Beyond PACIFIC: Real-World Outcomes of Adjuvant Durvalumab According to Treatment Received and PD-L1 Expression.

Adjuvant durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A post hoc exploratory analysis of PACIFIC revealed no OS benefit in the PD-L1 < 1% subgroup. This retrospective analysis assesses the real-world impact of durvalumab on OS according to PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS). Patients with stage III, unresectable NSCLC treated by CRT, with available PD-L1 TPS, from 1 March 2018 to 31 December 2020, at BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada were included. Patients were divided into two groups, CRT + durvalumab and CRT alone. OS and PFS were analyzed in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% and <1% subgroups. A total of 134 patients were included in the CRT + durvalumab group and 117, in the CRT alone group. Median OS was 35.9 months in the CRT + durvalumab group and 27.4 months in the CRT alone group [HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.83), p = 0.003]. Durvalumab improved OS in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% [HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.34-0.81), p = 0.003, n = 175], but not in the <1% subgroup [HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.44-1.42), p = 0.4, n = 76]. This retrospective study demonstrates a statistically significant improvement in OS associated with durvalumab after CRT in PD-L1 ≥ 1%, but not PD-L1 < 1% NSCLC. Variables not accounted for may have biased the survival analysis. A prospective study would bring more insight.

Population-based Long-term Outcomes for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasal Cavity.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates population-based outcomes of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the nasal cavity treated in British Columbia. METHODS: A retrospective review of nasal cavity SCC treated from 1984 to 2014 was performed (n = 159). Locoregional recurrence (LRR) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: The 3-year OS was 74.2% for radiation alone, 75.8% for surgery alone, and 78.4% for surgery and radiation ( P = 0.16). The 3-year LRR was 28.4% for radiation alone, 28.2% for surgery alone, and 22.6% for surgery and radiation ( P = 0.21). On multivariable analysis, surgery and postoperative radiation relative to surgery alone was associated with a lower risk of LRR (hazard ratio: 0.36, P = 0.03). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, node-positive, orbital invasion, smoking, and advanced age were associated with worse OS (all P <0.05). CONCLUSION: In this population-based analysis, multimodality treatment with surgery and adjuvant radiation were associated with improved locoregional control for SCC of the nasal cavity.

Comparison of 2-Weekly Versus 4-Weekly Durvalumab Consolidation for Locally Advanced NSCLC Treated With Chemoradiotherapy: A Brief Report.

Introduction: Durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for 1 year after chemoradiation has improved overall survival (OS) in unresectable stage III NSCLC. Subsequently, a 20 mg/kg 4-weekly regimen was approved. The study goal was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of the two regimens. Methods: All patients with NSCLC treated with curative-intent chemoradiation followed by durvalumab from March 1, 2018 to December 31, 2020 at BC Cancer, British Columbia, Canada were included in this retrospective review. Durvalumab dosing schedule, toxicity, progression, and OS were collected. Comparisons between treatment groups were made using chi-square and independent t tests. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used to analyze OS. Results: A total of 152 patients were included in the 2-weekly group and 53 patients in the 4-weekly group. The median follow-up was 19.7 months and 12.0 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached, but 12-month survival rates were 88.4% versus 85.2% (p = 0.55). Toxicity profiles were similar in terms of sites and severity. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in efficacy or toxicity between the 2-weekly and 4-weekly durvalumab in this cohort of patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with curative-intent chemoradiation.

Assessment of Toxic Effects and Survival in Treatment Deescalation With Radiotherapy vs Transoral Surgery for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The ORATOR2 Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The optimal approach for treatment deescalation in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) is unknown. Objective: To assess a primary radiotherapy (RT) approach vs a primary transoral surgical (TOS) approach in treatment deescalation for HPV-related OPSCC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international, multicenter, open-label parallel-group phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 9 tertiary academic cancer centers in Canada and Australia and enrolled patients with T1-T2N0-2 p16-positive OPSCC between February 13, 2018, and November 17, 2020. Patients had up to 3 years of follow-up. Interventions: Primary RT (consisting of 60 Gy of RT with concurrent weekly cisplatin in node-positive patients) vs TOS and neck dissection (ND) (with adjuvant reduced-dose RT depending on pathologic findings). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS) compared with a historical control. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life, and toxic effects. Results: Overall, 61 patients were randomized (30 [49.2%] in the RT arm and 31 [50.8%] in the TOS and ND arm; median [IQR] age, 61.9 [57.2-67.9] years; 8 women [13.6%] and 51 men [86.4%]; 31 [50.8%] never smoked). The trial began in February 2018, and accrual was halted in November 2020 because of excessive toxic effects in the TOS and ND arm. Median follow-up was 17 months (IQR, 15-20 months). For the OS end point, there were 3 death events, all in the TOS and ND arm, including the 2 treatment-related deaths (0.7 and 4.3 months after randomization, respectively) and 1 of myocardial infarction at 8.5 months. There were 4 events for the PFS end point, also all in the TOS and ND arm, which included the 3 mortality events and 1 local recurrence. Thus, the OS and PFS data remained immature. Grade 2 to 5 toxic effects occurred in 20 patients (67%) in the RT arm and 22 (71%) in the TOS and ND arm. Mean (SD) MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores at 1 year were similar between arms (85.7 [15.6] and 84.7 [14.5], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, TOS was associated with an unacceptable risk of grade 5 toxic effects, but patients in both trial arms achieved good swallowing outcomes at 1 year. Long-term follow-up is required to assess OS and PFS outcomes. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03210103.

The Prognostic Impact of Radiotherapy Delays in Oropharynx Carcinoma and the Role of p16 Status.

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of treatment delays (TDs) for oropharynx carcinoma patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), comparing p16+ versus p16- disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed (n=763). TD was defined as the time from pathologic diagnosis to initiation of RT. TD thresholds of ≤60, 61 to 90, and >90 days were used to stratify outcomes. Time on treatment (TOT) delays were estimated based on the RT fractionation. TOT delay of 1 to 3 days was compared with >3 days. Predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) were evaluated on multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty (85%) patients had p16+ disease. On multivariable analysis, TOT delay of 1 to 3 days versus <1 day was associated with inferior CSS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-3.22). TD >90 versus ≤60 days (HR=1.68; 95% CI: 0.98-3.04) and 61 to 90 versus ≤60 days (HR=0.94; 95% CI: 0.60-1.48) was not associated with CSS. TD >90 versus ≤60 days (HR=1.29; 95% CI: 0.66-2.52), TD 61 to 90 versus ≤60 days (HR=0.98; 95% CI: 0.64-1.52), TOT 1 to 3 versus <1 day (HR=0.91; 95% CI: 0.39-2.11), and TOT >3 versus <1 day (HR=1.79; 95% CI: 0.80-3.99) were not associated with LRR. There was no interaction between p16 status and TD in relation to LRR (P=0.27) or CSS (P=0.17). CONCLUSIONS: TDs were not significantly associated with CSS or LRR. TOT of 1 to 3 days was associated with inferior CSS. p16 status should not be a significant factor when triaging RT start dates.

Randomized Trial of Radiotherapy Versus Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the ORATOR Trial.

PURPOSE: The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has risen rapidly, because of an epidemic of human papillomavirus infection. The optimal management of early-stage OPSCC with surgery or radiation continues to be a clinical controversy. Long-term randomized data comparing these paradigms are lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with T1-T2, N0-2 (≤ 4 cm) OPSCC to radiotherapy (RT) (with chemotherapy if N1-2) versus transoral robotic surgery plus neck dissection (TORS + ND) (with or without adjuvant therapy). The primary end point was swallowing quality of life (QOL) at 1-year using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Secondary end points included adverse events, other QOL outcomes, overall survival, and progression-free survival. All analyses were intention-to-treat. Herein, we present long-term outcomes from the trial. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were randomly assigned (n = 34 per arm) between August 10, 2012, and June 9, 2017. Median follow-up was 45 months. Longitudinal MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory analyses demonstrated statistical superiority of RT arm over time (P = .049), although the differences beyond 1 year were of smaller magnitude than at the 1-year timepoint (year 2: 86.0 ± 13.5 in the RT arm v 84.8 ± 12.5 in the TORS + ND arm, P = .74; year 3: 88.9 ± 11.3 v 83.3 ± 13.9, P = .12). These differences did not meet the threshold to qualify as a clinically meaningful change at any timepoint. Certain differences in QOL concerns including more pain and dental concerns in the TORS + ND arm seen at 1 year resolved at 2 and 3 years; however, TORS patients started to use more nutritional supplements at 3 years (P = .015). Dry mouth scores were higher in RT patients over time (P = .041). CONCLUSION: On longitudinal analysis, the swallowing QOL difference between primary RT and TORS + ND approaches persists but decreases over time. Patients with OPSCC should be informed about the pros and cons of both treatment options (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01590355).

Patient-reported outcomes and complications during head and neck cancer radiotherapy before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: This study compares patient-reported outcomes and treatment-related complications during radiotherapy before (August 2019-January 2020) versus during (March-Sept 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-head and neck module was used to assess curative intent in H&N cancer patients' symptoms during radiotherapy. RESULTS: There were 158 patients in the pre-pandemic cohort and 137 patients in the pandemic cohort. There was no significant difference in enteral feeding requirements between the cohorts (21% versus 30%, p = 0.07). Weight loss was higher during the pandemic (mean - 5.6% versus 6.8%, p = 0.03). On multivariate analysis, treatment during the pandemic was associated with higher symptom scores for coughing/choking while eating (2.7 versus 2.1, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates during H&N radiotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic were similar at our institution relative to the pre-pandemic era, although weight loss was greater and patients reported more severe choking/coughing while eating.

Ninety-day mortality after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Population-based comparison between rural and urban patients.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses whether 90-day mortality differs between patients living in rural and urban areas, as lower access to supportive care services in rural areas could result in higher mortality. METHODS: All patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated between 1998 and 2014 with radiotherapy in British Columbia were included. Patients were divided into rurality areas according to the Modified Statistics Canada (mSC) definition, which classifies a population <30 000 as rural and ≥30 000 as urban. RESULTS: Five thousand five hundred and fifty-four patients were included in this study, of which 68% lived in urban centers. The 90-day mortality for rural versus urban patients were 3.0% and 3.9% (p = 0.09), respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed no association with 90-day mortality and rurality. CONCLUSION: After controlling for potentially confounding factors, we did not find a significant association between 90-day mortality and rurality in patients who were treated with radiotherapy for HNC in British Columbia.

External Beam Radiation Therapy in pT4 Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Study of 405 Patients.

PURPOSE: The benefit of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in locally advanced, well- differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) is uncertain. The purpose of this study is to evaluate locoregional recurrence (LRR), progression-free survival, and cause-specific survival (CSS) of patients with pT4 well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A population-based retrospective review was conducted of consecutive patients with pT4 WDTC (per the American Joint Committee on Cancer, 8th edition, criteria) treated provincially between 1985 and 2013. The primary endpoints were cumulative incidence of LRR and CSS. To account for the competing risks of death from other causes, a Fine-Gray's test was used. A Cox-proportional hazards model was used to analyze overall survival (OS). Multivariate models and propensity matching were used to account for the effects of covariates. RESULTS: A total of 405 patients were identified with a median follow-up time of 14.3 years for a total of 4209 person-years of follow up. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 53 years (range, 20-87). There were 211 patients (52%) who received EBRT. EBRT was associated with age ≥55 years (56% vs 35%; P < .001), airway involvement (42% vs 8%; P < .001), and R1/2 resection (81% vs 51%; P < .001). The 10-year outcomes for the non-EBRT and EBRT groups were 21.6% versus 11.4%, respectively, for LRR, 84.1% versus 93.1%, respectively, for CSS, and 85.7% versus 67.5%, respectively, for OS. On multivariate analysis, EBRT was associated with a lower rate of LRR (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.334; P < .001), but not associated with CSS (HR: 1.56; P = .142) nor OS (HR: 1.216; P = .335). After propensity score matching, the EBRT cohort had lower rates of LRR relative to the non-EBRT cohort (HR: 0.261; P = .0003), but there were no differences in CSS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, population-based analysis of patients with pT4 WDTC, EBRT was associated with lower rates of LRR, but no difference in CSS or OS.

A Unique Case of Primary EBV-Positive, HPV-Negative Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Located in the Tonsil.

Nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC) are non-keratinizing squamous cell carcinomas of the nasopharynx associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). When occurring outside of the nasopharynx, they are referred to as lymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas (LELCs) and present the same morphology as NPC. LELC have been described in other head and neck regions such as the salivary glands and the soft palate. LELC can also occur in the oropharynx, are associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) and are typically negative for EBV. We herein present a unique case of a 78-year-old Chinese male with EBV-positive, HPV-negative NPC of the left tonsil. His presenting symptom was a left-sided lymph node. There was no evidence of nasopharyngeal lesion seen on physical examination, PET and MRI. The patient was treated with curative-intent external beam radiotherapy which delivered 70 Gy (Gy) to the gross tumour and lymph nodes, and 56 Gy electively to the ipsilateral neck using a volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. This is the first case of primary tonsil EBV-positive NPC described in the literature.

Information Needs of Patients Diagnosed with Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiation Therapy: a Survey of Patient Satisfaction.

Research suggests that the information needs of patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer can be particularly complex, given the frequent need for multidisciplinary treatments and resulting potential for profound functional impairments. This study was designed to identify head and neck cancer patients' reported informational needs and to evaluate their satisfaction with the written information they received. The study was divided into 2 phases: phase 1, prior to development of a new educational pamphlet, and phase 2, after its implementation. A survey was designed to evaluate several measures including content, amount, understanding, and timing of information delivery. It was distributed at two points during patients' treatment pathway for each phase: at their last radiation appointment and at their posttreatment follow-up appointment. Participant responses after the revised pamphlet indicated greater preparedness before their first treatment, as well as increased satisfaction with treatment option information. Most were satisfied with information timing, but about a third did indicate that additional information would have been helpful at variable time points. Open-ended responses demonstrated that overall, patients do still desire more information, particularly on side effect and self-care management information. While patients with head and neck cancer appear to be generally satisfied with the written information received, our findings suggest that there is still considerable variability in how the information is understood, when it should be delivered, and in which areas more would have been beneficial. These findings underscore the need to consider how best to balance available resources in order to provide more tailored yet comprehensive education for this group of patients.

Clinical features of head and neck cancer patients with brain metastases: A retrospective study of 88 cases.

OBJECTIVES: Brain metastases (BM) arising from head and neck cancer (HNC) are rare and not well characterized. This study aims to describe the clinicopathological features, treatments, prognostic factors, and survival in HNC patients with BM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-thyroid HNC patients referred to BC Cancer from 1998 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed for BM. The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis were used to assess post-BM survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Out of 9432 HNC patients, 88 patients developed BM (0.9%, median follow-up 3.4 years). On average, the BM were diagnosed 18.5 months after the primary diagnosis and tended to arise after distant metastases to extracranial sites (85%) such as the lungs (78%). At BM presentation, 84% were symptomatic and two thirds had a poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 2, 68%). The median post-BM survival was 2.5 months (95% CI 2.1-3.3 months). On multivariable analysis, management of BM with radiotherapy (RT) alone (3.3 months, 95% CI 2.3-4.6, p = 0.005) and RT with surgery (4.4 months, 95% CI 2.8-6.9, p < 0.001) was associated with longer survival compared to best supportive care alone (1.4 months, 95% CI 1.0-2.0 months). Age, sex, performance status, sub-localization of the primary HNC, presence of extracranial metastases, and number of intracranial metastases were not associated with post-BM survival (all p ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date in BM from HNC. BM occur late in the course of HNC and carry a poor prognosis. Treatment with intracranial radiotherapy both with and without surgery was associated with improved survival.

Patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Head and neck (H&N) cancer patients experience significant acute side effects from treatment. This study evaluates prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in H&N patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) to assess feasibility of electronically collecting PROs and to objectively document symptom acuity and trajectory during RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: H&N patients undergoing radical RT at our multicentre institution completed a 12-item partial survey of the Vanderbilt Head & Neck Symptom Survey 2.0 prior to RT and weekly on RT. Between October 2016 and October 2018, 318 of 333 patients completed a baseline survey and at least one weekly survey. RESULTS: The average number of weekly questionnaires completed was 5 (range 1-8). The mean maximum symptom scores were highest for dysgeusia (5.8/10), pain (5.4/10), mucositis (4.8/10), weight loss due to swallowing (4.5/10) and mucus causing choking/gagging (4.3/10). On multivariate analysis, female gender, sinonasal, nasopharynx and oropharynx primaries were associated with a greater risk of moderate-severe pain (p < 0.05). Sinonasal, nasopharynx, oral cavity, oropharynx and thyroid primaries were associated with a greater risk of moderate-severe mucositis during radiation (p < 0.0001). Salivary gland, sinonasal, nasopharynx and oropharynx primaries and higher radiation dose were associated with a greater risk of moderate-severe dysgeusia (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic PRO collection during H&N cancer RT is feasible. H&N cancer patients experience significant symptoms during RT, and the most severe symptoms reported were dysgeusia, pain and mucositis. Oropharynx cancer patients reported the highest symptom scores during RT.

Population-based outcomes by immunosuppressed status in patients undergoing radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of immunosuppression in patients with oropharynx head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is not well studied. This study evaluates disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in oropharynx SCC in patients with and without immunosuppression. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients treated with radiotherapy for oropharynx SCC at BC Cancer from 2011 to 2016 was performed. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and competing risk analysis. Multivariate analysis and propensity score matching were performed. RESULTS: There were 1077 patients, of which 5.8% (n = 62) had an immunosuppressive medical condition or were taking long-term immunosuppressive medication at diagnosis. Median follow-up was 3.3 years. Three year OS for patients without immunosuppression was 79.5% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 76.8-82.0%) and for those with immunosuppression was 64.6% (95% CI 50.9-75.3%) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95% CI 1.18-2.68, p = 0.0062). The three year disease recurrence for patients without immunosuppression was 24.9% (95% CI 22.2-27.7%) and 44.4% (95% CI 31.5-56.6%) for those with immunosuppression (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.45-3.11, p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis of disease free survival (DFS) found that active smoking, advanced TNM stage, base of tongue subsite, p16 negative and unknown, no concurrent chemotherapy, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index, and lower radiation dose were also associated with worse DFS (all p < 0.05). Immunosuppressed patients had worse DFS relative to patients without immunosuppression, p < 0.001, HR 1.97 (95% CI 1.33-2.91). CONCLUSION: Immunosuppression was an independent predictor of worse DFS in this large cohort of patients with oropharynx SCC.

Association between nutritional risk index and outcomes for head and neck cancer patients receiving concurrent chemo-radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) are often malnourished. We assessed the utility of nutritional risk index (NRI) in HNC patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A population-based retrospective review of HNC patients treated with curative chemoradiation was performed. Demographics, anthropometrics, overall survival (OS), and the composite treatment complication rate (G-tube dependence, radiation incompletion, 90-day mortality, and unplanned hospitalization) were collected. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two patients were identified. Average pretreatment and posttreatment NRI were 110 (SD 3) and 99 (SD 12), respectively (P < .01). Pretreatment NRI risk category, age, ECOG status, and tumor subsites were associated with OS on multivariate analysis. Pretreatment NRI risk category was associated with risk of treatment related complications. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant decrease between pretreatment and posttreatment NRI in HNC patients receiving chemoradiation. Pretreatment NRI risk category may predict OS and composite treatment complications. Investigation of NRI as a prognostic factor is warranted.

FDG-PET/CT scan assessment of response 12 weeks post radical radiotherapy in oropharynx head and neck cancer: The impact of p16 status.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive value of FDG-PET/CT for detection of residual disease after radical radiotherapy for patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx, comparing p16 positive (+) versus p16 negative (-) disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis of patients with SCC of the oropharynx at our institution treated with radical radiotherapy between 2012 and 2016 was performed. The primary and lymph node metabolic responses were evaluated independently on the post-treatment FDG-PET/CT. The reference standard was pathology when available, subsequent post-treatment FDG-PET/CT results or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 32 (30-34) months. 556 patients had p16+ disease and 92 had p16- disease. The median time of post-treatment FDG-PET/CT was 96 (45-744) days after radiotherapy completion: 68% had complete metabolic response (CMR) defined as mild non-focal or no uptake, 10% residual primary disease, 11% residual regional lymph node disease, 5% residual primary and regional disease, and 6% distant metastatic disease. The local positive predictive value (PPV) was 26% for p16+ versus 54% for p16- (p = 0.01) and the regional PPV was 31% for p16+ versus 58% for p16- (p = 0.01). The local negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% regardless of p16 status and the regional NPV was 100% for p16+ versus 99% for p16- (p = 0.33). For p16+ cases, regional specificity was 76.2% versus 91.1% (p = 0.0003), local PPV was 0 versus 30% (p = 0.06) and the regional PPV was 12% versus 35% (p = 0.06) for FDG-PET/CT scans performed at ≤12 weeks versus >12 weeks. Five-year overall survival for those with CMR was 87% versus 51% without CMR (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic response on post-treatment FDG-PET/CT has excellent NPV regardless of p16 status. The PPV is significantly lower in those with p16+ versus p16- disease, with a significantly reduced regional specificity and a trend towards inferior predictive value if performed ≤12 weeks. CMR predicts for a significantly improved overall survival.

Treatment for Recurrent Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Canadian Population Based Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Management of recurrent differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) may include surgery, radioactive iodine (RAI), and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Systemic therapy may also be offered for RAI-refractory DTC. The study objective was to review patterns of practice in British Columbia (BC) for treatment of recurrent DTC, assess rates of RAI-refractory disease, and evaluate outcomes. METHODS: BC Cancer provides cancer care to a population of 4.6 million. A retrospective review of all patients with DTC stage I-IVB disease referred to BC Cancer from 2009 to 2013 was conducted. Patient and DTC characteristics, locoregional and distant recurrence, surgical management, RAI, EBRT, and systemic therapy details were retrospectively collected. Relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Some 1062 DTC patients were identified. Median follow-up was 4.1 years. Baseline characteristics: female 74%, median age 50, papillary/follicular/Hurthle cell 92%/6%/2%. Stage at presentation: I 60%, II 8%, III 22%, IVA/IVB 10%. Locoregional and/or distant recurrence occurred in 136 patients (13%). Locoregional recurrence (n=118) was treated with surgery +/- RAI or EBRT 48%, RAI +/- EBRT 40%, EBRT alone 1%, 11% were observed without treatment. Some 27 patients had a second cancer recurrence. Some 37 patients (3%) developed distant metastatic disease and common sites of distant metastases were: lung 76%, bone 30%, and liver 8%. Some 27 cases (2%) were deemed RAI-refractory. Some six patients (0.6%) received systemic therapy with a vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGF TKI). Five-year RFS was calculated to be 82%, OS 95%, and DSS 98% for the study population. CONCLUSIONS: In our population-based study cohort, 87% of patients were rendered disease-free by primary disease management. Multi-modality treatment of locoregional recurrence facilitated disease-free status in the majority of patients (67%). RAI-refractory disease developed in 2% of patients and despite a significant number of metastatic recurrences, only a small number of patients received systemic therapy.

Treatment de-escalation for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with radiotherapy vs. trans-oral surgery (ORATOR2): study protocol for a randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) have substantially better treatment response and overall survival (OS) than patients with HPV-negative disease. Treatment options for HPV+ OPC can involve either a primary radiotherapy (RT) approach (± concomitant chemotherapy) or a primary surgical approach (± adjuvant radiation) with transoral surgery (TOS). These two treatment paradigms have different spectrums of toxicity. The goals of this study are to assess the OS of two de-escalation approaches (primary radiotherapy and primary TOS) compared to historical control, and to compare survival, toxicity and quality of life (QOL) profiles between the two approaches. METHODS: This is a multicenter phase II study randomizing one hundred and forty patients with T1-2 N0-2 HPV+ OPC in a 1:1 ratio between de-escalated primary radiotherapy (60 Gy) ± concomitant chemotherapy and TOS ± de-escalated adjuvant radiotherapy (50-60 Gy based on risk factors). Patients will be stratified based on smoking status (< 10 vs. ≥ 10 pack-years). The primary endpoint is OS of each arm compared to historical control; we hypothesize that a 2-year OS of 85% or greater will be achieved. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, QOL and toxicity. DISCUSSION: This study will provide an assessment of two de-escalation approaches to the treatment of HPV+ OPC on oncologic outcomes, QOL and toxicity. Results will inform the design of future definitive phase III trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03210103. Date of registration: July 6, 2017, Current version: 1.3 on March 15, 2019.

Websites, Websites Everywhere: How Thyroid Cancer Patients Use the Internet.

Thyroid cancer incidence rates and Internet use are both increasing. Thyroid cancer is common in young patients, who are likely to use the Internet. This study aims to characterize thyroid cancer patient Internet use and search patterns, usability of online resources, and effects on clinical care. From May to December 2017, inclusive, patients with thyroid cancer attending two tertiary cancer centers were invited to complete a survey about Internet use. Thirty-nine of 72 questionnaires were returned (54%). Ninety-seven percent of participants used the Internet, and 87% had looked for thyroid cancer information. The majority (94%) searched on Google. Patients most often looked for information about treatment (94%) and symptom management (76%). Many patients evaluated content quality by comparing several resources (71%), discussing with a physician (56%) or using a credible academic or government site (53%). Online information was somewhat hard to understand for 32%, but 91% found it useful. Over half (60%) of treatment decisions were affected by web resources, and information helped 50% of patients make decisions with their physicians. Respondents highlighted a lack of resources on survivorship and uncommon tumors such as medullary or anaplastic cancer. Physicians should recognize that patients overwhelmingly access online information, which often impacts patients' decision-making. Clinicians can guide thyroid cancer patients through abundant web-based information and assist in interpreting this information. Educators can use this information to guide resource development, tailoring content and design to thyroid cancer patients' needs.

Radiotherapy versus transoral robotic surgery and neck dissection for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ORATOR): an open-label, phase 2, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with concurrent neck dissection has supplanted radiotherapy in the USA as the most common treatment for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), yet no randomised trials have compared these modalities. We aimed to evaluate differences in quality of life (QOL) 1 year after treatment. METHODS: The ORATOR trial was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, international, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2, randomised study. Patients were enrolled at six hospitals in Canada and Australia. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients aged 18 years or older, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores of 0-2, and with T1-T2, N0-2 (≤4 cm) OPSCC tumour types to radiotherapy (70 Gy, with chemotherapy if N1-2) or TORS plus neck dissection (with or without adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, based on pathology). Following stratification by p16 status, patients were randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomisation list with permuted blocks of four. The primary endpoint was swallowing-related QOL at 1 year as established using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) score, powered to detect a 10-point improvement (a clinically meaningful change) in the TORS plus neck dissection group. All analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01590355) and is active, but not currently recruiting. FINDINGS: 68 patients were randomly assigned (34 per group) between Aug 10, 2012, and June 9, 2017. Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 20-33) for the radiotherapy group and 29 months (23-43) for the TORS plus neck dissection group. MDADI total scores at 1 year were mean 86·9 (SD 11·4) in the radiotherapy group versus 80·1 (13·0) in the TORS plus neck dissection group (p=0·042). There were more cases of neutropenia (six [18%] of 34 patients vs none of 34), hearing loss (13 [38%] vs five [15%]), and tinnitus (12 [35%] vs two [6%]) reported in the radiotherapy group than in the TORS plus neck dissection group, and more cases of trismus in the TORS plus neck dissection group (nine [26%] vs one [3%]). The most common adverse events in the radiotherapy group were dysphagia (n=6), hearing loss (n=6), and mucositis (n=4), all grade 3, and in the TORS plus neck dissection group, dysphagia (n=9, all grade 3) and there was one death caused by bleeding after TORS. INTERPRETATION: Patients treated with radiotherapy showed superior swallowing-related QOL scores 1 year after treatment, although the difference did not represent a clinically meaningful change. Toxicity patterns differed between the groups. Patients with OPSCC should be informed about both treatment options. FUNDING: Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute Grant (#701842), Ontario Institute for Cancer Research Clinician-Scientist research grant, and the Wolfe Surgical Research Professorship in the Biology of Head and Neck Cancers grant.