RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of delivering extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) by low volume extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers and to explore pre-ECPR predictors of survival. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2020, we studied 21 ECPR patients admitted in 2 tertiary ECMO centers in Liège, Belgium. Our ECPR protocol was based on 6 prehospital criteria (no flow < 3 minutes, low flow < 60 minutes, initial shockable rhythm, end-tidal CO2 > 15 mmHg, age < 65 years, and absence of comorbidities). A dedicated training, prehospital checklist and call number for 24/7 ECMO team assistance were implemented. Hemodynamics and blood gases on admission also were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-one (28%) out of 75 refractory OHCA patients referred were treated by ECPR, with a hospital survival rate of 43% (n = 9/21), comparable to ECPR results from the international extracorporeal life support organization registry. Transient return of spontaneous circulation before ECPR (89% in survivors vs 17% in non-survivors, P = 0.002) and higher initial serum bicarbonate (med [P25-P75] 14.0 [10.6-15.2] vs 7.5 [3.7-10.5] mmol/L, P = 0.019) or lower initial base deficit (14.9 [11.9-18.2] vs 21.6 [17.9-28.9] mmol/L, P = 0.039) were associated with a more favorable outcome. CONCLUSION: In low volume ECMO centers, the implementation of a specific ECPR protocol for refractory OHCA patients is feasible and provides potential clinical benefit. Highly selective inclusion criteria seem essential to select candidates for ECPR. Initial serum bicarbonate and base deficit integrating cumulative cell failure may be relevant pre-ECMO prognostic factors and require larger-scale evaluation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The evidence of the Trauma Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (TICCS) accuracy has been evaluated in several studies but the potential effect of its use on patient outcomes needs to be evaluated. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact on mortality of a prehospital discrimination between trauma patients with or without a potential need for damage control resuscitation. METHODS: The trial will be designed as randomized phase II clinical trial with comparison of the experimental protocol against the standard of care. The TICCS will be calculated on the site of injury for the patients of the intervention group and treatment will be guided by the TICCS value. Seven days mortality, 30 days mortality, global use of blood products and global hospital length-of-stay will be compared. DISCUSSION: Many data suggest that a very early flagging of trauma patients in need for DCR would be beneficial but this need to be proved. Do we improve our quality of care by an earlier diagnosis? Does a prehospital discrimination between trauma patients with or without a potential need for DCR has a positive impact?
