Low doses of domoic acid during postnatal development produce permanent changes in rat behaviour and hippocampal morphology.

It is well established that the developing brain is a highly dynamic environment that is susceptible to toxicity produced by a number of pharmacological, chemical and environmental insults. We report herein on permanent behavioural and morphological changes produced by exposing newborn rats to very low (subconvulsive) doses of kainate receptor agonists during a critical window of brain development. Daily treatment of SD rat pups with either 5 or 20 microg/kg of domoic acid (DOM) from postnatal day 8-14 resulted in a permanent and reproducible seizure-like syndrome when animals were exposed to different tests of spatial cognition as adults. Similar results were obtained when animals were treated with equi-efficacious doses of kainic acid (KA; 25 or 100 microg/kg). Treated rats had significant increases in hippocampal mossy fiber staining and reductions in hippocampal cell counts consistent with effects seen in adult rats following acute injections of high doses of kainic acid. In situ hybridization also revealed an elevation in hippocampal brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mRNA in region CA1 without a corresponding increase in neuropeptide Y (NPY) mRNA. These results provide evidence of long-lasting behavioural and histochemical consequences arising from relatively subtle changes in glutamatergic activity during development, that may be relevant to understanding the aetiology of seizure disorders and other forms of neurological disease.

Comparison of the in vitro and in vivo neurotoxicity of three new sources of kainic acid.

Historically, all commercially available kainic acid has been derived from a single biological source using a consistent method of extraction and purification. That source became unavailable in 1995. Recently, three new commercial suppliers of kainic acid have made the product available, but the source of the material and the purification processes used differ. Our objective was to systematically compare the response produced by each of these new sources of kainic acid using three established neurobiological techniques: neuronal cell culture, hippocampal slice electrophysiology, and whole animal behavioural toxicity. Results in all three systems indicated no overall differences between the three formulations, although studies in both cerebellar neuron cultures and whole animal toxicity testing in mice, revealed some significant differences that may imply subtle differences in receptor selectivity and/or potency. We conclude that all three sources of kainic acid are viable alternatives to traditional kainate but they may not be identical. Until further information becomes available researchers may want to avoid using the three formulations interchangeably, and take note of the source of kainic acid when evaluating literature describing results from other laboratories.