Bacterial contamination of the smartphones of healthcare workers in a German tertiary-care hospital before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Assuming that hygiene measures have improved significantly due to COVID-19, we aimed to investigate bacterial colonization on smartphones (SPs) owned by healthcare workers (HCWs) before and during the pandemic. METHODS: Employing a before-and-after study design, randomly selected HCWs were included. Devices underwent sampling under real-life conditions, without prior manipulation. Swabs were collected in 2012 (pre-pandemic) and 2021 to determine microbial colonization. Isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and underwent microbiological susceptibility testing. RESULTS: The final analysis included 295 HCWs (67% female, mean age 34 years) from 26 wards. Bacterial contamination was present on 293 of 295 SP screens (99.3%). The proportion of clinically relevant bacterial pathogens (eg Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci, Enterobacterales, non-fermenting bacteria) ranged from 21.2% in 2012 to 39.8% in 2021. Resistance profiles revealed a proportion of multidrug-resistant bacteria such as MRSA and VRE of less than 2%. The comparison of before-and-after sampling showed a significant increase in smartphone use during work from 2012 to 2021 with a simultaneous increase in cleaning intensity, probably as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial contamination of SPs within the hospital is of concern and can serve as a source of cross-contamination. Hence, in addition to excellent hand hygiene, SPs must be carefully disinfected after handling in healthcare. Behavioral changes related to the COVID-19 pandemic could have a significant impact if implemented sustainably in everyday clinical practice.

Low colonization rates with Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in a German hospital-affiliated hemodialysis center.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDRGN) are found with rising prevalence in non-hemodialysis risk populations as well as hemodialysis (HD) cohorts in Asia, Europe and North America. At the same time, colonization and consecutive infections with such pathogens may increase mortality and morbidity of affected individuals. We aimed to monitor intestinal MDRGN colonization in a yet not investigated German HD population. METHODS: We performed cross-sectional point-prevalence testing with 12 months follow-up and selected testing of relatives in an out-patient HD cohort of n = 77 patients by using microbiological cultures from fresh stool samples, combined with Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. RESULTS: We detected MDRGN in 8 out of 77 patients (10.4%) and 1 out of 22 relatives (4.5%), indicating only colonization and no infections. At follow-up, 2 patients showed phenotypic persistence of MDRGN colonization, and in 6 other patients de-novo MDRGN colonization could be demonstrated. Pathogens included Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase [ESBL]-production as well as fluoroquinolone resistance), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Enterobacter cloacae. CONCLUSIONS: In a single-center study, MDRGN colonization rates were below those found in non-HD high-risk populations and HD units in the US, respectively. Reasons for this could be high hygiene standards and a strict antibiotic stewardship policy with evidence of low consumption of fluoroquinolones and carbapenems in our HD unit and the affiliated hospital.

[Consumption of antibiotics in a burns intensive care unit]. / Antibiotikaverbrauch auf einer Intensivstation für Schwerbrandverletzte.

INTRODUCTION: Burn-injured patients are at particularly high risk of infection; as such one would expect an increased requirement of antibiotics compared to other intensive care patients. There is no data in the literature investigating this hypothesis in Germany. The aim of this study was to determine the antibiotic consumption in severe burn patients and to compare this data with those from surgical intensive care units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective study included 136 patients treated in the period from 2013 to 2016 due to a severe burn in the ICU intensive care unit of a regional burn centre. The use of antibiotics was recorded using the electronic medical record. The number of daily doses in Recommended Daily Dose (RDD) and Defined Daily Dose (DDD) based on patient days was calculated. RESULTS: Median [interquartile range] age and total burned surface area were 56.5y [43-75y] and 17 % [8,75; 31] with an ABSI 7 [6; 9]. Antibiotic therapy was given to 82 patients (60.3 %). Antibiotic consumption totaled 77.38 RDD/100 PT or 937.64 DDD/1000 PT. This result was marginally lower than for surgical intensive care units. The most frequently used antibiotics in the burn care setting were fluorquinolones (16.90 RDD/100 PT, 259.91 DDD/1000 PT), followed by carbapenems (12.76 RDD/100 PT, 128.44 DDD/1000 PT) and aminopenicillins/ BLI (11.54 RDD/100 PT, 115.39 DDD/1000 PT). Whilst, the most frequently detected pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (54.4 %), Enterococcus faecalis (54.4 %), E. coli (37.5 %) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (36.8 %). CONCLUSION: The total antibiotic consumption in severe burns was not increased compared to other surgical intensive care patients. With regard to individual substance classes, peculiarities can be identified reflecting the particular germ spectrum in this cohort.