Nurse-led heart failure educational interventions for patient and informal caregiver dyads: An integrative review.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure is a major health problem with significant economic burden in the United States. Educating heart failure dyads (heart failure patient and informal caregiver) is a relatively new domain and is being proposed by providers, policy makers, and third-party payors. Nurse-led dyad education can improve quality of life and reduce hospital admissions in the heart failure population. OBJECTIVES: This integrative literature review focused on evaluating design, delivery content, and outcomes of nurse-led dyadic educational interventions. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases (1999 -2022) were searched for quantitative and qualitative studies that included these search terms: heart failure, dyads, nonmedical caregivers, caregivers, randomized controlled trials, nurse-led education, education. RESULTS: The search yielded 92 articles. The results included seven randomized controlled trials and one pilot study conducted from 2005 to 2017. Sample sizes ranged from 20 to 155 dyads. Dyads who received education interventions had positive outcomes. Face-to-face coaching provided stronger outcomes. Interventions varied in length from baseline to three months, with post-intervention follow-ups from one to 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A paucity of studies of nurse-led heart failure dyadic educational interventions have been reported in the literature. To advance the science and decrease heart failure readmissions, greater efforts to study and incorporate education and support for heart failure dyads is needed, along with assessment of both patient and caregiver outcomes.

The Role of Computer Skills in Personal Health Record Adoption Among Patients With Heart Disease: Multidimensional Evaluation of Users Versus Nonusers.

BACKGROUND: In the era of precision medicine, it is critical for health communication efforts to prioritize personal health record (PHR) adoption. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients with heart disease that choose to adopt a PHR. METHODS: A total of 79 patients with chronic cardiovascular disease participated in this study: 48 PHR users and 31 nonusers. They completed 5 surveys related to their choice to use or not use the PHR: demographics, patient activation, medication adherence, health literacy, and computer self-efficacy (CSE). RESULTS: There was a significant difference between users and nonusers in the sociodemographic measure education (P=.04). There was no significant difference between users and nonusers in other sociodemographic measures: age (P=.20), sex (P=.35), ethnicity (P=.43), race (P=.42), and employment (P=.63). There was a significant difference between PHR users and PHR nonusers in CSE (P=.006). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrate that sociodemographic characteristics were not an important factor in patients' use of their PHR, except for education. This study had a small sample size and may not have been large enough to detect differences between groups. Our results did demonstrate that there is a difference between PHR users and nonusers related to their CSE. This work suggests that incorporating CSE into the design of PHRs is critical. The design of patient-facing tools must take into account patients' preferences and abilities when developing effective user-friendly health information technologies.

Impact of Age on Patients' Communication and Technology Preferences in the Era of Meaningful Use: Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Identifying effective means of communication between patients and their health care providers has a positive impact on patients' satisfaction, adherence, and health-related outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the impact of patients' age on their communication and technology preferences when managing their health. We hypothesize that a patient's age affects their communication and technology preferences when interacting with clinicians and managing their health. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted to identify the preferences of patients with cardiovascular diseases. Results were analyzed based on the patients' age. Grounded theory was used to analyze the qualitative data. Patients were recruited based on age, gender, ethnicity, and zip code. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were recruited: 34 young adults (19-39 years), 33 middle aged (40-64), and 37 senior citizens (>65). Young adults (mean 8.29, SD 1.66) reported higher computer self-efficacy than middle-aged participants (mean 5.56, SD 3.43; P<.05) and senior citizens (mean 47.55, SD 31.23; P<.05). Qualitative analysis identified the following three themes: (1) patient engagement (young adults favored mobile technologies and text messaging, middle-aged patients preferred phone calls, and senior citizens preferred direct interactions with the health care provider); (2) patient safety (young adults preferred electronic after-visit summaries [AVS] and medication reconciliation over the internet; middle-aged patients preferred paper-based or emailed AVS and medication reconciliation in person; senior citizens preferred paper-based summaries and in-person medication reconciliation); (3) technology (young adults preferred smartphones and middle-aged patients and senior citizens preferred tablets or PCs). Middle-aged patients were more concerned about computer security than any other group. A unique finding among senior citizens was the desire for caregivers to have access to their personal health record (PHR). CONCLUSIONS: Patients of different ages have different communication and technology preferences and different preferences with respect to how they would like information presented to them and how they wish to interact with their provider. The PHR is one approach to improving patient engagement, but nontechnological options need to be sustained to support all patients.