A Particular Use of Endobag®: Extraction of Rectal Foreign Bodies.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of foreign bodies (FBs) in the rectum has recently increased. FB removal by the transanal way or by colonoscopy is generally feasible and only in few cases surgery is strictly necessary. Due to FB dimensions or rectum and colon anatomy, sometimes it may represent a challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two cases of FB inserted in the rectum were treated in our institute. They underwent surgery using Endobag, a laparoscopic surgical device. The device was inserted through the anus in order to catch and remove the FB. RESULTS: Both the procedures were easily performed, without any complication. CONCLUSIONS: The use of Endobag seems to be a good and effective way to remove FB from rectum.

Helicobacter pylori and functional dyspepsia: review of previous studies and commentary on new data.

Many studies have attempted to prove a link between Helicobacter pylori infection and functional dyspepsia but the results have been conflicting. Several mechanisms have been postulated for how H pylori associated inflammation disturbs antral and duodenal function but no pathophysiological explanation of how H pylori may cause dyspeptic symptoms is presently available.

Low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole vs. full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

AIM: To compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy and tolerability of two 1-week triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily (LCM group), or lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily (LCA group). H. pylori status was assessed by rapid urease test, histology and 13C-urea breath test before and after therapy. RESULTS: At 3 months, H. pylori eradication (intention- to-treat/per protocol analysis) was 92.4%/93.8% in the LCM group and 83.1%/85.7% in the LCA group (P=N.S.). Side-effects were more frequently reported in the LCA group (37.9%) than in the LCM group (19.7%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this open, randomized controlled trial, eradication of H. pylori by low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole was higher with significantly less side-effects than by full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. This finding may be related to the stronger synergism of clarithromycin plus metronidazole, even at lower doses, than of clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. Considering the lower cost as well, LCM should be preferred to LCA in the eradication of H. pylori.

Review article: non-invasive methods for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection are widely used in clinical practice and the management of patients with gastrointestinal disease. The serology and 13C-urea breath test are widely available, whereas salivary and faecal assay are still being developed. The non-invasive tests represent notable savings for the patient both in terms of money and discomfort. Whilst serology is the most widespread test its use is not advised in post-treatment follow-up. The 13C-urea breath test is a simple, safe and highly accurate method ideal to evaluate, in the short-term follow-up, Helicobacter pylori eradication after treatment.

What can be learnt from the new data about antibiotic resistance? Are there any practical clinical consequences of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance?

Effective treatment regimens are now available for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, but one of the factors limiting their efficacy is antibiotic resistance. Omeprazole-based triple therapy (omeprazole plus two antibiotics) can, at present, be considered the treatment of choice for H. pylori infection; some of the best results have been achieved by combining omeprazole with either amoxycillin and clarithromycin or metronidazole and clarithromycin. However, the potential effectiveness of nitroimidazole derivatives and clarithromycin must be weighed against the possibility that resistance can develop to these agents. Eradication in metronidazole-resistant strains is lower than in sensitive strains, but is still about 75% (versus 97%). However, clarithromycin resistance is thought to have more clinical significance, reducing the eradication rate of 95% in sensitive strains to 40% in resistant strains, although the overall importance of clarithromycin resistance for H. pylori eradication is still likely to be relatively low. Recent data on secondary resistance indicate that the rate is at least 50% for both metronidazole and clarithromycin in patients in whom eradication has failed. If, in the future, a large number of H. pylori-positive individuals undergo such treatment, treatment failures may become a major issue, and the problem of antibiotic resistance will have to be overcome.

Helicobacter pylori: optimum diagnosis and test of cure.

The fact that about 50% of the world's population is infected with Helicobacter (H.) pylori and the important role that this bacterium plays in public health have been important incentives in the search for accurate diagnostic methods. A large number of invasive and non-invasive methods have been used to diagnose H. pylori infection. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages and each practitioner should choose the best diagnostic method according to the facilities available. Non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection are largely used in clinical practice and in management of patients with gastroduodenal disease. Serology is the most widespread test but its use is not advised in the post-treatment follow-up. The Urea Breath Test is a simple, safe and highly accurate method ideal for evaluating the short-term follow-up of H. pylori eradication after therapy.

Efficacy of lansoprazole in eradicating Helicobacter pylori: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The combination of lansoprazole with antibiotics either as double or triple therapy has demonstrated an H. pylori eradication rate of between 80 and 90%. With the aim of providing a complete revision of the results of these clinical studies and a quantification of the efficacy of lansoprazole in eradicating H. pylori and healing peptic ulcers, we have undertaken a meta-analysis of all the controlled studies published in the literature. METHODS: This meta-analysis reviewed all randomized, controlled clinical trials published as full text articles in English between 1993 and 1996 that reported the efficacy of lansoprazole treatment as monotherapy or in combination with antibiotics in the treatment of peptic ulcer and in eradicating H. pylori. Articles were identified from the literature, which included both manual and computerized research (MEDLINE) and references provided by articles in this area. In order to compare the efficacy of triple therapy comprising lansoprazole vs. another PPI, data from abstracts (n = 5) were used, as no full text articles were located. RESULTS: This systematic review of the literature documents that lansoprazole has a high degree of efficacy in eradicating H. pylori, above all when used within treatment schemes including amoxicillin or clarithromycin, and metronidazole or tinidazole. This efficacy is comparable to that of other PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy allows the eradication of H. pylori in more than 85% of cases in patients with peptic ulcer. In addition, there is a substantial comparability of the efficacy of lansoprazole and omeprazole when they are used together with other anti-infective agents. Thus, lansoprazole appears to offer an option in the eradication of H. pylori.

Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: non-invasive diagnostic tests.

The non-invasive urea breath test can demonstrate the presence of Helicobacter pylori infection with the same accuracy as invasive methods (histology, rapid urease test, culture), but with less distress and inconvenience to the patient. It is evident that this test can and should substitute invasive methods in patients with uncomplicated duodenal ulcer, in those with non-ulcer dyspepsia and in all who have gastrointestinal disorders that do not require endoscopic examination. The urea breath test has a primary role for determining the success of eradication therapy. It is ideal for short- and long-term follow-up, particularly in the case of duodenal ulcer, which is strictly related to the presence of Helicobacter pylori. In serious disease, when endoscopic examination is mandatory, such as complicated ulcer or mucose associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, the urea breath test can still improve the diagnostic accuracy of Helicobacter pylori infection as it does not imply sampling error, to which biopsy is subject.