[Structured implementation and high adherence to the ERAS program in colorectal surgery in two operating units of the ASUR Marche.] / Implementazione strutturata ed elevata aderenza al programma ERAS in chirurgia colorettale in due unità operative dell'ASUR Marche.

BACKGROUND: An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery is able to significantly reduce the morbidity rates and postoperative hospital stay (LOS) related to the intervention. However, it is not clear what modalities and levels of implementation are necessary to achieve these results. The purpose of this work is to analyze the methods and results of the first year of implementation of the program in two centers of the Agenzia Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR) Marche. MATERIALS: After a structured implementation pathway, characterized by the creation of a core team, field training, internal courses and coaching, the details of 196 consecutive cases of patients submitted to colorectal resection over a one-year period in two surgical units of the ASUR Marche were prospectively loaded in a database, considering over 50 variables including adherence to the individual items of the ERAS program. The primary outcomes were: overall and major morbidity, mortality and anastomotic dehiscence rates; secondary outcomes were: LOS, re-admission and re-intervention rates. The results of primary endpoints were evaluated by univariable and multivariable analyses with logistic regression and, thereafter, according to ERAS item adherence rate. RESULTS: After a median (interquartile range, IQR) follow-up of 40 (32-94) days, we recorded complications in 72 patients (overall morbidity 36.7%), major morbidity in 14 patients (7.1%), 6 deaths (mortality 3.1%), an anastomotic dehiscence in 9 cases (4.9%), median (IQR) overalll LOS 5 (3-7) days, 10 readmissions (5.1%) and 13 reoperations (6.7%). The mean adherence rate to the items of the ERAS program was 85.4%, showing a significant dose-effect curve for overall morbidity, major morbidity, anastomotic leakage and for overall LOS. DISCUSSION: The ERAS implementation methods in this project led to a high adherence (>80%) to the program items. All the results showed a significant improvement compared to the previous pre-implementation period and according to the adherence to program items rate.

ERAS pathway in colorectal surgery: structured implementation program and high adherence for improved outcomes.

Although there is clear evidence that an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery leads to significantly reduced morbidity rates and length of hospital stay (LOS), it is still unclear what modalities and levels of implementation of the program are necessary to achieve these results. The purpose of this study is to analyze the methods and results of the first year of structured implementation of a colorectal ERAS program in two surgical units of the Azienda Sanitaria Unica Regionale (ASUR) Marche in Italy. A two-center observational study on a prospectively maintained database was performed on 196 consecutive colorectal resections (excluding emergencies and American Society of Anesthesiologists class > III cases) over a 1-year period. More than 50 variables including adherence to the individual items of the ERAS program were considered. Primary outcomes were overall morbidity, major morbidity, mortality and anastomotic leakage rates; secondary outcomes were LOS, re-admission and re-operation. The results were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses through logistic regression. After a median follow-up of 39.5 days, we recorded complications in 72 patients (overall morbidity 36.7%), major complications in 14 patients (major morbidity 7.1%), 6 deaths (mortality 3.1%), anastomotic dehiscence in 9 cases (4.9%), mean overall LOS of 6.6 days, 10 readmissions (5.1%) and 13 reoperations (6.7%). The mean adherence rate to the items of the ERAS program was 85.4%, showing a significant dose-effect curve for overall and major morbidity rates, anastomotic leakage rates and LOS. The implementation methods of a colorectal ERAS program in this study led to a high adherence (> 80%) to the program items. High adherence had significant effects also on major morbidity and anastomotic leakage rates.

Estimated oxygen extraction versus dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness for perioperative hemodynamic optimization of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Goal directed therapy (GDT) is able to improve mortality and reduce complications in selected high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. The aim of this study is to compare two different strategies of perioperative hemodynamic optimization: one based on optimization of preload using dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness and the other one based on estimated oxygen extraction rate (O2ER) as target of hemodynamic manipulation. METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Adult patients undergoing elective major open abdominal surgery will be allocated to receive a protocol based on dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness or a protocol based on estimated O2ER. The hemodynamic optimization will be continued for 6 h postoperatively. The primary outcome is difference in overall postoperative complications rate between the two protocol groups. Fluids administered, fluid balance, utilization of vasoactive drugs, hospital length of stay and mortality at 28 day will also be assessed. DISCUSSION: As a predefined target of cardiac output (CO) or oxygen delivery (DO2) seems to be not adequate for every patient, a personalized therapy is likely more appropriate. Following this concept, dynamic parameters of fluid-responsiveness allow to titrate fluid administration aiming CO increase but avoiding fluid overload. This approach has the advantage of personalized fluid therapy, but it does not consider if CO is adequate or not. A protocol based on O2ER considers this second important aspect. Although positive effects of perioperative GDT have been clearly demonstrated, currently studies comparing different strategies of hemodynamic optimization are lacking. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04053595. Registered on 12/08/2019.

The peritoneal dialysis catheter.

The results obtained from the positioning and management of the catheter for peritoneal dialysis depend on the techniques used, but also and above all, on the experience of the practitioners. A comparison between practitioners may help to change their convictions, as well as to further improve results, in the interests of patient welfare. This is the aim of these Best Practice Guidelines..