Diastolic arterial blood pressure: a reliable early predictor of survival in human septic shock.

BACKGROUND: Emphasis in therapy of human septic shock is shifting towards reliable end points and predictors of survival. Rationale is to study whether the evolution of cardiovascular reactivity in view of the administered doses of norepinephrine is an early predictor of in-hospital survival and to determine the optimal threshold of norepinephrine therapy and its consequences on renal function. METHODS: Observational study of a prospective cohort of patients in septic shock, hospitalized in intensive care unit at least 24 hours before requiring norepinephrine. Excluded were patients requiring <72 hours of continuous norepinephrine (16 patients) or who received corticosteroids. Hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, urinary output, and temperature) were continuously monitored. RESULTS: Of 68 patients, 45 survived [intensive care unit stay of 24 (12-36) days, hospital stay of 36 (27-66) days], and 23 died 5 (3-10) days after septic shock onset and norepinephrine treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed four independent positive predictive factors of short-term (10 days) outcome: Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II <50 [odds ratio (OR) 6.4, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.3-30.7, p < 0.011], and on day 3 Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (LODS) score <6 (OR 29.1, 95% CI 2.7-314.3, p = 0.0056), norepinephrine concentration <0.5 mug/kg/min (OR 17.6, 95% CI 2.2-142.0, p < 0.0007), diastolic arterial pressure >50 mm Hg (OR 24.8, 95% CI 2.9-215.9, p < 0.004), but not systolic arterial pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Septic shock survival increases when dose of 0.5 mug/kg/min of norepinephrine continuously improves vascular tone within the first 48 hours, or when diastolic arterial pressure (>50 mm Hg) is restored. Norepinephrine has beneficial effects on renal function. Predictive value of LODS score on day 3 is demonstrated, while SAPS II is confirmed as the only reliable predictive factor in first 24 hours.

A randomized study of out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: physiological and clinical effects.

AIMS: In acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPE), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) added to medical treatment improves outcome. The present study was designed to assess the benefit of CPAP as a first line treatment of ACPE in the out-of-hospital environment. METHODS AND RESULTS: The protocol lasted 45 min, divided into three periods of 15 min. Patients with ACPE were randomly assigned in two groups: 1/Early CPAP (n = 63): CPAP alone (T0-T15); CPAP + medical treatment (T15-T30); medical treatment alone (T30-T45) and 2/Late CPAP (n = 61): medical treatment alone (T0-T15); medical treatment + CPAP (T15-T30); medical treatment alone (T30-T45). Primary endpoint: effect of early CPAP on a dyspnoea clinical score and on arterial blood gases. Secondary endpoints: incidence of tracheal intubation, inotropic support, and in-hospital mortality. T0-T15: CPAP alone had a greater effect than medical treatment on the clinical score (P = 0.0003) and on PaO(2) (P = 0.0003). T15-T30: adding CPAP to medical treatment (late CPAP group) improved clinical score and blood gases and the two groups were no longer different at T30. T30-T45: in both groups, CPAP withdrawal worsened clinical score. Six patients in 'early CPAP' group vs. 16 in 'late CPAP' group were intubated [P = 0.01, odds-ratio: OR = 0.30 (0.09-0.89)]. Dobutamine was used only in the 'late CPAP' group (n = 5), (P = 0.02). Hospital death was higher in 'late CPAP' group (n = 8) than in 'early CPAP' group (n = 2) [P = 0.05, OR = 0.22 (0.04-1.0)]. CONCLUSION: When compared to usual medical care, immediate application of CPAP alone in out-of-hospital treatment of ACPO is significantly better improving physiological variables and symptoms and significantly reduces tracheal intubation incidence and in-hospital mortality.

Adrenal response in patients with septic shock of abdominal origin: relationship to survival.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of adrenocortical response to corticotropin in septic shock patients operated on exclusively for an intra-abdominal source of infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, observational, single-center study in a surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital PATIENTS: 118 consecutive septic shock patients undergoing laparotomy or drainage for intra-abdominal infection. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Baseline cortisol (t (0)) and cortisol response to corticotropin test (Delta) were measured during the first 24 h following onset of shock. The relationship between adrenal function test results and survival was analyzed as well as the effect of etomidate anesthesia. Cortisol plasma level at t (0) was higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (33 +/- 23 vs. 25 +/- 14 microg/dl), but the response to corticotropin test did not differ between these two subgroups. ROC analysis showed threshold values for t (0) (32 microg/dl) and Delta (8 microg/dl) that best discriminated survivors from nonsurvivors in our population. We observed no difference in survival at the end of hospital stay using log rank test when patients were separated according to t (0), Delta, or both. In addition, adrenal function tests and survival did not differ in patients who received etomidate anesthesia (n = 69) during the surgical treatment of their abdominal sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of patients with abdominal septic shock baseline cortisol level and the response to corticotropin test did not discriminate survivors from nonsurvivors. No deleterious impact of etomidate anesthesia on adrenal function tests and survival was observed in these patients.

Histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-D related expression is specifically altered and predicts mortality in septic shock but not in other causes of shock.

Although the expression of monocyte histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR has been shown to be decreased during human sepsis, its level of expression in other nonseptic critical conditions is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the level of HLA-DR expression on circulating monocytes among patients with septic, hemorrhagic, and cardiogenic shocks and severe sepsis without shock. At admission, HLA-DR expression was exclusively decreased in patients with septic shock (n = 30; P < 0.001), whereas the expression was similar between the other studied groups: cardiogenic shock (n = 16), hemorrhagic shock (n = 11), severe sepsis without shock (n = 18), and healthy volunteers (n = 8). HLA-DR expression was not predictive for overall mortality, but at day 1, an HLA-DR expression of less than 14 of mean fluorescence intensity (that corresponds to 40% labeled monocytes) was predictive of mortality exclusively in patients with septic shock (odds ratio, 11.4 and 95% confidence interval, 1.7; 78.4; P < 0.008). Catecholamine infusion, mechanical ventilation, positive blood culture, and number of units of blood or plasma transfused did not correlate with decreased HLA-DR expression. Thus, the decrease in HLA-DR expression is specific to septic shock and is associated, in septic shock patients, with increased mortality risk.

Equipment review: new techniques for cardiac output measurement--oesophageal Doppler, Fick principle using carbon dioxide, and pulse contour analysis.

Measuring cardiac output is of paramount importance in the management of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit and of 'high risk' surgical patients in the operating room. Alternatives to thermodilution are now available and are gaining acceptance among practitioners who have been trained almost exclusively in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter. The present review focuses on the principles, advantages and limitations of oesophageal Doppler, Fick principle applied to carbon dioxide, and pulse contour analysis. No single method stands out or renders the others obsolete. By making cardiac output easily measurable, however, these techniques should all contribute to improvement in haemodynamic management.