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of fifteen patients were treated with CC, 15 with MTF, and 20 with FC. At three-month follow-up, mean stem subsidence was 0.43 ± 0.08 mm, 1.47 ± 0.36 mm, and 0.68 ± 0.39 mm for CC, MTF, and FC cohorts, respectively (P = .323). At one-year, mean stem subsidence was 0.70 ± 0.08 mm, 1.74 ± 0.69 mm, and 1.88 ± 0.90 mm for the CC, MTF, and FC cohorts, respectively (P = .485). Medical complications included 2 venous thromboembolic events (4%) within 90 days of surgery. There were 6 reoperations (12%); 3 (6%) for acute periprosthetic joint infection (all within the FC cohort); 2 (4%) for postoperative periprosthetic fractures (one fracture distal to the stem in the FC cohort and one fracture at the level of the stem in the MTF cohort), and 1 (2%) closed reduction for instability (within the CC cohort). CONCLUSIONS: The three described methods of managing intraoperative nondisplaced calcar fractures demonstrated little radiographic stem subsidence; however, the risk of reoperation was much higher than expected.

Reevaluating isolated polyethylene revision for instability after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Instability is a common mode of failure after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Surgical management includes total revision and isolated polyethylene exchange. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes after isolated polyethylene exchange for instability in one of the largest cohorts reported to date. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 87 patients and 93 cases of isolated polyethylene exchange after TKA for instability at a tertiary academic center. Preoperative and postoperative Knee Society Scores were compared using paired T-testing with a significance level set at p = .05. Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, complications, rates of additional surgery, and recurrent instability. RESULTS: Of the 87 patients, 61 patients had both pre and post-operative KSS-Knee scores and 60 with matched KSS-Functional scores. KSS-Knee scores significantly increased from 63.78 to 83.13 (p < .05), and KSS-Functional scores increased from 63.80 to 84.00 (p < .05). Seven of 93 cases (7.78%) cases required additional surgery at an average of 3.8 years, including two for recurrent instability. Nine (10%) cases were initially satisfied but developed recurrent instability at an average of 27.6 months. CONCLUSION: Isolated polyethylene exchange after TKA for instability resulted in significantly increased reported clinical outcome scores. Isolated polyethylene exchange after TKA for recurrent instability may be a viable option but surgeons should consider the rate of complications requiring surgery as well as high rate of recurrent instability. More studies with longer-term follow-up are required to further identify which patients may benefit the most from isolated polyethylene exchange after TKA for recurrent instability.

Low Risk of Acute Iatrogenic Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Prosthetic Joint Aspiration.

BACKGROUND: Synovial fluid analysis is an essential tool in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, concern exists that aspiration may introduce infection into a noninfected joint. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of iatrogenic PJI following diagnostic knee aspiration done within 6 months of the primary TKA. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2021, the senior surgeon performed over 4,000 primary TKAs and aspirated 155 knees in 137 patients for whom there was a suspicion for PJI within 6 months of their primary TKA. There were 22 knees diagnosed as infected from the initial aspiration and therefore were excluded from the study. The remaining 133 aspirates in 115 patients who were negative for infection were followed for 6 months for signs and symptoms of PJI to elucidate whether aspiration introduced infection into an initially noninfected joint. RESULTS: There were 70 of 133 knees (52.6%) aspirated between 0 and 6 weeks after index TKA, 40 of 133 (30.1%) between 6 weeks and 3 months, and 23 of 133 (17.3%) between 3 and 6 months. At final follow-up, none of the 133 initially noninfected knees exhibited evidence of subsequent iatrogenic PJI or had subsequent surgery for infection. CONCLUSION: While joint aspiration is a procedure with inherent risks, this study shows that the rate of iatrogenic PJI is extremely low (0%). Therefore, if infection is suspected, the surgeon should consider joint aspiration, even in the initial postoperative period, as the risk for introducing infection is far outweighed by the risk of missing an infection.

Twenty-Year Experience With Primary Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty From a Single Institution.

PURPOSE: The use of implant arthroplasty in the distal radioulnar joint is increasing. Two main types of implants are commonly used, ulnar head prosthesis (UHP) and hemi or semi-constrained total distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. The literature consists mainly of small patient series. The purpose of this study was to examine our long-term outcomes of distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. METHODS: Patient data were collected in a patient registry from 2000 to 2019. The follow-up included radiographic examination, physical examination, Mayo Wrist Scores, pain level, range of motion, and grip strength. Reoperations were recorded. The implants were a semi-constrained prosthesis and a metallic UHP. The mean age at surgery was 50 years. Patient demographics were similar, but the semi-constrained group had a higher preoperative percentage of instability (85 vs 52 percent). The median follow-up time was 30 months for the semi-constrained implants group and 102 months for the UHP group. RESULTS: A total of 53 primary semi-constrained total joint arthroplasties and 102 UHPs were included. The grip strength and Mayo Wrist Score improved for both the implant groups. Pain reduced in 76% of the patients. Supination improved for the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty group. Lifting capacity was better in the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty patients. The unadjusted reoperation rate was 23% for the semi-constrained implants group and 34% for the UHP group. Twenty-two implants were bilateral; these had comparable results to unilateral implants. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated 94% survival rate for the semi-constrained implants group and 87% survival for the UHP group after 5 years. The risk factors associated with reoperation for the combined implant group included younger age at surgery, previous wrist surgery, ulnar shortening, and wrist fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty improved functional outcomes in both the implant groups, but reoperations were frequent. The semi-constrained implants group had better lifting capacity. The bilateral implants had comparable outcomes to the unilateral implants. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Staged BiCompartmental Knee Arthroplasty has Greater Functional Improvement, but Equivalent Midterm Survivorship, as Revision TKA for Progressive Osteoarthritis After Partial Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Progressive arthritis in the unresurfaced compartments of the knee is one failure mode after partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). While progressive arthritis after PKA is typically treated with revision to TKA (rTKA), staged bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (sBiKA) -the addition of another PKA - is an alternative. This study compared outcomes of sBiKA and rTKA for progressive arthritis after PKA. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of non-consecutive cases at four institutions were performed in patients with an intact PKA, without loosening or wear, who underwent sBiKA (n = 27) or rTKA (n = 30), for progressive osteoarthritis. Outcomes studied were new Knee Society Function and Objective Scores (KSSF, KSSO), KOOS, Jr., ROM, operative times, length of stay, complication rates and the need for reoperations. RESULTS: Mean time to conversion was 7.4 ± 6 years for sBiKA and 9.7 ± 8 for rTKA, P = .178. Patient demographics and pre-operative outcomes were similar among cohorts. At an average of 5.7 ± 3 (sBiKA) and 3.2 ± 2 years (rTKA), KOOS, Jr. significantly improved, P < .001, by an equivalent amount. Post-operative KSSO and KSSF were significantly higher in the sBiKA cohort, respectively, (90.4 ± 10 vs 72.1 ± 20, P < .001) and (80.3 ± 18 vs 67.1 ± 19, P = .011). sBiKA patients had significantly greater improvement in KSSO (30.7 ± 33 vs 5.2 ± 18, P = .003). One sBiKA patient underwent reoperation for continued pain. CONCLUSION: SBiKA has equivalent survivorship, but greater improvement in functional outcomes as rTKA at short to midterm follow-up. Given the shorter operative times and length of stay, sBiKA is a safe and cost-effective alternative to rTKA for progressive osteoarthritis following PKA. Nevertheless, further follow-up is necessary to determine whether sBiKA is a durable option.

Outcomes of complex primary total knee arthroplasties performed with custom cutting guides.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is particularly challenging in patients with marked deformities or existing hardware due to the inability to use traditional instrumentation. One potential technique to mitigate this obstacle is the use of patient-specific cutting guides. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of custom cutting guides in complex primary TKAs. METHODS: Twenty complex TKAs performed in 18 patients were identified. Of these, 11 were performed in patients with existing hardware, three in patients with dwarfism, three in patients with post-traumatic deformities, two in a patient with multiple epiphyseal dysplasia, and one in a patient with a large deformity from Blount's disease. All prior hardware was retained. One patient died from unrelated causes three months following surgery. The remaining patients were followed for a mean of 5.2 years (range: 1.2-9.7 years). RESULTS: One patient sustained a non-displaced, medial tibial plateau fracture intra-operatively that was successfully treated with plating. Mean operative time was 112.1 ± 44.4 min, and mean hospital stay was 2.7 ± 1.6 days. Average deviation from the mechanical axis improved from 10.5° pre-operatively to 3.1° postoperatively (P < 0.001). Average Knee Society Scores improved from 48.1 to 77.4 points (P < 0.001). Mean extension improved from 5.9° to 1.4° (P = 0.049). Two patients subsequently required a manipulation under anesthesia, and one patient had delayed wound healing that resolved without surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Custom cutting guides are a viable option in complex primary TKAs where the use of traditional instrumentation would be challenging.

Clinical Outcomes in Isolated Tibial Revision With Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Tibial component loosening is one of the most common modes of failure in contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Limited literature is available on the outcomes of isolated tibial revision with retention of the cruciate retaining (CR) femoral component. The purpose of this study was to determine the results of isolated tibial revisions in CR TKA. METHODS: We identified 135 patients who underwent an isolated tibial revision after a primary CR TKA from our institutional registry between January 2007 and January 2017. The mean time between the primary and revision was 2.9 years (range 0.1-15.4). Revision with a press-fit stem was performed in 79 patients and 56 patients were revised with a fully cemented stem. Patients were evaluated at a minimum of two years using Knee Society Score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score for Joint Replacement, and radiography. Implant survivorship was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 5.1 years, there were six (4.4%) repeat revisions: three for periprosthetic infection (2.2%), two for instability (1.5%), and one for a fractured tibial stem (0.7%). The mean Knee Society Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score for Joint Replacement increased from 51.6 and 56.1 preoperatively to 90.1 and 89.7 after surgery (P < .001). Survivorship free of repeat revision for any cause was 93.3% at 5 years, and aseptic revision survivorship was 95.8% at 5 years. No implants were radiographically loose. CONCLUSION: In patients with isolated tibial loosening and a well-fixed and well-positioned CR femoral component, isolated tibial revision provides excellent early to midterm implant survivorship and clinical outcomes with a low risk of instability and recurrent tibial loosening.

Partial Knee Arthroplasty: The State of the Art.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and patellofemoral arthroplasty were pioneered in the 1970s but abandoned by most in favor of total knee arthroplasty because of inconsistent early outcomes. Advancements in implant design, instrumentation, indications, and surgical techniques have enhanced results and led to a resurgence in both unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and patellofemoral arthroplasty for appropriate candidates. In appropriately selected patients, current implants and techniques provide surgeons the resources to carry out a surgical procedure that is simpler to perform and easier to recover from. Furthermore, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with fewer postoperative complications and lower mortality and is equal to or better than total knee arthroplasty.

Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 55 Years of Age at 4-19 Years of Follow-Up: A Concise Follow-Up of a Previous Report.

BACKGROUND: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an effective alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in isolated unicompartmental disease; however, mid-term to long-term results in young patients are unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the mid-term outcomes of fixed-bearing medial UKA in patients less than 55 years of age. METHODS: Seventy-seven fixed-bearing medial UKAs in patients less than 55 years of age (mean 49.9, range 38-55) from a previously published report were retrospectively reviewed at a mean follow-up of 11.2 years (range 4.1-19.2). RESULTS: Eleven knees were converted to TKA (14.3%) at 0.7-13.8 years postoperatively. The indications for revision included 7 for unexplained pain (9.1%), 2 for grade 4 arthritic progression (1 isolated lateral and 1 lateral and patellofemoral compartments; 2.6%), 1 for polyethylene wear (1.3%), and 1 for femoral component loosening (1.3%). Predicted survivorship free from component revision was 90.4% (95% confidence interval 86.9-93.9) at 10 years and 75.1% (95% confidence interval 66.2-84.0) at 19 years. The mean Knee Society Score improved from a mean of 51.9-88.6 points (P < .001). Of the 52 knees with 4-year minimum radiographs, 3 (5.8%) developed isolated grade 4 patellofemoral arthritis that was asymptomatic, and no knees had evidence of component loosening or osteolysis. CONCLUSION: Fixed-bearing medial UKA is a durable option for young patients with unicompartmental arthritis, with good clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Unexplained pain was the most common reason for revision to TKA.

Joint line elevation and tibial slope are associated with increased polyethylene wear in cruciate-retaining total knee replacement.

The purpose of this retrieval study was to determine the effect of implant positioning on wear, taking patient-related factors into account. Therefore, the volumetric material loss of 59 retrieved tibial liners was quantitatively determined using a coordinate measuring-machine. All retrievals were made of the same polyethylene and design by a single manufacturer. Using time in-situ and linear regression, a wear rate for each liner was determined and corrected for bedding-in. Backside damage was qualitatively scored. The following implant positioning parameters were obtained from radiographs: anatomical lateral-distal femoral angle, anatomical medial-proximal tibial angle, femoral tilt angle, and posterior tibial slope. The patella position was assessed by the Blackburne-Peel index and the Insall-Salvati ratio. Unlike the Insall-Salvati ratio, the Blackburne-Peel index is known to detect surgical joint line elevation. Using general linear modeling the most impactful factors on wear rate and backside damage was determined, thereby taking patient demographic factors into account. The mean volumetric wear rate was 11.6 mm3 /y. Wear decreased with older age (P = .021) and female sex (P = .001). The wear rate increased with joint line elevation as indicated from a decreased Blackburne-Peel index (P = .019), and increased with increased posterior tibial slope (P = .026). The backside damage score also increased with joint line elevation (P = .036). A Blackburne-Peel index decrease of 0.1, signifying joint line elevation, was found to increase the wear rate by 1.8 mm3 /y and increase back-sided wear. A high tibial slope (>7°) led to a 9.3 mm3 /y increase in wear rate compared with a low tibial slope (<3°). The results of this study demonstrate that tibial liner positioning has a significant impact on polyethylene wear with potential implications on osteolysis over time.

Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) to distal femoral replacement (DFR) for treatment of displaced periprosthetic distal femur fractures. METHODS: We identified 72 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up following a displaced periprosthetic distal femur fracture: 50 were treated with ORIF and 22 with DFR. Outcomes were assessed with multivariate regression analysis and include Knee Society Scores (KSS), infection rates, revision incidence, and mortality. RESULTS: Patients treated with DFR had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (5.2 vs 3.8; P = .006). The mean postoperative KSS were similar between groups, but the Knee Society Functional Scores were higher in the ORIF group (P = .01). Six ORIF patients (12%) and 3 DFR patients (14%) underwent a revision surgery (P = .1). In the ORIF group, 3 revisions were associated with periprosthetic infection, and 3 revisions occurred for aseptic nonunion. In the DFR group, 1 infection was treated with irrigation and debridement, and 2 cases of patellar maltracking resulted in 1 liner exchange with soft tissue release and 1 femoral revision for malrotation. More patients in the ORIF group required repeat revisions, with twice as many total revisions (P < .001). Six ORIF patients and 7 DFR patients died within 2 years (P = .26). CONCLUSION: The Knee Society Functional Score favored ORIF, but the total incidence of revision was higher in the ORIF cohort. Given the high mortality and the substantial risk of reoperation in both groups, additional studies are needed regarding the prevention of and optimal treatment for patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures.

Outcomes of Isolated Head and Liner Exchange Using Large Femoral Heads and Modern Liners in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports on the outcomes of isolated head and liner exchange in revision total hip arthroplasty have found high rates of instability after these surgeries. Most reports have studied constructs using ≤28 mm femoral heads. The purpose of this study was to determine if modern techniques with the use of larger head sizes can improve the rate of instability after head and liner exchange. METHODS: We identified 138 hips in 132 patients who underwent isolated head and liner exchange for polyethylene wear/osteolysis (57%), acute infection (27%), metallosis (13%), or other (2%). All patients underwent revision with either 32 (23%), 36 (62%), or 40 (15%) mm diameter heads. Cross-linked polyethylene was used in all revisions. Lipped and/or offset liners were used in 104 (75%) hips. Average follow-up was 3.5 (1.0-9.1) years. Statistical analyses were performed with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Revision-free survivorship for any cause was 94.6% and for aseptic causes was 98.2% at 5 years. 11 (8%) hips experienced a complication with 7 (5%) hips requiring additional revision surgery. After revision, 4 (3%) hips experienced dislocation, 5 (4%) hips experienced infection, and 1 (1%) hip was revised for trunnionosis. No demographic or surgical factors significantly affected outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that isolated head and liner exchange using large femoral heads and modern liners provides for better stability than previous reports. The most common complication was infection. We did not identify specific patient, surgical, or implant factors that reduced the risk of instability or other complication.

Outcomes of ulnotriquetral split tear repair: a report of 96 patients.

Ninety-six wrists (56 right and 40 left) in 96 patients (36 males and 60 females, mean age 38, range 15-77 years) underwent repair of ulnotriquetral ligament split tears between 2007 and 2016. Mayo wrist scores, visual analogue scale pain scores, and objective measures including grip strength and range of motion were obtained. Patients were assessed after a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 6-112 months). Ulnotriquetral split tear repair resulted in substantial improvements in pain and function. The mean Mayo wrist score improved from 57 preoperatively to 81 postoperatively, with 84% of patients achieving a good or excellent outcome. Pain scores decreased from 5.8 to 1.2. Grip improved from 25 kg to 29 kg. There was no significant change in range of motion of the wrist. Complications were noted in eight patients, with three experiencing continued pain, four with dysaesthesia of the dorsal sensory ulnar nerve, and one superficial infection. Arthroscopic ulnotriquetral split tear repair significantly reduced pain and improved Mayo wrist scores. Level of evidence: IV.

Outcomes of the Adams-Berger Ligament Reconstruction for the Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability in 95 Consecutive Cases.

Objective The objective of this article is to evaluate the outcomes and complication rate for Adams-Berger anatomic reconstruction of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), in addition, to determine the role of sigmoid notch anatomy on failure. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review to evaluate adult patients that had undergone reconstruction of the DRUJ for instability with the Adams-Berger procedure between 1998 and 2015 within our institution with > 24 months follow-up. Charts were reviewed for patient demographics, mechanism of injury, outcome, and complications. Results Ninety-five wrists in 93 patients were included. Mean age at surgery was 37.3 years with 65.2 months follow-up. At the last follow-up, 90.8% had a stable DRUJ, 5.3% did not, and 3.4% had some laxity. Postoperatively, 75.9% described either no pain or mild pain. Grip strength increased while pronosupination decreased. Procedure success was 86.3%, as 12 patients underwent revision at 13.3 months postoperatively. Reconstructive failure was more common in females when an interference screw was utilized for tendon fixation. Age, timing of surgery, type of graft, sigmoid notch anatomy, and previous surgery did not affect revision or failure rate. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate that Adams-Berger reconstruction of the DRUJ provides reliable long-term results with an overall success of 86% at > 5 years follow-up. Level of evidence/Type of study This is a Level IV, therapeutic study.

Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Less Than 50 Years of Age: Results at a Mean of 13 Years.

BACKGROUND: Patients between 45 and 54 years old will be the fastest-growing cohort seeking total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over the next 15 years. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the clinical outcomes of TKA in patients less than 50 years old at a minimum of 10 years. We hypothesized that this patient population would have a high rate of survivorship that is similar to that of older patients. METHODS: We reviewed 298 consecutive TKAs on 242 patients at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively. Twenty patients died and 30 TKAs were lost to follow-up leaving 248 TKAs in 202 patients (91 male, 111 female) with a mean age of 45.7 years (range, 26-49) at the time of surgery. Patient-reported outcomes, survivorship, causes of reoperation, and initial postoperative radiographic parameters were collected. RESULTS: At a mean of 13.0 years, there were 9 revisions for tibial loosening (3.6%), 8 for deep infection (3.2%), 7 for polyethylene wear (2.8%), and 3 for failed ingrowth of a cementless femoral component (1.2%). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated 92.0% survivorship with failures defined as aseptic component revision and 83.9% survivorship for all-cause reoperation at 13 years. Patients with tibial alignment of 4° or more of varus or 10° or more of posterior slope were found to have increased rate of failure. CONCLUSION: While overall durability was good in this young patient population, tibial fixation and deep infection were relatively common causes of failure. In addition, increased tibial varus and slope were found to increase the rate of failure. Furthermore, the nearly 3% risk of revision for wear suggests that the use of more wear-resistant bearing surfaces may reduce the risk of failure in this patient population.

Rapid Discharge and Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty Introduce a Burden of Care to the Surgeon.

BACKGROUND: Rapid-pathway outpatient (OTJA) and one-night inpatient (ITJA) arthroplasty require close follow-up by the surgeon. We quantify and characterize the total perioperative touches required in the first 7 days, and compare OTJA and ITJA patients. METHODS: We reviewed 103 consecutive primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients from April 2014 without exclusion; all patients were discharged either within 5 hours or the morning after surgery. All telephone and office visits during the first 7 days following surgery were studied. Specialized outpatient TJA education was included. We measured the frequency, duration, and subject matter of phone calls. Simple Poisson regression analysis and t-tests were used to determine significance. RESULTS: None of the 103 rapid pathway patients were lost to follow-up. Average age was 61.2 years (range 26.9-83.0), with 49 females (47.6%), 78 total knee arthroplasties, average Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2.1, and average body mass index of 29.5 kg/m2. There were 253 touches required, averaging 2.5/patient. One hundred sixty were outgoing phone calls by the surgical team and 93 were incoming calls from patients. The average duration of each call was 4.74 minutes (SD 3.7). The entire group required 19 hours and 35 minutes of telephone contact. After including specialized education time, this cohort required 83.1 hours of clinical time, or 48.4 minutes per patient. CONCLUSION: Postoperative care after rapid pathway TJA requires a significant burden of resources, shifted from the hospital to the surgeon. We found that both rapid pathway groups require similar work by the surgeon's team. This additional work should be considered by policymakers.

Most Patients Can Kneel After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients commonly report difficulty kneeling after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess patients' ability to kneel after TKA and to prospectively determine whether patients with reported difficulty can be taught to kneel. METHODS: Attempts were made to reach 307 consecutive TKAs in 255 adult patients who were 18-24 months after surgery. Patients were surveyed for their ability to kneel. Those who reported difficulty kneeling were offered participation in a kneeling protocol. At the conclusion of the protocol, participants were surveyed again for their ability to kneel. RESULTS: Of the 307 consecutive TKAs, 288 knees (94%) answered the survey. Of them, 196 knees (68%) could kneel with minor or no difficulty without any specific training. And 77 knees (27%) reported at least some difficulty kneeling and were eligible for participation in the protocol. Pain or discomfort was the most commonly reported reason for difficulty kneeling. Of these 77 knees, 43 knees (56%) participated. Thirty-six knees (84%) completed all or most of the protocol. All patients who completed all or most of the protocol were then able to kneel, and none reported significant difficulty kneeling. On average, participants improved 1.4 levels. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, 68% of knees could kneel after TKA without any specific training. Of those who had at least some difficulty kneeling, all who participated were able to kneel after a simple kneeling protocol, although 44% of eligible patients did not participate. This study suggests that kneeling should be included in postoperative TKA rehabilitation.

Buying Time: Long-Term Results of Wrist Denervation and Time to Repeat Surgery.

Background: This study reviews long-term outcomes of partial wrist denervation focusing on need for and time to revision procedure. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of all patients undergoing partial wrist denervation between 1994 and 2014. At average latest follow-up of 6.75 years (range, 1-21 years), clinical and radiographic data and need for revision surgery were recorded. Results: There were 100 wrists in 89 patients (61 male, 28 female) with average age at surgery of 54 years (range, 26-80). Principal diagnoses were arthritis (58%), inflammatory (19%), and posttraumatic arthritis (7%). Average flexion-extension arc was 83% and grip strength 75% of unaffected extremity. Average Mayo Wrist Scores improved from 48 preoperatively to 77 postoperatively. Sixty-nine percent of patients did not undergo other procedures during the time interval studied. Thirty-one percent underwent revision at an average of 26 months following denervation (range, 2-165). Conclusions: Partial wrist denervation is a motion-preserving procedure for patients with refractory wrist pain with 69% in this series requiring no further procedures. The remaining 31% experienced average symptom relief for 2 years prior to ultimately undergoing revision operation.