A deep phenotyping study in mouse and iPSC models to understand the role of oligodendroglia in optic neuropathy in Wolfram syndrome.

Wolfram syndrome (WS) is a rare childhood disease characterized by diabetes mellitus, diabetes insipidus, blindness, deafness, neurodegeneration and eventually early death, due to autosomal recessive mutations in the WFS1 (and WFS2) gene. While it is categorized as a neurodegenerative disease, it is increasingly becoming clear that other cell types besides neurons may be affected and contribute to the pathogenesis. MRI studies in patients and phenotyping studies in WS rodent models indicate white matter/myelin loss, implicating a role for oligodendroglia in WS-associated neurodegeneration. In this study, we sought to determine if oligodendroglia are affected in WS and whether their dysfunction may be the primary cause of the observed optic neuropathy and brain neurodegeneration. We demonstrate that 7.5-month-old Wfs1∆exon8 mice display signs of abnormal myelination and a reduced number of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) as well as abnormal axonal conduction in the optic nerve. An MRI study of the brain furthermore revealed grey and white matter loss in the cerebellum, brainstem, and superior colliculus, as is seen in WS patients. To further dissect the role of oligodendroglia in WS, we performed a transcriptomics study of WS patient iPSC-derived OPCs and pre-myelinating oligodendrocytes. Transcriptional changes compared to isogenic control cells were found for genes with a role in ER function. However, a deep phenotyping study of these WS patient iPSC-derived oligodendroglia unveiled normal differentiation, mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane interactions and mitochondrial function, and no overt signs of ER stress. Overall, the current study indicates that oligodendroglia functions are largely preserved in the WS mouse and patient iPSC-derived models used in this study. These findings do not support a major defect in oligodendroglia function as the primary cause of WS, and warrant further investigation of neurons and neuron-oligodendroglia interactions as a target for future neuroprotective or -restorative treatments for WS.

Prehospital fluid administration in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prehospital management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) focuses on preventing secondary brain injury. Therefore, hypotension should be prevented, or if present, should be promptly treated in order to maintain optimal cerebral perfusion pressure. Fluid resuscitation is a traditional mainstay in the prehospital treatment of hypotension, however, the choice of fluid type that is to be administered in the prehospital setting is the subject of an on-going debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore performed to assess the effect of different fluid types on outcome in patients with severe TBI. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were searched for articles up to March 2020. Studies comparing two or more prehospital administered fluid types with suspected or confirmed severe TBI were deemed eligible for inclusion. Studied outcomes were mortality and (extended) Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The meta-analysis tested for differences in survival between hypertonic saline (HTS) and normotonic crystalloids (i.e. normal saline or Lactated Ringer's) and between hypertonic saline with dextran (HSD) and normotonic crystalloids. The systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO register with number CRD42020140423. RESULTS: This literature search yielded a total of 519 articles, of which 12 were included in the systematic review and 6 were included in the meta-analysis. Eleven studies found no statistically significant difference in survival between patients treated with different fluid types (e.g. normal saline and hypertonic saline). All studies assessing neurological outcome, measured through (extended) GOS, found no statistically significant difference between different fluid types. Meta-analysis showed no better survival for patients treated with HSD, when compared to normotonic crystalloids (overall RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93-1.06). Moreover, HTS compared to normotonic crystalloids does not result in a better survival (overall RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12). CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis did not demonstrate a survival or neurological benefit for one specific fluid type administered in the prehospital setting.