Enlargement of umbilical incision in standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy is frequently necessary: An argument for the single incision approach?

OBJECTIVE: Cosmetic result after cholecystectomy is up for debate. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and extent of enlargement of initial skin and fascia incision in standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to detect predictive factors for such an enlargement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The size of the umbilical incision was measured before and after standard laparoscopic gallbladder removal in 391 patients from August 2009 to October 2012. Predisposing factors for the need of enlargement of the umbilical incision were analysed. RESULTS: Additional enlargement of the umbilical incision for gallbladder removal was required in 35.8% of the patients at skin level, and in 40.4% at fascia level. The median enlargement of the umbilical skin incision was 11 mm, from 25 mm to 36 mm. Gallbladder weight, total stone weight, maximum diameter of largest stone and shorter initial length of incision were independent predisposing factors for enlargement of the incision. CONCLUSIONS: In standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy the umbilical incision frequently requires secondary enlargement, especially if a large stone mass is involved. Therefore, the cosmetic result after laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends on more than only the technique used for access and the surgical technique for cholecystectomy should be chosen individually for each patient according to the stone mass.

Are there risk factors for snowboard injuries? A case-control multicentre study of 559 snowboarders.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse risk factors leading to injuries during snowboarding. DESIGN: A case-control multicentre survey of injured and non-injured snowboarders. SETTING: One tertiary and two secondary trauma centres in Bern, Switzerland. METHODS: All snowboard injuries admitted to our tertiary and two affiliated secondary trauma centres from 1 November 2007 to 15 April 2008 were analysed on the basis of a completed questionnaire incorporating 15 variables. The same questionnaire was applied in non-injured controls at valley stations after a snowboarding day during the same period. A multiple logistic regression was performed (dichotomous variables). Patterns of combined risk factors were calculated by inference trees. RESULTS: 306 patients and 253 controls were interviewed. The following variables were statistically significant for the injured PATIENTS: low readiness for speed (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.64, p=0.0037), bad weather/visibility (OR 19.06, 95% CI 2.70 to 134.73, p=0.0031) and old snow (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.68, p=0.0323). Not wearing a helmet and riding on icy slopes emerged as a combination of risk factors associated with injury. CONCLUSIONS: Several risk factors and combinations exist, and different risk profiles were identified. Future research should be aimed at more precise identification of groups at risk and developing specific recommendations for each group-for example, a snow-weather conditions index at valley stations.