Extinction retention predicts improvement in social anxiety symptoms following exposure therapy.

BACKGROUND: Several researchers have argued that basic research on extinction learning can guide efforts to enhance the efficacy of exposure-based therapy. At the basis of this translational research paradigm is the assumption that extinction retention is important to the outcome of exposure-based therapy. This study is the first to examine the relationship between extinction retention, which comprises the amount of fear reduction that is retained between two exposure sessions and improvement in anxiety symptoms following exposure treatment. METHODS: Adults (N=90), participating in two separate studies, who received three sessions of repeated exposure to public speaking provided ratings of peak fear during exposure treatment and completed the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self-Report version, LSAS-SR, Baker et al. [2002: Behav Res Ther 40:701-715] at baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up. RESULTS: After controlling for within-session extinction, extinction retention accounted for significant variance in the improvement of LSAS-SR scores over time. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the consolidation of extinction learning into long-term memory is associated with improvements in fear and avoidance related to social situations following exposure therapy. Implications for exposure therapy augmentation studies are discussed.

Effects of D-cycloserine administration on weekly nonemotional memory tasks in healthy participants.

BACKGROUND: The application of weekly doses of D-cycloserine (DCS) to the enhancement of exposure-based treatments has been a particular achievement of translational research. It is not known, however, whether this enhancement effect can be extended to other forms of learning. In this study, we investigated the relative benefit of DCS versus placebo for enhancing nonemotional verbal and nonverbal memory across weekly trials. METHODS: We randomized healthy participants to weekly doses of 50 mg DCS or placebo, with 33 participants completing a 5-week protocol. Participants completed baseline neuropsychological evaluation and then 4 subsequent weeks of repeated learning tasks. RESULTS: No improvement was found in immediate or delayed memory following single doses of DCS for the memory tasks repeated on a weekly basis. Trends for an advantage of DCS were evident for novel word lists given each week. CONCLUSIONS: The learning tasks in our study were particularly distinct from the extinction learning paradigms that have shown strong DCS effects, and we were unable to demonstrate useful DCS effects with these nonemotional stimuli. Additional research is needed to elucidate the bounds of DCS augmentation effects on therapeutic learning.

Reducing anxiety sensitivity with exercise.

BACKGROUND: Exercise interventions repeatedly have been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of depression, and initial studies indicate similar efficacy for the treatment of anxiety conditions. To further study the potential beneficial role of prescriptive exercise for anxiety-related conditions, we examined the role of exercise in reducing fears of anxiety-related sensations (anxiety sensitivity). METHODS: We randomly assigned 60 participants with elevated levels of anxiety sensitivity to a 2-week exercise intervention, a 2-week exercise plus cognitive restructuring intervention, or a waitlist control condition. Assessment of outcome was completed at pretreatment, midtreatment, 1-week posttreatment, and 3-week follow-up. RESULTS: We found that both exercise conditions led to clinically significant changes in anxiety sensitivity that were superior to the waitlist condition, representing a large controlled effect size (d=2.15). Adding a cognitive component did not facilitate the effects of the exercise intervention. Consistent with hypotheses, changes in anxiety sensitivity mediated the beneficial effects of exercise on anxious and depressed mood. CONCLUSIONS: We discuss these findings in terms of the potential role of exercise as an additional psychosocial intervention for conditions such as panic disorder, where anxiety sensitivity is a prominent component of pathology.

The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions for reducing anxiety sensitivity: a meta-analytic review.

The present study meta-analytically reviewed the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) vs. control conditions in the reduction of anxiety sensitivity. A computerized search was conducted to identify CBT outcome studies that included the Anxiety Sensitivity Index as a dependent variable. Of the 989 studies that were identified, 24 randomized-controlled trials with a total of 1851 participants met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Data were extracted separately for treatment-seeking (16 studies) and at-risk (eight studies) samples. Results indicated large effect sizes for treatment-seeking samples, Hedges' g=1.40, SE=0.21, 95% CI: 1.00-1.81, p<0.001, and moderate to large effect sizes for at risk samples Hedges' g=0.74, SE=0.18, 95% CI: 0.39-1.08, p<0.001. Additionally, both the amount of therapist contact and control modality (waitlist vs. psychological control) moderated the effect sizes for treatment-seeking samples. Our review indicates that CBT is efficacious in reducing anxiety sensitivity. However, more research is needed to determine the mechanisms by which CBT exert its effects on anxiety sensitivity.