Interstitial Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent Anorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Local tumor control (LC), overall survival (OS), symptom palliation, and late toxicity for patients with locally recurrent anorectal cancer treated with a computed tomography (CT)-guided interstitial brachytherapy implant were examined. METHODS: The medical records of 20 consecutive patients who had received interstitial brachytherapy for locally recurrent anorectal cancer from 2000 through 2012 were reviewed. Seventeen patients (85 %) had rectal cancer and three had anal cancer [median follow-up time for living patients, 23 months (range 13-132)]. Brachytherapy was used most commonly at the second pelvic recurrence (n = 13, 65 %). The implant dose was prescribed to 80 Gy to a 1-cm margin or 120 Gy to 100 % of the gross tumor volume. Endpoints were OS, LC, toxicity, and symptom palliation rate, all calculated from the time of implant. RESULTS: The actuarial 1-year rates of LC and OS were 80 and 95 %, respectively. At presentation, 17 patients (85 %) had symptoms related to the treated tumor which were palliated in 13 patients (76 %) at a median time of 3 months (range 1-6); palliation was permanent for seven patients (54 %), and the other six patients lost palliation after a median 8 months (range 5-17). One patient experienced a grade 3 late complication requiring a stent for hydronephrosis; five had grade 2 toxicity, and four had grade 1 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy for locally recurrent anorectal tumors produced durable tumor control and long-term survival, with effective palliation and minimal long-term morbidity.

Impact of heterogeneity-based dose calculation using a deterministic grid-based Boltzmann equation solver for intracavitary brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the dosimetric impact of the heterogeneity dose calculation Acuros (Transpire Inc., Gig Harbor, WA), a grid-based Boltzmann equation solver (GBBS), for brachytherapy in a cohort of cervical cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The impact of heterogeneities was retrospectively assessed in treatment plans for 26 patients who had previously received (192)Ir intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer with computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance-compatible tandems and unshielded colpostats. The GBBS models sources, patient boundaries, applicators, and tissue heterogeneities. Multiple GBBS calculations were performed with and without solid model applicator, with and without overriding the patient contour to 1 g/cm(3) muscle, and with and without overriding contrast materials to muscle or 2.25 g/cm(3) bone. Impact of source and boundary modeling, applicator, tissue heterogeneities, and sensitivity of CT-to-material mapping of contrast were derived from the multiple calculations. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 43 (TG-43) guidelines and the GBBS were compared for the following clinical dosimetric parameters: Manchester points A and B, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) report 38 rectal and bladder points, three and nine o'clock, and (D2cm3) to the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid. RESULTS: Points A and B, D(2) cm(3) bladder, ICRU bladder, and three and nine o'clock were within 5% of TG-43 for all GBBS calculations. The source and boundary and applicator account for most of the differences between the GBBS and TG-43 guidelines. The D(2cm3) rectum (n = 3), D(2cm3) sigmoid (n = 1), and ICRU rectum (n = 6) had differences of >5% from TG-43 for the worst case incorrect mapping of contrast to bone. Clinical dosimetric parameters were within 5% of TG-43 when rectal and balloon contrast were mapped to bone and radiopaque packing was not overridden. CONCLUSIONS: The GBBS has minimal impact on clinical parameters for this cohort of patients with unshielded applicators. The incorrect mapping of rectal and balloon contrast does not have a significant impact on clinical parameters. Rectal parameters may be sensitive to the mapping of radiopaque packing.

Retrospective dosimetric comparison of low-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy using a tandem and mini-ovoids.

The purpose of this study was to compare the dose distribution of Iridium-192 ((192)Ir) pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy to that of Cesium-137 ((137)Cs) low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy around mini-ovoids and an intrauterine tandem. Ten patient treatment plans were selected from our clinical database, all of which used mini-ovoids and an intrauterine tandem. A commercial treatment planning system using AAPM TG43 formalism was used to calculate the dose in water for both the (137)Cs and (192)Ir sources. For equivalent system loadings, we compared the dose distributions in relevant clinical planes, points A and B, and to the ICRU bladder and rectal reference points. The mean PDR doses to points A and B were 3% +/- 1% and 6% +/- 1% higher than the LDR doses, respectively. For the rectum point, the PDR dose was 4% +/- 3% lower than the LDR dose, mainly because of the (192)Ir PDR source anisotropy. For the bladder point, the PDR dose was 1% +/- 4% higher than the LDR dose. We conclude that the PDR and LDR dose distributions are equivalent for intracavitary brachytherapy with a tandem and mini-ovoids. These findings will aid in the transfer from the current practice of LDR intracavitary brachytherapy to PDR for the treatment of gynecologic cancers.

Dosimetric evaluation of the Fletcher-Williamson ovoid for pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy: a Monte Carlo study.

We used radiochromic film dosimetry to validate a Monte Carlo (MC) model of a 192Ir pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) source inside a Fletcher-Williamson ovoid. MD-55-2 radiochromic film was placed in a high-impact polystyrene phantom in a plane parallel to and displaced 2.0 cm medially from the long axis of the ovoid. MC N-particle transport code (MCNPX) version 2.4 was used to model the ovoid and the 192Ir source. Energy deposition was calculated using a track-length estimator modified by an energy-dependent heating function, which is a good approximation of the collision kerma. To convert the estimates of the MC dose per simulated particle to clinically relevant absolute dosimetry, additional MC models of an actual and a virtual 192Ir source in dry air were simulated to determine air kerma strength for the penetrating part of the photon spectrum (>11.3 keV). The absolute dose distributions predicted by MCNPX agreed with the film results and were within +/-9.4% (k = 2) and within +/-2% or within a distance to agreement of 2 mm for 94% of the dose grid. Additional MC models characterized the uncertainty resulting from source positioning inside the ovoid. For a worst-case scenario of 1 mm off centre from the nominal source position in the 3 mm diameter ovoid shaft, the average dose deviation over the film plane was +/-5% (1sigma = +/-4%), with maximum deviation near the sharp dose-gradient provided by the shields of -20% to + 26%. A validated MC model is the first requirement to simulate common LDR clinical loadings (5-20 mgRaEq) and, thus, will aid in the transition from the current 137Cs Selectron LDR ICBT to PDR for treatment of gynecologic cancers.