Sustained Virologic Suppression With Dolutegravir/Lamivudine in a Test-and-Treat Setting Through 48 Weeks.

Background: We assessed the efficacy and safety of dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) in a US test-and-treat setting at a secondary 48-week time point of the multicenter, single-arm, phase IIIb STAT study. Methods: Participants were eligible adults newly diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 and had started once-daily DTG/3TC within 14 days of diagnosis, before laboratory results were available. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was modified if baseline testing indicated DTG or 3TC resistance, hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection, or creatinine clearance <30 mL/min per 1.73 m2, and these participants remained in the study. A proportion with HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) <50 copies/mL at Week 48 was calculated among all participants (intention-to-treat-exposed [ITT-E] missing = failure analysis) and those with available data (observed analysis). Results: At Week 48, 82% of all participants regardless of ART (107 of 131; ITT-E missing = failure) and 97% with available data (107 of 110; observed analysis) achieved HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. High proportions of virologic response were seen overall, including in participants with high viral load (≥500 000 copies/mL; 89%) or low CD4+ cell count (<200 cells/mm3; 78%) at baseline. Ten participants had treatment modification (baseline HBV coinfection, n = 5; participant/proxy decision, n = 2; baseline M184V resistance mutation, adverse event [AE; rash], and pregnancy, n = 1 each) before Week 48. Two participants met confirmed virologic failure criteria. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed. Ten participants reported drug-related AEs (all grade 1-2); no serious drug-related AEs occurred. Conclusions: Results demonstrated high proportions of participants with sustained virologic suppression, no treatment-emergent resistance, and good safety over 48 weeks, supporting first-line use of DTG/3TC in a test-and-treat setting.

Lenacapavir administered every 26 weeks or daily in combination with oral daily antiretroviral therapy for initial treatment of HIV: a randomised, open-label, active-controlled, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral agents with novel mechanisms and dosing intervals could expand treatment options for people with HIV. Lenacapavir, an inhibitor of capsid protein that makes use of a unique mechanism, can be administered orally or subcutaneously. We sought to explore the efficacy of lenacapavir in various combination regimens as initial and maintenance therapy for HIV. METHODS: In a phase 2, randomised, open-label, ongoing study at 41 investigational sites in the USA and Dominican Republic, we randomly assigned adults with HIV who had not previously received antiretrovirals to four groups (2:2:2:1). Randomisation was stratified by plasma HIV-1 RNA load (≤100 000 or >100 000 copies per mL) at screening. Groups 1 and 2 both received lenacapavir (927 mg) subcutaneously every 26 weeks (after 2 weeks of oral loading [600 mg on days 1 and 2, followed by 300 mg on day 8]) with oral daily emtricitabine (200 mg) and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg) for 28 weeks followed by subcutaneous lenacapavir (927 mg) plus oral daily tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg, group 1) or bictegravir (75 mg, group 2). Group 3 received oral daily lenacapavir (600 mg on days 1 and 2, followed by 50 mg daily) with emtricitabine (200 mg) and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg). Group 4 received oral daily bictegravir (50 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir alafenamide (25 mg). Participants and investigators were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants with virological suppression (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) at week 54, analysed in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose of study drug) using only on-treatment data. The safety outcome measures were incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events and graded laboratory abnormalities, analysed in the full analysis set. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04143594. FINDINGS: Between Nov 22, 2019, and Aug 27, 2020, 249 people with HIV were screened, 183 participants were randomly assigned and 182 received a dose of antiretroviral drugs (52 in group 1, 53 in group 2, 52 in group 3, and 25 in group 4). 22 participants did not complete the full study course (five in group 1, 12 in group 2, four in group 3, and one in group 4). At week 54, virological suppression was 90% (47 of 52 patients) for group 1 (difference vs group 4: -2·6%, 95% CI -18·4 to 13·2), 85% (45 of 53) for group 2 (-7·1%, -23·4 to 9·3), 85% (44 of 52) for group 3 (-7·2%, -23·5 to 9·1), and 92% (23 of 25) for group 4. The most frequent non-injection-site adverse events with lenacapavir (subcutaneous or oral) were headache (13%, 21 of 157) and nausea (13%, 21 of 157). The most common lenacapavir-related injection-site reactions were erythema (27%, 28 of 105), swelling (23%, 24 of 105), and pain (19%, 20 of 105), which were generally mild or moderate. No serious adverse event related to study treatment occurred. Three participants discontinued subcutaneous lenacapavir because of grade 1 injection-site reactions (two for induration and one for erythema or swelling). INTERPRETATION: Lenacapavir warrants further investigation as a potential antiretroviral used orally and as injection in combination with other antiretroviral drugs. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Effect on SARS-CoV-2 viral load using combination therapy with casirivimab/imdevimab and remdesivir.

Evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 viral load is an independent predictor of disease severity and mortality. A 61-year-old woman presented with severe COVID-19 and was treated with casirivimab/imdevimab and remdesivir. Quantitative nasopharyngeal (NP) viral loads were trended throughout the treatment course. Baseline NP viral load was 25,860,901 copies/mL (7.4 log10). Casirivimab/imdevimab was administered, with subsequent reduction in NP viral load to 26,049 copies/mL (4.4 log10) on hospital day 4. A repeat NP viral load on day 7 was 13,113 copies/mL (4.1 log10). Despite uncertainty regarding correlation with reduction in viral load and outcomes, NP viral load may be considered when selecting treatment options and evaluating treatment response in hospitalized patients with early infection.

Capsid Inhibition with Lenacapavir in Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multidrug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection have limited treatment options. Lenacapavir is a first-in-class capsid inhibitor that showed substantial antiviral activity in a phase 1b study. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection in two cohorts, according to the change in the plasma HIV-1 RNA level between the screening and cohort-selection visits. In cohort 1, patients were first randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral lenacapavir or placebo in addition to their failing therapy for 14 days; during the maintenance period, starting on day 15, patients in the lenacapavir group received subcutaneous lenacapavir once every 6 months, and those in the placebo group received oral lenacapavir, followed by subcutaneous lenacapavir; both groups also received optimized background therapy. In cohort 2, all the patients received open-label oral lenacapavir with optimized background therapy on days 1 through 14; subcutaneous lenacapavir was then administered once every 6 months starting on day 15. The primary end point was the percentage of patients in cohort 1 who had a decrease of at least 0.5 log10 copies per milliliter in the viral load by day 15; a key secondary end point was a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter at week 26. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were enrolled, with 36 in each cohort. In cohort 1, a decrease of at least 0.5 log10 copies per milliliter in the viral load by day 15 was observed in 21 of 24 patients (88%) in the lenacapavir group and in 2 of 12 patients (17%) in the placebo group (absolute difference, 71 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 35 to 90). At week 26, a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter was reported in 81% of the patients in cohort 1 and in 83% in cohort 2, with a least-squares mean increase in the CD4+ count of 75 and 104 cells per cubic millimeter, respectively. No serious adverse events related to lenacapavir were identified. In both cohorts, lenacapavir-related capsid substitutions that were associated with decreased susceptibility developed in 8 patients during the maintenance period (6 with M66I substitutions). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection, those who received lenacapavir had a greater reduction from baseline in viral load than those who received placebo. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; CAPELLA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04150068.).

Effectiveness of casirivimab/imdevimab in an intensive care unit patient with acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Casirivimab/imdevimab, a cocktail of monoclonal antibodies, is currently approved for emergency use in high-risk ambulatory patients with early COVID-19 to reduce risk of hospitalization and/or death from SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the United States, there is no approved monoclonal antibody therapy for patients hospitalized for complications due to acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. We describe here the use of casirivimab/imdevimab in a 52-year-old fully vaccinated, immunocompromised man admitted to the intensive care unit for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Safety and Efficacy of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Active immunization with the BNT162b2 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) has been a critical mitigation tool against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic. In light of reports of waning protection occurring 6 months after the primary two-dose vaccine series, data are needed on the safety and efficacy of offering a third (booster) dose in persons 16 years of age or older. METHODS: In this ongoing, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 trial, we assigned participants who had received two 30-µg doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine at least 6 months earlier to be injected with a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine or with placebo. We assessed vaccine safety and efficacy against Covid-19 starting 7 days after the third dose. RESULTS: A total of 5081 participants received a third BNT162b2 dose and 5044 received placebo. The median interval between dose 2 and dose 3 was 10.8 months in the vaccine group and 10.7 months in the placebo group; the median follow-up was 2.5 months. Local and systemic reactogenicity events from the third dose were generally of low grade. No new safety signals were identified, and no cases of myocarditis or pericarditis were reported. Among the participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who could be evaluated, Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after dose 3 was observed in 6 participants in the vaccine group and in 123 participants in the placebo group, which corresponded to a relative vaccine efficacy of 95.3% (95% confidence interval, 89.5 to 98.3). CONCLUSIONS: A third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine administered a median of 10.8 months after the second dose provided 95.3% efficacy against Covid-19 as compared with two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine during a median follow-up of 2.5 months. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; C4591031 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04955626.).

Impact of Pharmacist Intervention in Response to Automated Molecular Diagnostic Tests of Blood Culture Results.

BACKGROUND: Rapid molecular diagnostic tests can aid in deescalating antimicrobial therapy prior to final culture and susceptibility reports. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a new workflow that incorporated pharmacist review of these results reduced time to change in antimicrobial therapy. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed pre- and post-implementation of pharmacist review of positive blood cultures analyzed by rapid diagnostics with clinical recommendations paged to providers. Patients 18 years of age or older initiated on empiric antibiotics were included. The primary outcome was the time to change to targeted antimicrobials. Other outcomes evaluated were rates of Clostridioides difficile (C difficile) infection, inpatient mortality, and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients were included, with 98 and 101 patients in the pre- and post-implementation groups, respectively. The median time to change to targeted antimicrobials was significantly reduced with pharmacist intervention from 18.35 to 8.43 hours (P = 0.042). The groups had similar rates of C difficile infection (1% vs 0%, P = 0.492) and mortality (7.1% vs 5%, P = 0.564). The post-group also had significant reductions in antibiotic days of therapy (10.5 vs 9 days, P = 0.014) and intensive care unit length of stay (3.04 vs 1.44 days, P = 0.046). Median hospital length of stay was similar between the pre- and post-groups (8.5 vs 8 days, P = 0.106), respectively. CONCLUSION: Incorporating pharmacist review of rapid molecular results of blood cultures decreased time to change to targeted antimicrobials and reduced inpatient antibiotic days of therapy.

Screening for SARS-CoV-2 via PCR and serological testing in asymptomatic healthcare workers.

The prevalence and seroconversion rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection among asymptomatic health care workers in the US is unclear. Our study utilized real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) SARS-CoV-2 testing and serological evaluation to detect IgG antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 antigens in asymptomatic health care workers. A total of 197 subjects with a mean age of 35 years were recruited into the study. While most (67%) reported prolonged contact with known COVID-19 patients, only 8 (4.2%) tested positive on RT-PCR and 23 (11.7%) had detectable levels of IgG antibody to SARS-CoV-2. Out of 19 subjects with detectable IgG antibody at week 1, 11 (57.9%) lost their antibody response by week 3. No statistically significant difference was found in baseline characteristics or exposure status between subjects with positive and negative results on RT-PCR or antibody positivity. In conclusion, we found a low incidence of PCR positivity for SARS-CoV-2 in a high-risk group. This likely demonstrates the effectiveness of proper personal protective equipment use and low transmission risk in health care settings. The detectable IgG antibody titer was low, and a significant portion of subjects lost their antibody response on repeat testing. This may mean that antibody response in asymptomatic patients is categorically different than in symptomatic hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Impact of antimicrobial selection for prophylaxis of left ventricular assist device surgical infections.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation are associated with high mortality, while surgical prophylaxis is variable. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients who underwent LVAD implantation at a single center. We compared outcomes in patients who received narrow antimicrobial prophylaxis (cefazolin, vancomycin, or both) to those who received broad antimicrobial prophylaxis (any antimicrobial combination targeting gram-positive and gram-negative organisms not included in the narrow group) at 30-day and 1-year postimplantation. Cox-proportional hazards models and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Among the 39 and 65 patients comprising narrow and broad groups respectively, there was no difference in rate of SSI at 30 days (6.2% vs. 12.8%, p = .290) and 1 year (16.9% vs. 25.6%, p = .435). Comparing narrow to broad prophylaxis, the risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15-1.35, logrank p = .14), and composite of mortality and infection was reduced (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.45-1.88, logrank p = .83), but did not reach statistical significance. Most culture positive infections were due to gram-positive bacteria (70%) and the most common organisms were the Staphylococcus spp (47%). There were no significant differences in the rate of SSI at 1-year (p = 1.00) and mortality (p = .33) by device type. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of infection and all-cause mortality were not different between patients who received narrow or broad prophylaxis. This highlights an opportunity for institutions to narrow their surgical infection prophylaxis protocols to primarily cover gram-positive organisms.

Dolutegravir/lamivudine as a first-line regimen in a test-and-treat setting for newly diagnosed people living with HIV.

OBJECTIVES: Dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) is indicated for treatment-naive and experienced people with HIV; however, questions remain about its utility in a test-and-treat setting because of potential transmitted resistance and baseline hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection. We present feasibility and efficacy of DTG/3TC in newly diagnosed individuals in a test-and-treat setting. DESIGN: The single-arm STAT study evaluated DTG/3TC in a US test-and-treat setting. METHODS: Eligible adults initiated DTG/3TC 14 days or less after HIV-1 diagnosis without availability of baseline laboratory results. If baseline testing indicated DTG or 3TC resistance, HBV co-infection, or creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, participants remained on study with treatment modification. Efficacy endpoints included proportions of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml at Week 24, regardless of antiretroviral regimen, among all participants (intention-to-treat exposed) and those with available HIV-1 RNA data (observed). RESULTS: Of 131 participants enrolled, 8% were female and 50% were non-white. Through Week 24, treatment was modified in eight participants [five with HBV co-infection, one with baseline M184V, one for adverse event (rash), one participant decision]. At Week 24, 78% (102/131) of all participants and 92% (102/111) of those with available data achieved HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml. Incidence of drug-related adverse events was low (7%); no drug-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of using DTG/3TC as a first-line regimen in a test-and-treat setting, with therapy adjustments for baseline resistance or HBV co-infection occurring safely via routine clinical care as needed [ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03945981; see Supplemental Digital Content 1, video abstract (Video abstract summarizing the STAT study design and results), http://links.lww.com/QAD/C189].

The dynamic treatment of SARS-CoV-2 disease.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) emerged from China in December 2019 and progressed to become a global pandemic. Our understanding of its pathophysiology and potential management was initially extrapolated from previous epidemics of coronaviruses like SARS and MERS. SARS-CoV-2 is asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic in more than 80% of patients and requires no additional management; however, the remaining patients progress to pneumonia and hypoxemia with ranging severity, including a smaller group that requires intensive care unit admission. To date, there are no approved treatments for SARS-CoV-2, and current management is focused on supplemental oxygen and supportive care. The antiviral medication remdesivir recently received emergency use authorization by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with severe disease. Multiple clinical trials evaluating different treatment modalities such as antivirals, immunomodulators, convalescent plasma, and monoclonal antibodies, among others, are still ongoing. We believe that patients present with clinical phenotypes that correlate with the spectrum of disease. Each phenotype may benefit from one or multiple interventions. We discuss treatments under evaluation in clinical trials and their potential application based on clinical phenotype presentation.

Brucella, a bacterium with multiple ways of causing infection.

Brucellosis is a zoonotic infection caused by the intracellular gram-negative bacterium Brucella. It is the most common zoonosis worldwide, and its transmission is classically associated with consumption of unpasteurized animal products. However, other mechanisms of transmission include contact of the skin or mucous membranes with infected animal tissue. We present a case of a patient who had more than one possible route of infection.

Outcomes analysis in patients with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase bacteremia empirically treated with piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems.

Infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are associated with worse outcomes and have limited treatment options. Carbapenems remain the drug of choice for these infections due to evidence of a mortality benefit and the mixed clinical efficacy associated with piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ). Though definitive treatment for ESBL infections is well defined, evidence for appropriate empiric therapy remains inconclusive, and the role of rapid molecular assays that identify ESBL has not been evaluated. This multicenter retrospective study at nine Baylor Scott & White Health sites included patients who had positive blood cultures with ESBL-producing bacteria identified by rapid molecular assay and were empirically prescribed PTZ or carbapenems. A total of 117 patients were included in the study; 66 received empiric PTZ and 51 received carbapenems. Results showed no difference in hospital mortality (3% vs 7.8%, P = 0.4), hospital length of stay (6.1% vs 5.9%, P = 0.88), intensive care unit length of stay (4.7% vs 3.3%, P = 0.39), or recurrent ESBL bacteremia (7.6% vs 7.8%, P = 0.99) between the PTZ and carbapenem empiric treatment groups, respectively. In the era of rapid molecular assays, these results suggest that empiric PTZ use and avoidance of empiric carbapenem therapy in the first 24 hours of infection can be considered until a microbiological diagnosis is confirmed.

Evaluating predictors of invasive candidiasis in patients with and without candidemia on micafungin.

Numerous risk factors have been linked to invasive candidiasis; however, they are nonspecific and often trigger empiric antifungal therapy in a large number of patients. Identification of more precise predictors could promote judicious use of empiric echinocandins. In this retrospective review, 127 patients with blood cultures positive for Candida spp. were compared to a randomly selected cohort of 134 patients on empiric micafungin for ≥3 days and with blood cultures negative for Candida spp. Factors associated with candidemia included total parenteral nutrition (TPN; 26.0% vs 15.7%, P = 0.040), multifocal Candida colonization (23.6% vs 3.0%, P < 0.001), and positive 1,3-ß-d-glucan assay (95.0% vs 35.0%, P < 0.001). Patients without candidemia on empiric micafungin were more likely to receive antibiotic therapy in the previous 10 days (55.9% vs 79.9%, P < 0.001) and to be taking immunosuppressive medications (11.0% vs 30.6%, P < 0.001). Receipt of TPN (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-4.21), severe sepsis (OR = 2.20, 95% CI, 1.00-4.83), and multifocal Candida colonization (OR = 13.87, 95% CI, 4.43-43.37) were independently associated with candidemia in the multivariable logistic regression model. Therefore, the absence of these risk factors, especially in conjunction with a negative 1,3-ß-d-glucan assay, may be used to recommend de-escalation of empiric micafungin therapy.

Tularemia presenting as pulmonary nodules in an immunocompromised patient.

Tularemia is a zoonotic disease caused by Francisella tularensis that can be transmitted to humans when they handle rabbits, receive tick bites, consume contaminated water, or inhale aerosolized particles. We present the case of a 51-year-old white man with rheumatoid arthritis who was taking immunosuppressive medications and presented with tularemia. Our patient acquired the typhoidal form of tularemia, which is a severe systemic illness that manifests with fevers, headaches, myalgias, vomiting, diarrhea, and neurological symptoms, due to his immunocompromised state. The diagnosis was made through biopsy of a pulmonary nodule found incidentally on computed tomography scan.

Measurement and feedback of infection control process measures in the intensive care unit: Impact on compliance.

BACKGROUND: Infection control process measures provide actionable and measurable indicators for performance improvement. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the measurement and feedback of selected infection control process measures and compliance with infection control practices. METHODS: We measured selected infection control process measures (hand hygiene, femoral catheter use as a proportion of all central venous catheter (CVC) days and proportion of head of bed elevations) in the medical respiratory intensive care unit (ICU) (MRICU) and the surgical trauma ICU (STICU). All data were collected by trained infection control practitioners. Baseline data were obtained April through June 2004. Baseline hand hygiene data were obtained from May to June. Follow-up observations were obtained from July 2004 through March 2005. Both baseline and follow-up observations were reported to the units' leadership. The data were reviewed for improvement in compliance with process measures. Differences in proportions were analyzed for statistical significance by the chi(2) test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in the head of bed elevation rates: 54.9% versus 98.4% (P < .001) for the MRICU and 46.5% versus 77.2% (P < .001) for the STICU, respectively. There was also a statistically significant decline in femoral catheter rates in both ICUs: 17.8% versus 10% (P = .001) in the MRICU and 8.4% versus 3% (P < .001) in the STICU, respectively. There was no significant improvement in hand hygiene rates in either ICU: 31.8% versus 39.3% (P = .1) in the MRICU and 50% versus 50.3% (P = .9) in the STICU, respectively. CONCLUSION: Feedback of process measures lowered the use of femoral catheters and improved the proportion of elevated head of beds in 2 ICUs, but there was no significant improvement in hand hygiene.